Search

The induction of autoimmune diseases during tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi) usage has been described. Herein, we report a rare case of a 49-year-old woman with antimelanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody (Ab)-positive dermatomyositis (DM), which developed 5 weeks after the introduction of an etanercept biosimilar to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Four of the five known cases, including ours, of anti-MDA5Ab-positive DM complicated with RA revealed anti-MDA5Ab-positive DM following TNFi usage. When patients with RA are diagnosed with interstitial lung disease during TNFi usage, anti-MDA5 Ab-positive DM could be a differential diagnosis., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Objectives: Methotrexate (MTX) is associated with extensive side effects, including myelosuppression, interstitial pneumonia, and infection. It is, therefore, critical to establish whether its administration is required after achieving remission with tocilizumab (TCZ) and MTX combination therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, the aim of this multicenter, observational, cohort study was to evaluate the feasibility of MTX discontinuation for the safety of these patients., Methods: Patients with RA were administered TCZ, with or without MTX, for 3 years; those who received TCZ+MTX combination therapy were selected. After remission was achieved, MTX was discontinued without flare development in one group (discontinued [DISC] group, n = 33) and continued without flare development in another group (maintain [MAIN] group, n = 37). The clinical efficacy of TCZ+MTX therapy, patient background characteristics, and adverse events were compared between groups., Results: The disease activity score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at 3, 6, and 9 months was significantly lower in the DISC group (P < .05, P < .01, and P < .01, respectively). Further, the DAS28-ESR remission rate at 6 and 9 months and Boolean remission rate at 6 months were significantly higher in the DISC group (P < .01 for all). Disease duration was significantly longer in the DISC group (P < .05). Furthermore, the number of patients with stage 4 RA was significantly higher in the DISC group (P < .01)., Conclusions: Once remission was achieved, MTX was discontinued in patients who responded favorably to TCZ+MTX therapy, despite the prolonged disease duration and stage progression.

Background: Efficacy of combination therapy with methotrexate and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs is well established in the management of patients with rheumatoid arthritis; however, the optimal dose of methotrexate to administer with a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor remains unclear. We aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of adalimumab combined with reduced methotrexate dose compared with the maximum tolerated methotrexate dose in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate monotherapy., Methods: In this open-label, randomised controlled trial, we recruited methotrexate-naive patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a disease duration of less than 2 years across 24 secondary or tertiary care hospitals across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. At initiation, methotrexate was given orally and increased to the maximum tolerated dose by week 12. Patients who did not achieve remission on the basis of the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at week 24 were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive adalimumab (40 mg biweekly) combined with a continued maximum tolerated dose of methotrexate or adalimumab combined with a reduced dose of methotrexate. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate to adalimumab plus maximal-dose methotrexate based on SDAI remission at week 48, assessed in the modified full-analysis set with a pre-specified non-inferiority margin of -15%, based on a two-sided 90% CI. Adverse events were assessed in the safety analysis set. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03505008 and has been completed., Findings: From April 18, 2018, to June 2, 2020, from 323 patients screened, 300 were enrolled, and 291 patients were included in the full analysis set. The mean age was 57·7 years (SD 15·2), 217 (75%) were female, 74 (25%) were male, and all patients were of Asian ethnicity. The mean SDAI at study enrolment was 26·5 (SD 12·4). 52 patients discontinued the study before week 24 or at week 24 before randomisation. At week 24, 105 (36%) of 291 patients achieved remission and continued methotrexate monotherapy through week 48. 134 (46%) did not achieve remission at week 24 and were randomly assigned to receive adalimumab plus the maximum tolerated dose of methotrexate (n=68) or adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate (n=66). Remission at week 48 was achieved in 25 (38%) of 66 and 27 (44%) of 61 patients, respectively, with an adjusted risk difference of 6·4% (90% CI -7·0 to 19·8), which met the non-inferiority margin of -15%. Adverse events after week 24 tended to be more frequent in the maximum tolerated dose group than in the reduced-dose group (24 [35%] vs 13 [20%], p=0·054). Between week 24 and 48, there were 14 serious adverse events (6 in the methotrexate monotherapy group, 5 in the adalimumab plus maximal-dose methotrexate, and 3 in the adalimumab plus reduced-dose methotrexate group), and no deaths., Interpretation: The MIRACLE study showed that the efficacy of adalimumab combined with reduced methotrexate dose was not inferior to that with the maximum tolerated methotrexate dose, with a tendency to a better safety profile., Funding: Eisai., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests HTam has received speaker honoraria from AbbVie and Eisai. KI has received grants from Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Astellas Pharma, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Chugai Pharma, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. TM received grants, research support, or speaker fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Kirin, Pfizer, and UCB. KS has received grants, research support from Novartis, Astellas Pharma, AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Yuhan Corporation, and consulting fees from KD Bio. SH has received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Eisai, Otsuka, Sanofi, Shionogi, Chugai, Pfizer, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Eli Lilly, and UCB; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and UCB; paid instructor fees from AbbVie and Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma; and consulting fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eisai, Gilead Sciences, and Eli Lilly. SS has received grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, AbbVie, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Teijin, Pfizer, Ayumi Pharma, and Daiichi Sankyo. HY has received research grants from Asahi Kasei Pharma, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, and Taisho Pharma; speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Gilead Sciences, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, and Nippon Shinyaku. MK has received grants from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharma, and MBL; royalties from MBL; consulting fees from Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Mochida Pharmaceutical, and Kissei Pharmaceutical; speaker honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Nippon Shinyaku, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. TI has received payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and GlaxoSmithKline. HK has received a research grant from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Boehringer, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Taisho; speaker honoraria fees from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Boehringer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. TK has received grants or research support and speaker fees from AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Eisai, UCB, and Taisho. TTan, MM, and HM are shareholders and employees of Eisai. YS has received speaker honoraria from Eisai and Kowa Pharmaceuticals; and consulting fees from Mochida Pharmaceutical. TTak received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Ono Pharma; consulting fees from AbbVie, Chugai Pharma, Eli Lilly, and Gilead Sciences, and Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma; and payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, and Pfizer. YK has received grants from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Ayumi Pharma, Chugai Pharma, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Asahi Kasei Pharma; payment or honoraria from AbbVie, Asahi Kasei Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Asahi Kasei Pharma, and Novartis. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To assess the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of single-dose subcutaneous (SC) sarilumab or tocilizumab SC ± methotrexate (MTX) and to assess the pharmacodynamics (PD) of sarilumab SC or tocilizumab SC monotherapy in Japanese rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: TDU13402 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose Phase 1 study (NCT01850680). Twenty-four patients (6 per treatment group) received sarilumab 50, 100, or 200 mg plus MTX or placebo (2 per cohort) on Day (D) 1; PK and safety were assessed through D57. PDY14191 was a randomized, open-label, single-dose study (NCT02404558). Thirty patients (15 per arm) received sarilumab 150 mg or tocilizumab 162 mg on D1; PK, PD, and safety were assessed through D43., Results: TDU13402: mean serum sarilumab exposure increased in a greater than dose proportional manner from 50 to 200 mg dose with no clinically meaningful increase in treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). PDY14191: PK profiles of single-dose sarilumab 150 mg or tocilizumab 162 mg were similar; some numerical differences in PD profiles and TEAEs were observed. Neutrophil count decrease/neutropenia was the most frequently reported TEAE with sarilumab treatment in both studies., Conclusions: PK, PD, and safety profiles of single-dose sarilumab SC with/without MTX were consistent with results anticipated in Japanese patients with RA., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objectives: To determine prognostic factors for the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice., Methods: We evaluated 388 biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve Japanese patients with RA with moderate to high disease activity at study entry after being treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs. These patients were treated according to a treat-to-target (T2T) strategy for one year. The Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) and the HAQ-DI were assessed every three months. We also evaluated joint destruction using a modified total Sharp score at baseline and at one year. HAQ-DI progression was defined as the yearly progression of HAQ-DI >0.1. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the factors predicting HAQ-DI progression at one year., Results: HAQ-DI progression was observed in 18% of the patients. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the independent variables associated with HAQ-DI progression were: DAS28-ESR >5.1 at baseline (odds ratio [OR] 0.31, 95% con dence interval [CI] 0.13-0.74, p=0.0083); HAQ-DI score at baseline <0.5 (OR 2.27, 95% CI 1.22-4.26, p=0.0102); and achievement of low disease activity at 12 weeks (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.82, p=0.0112)., Conclusions: Our data suggest that maintaining clinical improvement according to T2T and initiating the treatment at an early stage are important for functional improvement after one year and that patients with low baseline HAQ scores have a higher risk of HAQ disability progression.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) monotherapy administered weekly (qw) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to TCZ-SC every other week (q2w). Methods: Patients who completed 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with either TCZ-SC q2w monotherapy or TCZ-SC qw monotherapy were switched to or continued to receive open-label treatment with TCZ-SC qw monotherapy for 40 weeks. Safety and efficacy were assessed. Subgroup analyses of Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) were performed at 12 weeks. Results: The incidence of adverse events was 464.4/100 patient-years (PY). The incidence of infection was 121.3/100 PY. The safety profile of TCZ-SC qw monotherapy was consistent with that of prior studies of TCZ. No additional safety concerns were observed. Improvement from baseline in DAS28-ESR was maintained at week 52 in patients who continued TCZ-SC qw and improved in patients who switched from TCZ-SC q2w to qw. At week 12, the efficacy of TCZ-SC qw monotherapy was greater than that of TCZ-SC q2w monotherapy irrespective of weight and BMI subgroups. Conclusion: The long-term weekly dosing of TCZ-SC monotherapy was well tolerated and efficacy was maintained over 52 weeks.

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) monotherapy every week (qw) versus every other week (q2w) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to TCZ-SC q2w., Methods: Adult patients in Japan with inadequate response to TCZ-SC q2w were randomized to either TCZ-SC 162 mg qw monotherapy or TCZ-SC 162 mg q2w monotherapy for 12 weeks (double-blind). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in adjusted Disease Activity Score 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) at week 12. Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics were assessed., Results: TCZ-SC qw was superior to TCZ-SC q2w for adjusted mean change in DAS28-ESR from baseline to week 12. The difference in the change in DAS28-ESR between TCZ-SC qw and q2w was -1.21 (95%CI: -2.13, -0.30, p = .0108). A higher proportion of patients receiving TCZ-SC qw achieved DAS28-ESR remission/low disease activity than TCZ-SC q2w. Adverse events were 71.4% and 66.7% for TCZ-SC qw and q2w, respectively; infection was the most common event with one fatal case with TCZ-SC qw., Conclusions: In patients with inadequate response to TCZ-SC q2w, shortening the dosing interval to qw improved efficacy with acceptable tolerability. Occurrence of infection for both TCZ q2w and qw is important and needs careful attention.

Objectives: To preliminarily evaluate the feasibility of maintenance therapy with reduced dose of intravenous abatacept (ABT) to 250 mg/body/month after achieving remission or low disease activity (LDA)., Patients and Methods: RA patients treated with ABT at 13 sites were enrolled in this prospective interventional pilot study during the period between March 2013 and March 2015. Inclusion criteria were (1) age at 20 years or older, (2) under treatment with monthly intravenous ABT at approved doses, (3) DAS28-CRP lower than 2.7 at least for 6 months, (4) agreed to join this trial with written informed consent and (5) body weight under 125 kg. Enrolled patients were maintained with intravenous monthly ABT at a reduced dose of 250 mg/body (MATADOR protocol). The primary end point was the proportion of the patients continued with MATADOR protocol at week 48. MATADOR protocol was discontinued upon disease flare or other reasons such as patients' request or severe adverse event (AE). Disease activities and structural changes were also evaluated., Results: Fifty-three patients fulfilled the entry criteria and were followed for 1-year. MATADOR protocol was continued for 1-year in 43 (81%) of the evaluated patients. Three patients experienced severe AEs. Mean DAS28-CRP and remission rate were 1.56 and 88% when ABT reduced and 1.80 and 81% at 1-year, respectively. Structural remission was achieved in 34 out of 42 evaluated patients., Conclusions: Reduced dose of intravenous ABT was proposed as a feasible choice for maintenance therapy for RA after achievement of remission/LDA, although further randomized trials would be awaited.

Objectives: To determine prognostic factors of clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieving remission or low disease activity (LDA) in clinical practice., Methods: Using data from a nationwide, multicenter, prospective study in Japan, we evaluated 198 biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naïve RA patients who were in remission or had LDA at study entry after being treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs). CRRP was defined as the yearly progression of modified total Sharp score (mTSS) >3.0 U. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to explore the factors to predict CRRP at 1 year. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to estimate the performance of relevant variables for predicting CRRP., Results: The mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) was 2.32 ± 0.58 at study entry. During the 1-year observation, remission or LDA persisted in 72% of the patients. CRRP was observed in 7.6% of the patients. The multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent variables to predict the development of CRRP were: anti-citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) positivity at baseline (OR = 15.2, 95%CI 2.64-299), time-integrated DAS28-ESR during the 1 year post-baseline (7.85-unit increase, OR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.03-3.45), and the mTSS at baseline (13-unit increase, OR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.06-1.42)., Conclusions: ACPA positivity was the strongest independent predictor of CRRP in patients with RA in remission or LDA. Physicians should recognize ACPA as a poor-prognosis factor regarding the radiographic outcome of RA, even among patients showing a clinically favorable response to DMARDs.

Aim: To assess the prevalence, clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of patients who developed ulcerative keratitis (UK) during the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in the modern biologic era., Method: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 589 patients with RA who visited our department between April 2003 and October 2014, and identified patients who developed UK. We also obtained data about clinical characteristics of RA and UK, complications, treatment, and both visual and life prognoses of these patients., Results: Among 589 patients with RA, eight patients (1.4%) were diagnosed with UK. The mean age at the onset of RA was 61.0 years, while the mean age at the onset of UK was 73.0 years. Most of the patients were seropositive and had established RA with a relatively low disease activity. Secondary Sjögren's syndrome was observed in two patients. Peripheral UK occurred as a complication of scleritis, while central UK was not associated with scleritis. Although the mean duration of follow-up was only 3.7 years, visual and life prognoses were both tolerable with therapy, including the use of topical and systemic corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, sometimes combined with biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and corneal transplantation., Conclusion: This retrospective study demonstrated that the prevalence of UK in patients with RA was 1.4%. Immediate combination therapy, including topical and systemic corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors, together with biologic DMARDs and corneal transplantation, was effective for treating RA patients who developed UK in the modern biologic era., (© 2015 Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.)

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and structural efficacy of tocilizumab (TCZ) during its long-term administration in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: In total, 693 patients with RA who started TCZ therapy were followed for 3 years. Clinical efficacy was evaluated by DAS28-ESR and Boolean remission rates in 544 patients. Joint damage was assessed by calculating the modified total Sharp score (mTSS) in 50 patients., Results: When the reason for discontinuation was limited to inadequate response or adverse events, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year continuation rates were 84.0%, 76.8%, and 72.2%, respectively. The mean DAS28-ESR was initially 5.1 and decreased to 2.5 at 6 months and to 2.2 at 36 months. The Boolean remission rate was initially 0.9% and increased to 21.7% at 6 months and to 32.2% at 36 months. The structural remission rates (ΔmTSS/year ≤ 0.5) were 68.8%, 78.6%, and 88.9% within the first, second, and third years, respectively. The structural remission rate at 3 years (ΔmTSS ≤ 1.5) was 66.0%, and earlier achievement of swollen joint count (SJC) of 1 or less resulted in better outcomes., Conclusions: TCZ was highly efficacious, and bone destruction was strongly prevented. SJC was an easy-to-use indicator of joint destruction.

To determine prognostic factors of clinically relevant radiographic progression (CRRP) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in clinical practice.We performed a multicenter prospective study in Japan of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)-naive RA patients with moderate to high disease activity treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) at study entry. We longitudinally observed 408 patients for 1 year and assessed disease activity every 3 months. CRRP was defined as yearly progression of modified total Sharp score (mTSS) > 3.0 U. We also divided the cohort into 2 groups based on disease duration (<3 vs ≥3 years) and performed a subgroup analysis.CRRP was found in 10.3% of the patients. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent variables to predict the development of CRRP were: CRP at baseline (0.30 mg/dL increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.11), time-integrated Disease Activity Score in 28 joints-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) during the 1 year postbaseline (12.4-unit increase, 95%CI 1.17-2.59), RA typical erosion at baseline (95%CI 1.56-21.1), and the introduction of bDMARDs (95%CI 0.06-0.38). The subgroup analysis revealed that time-integrated DAS28-ESR is not a predictor whereas the introduction of bDMARDs is a significant protective factor for CRRP in RA patients with disease duration <3 years.We identified factors that could be used to predict the development of CRRP in RA patients treated with DMARDs. These variables appear to be different based on the RA patients' disease durations., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Objective: To evaluate the longterm safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab (TCZ-SC) as monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Of 346 patients who received 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with either TCZ-SC monotherapy, 162 mg every 2 weeks (q2w); or intravenous TCZ (TCZ-IV) monotherapy, 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks; 319 patients continued to receive TCZ-SC q2w in the 84-week open-label extension (OLE) of the MUSASHI study (JAPICCTI-101117). Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were evaluated for all patients treated with TCZ during 108 weeks., Results: The proportions of patients who achieved American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 responses, low disease activity [28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ≤ 3.2], or remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at Week 24 were maintained until Week 108. The incidences of adverse events and serious adverse events were 498.3 and 16.9 per 100 patient-years (PY), respectively. The overall safety of TCZ-SC monotherapy was similar to that of TCZ-IV monotherapy. Rates of injection site reactions (ISR) through 108 weeks remained similar to rates through 24 weeks. ISR were mild and did not cause any patient withdrawals. No serious hypersensitivity events (including anaphylactic reactions) occurred. Anti-TCZ antibodies were present in 2.1% of patients treated with TCZ-SC monotherapy., Conclusion: TCZ-SC monotherapy maintained a favorable safety profile and consistent efficacy throughout the 108-week study. Like TCZ-IV, TCZ-SC could provide an additional treatment option for patients with RA.

Objectives: To investigate the duration of remission and low disease activity (LDA) after cessation of tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients who showed remission or LDA as assessed by DAS28 in response to preceding TCZ monotherapy, and to explore the factors contributing to prolonged efficacy duration., Methods: Disease activity was monitored for 56 weeks. The rate of continued efficacy was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves., Results: A total of 187 patients were eligible. At baseline of this study, median disease duration was 7.8 years, preceding TCZ treatment period was 4.0 years and DAS28 was 1.5. The rate of continued LDA at 52 weeks was 13.4 % according to the Kaplan-Meier estimate. 19 patients (10 %) were completely drug-free and 17 patients (9.1 %) fulfilled DAS28 remission at 52 weeks. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified low serum IL-6 and normalisation of MMP-3 levels at cessation of TCZ as independent predictive markers for longer duration of LDA. In patients with low serum IL-6 (<12.9 pg/mL) and normal MMP-3 levels, the rate of continued LDA reached 38.0 % at 52 weeks., Conclusions: TCZ monotherapy may induce biologics-free remission or LDA without concomitant use of synthetic DMARDs. Serum levels of IL-6 and MMP-3 are useful markers for identifying patients who could discontinue TCZ without acute disease flare.

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retreatment with tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients who had participated in the DREAM study (Drug free remission/low disease activity after cessation of tocilizumab [Actemar] monotherapy study) and had experienced loss of efficacy., Methods: Patients were retreated with TCZ or other disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Disease activity was measured using the 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) for 12 weeks., Results: A total of 164 eligible patients, including 161 who experienced loss of efficacy within 52 weeks of the DREAM study, resumed treatment: 157 with TCZ and 7 with DMARDs and/or infliximab. Of TCZ-treated patients, 88.5 % (139 patients) achieved DAS28 <2.6 within 12 weeks, whereas among patients treated with DMARDs and/or infliximab only 14.3 % (1 patient) achieved DAS28 <2.6. Adverse events were observed in 70 TCZ-treated patients (44.0 %), but no serious infusion reactions were observed., Conclusions: Retreatment with TCZ was well-tolerated and effective in patients who had responded to the preceding TCZ monotherapy but had experienced loss of efficacy after cessation of TCZ.

Objective. To re-evaluate the roles of HLA-DRB1 alleles in susceptibility to SLE and RA and their effects on autoantibody status in large-scale Japanese cohorts. Methods. A total of 656 SLE, 2410 RA and 911 control subjects, who were all Japanese, were genotyped for HLA-DRB1 alleles using sequence-specific oligonucleotide probes. The association of alleles with disease susceptibility was tested by logistic regression analysis and by the relative predispositional effect method. The association with autoantibody status was examined by the standard χ(2) test. Results. HLA-DRB1*15:01, *09:01, *08:02 and *04:01 were significantly associated with SLE susceptibility, while shared epitope (SE) alleles and DRB1*09:01 were associated with RA susceptibility. The compound heterozygote of DRB1*09:01/*15:01 conferred an increased risk for SLE compared with the homozygotes for DRB1*09:01 and *15:01 and was associated with earlier onset of disease, whereas the compound effect of DRB1-SE/*09:01 was not clear in RA. DRB1*09:01 was significantly associated with the appearance of anti-Sm antibody in SLE as well as ACPA in RA, while protectively associated with anti-dsDNA antibody in SLE. No significant interaction was observed between DRB1*09:01 and smoking status for the appearance of ACPA, unlike that observed in SE alleles in RA. Conclusion. We identified HLA-DRB1 alleles associated with SLE and RA in a Japanese population and demonstrated a shared susceptibility of DRB1*09:01 between the diseases as well as its effect on autoantibody production.

To seek the cutoff value of the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR) that is necessary to achieve remission under the new Boolean-based criteria, we analyzed the data for 285 patients with rheumatoid arthritis registered between May 2008 and November 2009 by the Michinoku Tocilizumab Study Group and observed for 1 year after receiving tocilizumab (TCZ) in real clinical practice. Remission rates under the DAS28-ESR criteria and the Boolean criteria were assessed every 6 months after the first TCZ dose. The DAS28-ESR cutoff value necessary to achieve remission under the new criteria was analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Data were analyzed using last observation carried forward. After 12 months of TCZ use, remission was achieved in 164 patients (57.5 %) by DAS28-ESR and 71 patients (24.9 %) under the new criteria for clinical trials. CRP levels scarcely affected remission rates, and the difference between remission rates defined by DAS28-ESR and by the new criteria was mainly due to patient global assessment (PGA). Improvement of PGA was inversely related to disease duration. ROC analysis revealed that the DAS28-ESR cutoff value necessary to predict remission under the new criteria for clinical trials was 1.54, with a sensitivity of 88.7 %, specificity of 85.5 %, positive predictive value of 67.0 %, and negative predictive value of 95.8 %. A DAS28-ESR cutoff value of 1.54 may be reasonable to predict achievement of remission under the new Boolean-based criteria for clinical trials in patients receiving TCZ.

Autoantibodies against integral membrane proteins are usually pathogenic. Although anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) are considered to be critical, especially for vascular lesions in collagen diseases, most molecules identified as autoantigens for AECAs are localized within the cell and not expressed on the cell surface. For identification of autoantigens, proteomics and expression library analyses have been performed for many years with some success. To specifically target cell-surface molecules in identification of autoantigens, we constructed a serological identification system for autoantigens using a retroviral vector and flow cytometry (SARF). Here, we present an overview of recent research in AECAs and their target molecules and discuss the principle and the application of SARF. Using SARF, we successfully identified three different membrane proteins: fibronectin leucine-rich transmembrane protein 2 (FLRT2) from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, and Pk (Gb3/CD77) from an SLE patient with hemolytic anemia, as targets for AECAs. SARF is useful for specific identification of autoantigens expressed on the cell surface, and identification of such interactions of the cell-surface autoantigens and pathogenic autoantibodies may enable the development of more specific intervention strategies in autoimmune diseases.

The previous clinical studies have demonstrated tocilizumab monotherapy to be highly effective in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objectives of the present article are to report the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients with active RA in real clinical practice. In total, 61 patients with RA were treated with tocilizumab. Any comorbidities they had, especially infections, were treated thoroughly before they were given the drug. We provided guidance on infection control and prevention. Mean age of the patients was 60.9 +/- 12.4 years, and their mean disease duration 10.9 +/- 9.2 years. The patients remained on steroids, methotrexate, and tacrolimus as before, but were taken off any other drugs they had been using prior to the treatment. Mean of the 28-joint disease activity score using erythrocyte sedimentation rate was 4.75 +/- 1.15 initially and fell to 2.21 +/- 0.97 after two doses (n = 50). After four doses, the remission rate was 83.8% (31/37). All patients responded well to the therapy and there was no decrease in the efficacy of tocilizumab during the treatment. Even in the real clinical setting, treatment with tocilizumab can rapidly induce remission in RA in a high proportion of patients and is generally safe and well tolerated. Tocilizumab would seem to be promising as a first-line choice for the treatment of RA.