Search

Background: Leadless intracardiac pacemakers were developed to avoid the complications of transvenous pacing systems. The Medtronic Micra™ transcatheter pacemaker is one such system. We found an unexpected number of major adverse clinical events (MACE) in the Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturers and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database associated with Micra implantation., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe these MACE and compare them to implant procedure MACE in MAUDE for Medtronic CapSureFix™ active-fixation transvenous pacing leads., Methods: During January 2021, we queried the MAUDE database for reports of MACE for Micra pacemakers and CapSureFix leads using the simple search terms "death," "tamponade," and "perforation." Reports from 2016-2020 were included., Results: The search identified 363 MACE for Micra and 960 MACE for CapSureFix leads, including 96 Micra deaths (26.4%) vs 23 CapSureFix deaths (2.4%) (P <.001); 287 Micra tamponades (79.1%) vs 225 tamponades for CapSureFix (23.4%) (P <.001); and 99 rescue thoracotomies for Micra (27.3%) vs 50 rescue thoracotomies for CapSureFix (5.2%) (P <.001). More Micra patients required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (21.8% vs 1.1%) and suffered hypotension or shock (22.0% vs 5.8%) than CapSureFix recipients (P <.001). Micra patients were more likely to survive a myocardial perforation or tear if they had surgical repair (P = .014)., Conclusion: Micra leadless pacemaker implantation may be complicated by myocardial and vascular perforations and tears that result in cardiac tamponade and death. We estimate the incidence is low (<1%). Rescue surgery to repair perforations may be lifesaving. MACE are significantly less for implantation of CapSureFix transvenous ventricular pacing leads., (Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to report periprocedural outcomes and intermediate-term follow-up of hemodialysis patients undergoing Micra implantation., Background: Leadless pacemakers may be preferred in patients with limited vascular access and high-infection risk, such as patients on hemodialysis., Methods: Patients on hemodialysis at the time of Micra implantation attempt (n = 201 of 2,819; 7%) from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study investigational device exemption trial, Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Continued Access Study Protocol, and Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics, periprocedural outcomes, and intermediate-term follow-up were summarized., Results: Patients on hemodialysis at the time of Micra implantation attempt were on average 70.5 ± 13.5 years of age and 59.2% were male. The dialysis patients commonly had hypertension (80%), diabetes (61%), coronary artery disease (39%), and congestive heart failure (27%), and 72% had a condition that the implanting physician felt precluded the use of a transvenous pacemaker. Micra was successfully implanted in 197 patients (98.0%). Reasons for unsuccessful implantation included inadequate thresholds (n = 2) and pericardial effusion (n = 2). The median implantation time was 27 min (interquartile range: 20 to 39 min). There were 3 procedure-related deaths: 1 due to metabolic acidosis following a prolonged procedure duration in a patient undergoing concomitant atrioventricular nodal ablation and 2 deaths occurred in patients who needed surgical repair after perforation. Average follow-up was 6.2 months (range 0 to 26.7 months). No patients had a device-related infection or required device removal because of bacteremia., Conclusions: Leadless pacemakers represent an effective pacing option in this challenging patient population on chronic hemodialysis. The risk of infection appears low with an acceptable safety profile. (Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study; NCT02004873; Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Continued Access Study Protocol; NCT02488681; Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry; NCT02536118)., (Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: A leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system has been designed to avoid the need for a pacemaker pocket and transvenous lead., Methods: In a prospective multicenter study without controls, a transcatheter pacemaker was implanted in patients who had guideline-based indications for ventricular pacing. The analysis of the primary end points began when 300 patients reached 6 months of follow-up. The primary safety end point was freedom from system-related or procedure-related major complications. The primary efficacy end point was the percentage of patients with low and stable pacing capture thresholds at 6 months (≤2.0 V at a pulse width of 0.24 msec and an increase of ≤1.5 V from the time of implantation). The safety and efficacy end points were evaluated against performance goals (based on historical data) of 83% and 80%, respectively. We also performed a post hoc analysis in which the rates of major complications were compared with those in a control cohort of 2667 patients with transvenous pacemakers from six previously published studies., Results: The device was successfully implanted in 719 of 725 patients (99.2%). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the rate of the primary safety end point was 96.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.9 to 97.3; P<0.001 for the comparison with the safety performance goal of 83%); there were 28 major complications in 25 of 725 patients, and no dislodgements. The rate of the primary efficacy end point was 98.3% (95% CI, 96.1 to 99.5; P<0.001 for the comparison with the efficacy performance goal of 80%) among 292 of 297 patients with paired 6-month data. Although there were 28 major complications in 25 patients, patients with transcatheter pacemakers had significantly fewer major complications than did the control patients (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.75; P=0.001)., Conclusions: In this historical comparison study, the transcatheter pacemaker met the prespecified safety and efficacy goals; it had a safety profile similar to that of a transvenous system while providing low and stable pacing thresholds. (Funded by Medtronic; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02004873.).

Aims: An estimated 10,000-15,000 pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads are extracted annually worldwide using specialized tools that disrupt encapsulating fibrous tissue. Additional information is needed regarding the safety of the devices that have been approved for lead extraction. The aim of this study was to determine whether complications due to device-assisted lead extraction might be more hazardous than published data suggest, and whether procedural safety precautions are effective., Methods and Results: We searched the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Manufacturers and User Defined Experience (MAUDE) database from 1995 to 2008 using the search terms 'lead extraction and death' and 'lead extraction and injury'. Additional product specific searches were performed for the terms 'death' and 'injury'. Between 1995 and 2008, 57 deaths and 48 serious cardiovascular injuries associated with device-assisted lead extraction were reported to the FDA. Owing to underreporting, the FDA database does not contain all adverse events that occurred during this period. Of the 105 events, 27 deaths and 13 injuries occurred in 2007-2008. During these 2 years, 23 deaths were linked with excimer laser or mechanical dilator sheath extractions. The majority of deaths and injuries involved ICD leads, and most were caused by lacerations of the right atrium, superior vena cava, or innominate vein. Overall, 62 patients underwent emergency surgical repair of myocardial perforations and venous lacerations and 35 (56%) survived., Conclusion: These findings suggest that device-assisted lead extraction is a high-risk procedure and that serious complications including death may not be mitigated by emergency surgery. However, skilled standby cardiothoracic surgery is essential when performing pacemaker and ICD lead extractions. Although the incidence of these complications is unknown, the results of our study imply that device-assisted lead extractions should be performed by highly qualified physicians and their teams in specialized centres.

Background: Improvements in cardiac mapping are required to advance our understanding and treatment of arrhythmias. This study validated a new noncontact multielectrode array catheter and accompanying analysis system to provide electroanatomic mapping of the entire left ventricular (LV) endocardium during a single beat., Methods and Results: A 9F 64-electrode balloon array catheter with an inflated size of 1.8x4.6 cm was used to simultaneously record electrical potentials generated by the heart and locate a standard electrophysiology (EP) catheter within the same chamber. By use of the recorded location of the EP-catheter tip, LV geometry was determined. Array potentials served as inputs to a high-order boundary-element method to produce 3360 potential points on the endocardial surface translatable into electrograms or color-coded activation maps. Three methods of validation were used: (1) driven electrodes in an in vitro tank were located; (2) waveforms generated from the array catheter were compared with catheter contact waveforms in canine LV; and (3) sites of local LV endocardial activation were located and marked with radiofrequency lesions. Tank testing located a driven electrode to within 2.33+/-0.44 mm. Correlation of timing and morphology of computed versus contact electrograms was 0.966. Radiofrequency lesions marked 17 endocardial pacing sites to within 4.0+/-3.2 mm., Conclusions: This new system provides anatomically accurate endocardial isopotential mapping during a single cardiac cycle. The locator component enabled placement of a separate EP catheter to any site within the mapped chamber.

This study examined the impact of transcatheter fulguration on creatine kinase-MB release in 21 patients (age range 17-71 years). Arrhythmia diagnoses were ventricular tachycardia 9, atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response 7, atrioventricular nodal reentry 2, and reciprocating tachycardia utilizing a posteroseptal accessory pathway 3. Seven patients had apparently normal hearts while 8 had ischemic heart disease and 6 cardiomyopathy. Timing of initial elevated creatine kinase-MB activity (mean 1.34 +/- 0.69 SD hours) and peak creatine kinase-MB activity (mean 3.73 +/- 0.89 SD hours) was relatively uniform in all patients. Time to peak creatine kinase-MB activity was unrelated to either underlying cardiac disease (normal: 3.9 +/- 1.0 hours; ischemic heart disease: 3.5 +/- 0.9 hours; cardiomyopathy: 3.8 +/- 0.9 hours), or fulguration site (His bundle (n = 9): 4.2 +/- 0.9 hours, proximal coronary sinus (n = 3): 3.3 +/- 0.3 hours, ventricle (n = 9): 3.4 +/- 0.8 hours). The magnitude of peak serum creatine kinase-MB activity was independent of myocardial diagnosis or fulguration site, but was linearly related to total energy delivered (r = 0.5, P less than 0.022). The latter correlation was particularly strong within cardiac diagnosis subgroups (normal: r = 0.92, P less than 0.002; ischemic heart disease: 0.73, P less than 0.04; non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: r = 0.57, P = NS). Thus, serum creatine kinase-MB activity following transcatheter fulguration is linearly related to the magnitude of delivered energy, and is similar to that observed after transient coronary artery occlusion and reperfusion.

This study used transmural multipolar electrodes, ventricular pressure monitoring, and cardiac electrical stimulation techniques to examine the effects of transient aortic occlusion on ventricular refractoriness in a canine model of recent myocardial infarction. Six previously instrumented resting awake dogs were atrially paced, followed by timed premature extrastimuli inserted at epicardial pacing sites adjacent to an apical left ventricular (LV) myocardial infarction or in an LV control zone remote from the myocardial infarction. Electrophysiologic and pressure recordings were obtained before and during periods of transient aortic occlusion. Aortic occlusion was applied before the last beat of an eight-beat atrial pacing sequence and resulted in increased peak LV pressure (92.8 +/- 27.7 mm Hg, p = 0.003). Aortic occlusion shortened LV effective refractory period (ERP) recorded from the myocardial infarction border zone in both the subepicardial (-17.0 +/- 11.8 msec, p = 0.019) and subendocardial (-17.7 +/- 10.9 msec, p = 0.011) regions, whereas LVERP of the control zone was unchanged. Conduction latency of premature beats at equivalent coupling intervals and maximum latency observed were unchanged by aortic occlusion. atrioventricular conduction interval shortened in association with aortic occlusion. Thus transient aortic occlusion reduced ventricular refractoriness in the border zone adjacent to the myocardial infarction while control zone refractoriness was minimally or not changed. Heterogeneity of ventricular myocardial refractoriness may result from mechanical dysfunction, potentially increasing susceptibility to arrhythmias.

This study examined factors determining efficacy of intracavitary cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias in closed chest, anesthetized dogs with talc pericarditis. Electrode catheters were positioned transvenously with the cathode in the right atrial appendage. In Group 1 dogs (n = 6), three anode sites (superior and inferior venae cavae ostia and mid-right atrium) were tested with graded energy shocks to determine the lowest effective cardioversion energy at each anode position. In Group 2 dogs (n = 9), multiple cardioversion attempts with energy levels of 0.01 to 5.0 J were used to evaluate reproducibility of energy thresholds. In Group 3 dogs (n = 6) without talc-induced pericarditis, atrial pathologic study was done after five intracavitary shocks (0.5 or 5.0 J). In Group 1, cardioversion was achieved with 0.75 J or less with no significant difference in minimal effective cardioversion energies among the three anode positions tested. In Group 2, 98 (26%) of 372 cardioversion attempts were successful. Intra-animal minimal effective cardioversion energies varied widely, and timing of shocks relative to atrial electrograms did not influence efficacy. Complications were infrequent and included delayed sinus rhythm recovery, transient atrioventricular block and ventricular fibrillation. Ventricular fibrillation occurred in 9 (2.4%) of 372 shocks, and was associated with higher delivered energies (6 of 9 with greater than or equal to 1.0 J) and with shocks delivered 116 to 180 ms after onset of the QRS complex. In Group 3, two dogs had no histologic damage, three dogs had multiple small foci of subendocardial necrosis and in one dog these foci coalesced to involve half the atrial wall thickness. Thus, low energy cardioversion of atrial tachyarrhythmias is feasible using intracavitary electrodes. Synchronization of energy delivery to the QRS complex is important to minimize risk of ventricular fibrillation.