Search

Background: Vascular complications from transfemoral (TF) secondary access during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are common. We compare our experience of transradial (TR) versus transfemoral secondary access during TAVI and describe techniques for performing iliofemoral arterial intervention from the transradial approach., Methods: All TAVI procedures with a single secondary access were included. Demographics, procedural details and 30-day outcomes were recorded. VARC-2 criteria were used for procedural complications. Procedures with TF primary access were stratified by the site of secondary arterial access., Results: Single secondary access was used in 199 cases, of which 20 were performed via non-TF access. Of the 179 TF primary access cases, 115 (64%) used TR secondary access and 64 (36%) used TF secondary access. In the TR cohort percutaneous vascular intervention was performed from the transradial approach in 19 cases (17%). Emergent TF secondary access was not required in any case. There were no differences in procedural time, radiation dose, contrast use, bleeding complications, stroke or mortality between the groups. There was one secondary access complication in the TF cohort and none in the TR cohort., Conclusions: Transradial (TR) secondary access during TAVI is safe and feasible and may reduce the secondary access site vascular complication rate. With appropriate equipment, most peripheral vascular complications can be managed entirely via TR access avoiding unplanned femoral arterial access. TR secondary access should be considered the default approach for non-TF TAVI cases and can be considered for all TF cases as long as dedicated equipment is available., (Copyright © 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence and clinical impact of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) in a population referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and to examine the role of cardiac computed tomography (CCT) in the diagnosis of LAAT., Background: Atrial fibrillation is common in patients undergoing TAVR. Embolization of LAAT is a potential mechanism of periprocedural stroke. The incidence and clinical impact of LAAT in a TAVR cohort have not been reported, and the optimal method for diagnosing LAAT remains unclear., Methods: Dual-phase cardiac computed tomographic scans were examined for the presence of LAAT in 198 consecutive patients referred for consideration of TAVR. Findings on CCT were compared with those on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) when both modalities were available., Results: The incidence of LAAT on CCT was 11% in the overall cohort and 32% in patients with atrial fibrillation. Two patients (1.6%) had LAAT on CCT but were not known to have histories of atrial fibrillation. Ninety-eight patients also underwent TEE. Compared with TEE, CCT had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 98%, respectively, and a negative predictive value of 100%. In the 124 patients who underwent TAVR, the in-hospital stroke rate was 4.8%. The risk for stroke appeared higher in patients with LAAT (20% [2 of 10]) compared with patients without LAAT (3.8% [4 of 105])., Conclusions: The incidence of LAAT in patients considered for TAVR is high, and LAAT embolization may represent a clinically relevant cause of periprocedural stroke. Dual-phase CCT is an accurate modality for the diagnosis of LAAT. It may obviate the need for pre-procedural TEE. The presence of LAAT should be examined in all patients undergoing TAVR and strategies developed for those patients in whom LAAT is identified., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of direct transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) by the transfemoral approach without balloon pre-dilatation using the Edwards SapienXT valve., Background: TAVI is established in selected high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) is recommended prior to valve implantation, but may contribute to procedural risk. It is unknown whether this is necessary for successful passage and deployment of the device., Methods: 81 patients (mean age 84 [95%CI:82-85.8], 62% male, median EuroScore 22.8% [95%CI:20.5-27]) undergoing transfemoral TAVI (35 by direct implantation [direct group]; 46 with balloon pre-dilatation [balloon group]) between 2010 and 2013 were analyzed for efficacy and safety endpoints., Results: Procedural success was 100%. Pre and post-procedural peak gradients in the direct group were 66mmHg (95%CI:59-72.8) and 14mmHg (95%CI:12-17.8)(P < 0.0001) compared to 76.5mmHg (95%CI:73.7-94.0) and 17mmHg (95%CI:16-19)(P < 0.0001) in the balloon group. Post-dilatation was performed in 4/35(11.4%) of the direct group and 3/46(6.5%) of the balloon group (P = 0.83). Post procedure moderate AR was present in 1/35(2.9%) in the direct group and none in the balloon group. In-hospital mortality (2.9% direct vs. 0% balloon group), stroke (2.9% vs. 4.4%), tamponade (2.9% vs. 2.2%), major vascular complications (2.9% vs. 8.7%) and new permanent pacing (2.2% vs. 0) were similar. Pacing time, inflations, radiation dose and contrast use were all significantly lower in the direct group., Conclusions: Direct implantation of the Edwards SapienXT valve during TAVI by the transfemoral route appears safe, efficacious and feasible in those without extreme calcification. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

A randomized prospective trial was undertaken to compare the hemodynamic performance and left ventricular regression after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV stentless bioprosthesis and the Carpentier Edwards SAV (CE) bioprosthesis. Forty patients were randomized after the annular and sinotubular diameters had been measured. Early hemodynamic measurements were made with a thermodilution cardiac output catheter, and echocardiography was used thereafter. Left ventricular mass was assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 1 week, 6 months, and 32 months. The mean annular size was 25.3+/-2.2 mm (CE) and 25.5+/-1.5 mm (Toronto), although it was possible to implant valves with a mean diameter 3 mm larger in the stentless group (26.0+/-1.7 mm cf. 23.0+/-1.7 mm). Hemodynamic performance in the first 24 hours showed no significant difference between the groups, but there was a trend for shorter ventilation time and shorter stays in the intensive therapy unit in the stentless group. Echocardiography showed superior transvalvular gradients in the stentless group at 1 week (mean 5.5+/-3.1 mm Hg cf. 8.9+/-2.5 mm Hg), and this difference was maintained at a mean follow-up time of 32 months (3.5+/-0.6 mm Hg cf. 6.3+/-0.6 mm Hg). Similar regression of left ventricular mass was seen in both groups at 6 months, but at 32 months, measurement in diastole showed a reduction of 38% (P<.01) in the stentless group compared with 20% (P = ns) in the stented group, and measurements in systole showed a 23% (P<.01) and 13% (P = ns) reduction, respectively. This study confirms that a larger stentless valve can be implanted into a given size of aortic annulus with superior residual aortic valve gradients. These lower gradients seem to result in improved long-term regression of left ventricular mass as measured by MRI.