1. Tafenoquine co-administered with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria (INSPECTOR): a randomised, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety study.
- Author
-
Sutanto I, Soebandrio A, Ekawati LL, Chand K, Noviyanti R, Satyagraha AW, Subekti D, Santy YW, Crenna-Darusallam C, Instiaty I, Budiman W, Prasetya CB, Lardo S, Elyazar I, Duparc S, Cedar E, Rolfe K, Fernando D, Berni A, Jones S, Kleim JP, Fletcher K, Sharma H, Martin A, Taylor M, Goyal N, Green JA, Tan LK, and Baird JK
- Subjects
- Humans, Primaquine therapeutic use, Drug Therapy, Combination, Chloroquine therapeutic use, Plasmodium vivax, Malaria, Vivax drug therapy, Malaria, Vivax prevention & control, Antimalarials, Quinolines therapeutic use, Artemisinins adverse effects, Malaria drug therapy
- Abstract
Background: Tafenoquine, co-administered with chloroquine, is approved for the radical cure (prevention of relapse) of Plasmodium vivax malaria. In areas of chloroquine resistance, artemisinin-based combination therapies are used to treat malaria. This study aimed to evaluate tafenoquine plus the artemisinin-based combination therapy dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine for the radical cure of P vivax malaria., Methods: In this double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase-normal Indonesian soldiers with microscopically confirmed P vivax malaria were randomly assigned by means of a computer-generated randomisation schedule (1:1:1) to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus a masked single 300-mg dose of tafenoquine, or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine plus 14 days of primaquine (15 mg). The primary endpoint was 6-month relapse-free efficacy following tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine versus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of masked treatment and had microscopically confirmed P vivax at baseline (microbiological intention-to-treat population). Safety was a secondary outcome and the safety population comprised all patients who received at least one dose of masked medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02802501 and is completed., Findings: Between April 8, 2018, and Feb 4, 2019, of 164 patients screened for eligibility, 150 were randomly assigned (50 per treatment group). 6-month Kaplan-Meier relapse-free efficacy (microbiological intention to treat) was 11% (95% CI 4-22) in patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone versus 21% (11-34) in patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (hazard ratio 0·44; 95% CI [0·29-0·69]) and 52% (37-65) in the primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine group. Adverse events over the first 28 days were reported in 27 (54%) of 50 patients treated with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone, 29 (58%) of 50 patients treated with tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine, and 22 (44%) of 50 patients treated with primaquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine. Serious adverse events were reported in one (2%) of 50, two (4%) of 50, and two (4%) of 50 of patients, respectively., Interpretation: Although tafenoquine plus dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine was statistically superior to dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine alone for the radical cure of P vivax malaria, the benefit was not clinically meaningful. This contrasts with previous studies in which tafenoquine plus chloroquine was clinically superior to chloroquine alone for radical cure of P vivax malaria., Funding: ExxonMobil, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Newcrest Mining, UK Government all through Medicines for Malaria Venture; and GSK., Translation: For the Indonesian translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests IS reports grants or contracts from Menzies School of Health Research, Darwin and the National Health and Medical Research Council, and funding from Medicines for Malaria Venture (MMV) and GSK. AS, KC, RN, DS, YWS, II, WB, CBP, and SL report that they or their institutions received funding from MMV to do the study and editorial support from GSK for this publication. LLE and AWS report institutional funding from Menzies School of Health Research, MMV, and GSK. CC-D reports institutional funding from MMV, GSK, and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. IE reports institutional funding from MMV, GSK, WHO, SPARK (University of Melbourne), and honoraria from the Indonesian Ministry of Health. SD is an employee of MMV; his institution received funding from ExxonMobil, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (grant number INV-007155/19-BMGF-006), Newcrest Mining, and the UK Government to fund the INSPECTOR study. EC is a former independent contractor at GSK and holds shares in the company. EC developed the first draft of the manuscript and provided editorial services as an independent medical writer funded by GSK. KR, DF, AB, SJ, KF, HS, AM, MT, and LKT are employees of GSK and hold shares in the company. J-PK, NG, and JAG are former employees of GSK and hold shares in GSK. JKB reports institutional research funding from MMV, GSK, the Wellcome Trust, the Gates Foundation, FIND, Sanaria, UKAid, University of Oxford, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control; travel and speaking fees from the Belgian Society of Tropical Medicine, the International Conference of Tropical Medicine and Malariology, and Singapore Malaria Group Conference; and participation on the US National Health Institute Data Safety Monitoring Board., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF