Search

Whether combined CsA with androgen therapy was superior to androgen therapy alone in NSAA remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of combined therapy versus androgen therapy for NSAA patients using a meta-analytic approach. An electronic database of PubMed, EmBase, Cochrane library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang was systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to February 2020. The primary endpoint was effective rate, while the secondary endpoints included white blood cell (WBC), hemoglobin, platelet, and potential adverse events. The pooled results from included trials were calculated with the random-effects model. Forty-three RCTs recruited 2610 NSAA patients for the final quantitative meta-analysis. We noted that combined therapy was associated with an increased incidence of effective rate than androgen therapy alone (relative risk [RR]: 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29–1.41; P < 0.001). Moreover, patients treated with combined therapy were associated with higher WBC (weighted mean difference [WMD]: 1.22; 95%CI: 0.94–1.49; P < 0.001), hemoglobin (WMD: 12.93; 95%CI: 8.86–17.01; P < 0.001), and platelet (WMD: 8.65; 95%CI: 7.05–10.24; P < 0.001). Finally, the pooled incidence of hirsutism, handshake, gingiva hyperplasia, liver function damage, and renal function damage were 0.35 (95%CI: 0.22–0.48), 0.24 (95%CI: 0.15–0.32), 0.22 (95%CI: 0.10–0.35), 0.19 (95%CI: 0.14–0.25), and 0.06 (95%CI: 0.01–0.11), respectively. This study found that combined CsA with androgen therapy was superior to androgen therapy alone for Chinese patients with NSAA, and the most common adverse of combined therapy included hirsutism, handshake, gingiva hyperplasia, liver function damage, and renal function damage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was carried out to explore clinical treatment and prognosis of patients with AA with different economic status. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcome of 301 patients with AA in our center from April 2008 to November 2017. Treatments included anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) or anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG) combined with cyclosporineA (CsA) (9%), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) (7%), CsA combined with androgen or CsA alone (hereinafter referred to as CsA group) (77%), no specific therapy (7%). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was higher in patients with non-severe AA (94.6%) compared with those with severe AA (SAA) (66.6%, P <.001), very severe AA (VSAA) (41.3%, P <.001). The 5-year OS was 76.5% in patients with SAA/VSAA treated with ATG/ALG combined with CsA, 75% in allo-HSCT group(P =.936), 63.6% in CsA group (P =.557), which was significantly higher than no specific therapy group (21.8%, P =.002). For those who responded to CsA , the duration of CsA (median follow-up time: 27 months, 1–101 months) was positively correlated with progression-free survival (r=0.603, P <.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that 36–65 years of age, SAA/VSAA, and no specific therapy were independent risk factors for inferior survival. The treatment of elderly patients with AA still faces challenges. CsA is benefit to the survival of SAA/VSAA patients. AA patients, who responded to initialy CsA treatment, may benefit from prolonged CsA treatment. In view of the side effects of CsA, the timing of withdrawal is worth further exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]