Search

Purpose: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of primary conservative therapy for patients with symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) with a severely compressed true lumen and/or a large dissecting aneurysm., Materials and Methods: A total of 35 consecutive patients (all men; median age, 53 y) with symptomatic IMAD with a severely compressed true lumen and/or a large dissecting aneurysm but without intestinal necrosis or arterial rupture who were treated with primary conservative therapy between November 2018 and February 2020 were assessed. A severely compressed true lumen was defined as luminal stenosis > 70%. A large dissecting aneurysm was defined as dissecting aneurysm diameter ≥ 1.5 times larger than the normal mesenteric artery diameter., Results: There was a strong positive relationship among abdominal pain, degree of luminal stenosis, and length of dissection (R = 0.811; P < .001). Conservative treatment was successful in all patients. Abdominal pain was eliminated within 4.7 d ± 4.8 (range, 2-31 d) in all patients, within 3.6 d ± 1.2 (range, 2-6) in the 31 patients with minor or moderate abdominal pain, and within 13.3 d ± 11.9 (range, 6-31 d) in the 4 patients with severe abdominal pain. Complete or partial remodeling of the mesenteric artery was achieved in 6 (17.1%) and 29 (82.9%) patients, respectively, during 8.6 mo ± 4.3 of follow-up., Conclusions: Primary conservative therapy can be used safely and effectively in patients with symptomatic IMAD with a severely compressed true lumen and/or a large dissecting aneurysm but without intestinal necrosis or arterial rupture., (Copyright © 2020 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To retrospectively investigate factors associated with mesenteric artery remodeling after conservative management of isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) (dissection of the mesenteric arteries in the absence of aortic dissection or other known causes)., Materials and Methods: A total of 107 patients diagnosed with IMAD between February 2010 and October 2018 were identified. Eighteen patients were excluded because they underwent stent placement (n = 11) or were lost to follow-up (n = 7). A total of 89 patients who underwent conservative management were therefore included in the study. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with mesenteric artery remodeling., Results: During 15.9 ± 10.9 months of follow-up, complete remodeling of the mesenteric artery was achieved in 66 patients (74.2%), and partial remodeling was achieved in 23 patients (25.8%). Of the 66 patients with complete remodeling, 6 (9.1%) had type IIa IMAD (visible false lumen, no visible re-entry site), and 60 (90.9%) had type IIb IMAD (thrombosed false lumen). The mean interval between IMAD diagnosis and complete remodeling was 14.4 ± 5.4 months for all patients. The mean intervals for patients with type IIa IMAD were 20.0 ± 6.2 months and 13.9 ± 5.1 months for patients with type IIb IMAD (P = .015). Mesenteric artery remodeling was significantly associated with the presence of symptoms (odds ratio, 10.800; 95% confidence interval, 1.961-59.470; P = .006)., Conclusions: Complete remodeling of the mesenteric artery in patients with IMAD treated with conservative management is common, and the presence of symptoms is associated with complete remodeling., (Copyright © 2019 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess factors associated with conservative management failure in patients with symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection., Methods: Patients with symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection who underwent conservative therapy as first line treatment between February 2010 and May 2018 were included in this retrospective study. Conservative management failure was defined as the persistence or aggravation of symptoms and signs, increasing aneurysmal dilation, or new appearance of a dissecting aneurysm after conservative management. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to identify risk factors for failure of conservative management., Results: A total of 123 patients (115 men, 8 women, mean age, 53.7 ± 6.1 years) were included in this study. Conservative management was successful in 89 (72.4%) patients but failed in the remaining 34 (27.6%) patients. Of the 89 for whom conservative management was successful, all of the symptoms were eliminated (n = 81) or relieved (n = 8) within 3.8 ± 0.7 days after conservative management. All of the 34 patients in whom conservative management failed underwent successful endovascular stenting. Failure of conservative management was associated with type II IMADs as defined by the Sakamoto classification (meaning that there is an entry tear, but no re-entry, and still no thrombosis of false lumen, odds ratio: 33.76; 95% confidence interval 8.65-131.85; p < .001) and with ≥90% luminal stenosis (odds ratio 40.70; 95% confidence interval: 3.76-440.07; p < .01)., Conclusions: Conservative management can be used successfully in most patients with symptomatic isolated mesenteric artery dissection. Risk factors for failed conservative treatment were type II IMADs and degree of luminal stenosis ≥90%., (Copyright © 2019 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective To compare computed tomography arteriography (CTA) and digital subtraction arteriography (DSA) in the diagnosis of superior mesenteric artery dissecting aneurysm (SMADA). Methods All SMADA patients who underwent CTA and DSA at one of two medical centers between May, 2007 and April, 2017 were identified. The accuracy of CTA and DSA for the depiction of morphologic characteristics of SMADA was analyzed. Results Fourteen patients (12 men; mean age, 55.1 ± 6.4 years) were included in this study. The mean diameter of the dissecting aneurysm was 3.78 ± 1.53 mm on CTA and 3.81 ± 1.54 mm on DSA ( p = 0.96). The luminal stenosis was 0.52 ± 0.27 on CTA and 0.35 ± 0.23 on DSA ( p = 0.09). The thrombosed false lumen was visualized on CTA in 79% (11/14) of patients but in no patients on DSA ( p < 0.001). The entry points of the dissection were visualized on CTA in 64.3% (9/14) of patients and on DSA in 100% (14/14) of patients ( p = 0.041); CTA and DSA did not visualize re-entry points in any patients. The intimal flap was visualized on CTA in 71.4% (10/14) of patients and on DSA in 78.6% (11/14) of patients ( p > 0.05). Branch vessel involvement was visualized in 7.1% (1/14) of patients on CTA but in no patients on DSA ( p > 0.05). Conclusions CTA can be used in place of DSA for the diagnosis of SMADA. Although CTA may exaggerate the degree of luminal stenosis and is weak in depicting the entry points of SMADA, this modality more accurately depicts the thrombosed false lumen and branch vessel involvement.