Search

Objectives: Glucocorticoids (GC) are important in the treatment of autoinflammatory disorders. Oral prednisolone ≤5 mg/day can be effective, but such doses are at or even below physiological daily endogenous GC production. We hypothesised that their immunosuppressive effect might be explained by high hepatic bioavailability of oral GC, exposing the liver to supraphysiological GC via the portal circulation. We tested this by comparing the effect of oral versus subcutaneous low-dose prednisolone, on erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)., Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis or psoriatic arthritis, elevated ESR (≥30 mm/h) and no current or recent GC therapy were eligible. In a pilot study (n=5), 5 mg/day oral prednisolone decreased ESR significantly, suggesting a sample size of 10 patients for a randomised, non-blinded crossover trial. Patients received 5 mg/day prednisolone for 2 periods of 4 days: one treatment period orally and one subcutaneously with a 10-day washout period between treatments. ESR was measured before (day 1 and 15) and after (day 5 and 19) each treatment course., Results: 10 patients were included. ESR decreased after both oral and subcutaneous prednisolone, by -5.6 (20.9) and -5.8 (3.0) mm/h, respectively (p=0.98). The treatment order had no effect on the outcome., Conclusions: . Short-term oral low-dose GC therapy is not more effective than parental GC in decreasing ESR, arguing against therapeutic high hepatic bioavailability effects. More likely, systemic concentration peaks following administration explain why oral physiological steroid doses are clinically effective.

Objective: To assess the effect of 4 years of anti-inflammatory therapy on markers of subclinical vascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis patients., Methods: Carotid intima media thickness (IMT), augmentation index (AIx@75) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were performed repeatedly in 61 RA patients (30 early RA starting with csDMARDs and 31 established RA starting with adalimumab) for 4 years. These markers were also measured in 29 controls with osteoarthritis at baseline (BL)., Results: IMT and AIx@75 at BL were higher in RA compared to OA, while PWV was higher in OA. In RA patients, AIx@75 and PWV decreased in the first 6 months after starting anti-inflammatory therapy. At 48 M, the level of AIx@75 remained lower than before therapy, while PWV at 48 M was comparable to BL (AIx@75: BL 28% (95% confidence interval 25-30%), 6 M 23% (20-26%), 48 M 25% (22-28%); PWV: BL 8.5 (7.8-9.2), 6 M 8.0 (7.1-8.9), 48 M 8.6 (7.6-9.6) m/s). IMT remained stable. There was an effect of disease activity (longitudinally, adjusted for changes over time) on IMT, AIx@75 and PWV., Conclusion: This study suggests modest beneficial changes in some surrogate markers of subclinical vascular disease after anti-inflammatory therapy. These changes were associated with improvement in disease activity markers. Whether or not these beneficial changes ultimately predict a reduction in clinicalcardiovascular endpoints remains to be established in prospective studies., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objective: RA is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Ongoing systemic inflammation is presumed to accelerate atherosclerosis by increasing inflammation in the arterial wall. However, evidence supporting this hypothesis is limited. We aimed to investigate arterial wall inflammation in RA vs OA, and its association with markers of inflammation and CV risk factors., Methods: 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET combined with CT (18F-FDG-PET/CT) was performed in RA (n = 61) and OA (n = 28) to investigate inflammatory activity in the wall of large arteries. Secondary analyses were performed in patients with early untreated RA (n = 30), and established RA, active under DMARD treatment (n = 31) vs OA., Results: Patients with RA had significantly higher 18F-FDG uptake in the wall of the carotid arteries (beta 0.27, 95%CI 0.11-0.44, P <0.01) and the aorta (beta 0.47, 95%CI 0.17-0.76, P <0.01) when compared with OA, which persisted after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors. Patients with early RA had the highest 18F-FDG uptake, followed by patients with established RA and OA respectively. Higher ESR and DAS of 28 joints values were associated with higher 18F-FDG uptake in all arterial segments., Conclusion: Patients with RA have increased 18F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall compared with patients with OA, as a possible marker of early atherosclerosis. Furthermore, a higher level of clinical disease activity and circulating inflammatory markers was associated with higher arterial 18F-FDG uptake, which may support a role of arterial wall inflammation in the pathogenesis of vascular complications in patients with RA., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Systemic autoimmune diseases are characterized by their heterogenic clinical presentations and often poorly understood pathogenesis. As such, the diagnosis process may be complex and the final diagnosis is made by an expert, after considering a differential diagnosis. Classification criteria are developed for research purposes to select homogenous populations of already diagnosed patients. In clinical practice, these classification criteria are sometimes misused as diagnostic criteria. We describe three patient histories. Two patients met the classification criteria of several separate diseases, emphasizing the amount of overlap between different sets of criteria and the necessity of making a diagnosis before using classification criteria. A third patient was diagnosed with systemic sclerosis and later developed rheumatoid arthritis; a diagnosis that could have been overlooked if classification criteria were used diagnostically. We describe the correct use of classification criteria in systemic autoimmune diseases and discuss what the diagnostic process is supposed to entail.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), partly due to an increased prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, but also due to chronic systemic inflammation inducing atherosclerotic changes of the arterial wall. The aim of this study was to determine whether anti-inflammatory therapy for the treatment of RA has favorable effects on arterial wall inflammation in RA patients., Methods: Arterial wall inflammation before and after 6 months of anti-inflammatory treatment was assessed in 49 early and established RA patients using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT). Arterial 18F-FDG uptake was quantified as maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in the thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, carotid, iliac and femoral arteries. Early RA patients (n = 26) were treated with conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs with or without corticosteroids, whereas established RA patients (n = 23) were treated with adalimumab., Results: In RA patients, overall SUVmax was over time reduced by 4% (difference -0.06, 95%CI -0.12 to -0.01, p = 0.02), with largest reductions in carotid (-8%, p = 0.001) and femoral arteries (-7%, p = 0.005). There was no difference in arterial wall inflammation change between early and established RA patients (SUVmax difference 0.003, 95%CI -0.11 to 0.12, p = 0.95). Change in arterial wall inflammation significantly correlated with change in serological inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein)., Conclusion: Arterial wall inflammation in RA patients is reduced by anti-inflammatory treatment and this reduction correlates with reductions of serological inflammatory markers. These results suggest that anti-inflammatory treatment of RA has favorable effects on the risk of cardiovascular events in RA patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest A.B. Blanken: None, R. Agca: None, A.M. van Sijl: None, A.E. Voskuyl: None, R. Boellaard: None, Y.M. Smulders: None, C.J. van der Laken: None, M.T. Nurmohamed: None., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Given the link between systemic inflammation, body composition and insulin resistance (IR), anti-inflammatory therapy may improve IR and body composition in inflammatory joint diseases. This study assesses the IR and beta cell function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with active disease compared to osteoarthritis (OA) patients and investigates the effect of anti-TNF treatment on IR, beta cell function and body composition in RA. 28 Consecutive RA patients starting anti-TNF treatment (adalimumab), and 28 age, and sex-matched patients with OA were followed for 6 months. Exclusion criteria were use of statins, corticosteroids, and cardiovascular or endocrine co-morbidity. Pancreatic beta cell function and IR, using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA2), and body composition, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were measured at baseline and 6 months. At baseline, IR [1.5 (1.1-1.8) vs. 0.7 (0.6-0.9), 100/%S] and beta cell function (133% vs. 102%) were significantly (p < 0.05) higher in RA patients with active disease as compared to OA patients. After 6 months of anti-TNF treatment, IR [1.5 (1.1-1.8) to 1.4 (1.1-1.7), p = 0.17] slightly improved and beta cell function [133% (115-151) to 118% (109-130), p <0.05] significantly improved. Improvement in IR and beta cell function was most pronounced in RA patients with highest decrease in CRP and ESR. Our observations indicate that IR and increased beta cell function are more common in RA patients with active disease. Anti-TNF reduced IR and beta cell function especially in RA patients with highest decrease in systemic inflammation and this effect was not explained by changes in body composition.

Objective: Cardiovascular (CV) disease (CVD) risk is increased in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, longterm followup studies investigating this risk are scarce., Methods: The CARRÉ (CARdiovascular research and RhEumatoid arthritis) study is a prospective cohort study investigating CVD and its risk factors in 353 patients with longstanding RA. CV endpoints were assessed at baseline and 3, 10, and 15 years after the start of the study and are compared to a reference cohort (n = 2540), including a large number of patients with type 2 diabetes (DM)., Results: Ninety-five patients with RA developed a CV event over 2973 person-years, resulting in an incidence rate of 3.20 per 100 person-years. Two hundred fifty-seven CV events were reported in the reference cohort during 18,874 person-years, resulting in an incidence rate of 1.36 per 100 person-years. Age- and sex-adjusted HR for CV events were increased for RA (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.57-2.72, p < 0.01) and DM (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.02-2.22, p = 0.04) compared to the nondiabetic participants. HR was still increased in RA (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.32-2.50, p < 0.01) after additional adjustment for CV risk factors. Patients with both RA and DM or insulin resistance had the highest HR for developing CVD (2.21, 95% CI 1.01-4.80, p = 0.046 and 2.67, 95% CI 1.30-5.46, p < 0.01, respectively)., Conclusion: The incidence rate of CV events in established RA was more than double that of the general population. Patients with RA have an even higher risk of CVD than patients with DM. This risk remained after adjustment for traditional CV risk factors, suggesting that systemic inflammation is an independent contributor to CV risk.

Objective : In 2011, we started to offer cardiovascular (CV) risk screening to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with a high CV risk. After 1 year, we assessed whether patients labelled as high CV risk had started preventive treatment when indicated, and whether the CV risk score had changed. Methods : CV risk screening was performed in both a large outpatient rheumatology clinic and a general hospital in the Netherlands, and the general practitioner or the internist was informed about the results of the CV screening, including specific advice on the initiation or adjustment of cardiopreventive drugs. National guidelines were used to assess how many patients were eligible for preventive treatment. After 1 year, CV risk, lifestyle, and treatment were re-evaluated. Patients with a history of CV disease at baseline or who experienced a CV event during follow-up were excluded from the analyses. Results : A high 10 year CV risk (> 20%) was present in 58%, and 55% had an indication for anti-hypertensives, statins, or both. At follow-up, cardiopreventive drug treatment had been started or adjusted in only one-third of patients with an indication for treatment. After screening, 42% of patients reported having changed their lifestyle, through more exercise (24%), diet adaption (20%), and weight loss (11%). Conclusion : Despite clear guidelines to improve CV risk, the results of a programme comprising active screening, targeted advice, and referral to the general practitioner or internist prove that primary prevention remains a major challenge in high-risk RA patients.

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints affecting 1% of the world population. It has major impact on patients through disability and associated comorbidities. Current treatment strategies have considerably improved the prognosis, but recent innovations (especially biologic drugs and the new class of so-called "JAK/STAT inhibitors") have important safety issues and are very costly. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are highly effective in RA, and could reduce the need for expensive treatment with biologic agents. However, despite more than 65 years of clinical experience, there is a lack of studies large enough to adequately document the benefit/harm balance. The result is inappropriate treatment strategies, i.e. both under-use and over-use of GCs, and consequently suboptimal treatment of RA., Methods: The GLORIA study is a pragmatic multicentre, 2-year, randomised, double-blind, clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of a daily dose of 5 mg prednisolone or matching placebo added to standard of care in elderly patients with RA. Eligible participants are diagnosed with RA, have inadequate disease control (disease activity score, DAS28 ≥ 2.6), and are ≥ 65 years. The primary outcome measures are the time-averaged mean value of the DAS28 and the occurrence of serious adverse events or adverse events of special interest. During the trial, change in antirheumatic therapy is permitted as clinically indicated, except for GCs. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility are secondary outcomes. The main challenge is the interpretation of the trial result with two primary endpoints and the pragmatic trial design that allows co-interventions. Another challenge is the definition of safety and the relative lack of power to detect differences between treatment groups. We have chosen to define safety as the number of patients experiencing at least one serious adverse event. We also specify a decision tree to guide our conclusion on the balance of benefit and harm, and our methodology to combat potential confounding caused by co-interventions., Discussion: Pragmatic trials minimise impact on daily practice and maximise clinical relevance of the results, but analysis and interpretation of the results is challenging. We expect that the results of this trial are of importance for all rheumatologists who treat elderly patients with RA., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02585258 . Registered on 20 October 2015.

Objective: To assess the 10-year cardiovascular (CV) risk score and to identify treatment and undertreatment of CV risk factors in patients with established RA., Methods: Demographics, CV risk factors and prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) were assessed by questionnaire. To calculate the 10-year CV risk score according to the Dutch CV risk management guideline, systolic blood pressure was measured and cholesterol levels were determined from fasting blood samples. Patients were categorized into four groups: indication for treatment but not treated; inadequately treated, so not meeting goals (systolic blood pressure ⩽140 mmHg and/or low-density lipoprotein ⩽2.5 mmol/l); adequately treated; or no treatment necessary., Results: A total of 720 consecutive RA patients were included, 375 from Reade and 345 from the Antonius Hospital. The mean age of patients was 59 years (s.d. 12) and 73% were female. Seventeen per cent of the patients had a low 10-year CV risk (<10%), 21% had an intermediate risk (10-19%), 53% a high risk (⩾20%) and 9% had CVD. In total, 69% had an indication for preventive treatment (cholesterol-lowering or antihypertensive drugs). Of those, 42% received inadequate treatment and 40% received no treatment at all., Conclusion: Optimal CV risk management remains a major challenge and better awareness and management are urgently needed to reduce the high risk of CVD in the RA population., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Background: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have double the risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, largely independently of traditional CV risk factors. Renal dysfunction is associated with CV morbidity and mortality in the general population, but data on this association in RA are lacking., Objective: To investigate the association between renal function and CV events in RA., Methods: The CARRÉ Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study of Dutch patients with RA, which records CV events. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula. Logistic regression determined the association between estimated GFR and the occurrence of CV events., Results: 353 patients were followed for 3 years, and 23 (7%) had a CV event. Patients who had an event had a significantly lower baseline GFR than those who did not (59 vs 79 ml/min, p=0.001). This association remained significant after adjustment for traditional risk factors: in this analysis, a decrease in GFR of 5 ml/min was associated with a 30% (95% CI 7% to 59%) increase in the occurrence of CV events. During follow-up, an unfavourable change in GFR was noted in patients who later had a CV event compared with those who did not., Conclusion: These data confirm that, in RA, renal dysfunction is associated with a higher risk of CV disease independently of traditional CV risk factors.

There is abundant evidence that rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic inflammatory disorder, is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) disease. While there may be several mechanisms contributing to a higher CV risk in RA patients, inflammation is considered to be the main cause explaining the excess CV burden. Inflammatory processes appear pivotal to the atherothrombotic process and are linked to endothelial dysfunction, fatty streak initiation and progression, deterioration of fatty streaks into (unstable) plaques, and plaque rupture. Moreover, systemic inflammation, through tumor necrosis factor (TNF) or related cytokines, appears to accelerate atherothrombosis either directly or via effects on conventional and novel CV risk factors, such as lipids and lipoproteins, blood pressure, haemostatic factors, and insulin resistance. New and highly specific therapeutic agents (TNF inhibitors) may significantly lower CV risk in RA. This review summarizes the evidence base supporting the notion that TNF inhibitors confer benefit CV disease risk in RA.

Objectives: Changes in the lipid profile have been described in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) following therapy with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha blocking agents. However, thus far, results have been inconsistent. Therefore, we investigated changes in lipid levels after TNF-alpha blocking therapy using meta-analysis of published data., Methods: The literature was searched to identify studies assessing changes in total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, atherogenic index (ie, TC/HDLc ratio), and apolipoprotein levels in response to TNF-alpha blocking therapy. Weighted mean levels of lipids at different time points and subsequent changes in these lipid levels between these time points were calculated with multivariate linear mixed models., Results: Data were available on TC in 15 studies encompassing 766 RA patients and on HDLc in 14 studies encompassing 736 RA patients. TC increased significantly (maximum increase of 10%) and HDLc increased significantly in the first 2 to 6 weeks of therapy (maximum increase of 7%), after which it remained more or less stable. The atherogenic index did not significantly change over time. There was too limited information to evaluate changes in other lipids and apolipoproteins., Conclusions: TNF-alpha blocking therapy has a modest effect on TC and HDLc levels in RA patients with no significant overall effect on the atherogenic index. Whether TNF-alpha blocking effects on qualitative lipid changes (structure and function) are more relevant to their presumed vascular benefits requires further study., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Carotid intima media thickness (cIMT) is frequently used to identify populations at elevated cardiovascular risk. A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate cIMT difference between RA and controls., Methods: The literature was screened to identify all available studies comparing cIMT in RA patients and controls. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the overall mean cIMT difference between both groups. Meta-regression was performed to assess the influence of age and the degree of comparability regarding established cardiovascular risk factors on cIMT difference. Potential publication bias was examined by a funnel plot and Egger test., Results: From 22 studies, cIMT data were available from 1384 RA patients and 1147 controls. In 17 of the studies, RA patients had a statistically significantly greater cIMT. The overall mean cIMT difference was 0.09 mm (95%CI: 0.07-0.11 mm). Heterogeneity was observed (I(2) 72.5%, P < 0.001). A likely source of heterogeneity was the difference in cardiovascular risk factors between RA patients and controls at baseline, but not age. The funnel plot did not show a skewed or asymmetrical shape, which was supported by the Egger's test (P = 0.87)., Conclusions: Our observations support the current evidence base for an increased cardiovascular burden in RA and support the use of cIMT in observational studies in RA patients. The next step is to determine its utility as a surrogate cardiovascular risk marker in RA in prospective studies., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is abundant evidence that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are at elevated cardiovascular (CV) risk. The contribution of lipids in general is well recognised, but is as yet unclear in inflammatory diseases such as RA in part because inflammation appears inversely associated with lipid levels in RA., Methods: The CARRE study is a cohort study of 353 randomly selected RA outpatients followed since their enrollment in 2001-2002. We used data from this cohort to (i) evaluate the relationship at baseline between lipid levels [total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and the TC:HDLc ratio] and inflammation [by means of C-reactive protein (CRP)]; and (ii) determine the association of baseline TC and TC:HDLc ratio with incident (fatal and non-fatal) CV events., Results: C-reactive protein correlated negatively with TC (r = -0.184, p = 0.002), more so with HDLc (r = -0.327, p = 0.001) and therefore positively with TC:HDLc ratio (r = 0.204, p = 0.001). These associations were most evident when CRP exceeded 10 mg/l. Furthermore, the TC:HDLc ratio, but not TC, was positively related to event risk, again most marked in those with elevated CRP., Conclusion: Our observations support use of TC:HDLc ratio rather than TC alone in assessing cardiovascular risk in RA patients, especially in those with high inflammatory activity.

Objectives: To develop evidence-based EULAR recommendations for cardiovascular (CV) risk management in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)., Methods: A multidisciplinary expert committee was convened as a task force of the EULAR Standing Committee for Clinical Affairs (ESCCA), comprising 18 members including rheumatologists, cardiologists, internists and epidemiologists, representing nine European countries. Problem areas and related keywords for systematic literature research were identified. A systematic literature research was performed using MedLine, Embase and the Cochrane library through to May 2008. Based on this literature review and in accordance with the EULAR's "standardised operating procedures", the multidisciplinary steering committee formulated evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for CV risk screening and management in patients with inflammatory arthritis., Results: Annual CV risk assessment using national guidelines is recommended for all patients with RA and should be considered for all patients with AS and PsA. Any CV risk factors identified should be managed according to local guidelines. If no local guidelines are available, CV risk management should be carried out according to the SCORE function. In addition to appropriate CV risk management, aggressive suppression of the inflammatory process is recommended to further lower the CV risk., Conclusions: Ten recommendations were made for CV risk management in patients with RA, AS and PsA. The strength of the recommendations differed between RA on the one hand, and AS and PsA, on the other, as evidence for an increased CV risk is most compelling for RA.

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), but longitudinal observations are limited and the precise magnitude is unknown. We prospectively assessed the incidence of CVD in patients with RA compared with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and the general population., Methods: The 3-year incidence rate of CVD was determined in a prospective cohort (the Cardiovascular Research and Rheumatoid Arthritis Study) of 353 outpatients with RA, and was compared with that in 1,852 population-based cohort study participants (155 had type 2 DM). We investigated fatal and nonfatal CVD (according to International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision criteria) and used Cox proportional hazards models to assess the incidence of CVD in RA, type 2 DM, and the general population., Results: The 3-year incidence of CVD was 9.0% in patients with RA and 4.3% in the general population, corresponding with an incidence rate of 3.30 per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.08-4.25) and 1.51 per 100 person-years (95% CI 1.18-1.84), respectively. Compared with the general population, the age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for RA was 1.94 (95% CI 1.24-3.05, P = 0.004). Neither exclusion of patients with prior CVD at baseline nor adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors significantly influenced this. Compared with the nondiabetic population, nondiabetic patients with RA and those with type 2 DM had comparable HRs, 2.16 (95% CI 1.28-3.63, P = 0.004) and 2.04 (95% CI 1.12-3.67, P = 0.019), respectively., Conclusion: The risk of CVD in RA was significantly elevated compared with the general population, and comparable with the magnitude of risk in type 2 DM.

Objectives: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have an increased cardiovascular risk, but the magnitude of this risk is not known precisely. A study was undertaken to investigate the associations between RA and type 2 diabetes (DM2), a well-established cardiovascular risk factor, on the one hand, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) on the other., Methods: The prevalence of CVD (coronary, cerebral and peripheral arterial disease) was determined in 353 randomly selected outpatients with RA (diagnosed between 1989 and 2001, aged 50-75 years; the CARRE study) and in participants of a population-based cohort study on diabetes and CVD (the Hoorn study). Patients with RA with normal fasting glucose levels from the CARRE study (RA, n = 294) were compared with individuals from the Hoorn study with normal glucose metabolism (non-diabetic, n = 258) and individuals with DM2 (DM2, n = 194)., Results: The prevalence of CVD was 5.0% (95% CI 2.3% to 7.7%) in the non-diabetic group, 12.4% (95% CI 7.5% to 17.3%) in the DM2 group and 12.9% (95% CI 8.8% to 17.0%) in those with RA. With non-diabetic individuals as the reference category, the age- and gender-adjusted prevalence odds ratio (OR) for CVD was 2.3 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.7) for individuals with DM2 and 3.1 (95% CI 1.6 to 6.1) for those with RA. There was an attenuation of the prevalences after adjustment for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (OR 2.0 (95% CI 0.9 to 4.5) and 2.7 (95% CI 1.2 to 5.9), respectively)., Conclusions: The prevalence of CVD in RA is increased to an extent that is at least comparable to that of DM2. This should have implications for primary cardiovascular prevention strategies in RA.