Search

Background: To explore why bicuspid aortic stenosis has certain clinical differences from the tricuspid morphology, we evaluated the metabolomics profile involved in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis prior to and after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in comparison with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)., Methods: In this TAVR cohort with prospectively collected data, blood samples were obtained before TAVR valve deployment and at the 7th day after TAVR, which were then sent for liquid and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry detection. Besides comparisons between BAV and TAV, BAV patients were also divided in subgroups according to baseline hemodynamics (i.e. maximal transaortic velocity, V max ) and post-procedural reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling (i.e. the change in LV mass index from baseline, ∆LVMI) for further analysis. Metabolic differences between groups were identified by integrating univariate test, multivariate analysis and weighted correlation network analysis algorithm., Results: A total of 57 patients were enrolled including 33 BAV patients. The BAV group showed lower arginine and proline metabolism both before and post TAVR than TAV represented by decreased expression of L-Glutamine. In BAV subgroup analysis, patients with baseline V max  > 5 m/s (n = 11) or the 4 th quartile of change in ∆LVMI at one-year follow-up (i.e. poorly-recovered LV, n = 8) showed elevated arachidonic acid metabolism compared with V max  < 4.5 m/s (n = 12) or the 1 st quartile of ∆LVMI (i.e. well-recovered LV, n = 8) respectively., Conclusions: Difference in arginine and proline metabolism was identified between BAV and TAV in TAVR recipients. Elevated arachidonic acid metabolism may reflect more severe baseline hemodynamics and worse LV reserve remodeling after TAVR in BAV.

Objectives: We aimed to assess the procedural and clinical results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for nonraphe bicuspid aortic stenosis (AS) with coronary vs mixed cusp fusion., Background: It remains unclear whether cusp fusion morphology affects TAVR outcomes in patients with nonraphe bicuspid AS., Methods: This retrospective study enrolled consecutive patients with severe symptomatic AS and type-0 bicuspid aortic valve, who underwent TAVR at our institution between 2012 and 2017. TAVR outcomes were defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 recommendations., Results: Compared to patients with mixed cusp fusion (44/71), those with coronary cusp fusion (27/71) had a larger ellipticity index for the aortic annulus (21.9% ± 9.0% vs 15.6% ± 9.3%, p =0.007) and increased left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (31.1% ± 9.4% vs 26.9% ± 7.5%, p =0.04) but comparable rates of second valve implantation (15.9% vs 14.8%), mild paravalvular leakage (PVL, 38.5% vs 30.2%), permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM, 25.9% vs 15.9%), and 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 6.8%). Use of a first-generation transcatheter heart valve was associated with higher risk for mild PVL (odds ratio (OR) = 4.37; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.14-16.75; p =0.03) but not PPM (OR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.22-2.62; p =0.67), whereas a larger oversizing ratio tended to be associated with a higher PPM rate (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 0.46-4.86; p =0.51) but lower incidence of mild PVL (OR = 0.51; 95% CI = 0.19-1.35; p =0.17)., Conclusions: In AS patients with type-0 bicuspid valves, cusp fusion morphology does not affect the procedural or clinical results of TAVR. Use of second-generation transcatheter heart valves may provide more favorable results in such patients. This trial is registered with NCT01683474., Competing Interests: Yuan Feng and Mao Chen are consultants/proctors of Venus MedTech. Other authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2019 Wen-hua Lei et al.)

Objectives: The authors sought to better understand the stent geometry of the Lotus valve after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and its potential implications for valve size selection., Background: The authors hypothesized that the greatest interference between the frame and aortic valvar complex occurs across the aortic valve leaflets., Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) scans of 32 consecutive patients undergoing Lotus valve (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) implantation. The prosthesis cross section was analyzed at 3-mm increments along its length. The plane where the frame had the smallest area was defined as the waist. The corresponding plane of the waist on pre-procedural MDCT was identified by surrounding structures such as calcium deposits, commissural fusion, and commissural gaps, and was referred to as the supra-annulus. The spline of the supra-annulus was circumscribed with reference to the post-implant stent geometry at the waist., Results: The waist was 5.8 ± 1.7 mm higher than the native annulus on post-procedural MDCT. The waist had a nearly 2-fold larger compression rate than the stent at the native annulus level (36.3 ± 10.4% vs. 18.9 ± 9.6%; p < 0.01), irrespective of valve morphologies. The supra-annulus was 5.9 ± 1.6 mm higher than the annulus on pre-procedural MDCT. Patients had an approximately 17% decrease in area from the annulus to the supra-annulus (18.3 ± 4.4% for bicuspid morphology and 16.0 ± 3.5% for tricuspid morphology)., Conclusions: Major interference between the implanted prosthesis and anatomy occurred at a level above the annulus. The decrease in area from the annulus to supra-annulus may explain the feasibility of implanting a smaller valve than that suggested by traditional annular measurements., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Studies of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) specifically for bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients are lacking. We aim to delineate possible aspects that might affect the incidence of PPI in a retrospective cohort of BAV patients treated with early-generation self-expanding devices., Methods: A total of 80 patients with bicuspid morphology who successfully underwent TAVR by self-expanding devices without prior PPI were included. Baseline clinical, echocardiographic, and angiographic characteristics, procedural and post-procedural details were collected., Results: The incidence of PPI after early-generation self-expanding valves in this BAV cohort was 26.3%. Baseline characteristics were comparable between patients requiring PPI post-TAVR or not. Perimeter oversizing greater than 20% significantly increased the risk of PPI compared with an oversizing of 10-20% (OR 5.08 [1.22, 21.07], P = 0.03). The proportion of patients with a depth of implantation greater than 6 mm was significantly higher in those who required PPI (82.4% vs 54.3%, P = 0.04). When testing the impact of depth of implantation >6 mm and oversizing in different morphologies, only in type 1 bicuspid patients and by oversizing>20% increased the risk of PPI (OR 12.00 [1.25, 115.36], P = 0.03) compared with an oversizing of 10-20%., Conclusions: Excessive perimeter oversizing in relation to aortic annulus and depth of implantation greater than 6 mm should be avoided to improve PPI post-TAVR for BAV patients receiving self-expanding devices, especially for type 1 BAV., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

To compare reverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valve (TAV). We retrospectively reviewed data of patients with at least two serial echocardiographic follow-ups (1, 3, 6 months and 1 year) post-TAVR. A total of 116 patients were identified. BAV morphology was documented in 67 patients. LV mass index (LVMi) at baseline was not significantly different between the TAV and BAV group (178.0 ± 6.9 vs. 166.3 ± 6.4 g/m 2 , P = 0.14). Reverse LV remodeling was observed in both BAV and TAV patients, but the reduction of LVMi from baseline was significantly more pronounced in TAV patients compared with BAV patients from 6 months post-TAVR (- 56.3 ± 8.1 vs. - 30.0 ± 4.7 g/m 2 , P < 0.01 at 6-month follow-up; - 60.6 ± 7.6 vs. - 37.9 ± 6.2 g/m 2 , P = 0.02 at 1-year follow-up). EDV value changes during follow-up were similar between patient with TAV and BAV. There were no significant differences in the proportions of patients with more than mild PVL or new permanent pacemaker between TAV and BAV morphology throughout the follow-up. Patients with bicuspid morphology might experience less pronounced reverse LV remodeling post-TAVR than patients with tricuspid morphology.

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis has been increasingly recognized as a common imaging finding after surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in recent studies. This finding has raised concerns over TAVR valve durability and debates on optimal postprocedural antithrombotic regime. Hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) and the associated reduced leaflet motion (RELM) were noted as computed tomography hallmarks of the phenomenon. The coexistence of HALT and significant RELM has been suggested as a threshold for reporting of subclinical leaflet thrombosis. This methodology may contribute to the standardization of reporting for research collaboration, hence the better understanding and management of this common yet largely unknown phenomenon., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Limited information exists describing the results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with symptomatic severe non-calcific aortic stenosis (AS). We aimed to compare procedural, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes among patients with non-calcific AS with those of senile calcific AS undergoing TAVR., Methods and Results: We retrospectively identified patients with non-calcific AS who received TAVR with self-expanding transcatheter heart valves in our centre. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, and post-procedural multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) measures were compared to those in patients undergoing TAVR for calcific AS. Among 136 patients, 21 patients (15.4%) with native leaflet thickening and minimal calcification were identified (non-calcific group). The patients were significantly younger in the non-calcific group (70.0 [64.0-75.5] vs. 75.0 [69.0-78.0] years) with comparable STS-PROM scores (6.7 [4.8-8.9] vs. 8.2 [4.8-10.9] %). Predilation was performed less frequently (42.9% vs. 93.9%) and post-dilation more often (71.4% vs. 42.6%) in the non-calcific group. Both 30-day and one-year mortality were similar between groups (0% vs. 7.8% and 0% vs. 17.6%). Rates of post-implantation paravalvular leak ≥mild at six months (17.6% vs. 25.7%) were comparable despite lower implantation depth among non-calcific AS patients (10.9±5.7 vs. 7.2±4.3 mm) on post-implantation MDCT., Conclusions: TAVR with self-expanding transcatheter heart valves appears to be safe and effective in patients with non-calcific AS.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been demonstrated to be an effective alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis who are deemed high risk or inoperable. Currently, TAVI procedures in China mostly make use of the domestic Venus A-Valve and the CoreValve; however, there is no data on their comparative performance., Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing TAVI with the aforementioned devices were included. The outcomes were reported according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC) definitions., Results: A total of 54 TAVI procedures were performed, 27 with the CoreValve and the other 27 with the Venus A-Valve. An additional valve was required in 4 (14.8%) and 3 (11.1%) patients, and the VARC-2 device success rates were 81.5 and 85.2%, respectively. The incidences of common complications were similar, except for the significantly less frequent pacemaker insertion in the Venus A-Valve group (7.4 vs. 37.0%, P = 0.03). Within 30 days, 2 (3.7%) patients died, 1 in each group, and both had a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). No other serious complications, such as annular rupture, coronary obstruction and aortic dissection, occurred in the 32 BAV patients treated with the Venus A-Valve (14) or the CoreValve (18). After 2-years of follow-up, there was no significant difference between CoreValve group and Venus-A group (11.1 vs. 7.4%, P = 0.64)., Conclusion: TAVI with the domestic Venus A-Valve is feasible, safe, and can produce favorable short-term outcomes comparable to those with the CoreValve in inoperable or high-risk patients with tricuspid and bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: To investigate the individual sequential hemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), especially for patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), in comparison with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV)., Methods: The study population comprised 85 patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent TAVI for BAV (n = 49) or TAV (n = 36) with at least two serial echocardiographic follow-ups. Doppler echocardiography was scheduled to be performed at discharge and 1, 3, 6 months and 1 year after the procedure. D peak transvalvular velocities and D mean transvalvular gradients were calculated as the difference at follow-up time points and discharge. Paravalvular leak (PVL) was assessed as another indicator for prosthesis performance., Results: Comparisons between patients with BAV and TAV revealed similar gradient performances (1.00 [-2.00, 2.00] vs. 1.00 [-0.25, 5.00] mm Hg, p = 0.57 at 1 month; -0.71 ± 7.52 vs. 1.55 ± 3.97 mm Hg, p = 0.21 at 3 months; 0.96 ± 7.81 vs. 1.53 ± 5.85 mm Hg, p = 0.79 at 6 months; 1.00 [-0.50, 2.25] vs. 3.00 [-0.50, 7.50] mm Hg, p = 0.07 at 1 year). Moreover, the incidence of ≥ mild PVL was not significantly different in patients with BAV and TAV during follow-up (34.88% vs. 19.35%, p = 0.14 at 1 month; 45.83% vs. 27.27%, p = 0.19 at 3 months; 30.00% vs. 23.53%, p = 0.89 at 6 months; 30.00% vs. 17.65%, p = 0.56 at 1 year)., Conclusions: TAVI is effective and applicable in BAV anatomy with sustained and acceptable mid- -term prosthesis hemodynamic performance. (Cardiol J 2017; 24, 4: 350-357).

Objectives: This study sought to evaluate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) aortic stenosis (AS), with a particular emphasis on TAVR-directed bicuspid aortic valve imaging (BAVi) of morphological classification., Background: TAVR has been used to treat BAV-AS but with heterogeneous outcomes and uncertainty regarding the relevance of morphology., Methods: In 14 centers in the United States, Canada, Europe, and Asia, 130 BAV-AS patients underwent TAVR. Baseline cardiac computed tomography (CT) was analyzed by a dedicated Corelab. Outcomes were assessed in line with Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria., Results: Bicommissural BAV (vs. tricommissural) accounted for 68.9% of those treated in North America, 88.9% in Europe, and 95.5% in Asia (p = 0.003). For bicommissural bicuspids, non-raphe type (vs. raphe type) BAV accounted for 11.9% of those treated in North America, 9.4% in Europe, and 61.9% in Asia (p < 0.001). Overall rates of 30-day mortality (3.8%) and cerebrovascular events (3.2%) were favorable and similar among anatomical subsets. The rate of new permanent pacemaker insertion was high (26.2%) and similar between balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expanding (SE) designs (BE: 25.5% vs. SE: 26.9%; p = 0.83); there was a trend to greater permanent pacemaker insertion in BE TAVR in the presence of coronary cusp fusion BAV morphology. Paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAR) ≥ moderate was 18.1% overall but lower at 11.5% in those with pre-procedural CT. In the absence of pre-procedural CT, there was an excess of PAR in BE TAVR that was not the case in those with a pre-procedural CT; SE TAVR required more post-dilation. Predictors of PAR included intercommissural distance for bicommissural bicuspids (odd ratio [OR]: 1.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.84; p = 0.036) and lack of a baseline CT for annular measurement (OR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.20 to 7.69; p = 0.018)., Conclusions: In this multicenter study, TAVR achieved favorable outcomes in patients with pre-procedural CT, with the exception of high permanent pacemaker rates for all devices and shapes., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Evidence regarding the safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation without balloon predilation (BP) is scarce. A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and major conference proceedings was performed from January 2002 to July 2015. There were 18 studies incorporating 2,443 patients included in the present study. No differences were observed in the baseline characteristics between patients without BP (no-BP) and with BP. Compared with BP, no-BP had a shorter procedure time (no-BP vs BP, 124.2 vs 138.8 minutes, p = 0.008), used less-contrast medium (no-BP vs BP, 126.3 vs 156.3 ml, p = 0.0005) and had a higher success rate (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% CI 1.40 to -3.58). In addition, no-BP was associated with lower incidences of permanent pacemaker implantation (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.67), grade 2 or greater paravalvular leakage (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.83), and stroke (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.0). Furthermore, no-BP was associated with a 0.6-fold decreased risk for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.92). However, the difference in the risk for permanent pacemaker implantation, grade 2, or higher aortic regurgitation, stroke was noted to be significant only in the subgroup of the CoreValve-dominating studies. In conclusion, no-BP before transcatheter aortic valve implantation was not only safe and feasible but was also associated with fewer complications and short-term mortality in selected patients especially using self-expandable valve., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established therapeutic option for high-risk patients with tricuspid aortic valve stenosis. Historically, the presence of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been regarded as a contraindication to TAVI, on the basis of putative concerns about the associated risks of elliptical deployment, accelerated leaflet degeneration, periprosthetic leaks, and aortic complications. Fortunately, with technological refinements and mounting experience, reasonable success has been achieved with TAVI in selected patients with a BAV. The rate of procedural success is high, and survival is similar to that in patients with a tricuspid aortic valve who undergo TAVI. Nevertheless, moderate or severe aortic regurgitation and aortic dissection seem to occur more frequently in patients with a BAV rather than a tricuspid aortic valve. Specifically-designed prospective studies should address these concerns and help to define anatomical selection criteria before TAVI can be recommended for patients with a BAV.

Background: There were considerable discrepancies with regard to sex-related differences in complications and prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation., Methods and Results: The Cochrane library and PubMed online databases were searched. Articles reporting sex-specific post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation complications and mortality were identified. Two authors selected studies and extracted data independently. Random- and fixed-effects models were used depending on between-study heterogeneity. There were 27 articles, a total of 9118 patients, enrolled in our systematic review and meta-analysis, including 4176 men and 4942 women. Pooled analyses suggested considerable sex-related differences in complications and early as well as midterm outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The difference in the risk for heart block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation was noted to be significant only in the subgroup of the CoreValve-dominating studies (pooled risk ratio [RR, men versus women], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.47). Although men had significantly lower risks for major/life-threatening bleeding (pooled RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) and major vascular complications (pooled RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.37-0.66), they had poorer prognosis. In fact, male sex was associated with significantly higher risks for deaths at both 30 days (RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.76) and 1 year (RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.49)., Conclusions: Although men had lower risks for major/life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, they had less favorable short-term and midterm survival.

The snare-assisted technique has been described to facilitate transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) delivery system advancement in complex aortic anatomies. However, the evidence is limited to case reports. To evaluate the safety profile of the snare-facilitated approach and its impact on self-expanding (SE) TAVR outcomes, we collected consecutive patients who underwent transfemoral SE-TAVR for aortic stenosis, using propensity score matching (PSM) separately in tricuspid and type-0 and type-1 bicuspid aortic valve morphology between the snare and non-snare groups. In 766 patients, despite the snare group having significantly larger annulus angulation and maximal ascending aortic diameter, both groups achieved comparable 30-day device success rates, regardless of first-generation or new-generation valve use. After PSM, the snare group had a significantly lower new permanent pacemaker implantation rate among 193 type-0 patients (3.3% vs. 18.3%, p = 0.01). The ipsilateral group used new-generation valves less frequently (23.0% vs. 75.4%, p < 0.001), but there were no significant inter-group differences in procedure-related events, except for a lower incidence of PVL ≥ mild in the ipsilateral group (14.9% vs. 32.3%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, the snare-assisted technique appears useful in SE-TAVR with angulated aortic root anatomy, and the benefits were comparable between ipsilateral and contralateral snare techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Herz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Introduction: Diet and hyperlipidemia are correlated to coronary atherosclerosis, whose progression may be modulated by statin therapy. Aortic stenosis and calcification are atherosclerotic processes but they are not influenced by statin therapy. Limited data is available on the influence or correlates of diet on aortic valve calcification. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that diet may be related to aortic valve calcification (AVC) on computed tomography (CT). Methods: Consecutive patients with severe or critical aortic stenosis (AS) were evaluated in a busy Heart Valve Clinic and underwent both detailed dietary evaluation with a rate your plate (RYP) questionnaire and a high resolution CT as part of their work-up for valvular intervention (medical therapy, surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement). AVC volume was quantified using a validated method based on a higher threshold of detection from the contrast CT (850 Hounsfield Units, HU-850). Dietary data was separated according to patients in the highest tertile of AVC. Results: A total of 117 patients were evaluated. The upper tertile threshold of AVC was identified as 284.5 mm3 (figure: examples above and below this threshold are shown). Higher scores on RYP identify heart-healthy choices. There were no differences in the overall total RYP score or percentages of specific heart-healthy dietary choices according to AVC severity (table). Conclusions: AVC severity is unrelated to heart-healthy dietary choices in patients with aortic stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]