Search

Arginase I is a marker of murine M2 macrophages and is highly expressed in many inflammatory diseases. The basis for high arginase I expression in macrophages in vivo is incompletely understood but likely reflects integrated responses to combinations of stimuli. Our objective was to elucidate mechanisms involved in modulating arginase I induction by IL-4, the prototypical activator of M2 macrophages. IL-4 and 8-bromo-cAMP individually induce arginase I, but together they rapidly and synergistically induce arginase I mRNA, protein, and promoter activity in murine macrophage cells. Arginase I induction by IL-4 requires binding of the transcription factors STAT6 and C/EBPβ to the IL-4 response element of the arginase I gene. Chromatin immunoprecipitation showed that the synergistic response involves binding of both transcription factors to the IL-4 response element at levels significantly greater than in response to IL-4 alone. The results suggest that C/EBPβ is a limiting factor for the level of STAT6 bound to the IL-4 response element. The enhanced binding in the synergistic response was not due to increased expression of either STAT6 or C/EBPβ but was correlated primarily with increased nuclear abundance of C/EBPβ. Our findings also suggest that induction of arginase I expression is stochastic; that is, differences in induction reflect differences in probability of transcriptional activation and not simply differences in rate of transcription. Results of the present study also may be useful for understanding mechanisms underlying regulated expression of other genes in macrophages and other myeloid-derived cells in health and disease.

Macrophages in granulomas are both antimycobacterial effector and host cell for Mycobacterium tuberculosis, yet basic aspects of macrophage diversity and function within the complex structures of granulomas remain poorly understood. To address this, we examined myeloid cell phenotypes and expression of enzymes correlated with host defense in macaque and human granulomas. Macaque granulomas had upregulated inducible and endothelial NO synthase (iNOS and eNOS) and arginase (Arg1 and Arg2) expression and enzyme activity compared with nongranulomatous tissue. Immunohistochemical analysis indicated macrophages adjacent to uninvolved normal tissue were more likely to express CD163, whereas epithelioid macrophages in regions where bacteria reside strongly expressed CD11c, CD68, and HAM56. Calprotectin-positive neutrophils were abundant in regions adjacent to caseum. iNOS, eNOS, Arg1, and Arg2 proteins were identified in macrophages and localized similarly in granulomas across species, with greater eNOS expression and ratio of iNOS/Arg1 expression in epithelioid macrophages as compared with cells in the lymphocyte cuff. iNOS, Arg1, and Arg2 expression in neutrophils was also identified. The combination of phenotypic and functional markers support that macrophages with anti-inflammatory phenotypes localized to outer regions of granulomas, whereas the inner regions were more likely to contain macrophages with proinflammatory, presumably bactericidal, phenotypes. Together, these data support the concept that granulomas have organized microenvironments that balance antimicrobial anti-inflammatory responses to limit pathology in the lungs.

Objective: To determine 1) whether renal arginase activity or expression is increased in diabetes and 2) whether arginase plays a role in development of diabetic nephropathy (DN)., Research Design and Methods: The impact of arginase activity and expression on renal damage was evaluated in spontaneously diabetic Ins2(Akita) mice and in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic Dilute Brown Agouti (DBA) and arginase-2-deficient mice (Arg2(-/-))., Results: Pharmacological blockade or genetic deficiency of arginase-2 conferred kidney protection in Ins2(Akita) mice or STZ-induced diabetic renal injury. Blocking arginases using S-(2-boronoethyl)-L-cysteine for 9 weeks in Ins2(Akita) mice or 6 weeks in STZ-induced diabetic DBA mice significantly attenuated albuminuria, the increase in blood urea nitrogen, histopathological changes, and kidney macrophage recruitment compared with vehicle-treated Ins2(Akita) mice. Furthermore, kidney arginase-2 expression increased in Ins2(Akita) mice compared with control. In contrast, arginase-1 expression was undetectable in kidneys under normal or diabetes conditions. Arg2(-/-) mice mimicked arginase blockade by reducing albuminuria after 6 and 18 weeks of STZ-induced diabetes. In wild-type mice, kidney arginase activity increased significantly after 6 and 18 weeks of STZ-induced diabetes but remained very low in STZ-diabetic Arg2(-/-) mice. The increase in kidney arginase activity was associated with a reduction in renal medullary blood flow in wild-type mice after 6 weeks of STZ-induced diabetes, an effect significantly attenuated in diabetic Arg2(-/-) mice., Conclusions: These findings indicate that arginase-2 plays a major role in induction of diabetic renal injury and that blocking arginase-2 activity or expression could be a novel therapeutic approach for treatment of DN.

Rationale: Activation of liver X receptors (LXRs) inhibits the progression of atherosclerosis and promotes regression of existing lesions. In addition, LXRα levels are high in regressive plaques. Macrophage arginase 1 (Arg1) expression is inversely correlated with atherosclerosis progression and is markedly decreased in foam cells within the lesion., Objective: To investigate LXRα regulation of Arg1 expression in cultured macrophages and atherosclerotic regressive lesions., Methods and Results: We found that Arg1 expression is enhanced in CD68+ cells from regressive versus progressive lesions in a murine aortic arch transplant model. In cultured macrophages, ligand-activated LXRα markedly enhances basal and interleukin-4-induced Arg1 mRNA and protein expression as well as promoter activity. This LXRα-enhanced Arg1 expression correlates with a reduction in nitric oxide levels. Moreover, Arg1 expression within regressive atherosclerotic plaques is LXRα-dependent, as enhanced expression of Arg1 in regressive lesions is impaired in LXRα-deficient CD68+ cells. LXRα does not bind to the Arg1 promoter but instead promotes the interaction between PU.1 and interferon regulatory factor (IRF)8 transcription factors and induces their binding of a novel composite element. Accordingly, knockdown of either IRF8 or PU.1 strongly impairs LXRα regulation of Arg1 expression in macrophage cells. Finally, we demonstrate that LXRα binds the IRF8 locus and its activation increases IRF8 mRNA and protein levels in these cells., Conclusions: This work implicates Arg1 in atherosclerosis regression and identifies LXRα as a novel regulator of Arg1 and IRF8 in macrophages. Furthermore, it provides a unique molecular mechanism by which LXRα regulates macrophage target gene expression through PU.1 and IRF8.

Increased catabolism of arginine by arginase is increasingly viewed as an important pathophysiological factor in cardiovascular disease, including atherosclerosis induced by high cholesterol diets. Whereas previous studies have focused primarily on effects of high cholesterol diets on arginase expression and arginine metabolism in specific blood vessels, there is no information regarding the impact of lipid diets on arginase activity or arginine bioavailability at a systemic level. We, therefore, evaluated the effects of high fat (HF) and high fat-high cholesterol (HC) diets on arginase activity in plasma and tissues and on global arginine bioavailability (defined as the ratio of plasma arginine to ornithine + citrulline) in apoE(-/-) and wild-type C57BL/6J mice. HC and HF diets led to reduced global arginine bioavailability in both strains. The HC diet resulted in significantly elevated plasma arginase in both strains, but the HF diet increased plasma arginase only in apoE(-/-) mice. Elevated plasma arginase activity correlated closely with increased alanine aminotransferase levels, indicating that liver damage was primarily responsible for elevated plasma arginase. The HC diet, which promotes atherogenesis, also resulted in increased arginase activity and expression of the type II isozyme of arginase in multiple tissues of apoE(-/-) mice only. These results raise the possibility that systemic changes in arginase activity and global arginine bioavailability may be contributing factors in the initiation and/or progression of cardiovascular disease.

Of all arginine catabolic enzymes, the arginases and nitric oxide (NO) synthases are the ones that are of greatest interest to many investigators. Mammalian arginases catalyze the hydrolysis of arginine to ornithine and urea and are composed of two distinct isozymes: arginase I, located within the cytosol, and arginase II, located within mitochondria. The arginases not only can inhibit NO synthesis by reducing arginine availability, but also can promote the synthesis of polyamines or proline via production of the common precursor ornithine. Because of their inducibility in many cell types and to their potential impact on multiple biochemical pathways in health and disease, there is growing interest in assays of arginase activity. Although arginase activity may be determined by either spectrophotometric or radiochemical assays, radiochemical assays afford greater sensitivity and do not require correction for any ornithine or urea that may be present in the samples. Part of the arginase assay protocol described in this chapter also can be used for radiochemical assays of enzymes that catalyze decarboxylation reactions. No activity assay currently available is capable of distinguishing the arginase isozymes.

Arginase induction was reported in several inflammatory lung diseases, suggesting that this may be a common feature underlying the pathophysiology of such diseases. As little is known regarding arginase expression in silicosis, the induction and cellular localization of arginase were elucidated in lungs of Sprague-Dawley rats 24 h following exposure to varying doses of silica by intratracheal instillation. Arginase expression was evaluated by activity assay, quantification of arginase I and arginase II mRNA levels using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and immunohistochemistry. Analyses of cells and fluid obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) showed that markers of pulmonary inflammation, tissue damage, activation of alveolar macrophages (AM) and NO production were significantly increased by all silica doses. Arginase activity was increased also in AMs isolated from BAL fluid of silica-treated rats. Silica produced two- and three-fold increases in arginase activity of whole lung at doses of 1 and 5 mg/100 g body weight, respectively. Levels of arginase I mRNA, but not of arginase II mRNA, were similarly elevated. In control lungs, arginase I immunoreactivity was observed only in AMs sparsely dispersed throughout the lung; no inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) immunoreactivity was detected. In silica-treated lungs, arginase I and iNOS were co-expressed in most AMs that were abundantly clustered at inflammatory foci. The rapid induction of arginase I expression in inflammatory lung cells, similar to induction of arginase in other inflammatory lung diseases, implicates elevated arginase activity as a factor in the development of lung damage following exposure to silica.

Arginase is greatly elevated in asthma and is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of this disease. As inhibitors of phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4), the predominant PDE in macrophages, elevate cAMP levels and reduce inflammation, they have been proposed for use in treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. As cAMP is an inducer of arginase, we tested the hypothesis that a PDE4 inhibitor would enhance macrophage arginase induction by key cytokines implicated in asthma and other pulmonary diseases. RAW 264.7 cells were stimulated with IL-4 or transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, with and without the PDE4 inhibitor rolipram. IL-4 and TGF-beta increased arginase activity 16- and 5-fold, respectively. Rolipram alone had no effect but when combined with IL-4 and TGF-beta synergistically enhanced arginase activity by an additional 15- and 5-fold, respectively. The increases in arginase I protein and mRNA levels mirrored increases in arginase activity. Induction of arginase II mRNA was also enhanced by rolipram but to a much lesser extent than arginase I. Unlike its effect in RAW 264.7 cells, IL-4 alone did not increase arginase activity in human alveolar macrophages (AM) from healthy volunteers. However, combining IL-4 with agents to induce cAMP levels induced arginase activity in human AM significantly above the level obtained with cAMP-inducing agents alone. In conclusion, agents that elevate cAMP significantly enhance induction of arginase by cytokines. Therefore, consequences of increased arginase expression should be evaluated whenever PDE inhibitors are proposed for treatment of inflammatory disorders in which IL-4 and/or TGF-beta predominate.

Arginine metabolism in macrophages during infection and inflammation is complex, owing to differential regulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and arginases by cytokines and other agents. Changes in levels of Th2 cytokines such as interleukin-4 (IL-4) can play important roles in these conditions via effects on arginine metabolism. IL-4 alters macrophage arginine metabolism by inducing arginase I expression and inhibiting nitric oxide production. To determine the molecular basis for induction of arginase I, the promoter of the murine arginase I gene was cloned and analyzed by transfection in RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. IL-4 induction required a composite response element containing STAT6 and C/EBP sites located 2.86 kb upstream of the transcription start site. Competition experiments showed that STAT6 and C/EBPbeta bind to the STAT6 and C/EBP sites non-cooperatively. Elucidation of the mechanisms involved in regulation of arginase I transcription may provide a basis for developing strategies to modulate arginase expression in Th2 cytokine-predominant diseases.

Endothelial cells (EC) metabolize L-arginine mainly by arginase, which exists as two distinct isoforms, arginase I and II. To understand the roles of arginase isoforms in EC arginine metabolism, bovine coronary venular EC were stably transfected with the Escherichia coli lacZ gene (lacZ-EC, control), rat arginase I cDNA (AI-EC), or mouse arginase II cDNA (AII-EC). Western blots and enzymatic assays confirmed high-level expression of arginase I in the cytosol of AI-EC and of arginase II in mitochondria of AII-EC. For determining arginine catabolism, EC were cultured for 24 h in DMEM containing 0.4 mM L-arginine plus [1-(14)C]arginine. Urea formation, which accounted for nearly all arginine consumption by these cells, was enhanced by 616 and 157% in AI-EC and AII-EC, respectively, compared with lacZ-EC. Arginine uptake was 31-33% greater in AI-EC and AII-EC than in lacZ-EC. Intracellular arginine content was 25 and 11% lower in AI-EC and AII-EC, respectively, compared with lacZ-EC. Basal nitric oxide (NO) production was reduced by 60% in AI-EC and by 47% in AII-EC. Glutamate and proline production from arginine increased by 164 and 928% in AI-EC and by 79 and 295% in AII-EC, respectively, compared with lacZ-EC. Intracellular content of putrescine and spermidine was increased by 275 and 53% in AI-EC and by 158 and 43% in AII-EC, respectively, compared with lacZ-EC. Our results indicate that arginase expression can modulate NO synthesis in bovine venular EC and that basal levels of arginase I and II are limiting for endothelial syntheses of polyamines, proline, and glutamate and may have important implications for wound healing, angiogenesis, and cardiovascular function.

Because arginase hydrolyzes arginine to produce ornithine and urea, it has the potential to regulate nitric oxide (NO) and polyamine synthesis. We tested whether expression of the cytosolic isoform of arginase (arginase I) was limiting for NO or polyamine production by activated RAW 264.7 macrophage cells. RAW 264.7 cells, stably transfected to overexpress arginase I or beta-galactosidase, were treated with interferon-gamma to induce type 2 NO synthase or with lipopolysaccharide or 8-bromo-cAMP (8-BrcAMP) to induce ornithine decarboxylase. Overexpression of arginase I had no effect on NO synthesis. In contrast, cells overexpressing arginase I produced twice as much putrescine after activation than did cells expressing beta-galactosidase. Cells overexpressing arginase I also produced more spermidine after treatment with 8-BrcAMP than did cells expressing beta-galactosidase. Thus endogenous levels of arginase I are limiting for polyamine synthesis, but not for NO synthesis, by activated macrophage cells. This study also demonstrates that it is possible to alter arginase I levels sufficiently to affect polyamine synthesis without affecting induced NO synthesis.

Activated macrophages avidly consume arginine via the action of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and/or arginase. In contrast to our knowledge regarding macrophage iNOS expression, the stimuli and mechanisms that regulate expression of the cytosolic type I (arginase I) or mitochondrial type II (arginase II) isoforms of arginase in macrophages are poorly defined. We show that one or both arginase isoforms may be induced in the RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cell line and that arginase expression is regulated independently of iNOS expression. For example, 8-bromo-cAMP strongly induced both arginase I and II mRNAs but not iNOS. Whereas interferon-gamma induced iNOS but not arginase, 8-bromo-cAMP and interferon-gamma mutually antagonized induction of iNOS and arginase I mRNAs. Dexamethasone, which did not induce either arginase or iNOS, almost completely abolished induction of arginase I mRNA by 8-bromo-cAMP but enhanced induction of arginase II mRNA. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) induced arginase II mRNA, but 8-bromo-cAMP plus LPS resulted in synergistic induction of both arginase I and II mRNAs. In all cases, increases in arginase mRNAs were sufficient to account for the increases in arginase activity. These complex patterns of expression suggest that the arginase isoforms may play distinct, although partially overlapping, functional roles in macrophage arginine metabolism.

Mammals contain two genes encoding distinct isoforms of arginase (arginases I and II), both of which catalyze the conversion of arginine to ornithine and urea. However, their subcellular localization and tissue-specific patterns of expression are very different, indicating that they perform distinct physiologic roles. As an initial step in elucidating the regulation and physiologic roles of arginase II, this report describes the characterization of a mammalian arginase II gene. The murine arginase II gene contains eight exons like the arginase I gene. The six internal exons have intron/exon boundaries that are identical to the arginase I gene; however, exon three of the arginase II gene has obtained a three-base-pair insertion. The identity of the exon/intron boundaries is consistent with a gene duplication as the origin of the arginase isozymes with the small insertion occurring after the duplicative event. The promoter region of the arginase II gene, which bears no resemblance to that of the arginase I genes, contains numerous potential binding sites for enhancer and promoter elements but does not contain a TATA box.

A full-length cDNA encoding type II arginase was isolated from a human kidney cDNA library and its sequence compared to those of vertebrate type I arginases as well as to arginases of bacteria, fungi and plants. The predicted sequence of human type II arginase is 58% identical to the sequence of human type I arginase but is 71% identical to the sequence of Xenopus type II arginase, suggesting that duplication of the arginase gene occurred before mammals and amphibians diverged. Seven residues known to be essential for activity were found to be conserved in all arginases. Type II arginase mRNA was detected in virtually all human and mouse RNA samples tested whereas type I arginase mRNA was found only in liver. At least five mRNA species hybridizing to type II arginase cDNA were found in the human RNA samples whereas only a single type II arginase mRNA species was found in the mouse. This raises the possibility that the multiple type II arginase mRNAs in humans arise from differential RNA processing or usage of alternative promoters.