Search

Your search keyword '"Calegari, Roberta"' showing total 7 results
Start Over Author "Calegari, Roberta" Topic argumentation
7 results on '"Calegari, Roberta"'

1. Multi-agent Cooperative Argumentation in Arg2P

Author

Pisano, Giuseppe, Calegari, Roberta, Omicini, Andrea, Goos, Gerhard, Founding Editor, Hartmanis, Juris, Founding Editor, Bertino, Elisa, Editorial Board Member, Gao, Wen, Editorial Board Member, Steffen, Bernhard, Editorial Board Member, Yung, Moti, Editorial Board Member, Dovier, Agostino, editor, Montanari, Angelo, editor, and Orlandini, Andrea, editor

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Burden of Persuasion in Meta-argumentation

Author

Pisano, Giuseppe, Calegari, Roberta, Omicini, Andrea, Sartor, Giovanni, Goos, Gerhard, Founding Editor, Hartmanis, Juris, Founding Editor, Bertino, Elisa, Editorial Board Member, Gao, Wen, Editorial Board Member, Steffen, Bernhard, Editorial Board Member, Yung, Moti, Editorial Board Member, Bandini, Stefania, editor, Gasparini, Francesca, editor, Mascardi, Viviana, editor, Palmonari, Matteo, editor, and Vizzari, Giuseppe, editor

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

3. Burdens of Persuasion and Standards of Proof in Structured Argumentation

Author

Calegari, Roberta, Sartor, Giovanni, Goos, Gerhard, Founding Editor, Hartmanis, Juris, Founding Editor, Bertino, Elisa, Editorial Board Member, Gao, Wen, Editorial Board Member, Steffen, Bernhard, Editorial Board Member, Woeginger, Gerhard, Editorial Board Member, Yung, Moti, Editorial Board Member, Baroni, Pietro, editor, Benzmüller, Christoph, editor, and Wáng, Yὶ N., editor

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Explainable and Ethical AI: A Perspective on Argumentation and Logic Programming

Author

Calegari, Roberta, Omicini, Andrea, Sartor, Giovanni, Goos, Gerhard, Founding Editor, Hartmanis, Juris, Founding Editor, Bertino, Elisa, Editorial Board Member, Gao, Wen, Editorial Board Member, Steffen, Bernhard, Editorial Board Member, Woeginger, Gerhard, Editorial Board Member, Yung, Moti, Editorial Board Member, Baldoni, Matteo, editor, and Bandini, Stefania, editor

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Arguing about the existence of conflicts

Author

Pisano, Giuseppe, Calegari, Roberta, Prakken, Henry, Sartor, Giovanni, Toni, Francesca, Polberg, Sylwia, Booth, Richard, Caminada, Martin, Kido, Hiroyuki, Sub Intelligent Systems, and Intelligent Systems

Subjects
argumentation, Artificial Intelligence, ASPIC+, meta-Argumentation
Abstract

In this paper we formalise a meta-argumentation framework as an ASPIC+ extension which enables reasoning about conflicts between formulae of the argumentation language. The result is a standard abstract argumentation framework that can be evaluated via grounded semantics.

Published
2022

6. Argumentation and Defeasible Reasoning in the Law.

Author

Billi, Marco, Calegari, Roberta, Contissa, Giuseppe, Lagioia, Francesca, Pisano, Giuseppe, Sartor, Galileo, and Sartor, Giovanni

Subjects
DEBATE, DEFEASIBLE reasoning, LOGIC, COMPUTER software, COMPUTER programming
Abstract

Different formalisms for defeasible reasoning have been used to represent knowledge and reason in the legal field. In this work, we provide an overview of the following logic-based approaches to defeasible reasoning: defeasible logic, Answer Set Programming, ABA+, ASPIC+, and DeLP. We compare features of these approaches under three perspectives: the logical model (knowledge representation), the method (computational mechanisms), and the technology (available software resources). On top of that, two real examples in the legal domain are designed and implemented in ASPIC+ to showcase the benefit of an argumentation approach in real-world domains. The CrossJustice and Interlex projects are taken as a testbed, and experiments are conducted with the Arg2P technology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Argumentation and Defeasible Reasoning in the Law

Author

Galileo Sartor, Roberta Calegari, Giovanni Sartor, Giuseppe Pisano, Giuseppe Contissa, Francesca Lagioia, Marco Billi, Billi, Marco, Calegari, Roberta, Contissa, Giuseppe, Lagioia, Francesca, Pisano, Giuseppe, Sartor, Galileo, and Sartor, Giovanni

Subjects
tools and technologie, argumentation, defeasible reasoning, tools and technologies, Arg2P, Science, 06 humanities and the arts, 02 engineering and technology, 0603 philosophy, ethics and religion, 0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing, 060301 applied ethics
Abstract

Different formalisms for defeasible reasoning have been used to represent knowledge and reason in the legal field. In this work, we provide an overview of the following logic-based approaches to defeasible reasoning: defeasible logic, Answer Set Programming, ABA+, ASPIC+, and DeLP. We compare features of these approaches under three perspectives: the logical model (knowledge representation), the method (computational mechanisms), and the technology (available software resources). On top of that, two real examples in the legal domain are designed and implemented in ASPIC+ to showcase the benefit of an argumentation approach in real-world domains. The CrossJustice and Interlex projects are taken as a testbed, and experiments are conducted with the Arg2P technology.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results