Search

The article discusses the Supreme Court's recent term, highlighting major decisions favoring Donald J. Trump, curtailing administrative agencies' powers, and addressing issues like guns and abortion. Topics include immunity for former presidents, social media platforms' First Amendment rights, and obstruction charges related to the Capitol attack.

The article focuses on The New York Times' rare access to observe the Supreme Court behind closed doors during a pivotal term, highlighting the justices' deliberations on contentious issues like guns, abortion, and presidential authority.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to dismiss a case on emergency abortions in Idaho, temporarily allowing women in the state to access abortions when their health is at risk, while indicating that the justices reversed their initial decision to hear the case.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to temporarily reinstate a congressional map in Louisiana, which includes a second majority-Black district, potentially increasing the likelihood of Democrats gaining a House seat in the November election.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's temporary allowance for Idaho to enforce a ban on gender-affirming treatment for minors, indicating a willingness of some justices to engage in the culture wars.

The article offers outlook on the probability of the U.S. Supreme Court to incline to the right and the impact of justices' ethical standards on their judicial work and personal relationships as they face issues like gun rights, government power, race and free speech. It discusses cases to be heard by the court on matters relating to the Second Amenment, power of administrative agencies to regulate, administrative law, access to and constitutional right to abortion, and opioid epidemic.

The article focuses on U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel A. Alito's renewed criticism of the Supreme Court's decision on same-sex marriage, expressing concern that those opposing homosexuality risk being labeled as bigots. Topics discussed include Alito's warning in a statement rejecting a Missouri case, his discontent with the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, and the legal dispute involving jurors dismissed for religious objections to gay relationships.

The article focuses on former President Donald J. Trump's request to the Supreme Court to halt an appeals court ruling that rejected his claim of absolute immunity from criminal charges related to his efforts to subvert the 2020 election.

The article reports on decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to decline to block race-conscious admissions at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, clearing the way for the school to continue considering race as a factor in selecting the class that will enroll in the fall.

The article delves into legal battles surrounding the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), a federal law from 1986, with the Biden administration facing challenges from Texas and Idaho over whether the law compels emergency rooms to provide abortions in urgent cases. The topics include implications of this legal dispute on state abortion laws, potential restrictions on medical care in emergency rooms and recent cases highlighting the intersection of EMTALA and abortion rights.

The article reports that the U.S. Supreme Court debates whether a piecemeal deportation hearing notice with missing time and date is valid, potentially impacting thousands of undocumented immigrants and reigniting the wider immigration debate.

The article reports on the repose of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman on the Supreme Court, highlighting her impactful role as the ideological center and one of the most powerful women in U.S.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to decide on the availability of the abortion pill, mifepristone, marking the first major abortion-related case since the Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion over a year ago.

The article reports on the book deals of U.S. Supreme Court justices including Ketanji Brown Jackson, Neil M. Gorsuch, Amy Corey Barrett that have eclipsed their government salaries, with no limits on outside income. It raises concerns about the lack of transparency, absence of a binding ethics code for justices at the Supreme Court, and justices' use of court resources and staff to bolster their book ventures.

The article focuses on the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court gun rights case to be heard and how the man at its center, Zackey Rahimi, has written a letter from jail apologizing for his gun-related crimes and pledging to no longer carry a gun.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's refusal to reinstate Alabama's congressional map, which was drawn by Republican lawmakers and had only one majority-Black district, leading to the development of a new map before the 2024 election.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to pause a bankruptcy deal for Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, that aims to shield the Sackler family from further opioid-related lawsuits in exchange for providing funds to those affected by the opioid epidemic.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court temporarily lifting a stay on the construction of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, a 300-mile pipeline to carry natural gas from West Virginia to Virginia, which has been the subject of legal challenges from environmental groups.

The article focuses on a Supreme Court decision that expands protections for religious workers, highlighting a case involving a mail carrier who refused to work on his Sabbath. Topics include the rejection of a previous test used to determine religious accommodations, the requirement for employers to demonstrate substantial increased costs to deny accommodations, and the broader implications for countless workplaces in accommodating religious workers.

The article focuses on the Supreme Court's decision to uphold a Pennsylvania law that mandates corporations to agree to be sued in the state's courts for their actions, regardless of where those actions took place. Topics include the scope of the Pennsylvania law, the potential impact on corporate defendants, and the reasoning behind the court's decision to uphold the law.

The focus of the article appears to be a federal appeals court hearing regarding the availability of a commonly used abortion pill called mifepristone.

The article reports that a conservative appeals court in New Orleans, the Fifth Circuit, is set to decide on the legal status of the abortion drug mifepristone, which is used in over half of recent abortions in the United States.

The article discusses a bipartisan bill introduced by Senators, Angus King and Lisa Murkowski aimed at establishing an ethics code for the Supreme Court.

The article highlights Senate Democrats' unsuccessful attempt to pass legislation aimed at imposing stricter ethics and transparency rules on U.S. Supreme Court justices, amidst growing concerns over unreported gifts and travel.