1. Impact of One Versus Two Consecutive Doses of Endothelial Cells (EPCs) and EPCs-Derived Condition Medium on Protecting Myocardium from Acute Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Rat
- Author
-
Chi-Ruei Huang, Christopher Glenn Wallace, Yi-Ching Chu, Ruan-Ruan Yang, Hon-Kan Yip, Jun Guo, and Jui-Ning Yeh
- Subjects
Male ,CD31 ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Angiogenesis ,Biomedical Engineering ,030204 cardiovascular system & hematology ,medicine.disease_cause ,CXCR4 ,condition medium ,angiogenesis ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Fibrosis ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Animals ,Progenitor cell ,endothelial progenitor cells ,Transplantation ,Chemistry ,Myocardium ,fibrosis ,apoptosis ,Cell Biology ,medicine.disease ,Rats ,Disease Models, Animal ,Oxidative Stress ,Endocrinology ,Apoptosis ,Reperfusion Injury ,Acute Disease ,cardiovascular system ,Medicine ,Original Article ,Reperfusion injury ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Oxidative stress - Abstract
This study tested the impact of single dose and two doses of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and EPCs-derived condition medium (CM) on protecting the left-ventricular myocardium (LVM) from acute ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury. In vitro study showed EPCs and CM had comparably higher capacity for enhancement of angiogenesis as compared with the controls (all P < .001). Adult-male SD rats ( n = 36) were equally categorized into groups 1 (sham-operated control), 2 (IR+vehicle), 3 [IR+EPCs/1.2 × 106/intravenous administration at 3 h after IR procedure), 4 (IR+EPCs/1.2 × 106/at 3 h/24 h after IR), 5 (IR+CM/3.0cc/intravenous administration at 3 h after IR), 6 (IR+EPCs/3.0cc/at 3h/24 h after IR), and euthanized by day 3 after IR. The left-ventricular-ejection-fraction, protein and cellular expressions of endothelial-cell markers (CD31/vWF), small vessel number and protein expression of mitochondrial (mitochondrial-cytochrome-C) integrity were highest in group 1, lowest in group 2, significantly higher in group 4 than in groups 3/5/6 and significantly higher in groups 3/6 than in group 5 but they showed no differences in groups3/6, whereas the protein expressions of apoptotic (cleaved-caspase 3/cleaved-PARP), fibrotic (Smad3/TGF-ß), mitochondrial-damaged (cytosolic-cytochrome-C), heart-failed/pressure-overload (BNP), oxidative-stress (p47phox/NOX-1/NOX-2/oxidized protein), and autophagic (LCB3-II/LCB3-I) biomarkers and fibrotic/collagen-deposition areas exhibited an opposite pattern to endothelial-cell markers (all P < .0001). The protein expressions of angiogenesis (VEGF/SDF-1α/CXCR4/HIF-1α) were lowest in group 1, highest in group 4, significantly higher in groups 3/6 than in groups 2/5, significantly higher in group 5 than in group 2, but they showed no difference between groups 3/6 (all P < .0001). These results demonstrate that two consecutive doses of EPC/CM were superior to just one at protecting LVM against IR injury.
- Published
- 2021