Search

Objectives: To analyse in routine practice the efficacy of targeted therapies on joint involvement of patients with rheumatoid arthritis/systemic sclerosis (RA/SSc) overlap syndrome., Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of medical records of two academic centres over a 10-year period. Joint response to targeted therapies was measured according to EULAR criteria based on Disease Activity Score (DAS)-28. In addition, changes in CRP level and glucocorticoid consumption were recorded., Results: Nineteen patients were included. Methotrexate (n=11) and hydroxychloroquine (n=4) were the most used first-line treatments. Targeted therapies were frequently used (n=14). Tocilizumab was the most selected therapy (n=8), then rituximab (n=5), abatacept and anti-tumour necrosis factor (n=4). Twenty-one treatment sequences were assessed, including 18 with EULAR response criteria. Responses were "good" or "moderate" in 100% (4/4) of patients treated with abatacept, 80% (4/5) with rituximab, 40% (2/5) with tocilizumab, and 25% (1/4) with anti-TNF. T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies (abatacept, rituximab) resulted more frequently in a "good" or "moderate" response compared to cytokine inhibitors (tocilizumab, etanercept, infliximab) with a significant decrease in DAS-28 at 6 months (-1.75; p=0.016) and a trend to a lower consumption of glucocorticoids., Conclusions: In patients with RA/SSc overlap syndrome refractory to conventional synthetic-DMARDs, T and B lymphocyte-targeted therapies seem to be a promising therapeutic option to control joint activity.

Objectives: To investigate whether the efficacy and safety data from drug-registration trials can be extrapolated to real-life RA patients receiving RTX., Methods: The 'AutoImmunity and Rituximab' (AIR-PR) registry is a French multicentre, prospective cohort of RA patients treated with RTX in a real-life setting. We compared treatment responses at 12 months and serious adverse events (AEs) between eligible and non-eligible patients, by retrieving the eligibility criteria of the three rituximab-registration trials. We determined critical eligibility criteria and modelled the benefit-risk ratio according to the number of fulfilled critical eligibility criteria., Results: Among 1984 RA patients, only 9-12% fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Non-eligible patients had fewer EULAR responses at 12 months (40.3% vs 46.9%, P = 0.044). Critical inclusion criteria included swollen joints count ≥4, tender joints count ≥4, CRP ≥15 mg/l and RF positivity. Critical exclusion criteria were age >80 years, RA-associated systemic diseases, ACR functional class IV, DMARD other than MTX and prednisone >10 mg/day. Only 20.8% fulfilled those critical eligibility criteria. During the first year, serious AEs occurred for 182 (9.2%) patients (70.3% serious infections) and patients with ≥1 critical exclusion criterion were at higher risk (hazard ratio 3.03; 95% CI 2.25-4.06; for ≥3 criteria vs 0). The incremental risk-benefit ratio decreased with the number of unmet critical inclusion criteria and of fulfilled exclusion criteria., Conclusion: Few real-life RA patients were eligible for the drug-registration trials. Non-eligible patients had lower chance of response, and higher risk of serious AEs. Efficacy and safety data obtained from those trials may not be generalizable to RA patients receiving RTX in real-world clinical practice., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Background: To compare the 10-year structural and functional prognosis between patients in sustained remission versus patients in sustained low disease activity (LDA) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: We included 256 patients from the ESPOIR cohort who fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA and who were in sustained remission using the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score (n = 48), in sustained LDA (n = 139) or in sustained moderate to high disease activity (MDA or HDA, n = 69) over 10 years. The mTSSs progression over 10 years and the 10-year HAQ-DI scores were compared between the 3 groups. A longitudinal latent process mixed model was used to assess the independent effect of SDAI status over time on 10-year mTSS progression and HAQ-DI at 10 years., Results: Patients in sustained remission group were younger, had lower baseline HAQ-DI and mTSS scores and were less exposed to glucocorticoids, methotrexate or biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs over 10 years. Patients in sustained remission had lower 10-year structural progression (variation of mTSS in the remission group: 4.06 (± 4.75) versus 14.59 (± 19.76) in the LDA group and 21.04 (± 24.08), p < 0.001 in the MDA or HDA groups) and lower 10-year HAQ-DI scores (10-year HAQ-DI in the remission group: 0.14 (± 0.33) versus 0.53 (± 0.49) in the LDA group and 1.20 (± 0.62) in the MDA or HDA groups, p < 0.001). The incidence of serious adverse events over 10 years was low, about 3.34/100 patient years, without any difference between the three groups., Conclusion: RA patients in sustained SDAI remission have better long-term structural and functional outcomes in comparison to patients in sustained LDA., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To determine a potential window of opportunity for retreatment with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from a multicentre longitudinal real-life study based on tight monitoring with ultrasonography (US)., Methods: Thirty RA patients treated with rituximab were included. US parameters were collected at each time (8 visits) of the 18-month follow-up, notably the global score of power Doppler (PD) activity. Clinical relapse was defined as a DAS28 ESR of >3.2 after 6 months in responders while US relapse was defined as an increase of ≥20% of the global score of PD activity. The decision of retreatment was based exclusively on clinical findings., Results: A total of 29 patients were analysed (mean (SD) age: 57.2 (12.2) years; female gender: 66%). The mean (SD) PD score decreased from 8.8 (5.2) at baseline to 4.9 (4.3) at 6 months (p <0.0001). A clinical response was observed at Month 4 or Month 6 for 93% of patients. A total of 19 patients had a first clinical relapse (with or without US relapse) after Month 6 (18 of them were retreated with rituximab). Among 10 patients without clinical relapse, 3 had US relapse (only one was retreated) and 7 had no US relapse (but 4 were retreated)., Conclusions: This study highlights a great heterogeneity in terms of sequence of clinical relapse, US relapse and retreatment in RA patients receiving rituximab. Therefore, US monitoring does not seem to be relevant to determine the best time for retreatment with rituximab.

Objectives: To assess, in patients with recent-onset arthritis, whether a self-reported familial occurrence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with a clinical presentation of the disease, final diagnosis, long-term outcome and treatment decisions., Methods: The study was conducted from data of patients included between 2002 and 2005 in the early arthritis ESPOIR cohort. Patients were recruited on the basis of having at least two swollen joints for >6 weeks and <6 months, no other diagnosis than RA and no previous exposure to glucocorticoids or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients were stratified into two groups according to the presence of a self-reported familial occurrence of RA at baseline. Data concerning final diagnosis (2-year visit), long-term outcome (5-year visit) and therapeutic decisions were compared between the 2 groups of patients, using logistic and Cox regression models., Results: At baseline, 115 patients (14.1%) reported a familial occurrence of RA and showed, as compared with the remaining participants, higher prevalence of extra articular manifestations (EAMs) (51.8% vs. 39.6%, p=0.01) and severe EAMs (7.9% vs. 3.1%, p 0.01). Both unadjusted (hazard ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.1-2.21; p = 0.01) and adjusted analysis (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.06-2.15; p=0.02) identified a higher probability for the initiation of a targeted DMARD over time among patients with a self-reported familial occurrence of RA., Conclusions: In the specific context of early arthritis, a self-reported familial occurrence of RA is associated with the future decision to initiate a targeted DMARD.

Background: Rhupus syndrome is better characterized, but uncertainties remain, and therapeutic management must be defined. The objective was to analyze therapeutic procedures with a focus on biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)., Methods: This 10-year medical records review was based on diagnosis codes (rheumatoid arthritis [RA] and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) and biological data (anti-CCP testing, anti-dsDNA, and anti-RNP antibodies). Patients fulfilling 2010 ACR/EULAR and 2012 SLICC and/or 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA and SLE, respectively, were included., Results: Sixteen patients were identified. Rheumatoid arthritis most often preceded rhupus, with predominant articular pattern; 11 of them had erosive arthropathy. Skin involvement was the most frequent associated manifestation (n = 12). Serious events were reported, including active glomerulonephritis (n = 3), ischemic stroke (n = 1), and myocardial infarction (n = 1). Immunological profiles showed positivity for antinuclear (n = 16), anti-dsDNA (n = 9), and anti-CCP (n = 9). Ten patients required bDMARDs. All types of RA-approved bDMARDs were used. Abatacept was considered effective in 3 of the 4 patients, with 1 primary failure, 1 secondary escape, and 2 therapeutic maintenances, whereas primary or secondary failure was observed under tocilizimub and TNF-blocking agents. Rituximab was the most prescribed (n = 9) and the most effective with a sustained response in 6 patients., Conclusions: In rhupus refractory to conventional treatment, T or B lymphocytes targeted therapies, and particularly rituximab, seem to be a relevant therapeutic option unlike anticytokine biologics., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Patients at high risk of rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD) would benefit from being identified before the onset of respiratory symptoms; this can be done by screening patients with the use of chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Our objective was to develop and validate a risk score for patients who have subclinical RA-ILD., Methods: Our study included a discovery population and a replication population from 2 prospective RA cohorts (ESPOIR and TRANSLATE2, respectively) without pulmonary symptoms who had received chest HRCT scans. All patients were genotyped for MUC5B rs35705950. After multiple logistic regression, a risk score based on independent risk factors for subclinical RA-ILD was developed in the discovery population and tested for validation in the replication population., Results: The discovery population included 163 patients with RA, and the replication population included 89 patients with RA. The prevalence of subclinical RA-ILD was 19.0% and 16.9%, respectively. In the discovery population, independent risk factors for subclinical RA-ILD were presence of the MUC5B rs35705950 T allele (odds ratio [OR] 3.74 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.37, 10.39]), male sex (OR 3.93 [95% CI 1.40, 11.39]), older age at RA onset (for each year, OR 1.10 [95% CI 1.04, 1.16]), and increased mean Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (for each unit, OR 2.03 [95% CI 1.24, 3.42]). We developed and validated a derived risk score with receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.94) for the discovery population and 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.92) for the replication population. Excluding MUC5B rs35705950 from the model provided a lower goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test, P = 0.01)., Conclusion: We developed and validated a risk score that could help identify patients at high risk of subclinical RA-ILD. Our findings support an important contribution of MUC5B rs35705950 to subclinical RA-ILD risk., (© 2022 The Authors. Arthritis & Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology.)

Background: To validate the ability of PROS (vitamin K-dependent protein S) and CO7 (complement component C7) to predict response to the methotrexate (MTX)/etanercept (ETA) combination in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who received this therapeutic combination in a well-documented cohort., Method: From the ESPOIR cohort, RA patients having received the MTX/ETA or MTX/adalimumab (ADA) combination as a first-line biologic treatment were included. Serum concentrations of PROS and CO7 were measured by ELISA prior to the initiation of ETA or ADA, at a time where the disease was active (DAS28 ESR > 3.2). The clinical efficacy (response/non-response) of both combinations has been evaluated after at least 6 months of treatment, according to the EULAR response criteria with some modifications., Results: Thirty-two were treated by MTX/ETA; the numbers of responders and non-responders were 24 and 8, respectively. Thirty-three patients received the MTX/ADA combination; 27 and 5 patients were respectively responders and non-responders. While there were no differences for demographic, clinical, biological, and X-rays data, as well as for CO7, serum levels of PROS tended to be significantly higher in responders to the MTX/ETA combination (p = 0.08) while no difference was observed in the group receiving MTX/ADA. For PROS, the best concentration threshold to differentiate both groups was calculated at 40 μg/ml using ROC curve. The theranostic performances of PROS appeared better for the ETA/MTX combination. When considering the response to this combination, analysis of pooled data from ESPOIR and SATRAPE (initially used to validate PROS and CO7 as potential theranostic biomarkers) cohorts led to a higher theranostic value of PROS that became significant (p = 0.009)., Conclusion: PROS might be one candidate of a combination of biomarkers capable of predicting the response to MTX/ETA combination in RA patients refractory to MTX., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03666091 and NCT00234234 ., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Objective: The Flare Assessment in RA (FLARE-RA) self-administered questionnaire aims to identify patients who had flare in the interval between two consultations. This study aimed to establish a threshold for FLARE-RA score to identify RA flare., Methods: The Tocilizumab SubCutAneous study evaluated the efficacy and safety of s.c. tocilizumab (TCZ) to patients with active RA. Disease activity was assessed with the DAS28ESR at baseline and at week 2 (W2), W4, W12 and W24. The FLARE-RA questionnaire was administered at W12 and W24. Patient satisfaction, assessed at baseline and W24 with the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), was used as a surrogate marker of no flare. A correlation was sought between the FLARE-RA score at W12 and W24 and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) for monthly DAS28ESR. The optimal FLARE-RA cut-off below which patient satisfaction reached the PASS was explored with an ROC curve., Results: A total of 139 patients were included (mean age 57.3 ± 13.8 years, 74.1% women, mean RA duration 10.8 ± 9.2 years, mean DAS28ESR 5.8 ± 1.1). The correlation between the FLARE-RA score and DAS28ESR AUC was moderate at all times: ρ = 0.41 at W12 (P < 0.0001) and 0.51 at W24 (P < 0.0001). The optimal cut-off for the FLARE-RA score to identify absence of flare (i.e. an acceptable situation based on the PASS) was 2.3 with an AUC of 0.81., Conclusion: FLARE-RA and DAS28ESR assessment differ; we propose a FLARE-RA cut-off of 2.3, below which the situation (i.e. without flare) is acceptable for patients., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objective: To report the 10-year outcome of an inception cohort of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the ESPOIR cohort, and predictors of outcome., Methods: From 2003 to 2005, 813 patients were included if they had early arthritis (<6 months) with a high probability of RA and had never been prescribed DMARDs. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate predictors of outcome., Results: In total, 521 (64.1%) RA patients were followed up for 10 years; 35 (4.3%) died, which appears to be similar to the French general population. Overall, 480 (92.1%) patients received a DMARD; 174 (33.4%) received at least one biologic DMARD, 13.6% within 2 years. At year 10, 273 (52.4%) patients were in DAS28 remission, 40.1% in sustained remission, 14.1% in drug-free remission, 39.7% in CDAI remission. Half of the patients achieved a health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) < 0.5. SF-36 physical component and pain were well controlled. Structural progression was weak, with a mean change from baseline in modified Sharp score of 11.0  (17.9). Only 34 (6.5%) patients required major joint surgery. A substantial number of patients showed new comorbidities over 10 years. Positivity for anti-citrullinated peptides antibodies (ACPA) was confirmed as a robust predictor of long-term outcome., Conclusions: We report a very mild 10-year outcome of a large cohort of patients with early RA diagnosed in the early 2000s, which was much better than results for a previous cohort of patients who were recruited in 1993. This current favourable outcome may be related to more intensive care for real-life patients., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

To identify the targets recognized by anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (anti-CarP) in patients with early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), to study the cross-reactivity between anti-CarP and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) and to evaluate their prognostic value. 331 patients (184 RA and 147 other rheumatisms) from the Very Early Arthritis (VErA) French cohort were analyzed. We performed mass spectrometry analysis of RA sera displaying anti-CarP activity and epitope mapping of the carbamylated fibrinogen γ chain to identify immunodominant peptides. The specificity of these targets was studied using competition assays with the major antigens recognized by ACPA. The prognostic value of anti-carbamylated fibrinogen IgG antibodies (ACa-Fib IgG) was compared to that of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) and anti-CarP using an in-house ELISA. Besides the α chain, the γ chain of fibrinogen, particularly one immunodominant epitope that has a specific reactivity, was identified as a circulating carbamylated target in sera. The prevalence of ACa-Fib was 37% at baseline and 10.9% for anti-CCP-negative RA. In anti-CCP-negative patients, ACa-Fib positivity was associated with a more inflammatory and erosive disease at baseline but not with rapid radiological progression, which remains strongly related to anti-CCP antibodies. Fibrinogen seems to be one of the antigens recognized in vivo by the anti-CarP response, particularly 2 epitopes of the γ chain, one of which is not cross reactive with ACPA. This specificity might be associated with a distinct clinical phenotype since ACa-Fib IgG were shown to be linked to systemic inflammation in very early RA but not to rapid radiological progression., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Brevet, Lattard, Guillou, Rottenberg, Fardellone, Le-Loët, Lequerré, Cosette, Boyer, Fréret and Vittecoq.)

Objectives: Abatacept acts as a competitive inhibitor of the CD28/(CD80/86) costimulation signal required for T cell activation. Mechanisms of action of abatacept have not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to provide detailed insight into the mode of action of Abatacept based on gene expression data., Methods: In this ancillary study from the APPRAISE trial, we investigated the global molecular effects of Abatacept in whole blood samples collected prospectively in biologic naive rheumatoid arthritis patients (n = 19) at baseline and 6 months after the initiation of Abatacept therapy concomitant with methotrexate. Whole human genome microarrays (4x44K) were performed on both baseline and 6-month samples from responders and non-responders patients categorized according to EULAR criteria. T-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction was performed to identify significant gene expression changes. Gene Ontology and Single Experiment Analysis tools allowed us to highlight specific biological mechanisms involved in methotrexate/Abatacept., Results: In methotrexate/Abatacept responders, 672 genes were significantly (q<0.05) dysregulated at 6 months compared to baseline. Correlation analysis highlighted 19 genes whose dysregulations were significantly associated with disease activity variation (p<0.05) and whose functions were associated with proliferation, apoptosis of cells and mitochondrial metabolism, suggesting a restoration of oxidative signaling. The other 653 gene expression changes were relative to direct or indirect effects of methotrexate/Abatacept treatment and were significantly (p<0.005) involved in pathways relative to mRNA processing, proteasome, angiogenesis, apoptosis and TCR signaling. This study highlights new mechanisms of action of methotrexate/Abatacept and may provide new therapeutic targets to prevent autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis., Competing Interests: M-AD’A has received fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, AbbVie, UCB, MSD, Novartis and Roche Pharma, as well as research grants from Pfizer. TL and OV reports consultancy fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb outside the submitted work; TL and OV reports consultancy and personal fees from AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, Pfizer, UCB and grant from BMS. CD and GDT have nothing to disclose. CD, TL, OV, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Inserm Transfert have a patent application in conjunction with the University of Rouen for the use of predictive biomarkers able to predict abatacept responsiveness (METHODS OF PREDICTING DRUG RESPONSIVENESS OF PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM AUTOIMMUNE INFLAMMATORY DISEASES; PCT/EP2017/050928). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Objectives: This work aimed to assess treatment adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients with several tools and to identify factors associated with poor adherence., Method: Between February and December 2015, 183 patients were included in this cross-sectional study. A homemade 23-item self-questionnaire was filled by patients during an outpatient consultation or a day hospitalization stay. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS)-4, MMAS-8 and Girerd scores were extracted from this homemade questionnaire. Medication possession ratio (MPR) was then calculated. For identification of factors associated with nonadherence, patients were divided in two groups according to MMAS-8 results differentiating patients with good or bad adherence to treatments., Results: Of the 183 patients, 59% received a combination of biologic and conventional synthetic disease-modifying drugs, 22% a biological treatment alone, and 19% a conventional DMARD alone. Respectively, 3%, 10%, and 7% were considered as low adherent according to MMAS-4, MMAS-8, and Girerd scores. MPR was calculated for 84/183 patients; 23% were low adherent. The need for a help in preparing the drugs (p = 0.05; OR = 6.12; 95% CI: 0.86 to 268.90) and concomitant diabetes (p < 0.001; OR = 0.045, 95% CI: 0.001 to 0.299) was higher in patients with good adherence. Presence of a patient's relative reminding to take medications was associated with low adherence (p = 0.002; OR = 4.32, 95% CI: 1.41 to 13.11)., Conclusions: This study highlighted the difficulty of assessing treatment adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients despite four different tools. Objective measures by MPR indicated a higher proportion of poor adherent patients than self-questionnaires.Key Points• Proportion of patients considered as low adherent ranged from 3 to 27% according to the method of evaluation.• The use of a pillbox and/or the preparation of drugs by a patient's relative was associated with good adherence.• The presence of a patient's relative reminding to take medication was associated with low adherence.

Objective: To determine predictive/predictable factors of relapse in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients undergoing biologic Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs) dose reduction/discontinuation., Patients and Methods: RA patients receiving the same bDMARD for more than 1 year, in Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) remission, were selected in an observational monocentric real-life study. The 18-month follow-up included spacing (6 months) and withdrawal (12 months) periods of bDMARD. Clinical, biological and ultrasonographic (US) parameters were collected regularly. Relapse was defined by SDAI>11., Results: Fifty-three RA patients (mean age: 58 years; 72% women; median duration: 11 years) were enrolled. Forty-two received anti-cytokinic bDMARD targeting tumour necrosis factor (n=39) or interleukin-6R (n=3) and 11 were treated by abatacept. The number of relapses during the spacing and discontinuation periods were 19 and 20, respectively. After 18 months of follow-up, among the 53 patients, 12 maintained bDMARD-free remission, 39 had relapsed and 2 were lost of follow-up. Median time to relapse was 11.8 months. In multivariate analysis, baseline factors predictive of relapse were corticosteroid intake, female gender, longer disease duration and no methotrexate intake with bDMARD. Concerning the survival analysis, also taking into account the factors of predictability, the main risk factor of relapse after discontinuation was an increase of SDAI >0 during the spacing period (p=0.03). US findings were not contributive., Conclusion: In the context of RA in remission under bDMARDs, variation of SDAI during the dose-reduction phase is more relevant than baseline parameters to predict success of drug withdrawal., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

The expanding array of drugs available for treating rheumatoid arthritis is creating challenges in drug selection for the individual patient. The identification of biomarkers that predict the treatment response prior to drug exposure is therefore a current priority. This new approach, known as theranostics, is a component of personalized medicine, which involves selecting the management strategies that are most effective for a given patient at a given point in time. Antibodies to citrullinated peptides, rheumatoid factor, and the interferon signature are the most robust and best validated biomarkers identified to date. Matrices containing clinical or laboratory parameters of diagnostic or prognostic relevance may help to select the best treatment for the individual patient. Furthermore, the development of large-scale approaches requiring no a priori knowledge, such as functional genomics and metabolomics, hold considerable promise, despite persistent difficulties in replicating findings. The complexity of the treatment response in a given patient and substantial variability across patients suggest that biomarkers may be more helpful in combination than singly. The objectives of this review article are to discuss the approaches used to identify theranostic biomarkers and to present an overview of currently available biomarkers and of their performance in everyday clinical practice. However, the range of biomarkers suitable for use in daily practice remains extremely narrow., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Objectives: Tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) are effective treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Responses to treatment are barely predictable. As these treatments are costly and may induce a number of side effects, we aimed at identifying a panel of protein biomarkers that could be used to predict clinical response to TNFi for RA patients., Methods: Baseline blood levels of C-reactive protein, platelet factor 4, apolipoprotein A1, prealbumin, α1-antitrypsin, haptoglobin, S100A8/A9 and S100A12 proteins in bDMARD naive patients at the time of TNFi treatment initiation were assessed in a multicentric prospective French cohort. Patients fulfilling good EULAR response at 6 months were considered as responders. Logistic regression was used to determine best biomarker set that could predict good clinical response to TNFi., Results: A combination of biomarkers (prealbumin, platelet factor 4 and S100A12) was identified and could predict response to TNFi in RA with sensitivity of 78%, specificity of 77%, positive predictive values (PPV) of 72%, negative predictive values (NPV) of 82%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 3.35 and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) of 0.28. Lower levels of prealbumin and S100A12 and higher level of platelet factor 4 than the determined cutoff at baseline in RA patients are good predictors for response to TNFi treatment globally as well as to Infliximab, Etanercept and Adalimumab individually., Conclusion: A multivariate model combining 3 biomarkers (prealbumin, platelet factor 4 and S100A12) accurately predicted response of RA patients to TNFi and has potential in a daily practice personalized treatment., (Copyright © 2018 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the prevalence of anti-carbamylated protein (anti-CarP) antibodies in a French cohort of patients with early arthritis and to investigate their association with clinical features, final diagnosis, prognosis, and comorbidities., Methods: The presence of anti-CarP antibodies among patients with early arthritis in the French Etude et Suivi des Polyarthrites Indifférenciées Récentes (ESPOIR) cohort (n = 720) was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We investigated the prevalence of anti-CarP antibodies in different patient subgroups stratified according to anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and/or rheumatoid factor (RF) status. Diagnostic and prognostic values of the test were evaluated in this population., Results: Anti-CarP antibodies were present in approximately one-third of the patients (32.6%) and in 23.6% of the patients who were seronegative for both RF and ACPA. Anti-CarP positivity was associated with a more active disease status at baseline and over time. Anti-CarP-positive patients had a significantly higher Disease Activity Score in 28 joints using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate at month 36 than anti-CarP-negative patients (3.1 ± 0.11 versus 2.8 ± 0.06; P = 0.03). Anti-CarP-positive early arthritis was associated with a higher risk of developing erosions after 96 months of follow-up (55.6% of anti-CarP-positive patients versus 37.3% of anti-CarP-negative patients) (odds ratio 2.1 [95% CI 1.2-3.6]; P = 0.009). This association was particularly true when anti-CarP was associated with ACPA positivity. Moreover, ACPA positivity alone in early arthritis was not associated with a higher risk of erosive evolution., Conclusion: Our findings indicate that anti-CarP antibodies are present in one-third of patients with early arthritis and in one-fourth of the RF-negative and ACPA-negative patients. They are particularly associated with a more severe radiographic outcome. Anti-CarP antibody positivity may help to accurately identify those at risk of erosive evolution in an early arthritis population., (© 2017, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical value of sVE and anti-vascular endothelial-cadherin antibodies (AAVE) in RA treated with etanercept or adalimumab combined with methotrexate., Methods: This was an 18-month prospective multicenter study in which patients had active RA, requiring TNF antagonist. sVE rates and AAVE titers were measured respectively by dot blot and ELISA. The relationship of these biomarkers with parameters reflecting articular or systemic disease activity, progression of structural damage, and response or remission to treatment was analyzed., Results: Forty-eight patients received TNF blocking agents. Variation of sVE rates were significantly correlated with that of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels at weeks 6, 12, 26 and 52. A significant decrease in sVE levels was observed in the group of patients exhibiting a decrease in CRP levels as compared to the patient group with unmodified CRP. AAVE at baseline were correlated with rheumatoid factor. Kinetics analysis of sVE levels and AAVE titers showed that their level were not associated with disease activity score and to methotrexate/adalimumab or etanercept response., Conclusions: sVE is a biomarker associated with systemic RA activity under anti-TNF. AAVE are related to autoantibodies usually associated to RA., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Observational studies have already reported the risk of serious infections in RA treated with tocilizumab, but in limited samples. The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive risk factors for serious infections in the largest European registry of patients treated with tocilizumab for RA., Methods: A total of 1491 RA patients included in the French REGistry-RoAcTEmra were analysed to calculate the incidence rate of first serious infections rate after initiation of tocilizumab. To identify independent factors associated with serious infections, a Cox model was performed., Results: Among the 1491 patients, average age 56.6 (13.6) years, 125 serious infections occurred in 122 patients (incidence rate of serious infection: 4.7/100 patient-years). Univariate analysis identified initial ACPA positivity as the only factor associated with a lower risk of serious infection [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.36, 0.88]. Other factors significantly associated with a higher risk of serious infections were DAS28, concomitant Leflunomide (LEF) treatment, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at baseline. Initial ANC above 5.0 × 109/l (HR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.32, 2.85; P < 0.001), negative ACPA (HR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.78; P = 0.012) at baseline and concomitant LEF treatment (LEF alone vs no treatment, HR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.88; P = 0.009) remained significantly associated with first serious infections in multivariate analysis after imputation for missing data., Conclusion: The rate of first serious infections in current practice is similar to that reported in clinical trials. High ANC (above 5.0 × 109 at baseline), negative ACPA and concomitant therapy with LEF are predictive factors of serious infection, requiring in this case a tighter surveillance., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Recent progress in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is turning attention toward comorbidities, such as diabetes. The objectives of this review are to clarify the links between RA and diabetes and to assess potential effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on diabetes. The increased insulin resistance seen in RA is closely linked to the systemic inflammation induced by certain proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and interleukin-6. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increased in patients with RA. Furthermore, certain DMARDs including hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, TNFα antagonist, and interleukin-1β antagonists seem to improve the markers of glucose metabolism. In contrast, glucocorticoids tend to adversely affect glycemic control, particularly when taken chronically. Consequently, a crucial yet insufficiently applied rule is that cardiovascular risk factors must be sought and treated routinely, particularly as the choice of the DMARD may affect glucose metabolism., (Copyright © 2016 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the frequency and risk factors of postoperative complications in RA patients treated with abatacept (ABA)., Methods: The Orencia RA registry recruited 1012 patients receiving ABA for RA in routine care. Data from patients treated with ABA who underwent surgery were reviewed to describe the frequency of postoperative complications. Characteristics of patients and surgeries with and without complications were compared to identify factors associated with complications., Results: We identified 205 (20.3%) patients who underwent 263 surgeries, including 176 (66.9%) orthopaedic surgeries. Nineteen (7.2%) surgeries, in 19 patients (9.3%), entailed complications, including 7 delayed wound healing (2.7% of surgeries) and 6 surgical site infections (2.3% of surgeries). The median time between the last infusion of ABA and surgery was 5.9 weeks (range: 0.3-12.0 weeks), with no significant difference between patients with and without complications. The median corticosteroids daily dosage was higher in the group with complications [10.0 (6.25-15.0) vs 6.0 (5.0-10.0) mg/day, P = 0.042]. In multivariate analysis, only the duration of ABA treatment was significantly associated with postoperative complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.94 (95% CI: 0.89, 0.99) for each month of treatment], as were orthopaedic surgeries compared with other kinds of surgery [aOR = 4.45 (95% CI: 1.01, 20.2)]., Conclusion: In RA patients treated with ABA, the rate of surgical complications was low: 7.2% and higher in case of orthopaedic procedure and a more recent initiation of ABA. The median time between surgery and the last infusion of ABA was short and did not influence the rate of postoperative complications., (© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com)

Objective: To validate the measurement properties and the detection performance of the FLARE-RA questionnaire in a longitudinal prospective study., Methods: To validate the FLARE-RA self-administered questionnaire, we conducted a prospective trial in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients to document: 1) content and construct validity by factor analysis, convergent validity by Pearson's correlation with routine assessment of patient index data (Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 [RAPID-3] questionnaire), RA Impact of Disease (RAID) score, Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 2) reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and Bland-Altman plot), and 3) feasibility of use. Patients were examined and questionnaires were collected at baseline and 3 months, and every week in between for RAPID-3., Results: We recruited 138 patients from 13 centers: 81.9% women, mean age 57.4 years, mean DAS28 2.9, mean C-reactive protein level 6.2 mg/liter, 84.4% rheumatoid factor positive, 78.0% anti-citrullinated protein antibody positive, and 78.8% with erosive disease. At baseline, the mean ± SD FLARE-RA score was 2.3 ± 2.3. The content and construct validity of FLARE-RA was good. A substantial floor effect, but no ceiling effect, was observed. Principal components analysis revealed 1 domain disentangled in 2 subdomains: physical and emotional. The FLARE-RA total score was correlated with the DAS28 (r = 0.63, P < 0.001), RAID (r = 0.80, P < 0.001), RAPID-3 (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), and HAQ (r = 0.53, P < 0.001). The ICC for reliability was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.92-0.96)., Conclusion: The FLARE-RA self-administered questionnaire represents a valid and valuable instrument to detect RA flare between visits to the physician., (© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: To study the responsiveness of a combined power Doppler and greyscale ultrasound (PDUS) score for assessing synovitis in biologic-naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX)., Methods: In this open-label, multicentre, single-arm study, patients with RA (MTX inadequate responders) received intravenous abatacept (∼10 mg/kg) plus MTX for 24 weeks. A composite PDUS synovitis score, developed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology-European League Against Rheumatism (OMERACT-EULAR)-Ultrasound Task Force, was used to evaluate individual joints. The maximal score of each joint was added into a Global OMERACT-EULAR Synovitis Score (GLOESS) for bilateral metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPs) 2-5 (primary objective). The value of GLOESS containing other joint sets was explored, along with clinical efficacy., Results: Eighty-nine patients completed the 24-week treatment period. The earliest PDUS sign of improvement in synovitis was at week 1 (mean change in GLOESS (MCPs 2-5): -0.7 (95% CIs -1.2 to -0.1)), with continuous improvement to week 24. Early improvement was observed in the component scores (power Doppler signal at week 1, synovial hyperplasia at week 2, joint effusion at week 4). Comparable changes were observed for 22 paired joints and minimal joint subsets. Mean Disease Activity Score 28 (C reactive protein) was significantly reduced from weeks 1 to 24, reaching clinical meaningful improvement (change ≥1.2) at week 8., Conclusions: In this first international prospective study, the composite PDUS score is responsive to abatacept. GLOESS demonstrated the rapid onset of action of abatacept, regardless of the number of joints examined. Ultrasound is an objective tool to monitor patients with RA under treatment., Trial Registration Number: NCT00767325., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/)

Background: B and T cells play a key role in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathophysiology. RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 are involved in T and B cell receptors signaling, and belong to gene combination able to predict infliximab responsiveness, leading to the question of RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 involvement in RA., Methods: RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 expression levels were measured by qRT-PCR and/or western-blot in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), in T and B cells from untreated RA patients and in RA patients treated by TNFα inhibitors. T and B cells from healthy controls (HC) were cultured with TNFα, and TNFα receptors neutralizing antibodies to highlight the TNFα effects on RasGRP1 and RasGRP3 pathways. MAPK pathways and apoptosis were respectively analyzed using the Proteome Profiler arrays and flow cytometry., Results: In PBMCs from RA patients, gene expression levels of RasGRP1 were invariant while RasGRP3 was downregulated under TNFα inhibitors and upregulated under TNFα. In T cells from RA patients, RasGRP1 was decreased and its gene expression level was correlated with disease activity. In T cells from HC, TNFα stimulation increased RasGRP1 gene expression level while it reduced RasGRP1 protein expression level. Bryostatin-1 experiments have confirmed that the TNFα effect observed on T cells proliferation was due to the decrease of RasGRP1 expression. Besides, RasGRP3 expression level increased in PBMCs from RA patients under TNFα and in B cells from HC leading us to conclude that RasGRP3 in B cells was modulated by TNFα., Conclusion: This study demonstrates RasGRP1 dysregulation in RA patients while RasGRP3 is characterized as a biomarker linked to TNFα inhibitors. After binding to TNFR1, TNFα reduced RasGRP1 protein expression resulting in inhibition of T cell activation., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00234234 , registered 04 November 2008; NCT00767325 , registered 05 October 2005.

Objectives: To evaluate the benefits for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients of switching from one tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to another based on reason for change (primary failure, escape or intolerance) and molecule-switching order., Methods: Between 2000 and 2008, 356 RA patients prescribed a TNFi (infliximab [IFX], etanercept [ETA] or adalimumab [ADA]) and undergoing standardized evaluation were included in this retrospective study. Detailed demographic, clinical and biological data were collected before first biologic use and ≤6 months later to evaluate response based on EULAR-criteria. Primary failure, escape or intolerance of first TNFi triggered switch to another TNFi, the response of which was evaluated 6 months later. Propensity score then measured any interaction with baseline variables., Results: Of the 356 RA patients, 38 switched from IFX/ADA to ETA, 26 from ETA to IFX/ADA, and eight from one monoclonal antibody (mAb; IFX/ADA) to another. Clinical parameters for switchers and non-switchers were comparable. Switchers changed therapies because of primary failure (36.1%), escape (33.3%), or intolerance (30.6%), with no difference found in these subgroups. More switchers responded to the second TNFi than the first (P<0.01), respectively, regardless of switch (ETA to IFX/ADA: 50 vs. 23.1% [P<0.05]; IFX/ADA to ETA: 57.9 vs. 15.8% [P<0.001]) or reason for changing. In addition, DAS28 decreased more with the second antagonist (P<0.001) and regardless of molecules switched (P<0.01). Survival of the second TNFi was significantly longer with switch from mAb to the soluble receptor than vice versa (P<0.05)., Discussion: Overall, any switching from one TNFi to another, especially mAb to soluble receptor, was often beneficial for RA patients., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Using data for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) from the ESPOIR cohort, we aimed to evaluate the impact of remission versus low disease activity (LDA) by the Simple Disease Activity Index (SDAI) at 1 year on 3-year structural damage assessed by the modified Sharp-van der Heijde total score (mTSS) and functional impairment assessed by the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI)., Methods: We included 625 patients from the ESPOIR cohort who fulfilled the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism criteria for RA at baseline and had an SDAI score at 1 year. mTSS and HAQ-DI scores were compared at 3 years for patients with SDAI remission or LDA status at 1 year. A linear mixed model was used to assess the independent effect of SDAI status at 1 year on mTSS and HAQ-DI at 3 years., Results: Of the 625 patients included (mean (SD) age 48.5 (12.1) years; 491 (78.6%) were women), 121 (19.4%) were in SDAI remission and 223 (35.7%) in LDA at 1 year. The mean (SD) mTSS and HAQ-DI score at 3 years was 9.6 (9.2) and 0.23 (0.42), respectively, for patients in remission at 1 year and 15.8 (16.1) and 0.43 (0.52), respectively, for patients with LDA (both p<0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed an association of remission rather than LDA status at 1 year and reduced mTSS score (p=0.005) but not HAQ-DI score (p=0.4) at 3 years., Conclusions: Aiming for SDAI remission rather than LDA at 1 year leads to better radiographic outcomes at 3 years in early RA patients., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Objective: The recent growth of innovating biologics has opened fascinating avenues for the management of patients. In rheumatoid arthritis, many biologics are currently available, the choice of which being mostly determined empirically. Importantly, a given biologic may not be active in a fraction of patients and may even provoke side effects. Here, we conducted a comparative proteomics study in attempt to identify a predictive theranostic signature of non-response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated by etanercept/methotrexate combination., Methods: A serum sample was collected prior to treatment exposure from a cohort of 22 patients with active RA. A proteomic "label free" approach was then designed to quantitate protein biomarkers using mass spectrometry. To verify these results, a relative quantification followed by an absolute quantification of interesting protein candidates were performed on a second cohort. The criterion of judgment was the response to etanercept/methotrexate combination according to the EULAR criteria assessed at 6 months of treatment., Results: These investigations led to the identification of a set of 12 biomarkers with capacity to predict treatment response. A targeted quantitative analysis allowed to confirm the potential of 7 proteins from the latter combination on a new cohort of 16 patients. Two highly discriminating proteins, PROS and CO7, were further evaluated by ELISA on this second cohort. By combining the concentration threshold of each protein associated to a right classification (responders vs non-responders), the sensitivity and specificity reached 88.9 % and 100 %, respectively., Conclusion: Prior to methotrexate/etanercept treatment, abundance of several sera proteins, notably PROS and CO7, were associated to response status of RA patients 6 month after treatment initiation.

Introduction: We previously reported that low ratio of osteoprotegerin (OPG) to tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) was associated with Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) remission at 6 months in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Here, we aimed to evaluate the value of baseline OPG/TRAIL ratio in predicting clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with early RA in the ESPOIR cohort., Methods: OPG and TRAIL serum concentrations were assessed in the ESPOIR cohort patients. Patients with definite RA were included in this study. Patients were excluded if they had high erosion score at baseline (>90(th) percentile) or received biological therapy during the first 2 years of follow-up. Data were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression to predict 1-year DAS28 remission and 2-year radiographic disease progression., Results: On univariate analysis of 399 patients, OPG/TRAIL ratio at baseline was significantly lower in patients with than without remission at 1 year (p = 0.015). On multivariate logistic regression including age, gender, body mass index and DAS28, low OPG/TRAIL ratio was independently associated with remission at 1 year (odds ratio 1.68 [95 % confidence interval 1.01-2.79]). On univariate analysis, high OPG/TRAIL ratio at baseline was associated with rapid progression of erosion at 2 years (p = 0.041), and on multivariate logistic regression including age, anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity and C-reactive protein level, OPG/TRAIL ratio independently predicted rapid progression of erosion at 2 years., Conclusions: OPG/TRAIL ratio at baseline was an independent predictor of 1-year remission and 2-year rapid progression of erosion for patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Thus, OPG/TRAIL ratio could be included in matrix prediction scores to predict rapid radiographic progression. Further confirmation in an independent cohort is warranted.

A 47-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated successively with infliximab, abatacept, and etanercept spontaneously developed subcutaneous bruises and a noncompressive hematoma 11 months after starting etanercept therapy (50mg/week). Her prothrombin time was normal but her activated partial thromboplastin time was increased to 2.48 (normal range, 0.85-1.17). She had a circulating anticoagulant (Rosner index, 45; normal,<13) due to an anti-factor VIII antibody in a titer of 45 Bethesda units. Her factor VIII level was less than 1% (normal range, 55-150). The etanercept and leflunomide were stopped and prednisone was given in a daily dosage of 1mg/kg, in combination with rituximab, two 1-g doses at an interval of 2 weeks. After 5 months, persistence of the anti-factor VIII antibody prompted the initiation of azathioprine therapy, 2mg/kg/d. A remission was achieved 9 months after the diagnosis of acquired hemophilia and was sustained at last follow-up after 3 years. This new case of acquired hemophilia in a patient with RA may reflect a simple association or an inducing role of etanercept., (Copyright © 2015 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of the SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 polymorphisms, previously reported as autoimmune risk variants, in the rheumatoid arthritis (RA) genetic background according to anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) status of RA individuals., Methods: We analysed a total of 11,715 RA cases and 26,493 controls from nine independent cohorts; all individuals were genotyped or had imputed genotypes for SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138. The effect of the SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 risk-allele combination on osteopontin (OPN) expression in macrophages and OPN serum levels was investigated., Results: We provide evidence for a distinct contribution of SPP1 to RA susceptibility according to ACPA status: the combination of ≥3 SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 common alleles was associated mainly with ACPA negativity (p=1.29×10(-5), ORACPA-negative 1.257 (1.135 to 1.394)) and less with ACPA positivity (p=0.0148, ORACPA-positive 1.072 (1.014 to 1.134)). The ORs between these subgroups (ie, ACPA-positive and ACPA-negative) significantly differed (p=7.33×10(-3)). Expression quantitative trait locus analysis revealed an association of the SPP1 risk-allele combination with decreased SPP1 expression in peripheral macrophages from 599 individuals. To corroborate these findings, we found an association of the SPP1 risk-allele combination and low serum level of secreted OPN (p=0.0157), as well as serum level of secreted OPN correlated positively with ACPA production (p=0.005; r=0.483)., Conclusions: We demonstrate a significant contribution of the combination of SPP1 rs11439060 and rs9138 frequent alleles to risk of RA, the magnitude of the association being greater in patients negative for ACPAs., (Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.)

Aims: This study aimed at describing adalimumab pharmacokinetics (PK) and the concentration-effect relationship of adalimumab using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modelling in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Adalimumab PK and PK-PD data were obtained from a multicentric observational study. Adalimumab (40 mg) was administered subcutaneously every other week, and its pharmacokinetics was described using a one-compartment model. The relationship between adalimumab concentration and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration was described using an indirect response model with inhibition of CRP input, whereas the relationship between adalimumab concentration and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28) was described using a direct inhibition model. Dose regimens that included a loading dose of adalimumab were simulated., Results: Thirty patients treated for RA were analysed. The following pharmacokinetic and PK-PD parameters were estimated (interidividual coefficient of variation): apparent volume of distribution (Vd /F) = 10.8 l (92%); apparent clearance (CL/F) = 0.32 l day(-1) (17%); first-order absorption rate (ka ) = 0.28 day(-1) ; CRP input (kin ) = 22.0 mg l(-1)  day(-1) (65%); adalimumab concentration leading to a 50% decrease in kin (C50 ) = 3.6 mg l(-1) (88%); baseline DAS28 (DAS0 ) = 5.5 mg l(-1) (11%); and adalimumab concentration leading to 50% decrease of DAS0 (IC50 ) = 11.0 mg l(-1) (71%). Simulations showed that a 160 mg loading dose should reduce the time to reach efficacy in terms of both CRP and DAS28 after the first injection., Conclusions: This is the first study to describe adalimumab pharmacokinetics and the concentration-effect relationship in RA. A 160 mg loading dose may lead to an increased benefit from treatment in RA patients., (© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Objective: To validate the 2010-ACR/EULAR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), taking into account the recent EULAR definition of "erosive disease", on the 310 patients comprising the very early arthritis cohort (VErA)., Methods: 2010-criteria performances were tested by first strictly applying its three items successively: ≥ 1 clinical synovitis/another disease(s)/score ≥ 6/10), then the typical erosion grid without obtaining a score of ≥ 6 to diagnose RA. We tested successively: no erosion (S1), ≥ 1 erosion(s) (S2), EULAR-defined erosive disease (S3). Two gold standards were used: expert diagnosis at six years and EULAR erosive disease at two years., Results: At inclusion, median age was 52 years; median RA duration 4.2 months. 2010-ACR/EULAR criteria, including EULAR-defined erosive disease applied at baseline, classified comparable numbers of patients as the 1987 criteria (P=0.27). Using expert diagnosis at six years, more patients were classified as RA with S2 than 1987-ACR criteria (P<0.04). In contrast, sensitivity and specificity indicated that 2010-ACR/EULAR-S3 criteria performed slightly but not significantly better than 1987-ACR criteria. On ROC curves, a score ≥ 6 correctly classified RA. When EULAR-defined erosion at two years was the gold standard, the 1987-ACR, the 2010-S1, -S2 and -S3 criteria performed comparably., Conclusions: Using the very early community-based, conservatively treated VErA cohort, the strict application of 2010-ACR/EULAR criteria using the new EULAR definition of erosive disease or not performed slightly but not significantly better than the 1987-ACR criteria., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier SAS.)

Objectives: One way to optimize the drug prescription in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to identify predictive biomarkers of drug responsiveness. Here, we investigated the potential "theranostic" value of proteins of the S100 family by monitoring levels of both S100A8 and S100A9 in blood samples from RA patients., Design: For proteomic analysis, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and serum samples were collected in patients prior to initiation of the methotrexate/etanercept (MTX/ETA) combination. Firstly, relative mass spectrometry (MS) quantification focusing on S100A8 and S100A9 proteins was carried out from PBMCs samples to identify potential biomarkers. The same approach was also performed from serum samples from responder (R) and non responder (NR) patients. Finally, to confirm these results, an absolute quantification of S100A8, S100A9 proteins and calprotectin (heterodimer of S100A8/S100A9) was carried out on the serum samples using ELISA., Results: MS analyses revealed that both S100A8 and S100A9 proteins were significantly accumulated in PBMC from responders. In contrast to PBMC, only the S100A9 protein was significantly overexpressed in the serum of R patients. Absolute quantification by ELISA confirmed this result and pointed out a similar expression level of S100A8 protein and calprotectin in sera from both R and NR groups. Thus, the S100A9 protein revealed to be predictive of MTX/ETA responsiveness, contrarily to parameters of inflammation and auto-antibodies which did not allow significant discrimination., Conclusion: This is the first report of an overexpression of S100A9 protein in both PBMCs and serum of patients with subsequent response to the MTX/ETA combination. This protein thus represents an interesting biomarker candidate of therapeutic response in RA.

Background: BANK1 and BLK belong to the pleiotropic autoimmune genes; recently, epistasis between BANK1 and BLK was detected in systemic lupus erythematosus. Although BLK has been reproducibly identified as a risk factor in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), reports are conflicting about the contribution of BANK1 to RA susceptibility. To ascertain the real impact of BANK1 on RA genetic susceptibility, we performed a large meta-analysis including our original data and tested for an epistatic interaction between BANK1 and BLK in RA susceptibility., Patients and Methods: We investigated data for 1,915 RA patients and 1,915 ethnically matched healthy controls genotyped for BANK1 rs10516487 and rs3733197 and BLK rs13277113. The association of each SNP and RA was tested by logistic regression. Multivariate analysis was then used with an interaction term to test for an epistatic interaction between the SNPs in the 2 genes., Results: None of the SNPs tested individually was significantly associated with RA in the genotyped samples. However, we detected an epistatic interaction between BANK1 rs3733197 and BLK rs13277113 (P(interaction)  = 0.037). In individuals carrying the BLK rs13277113 GG genotype, presence of the BANK1 rs3733197 G allele increased the risk of RA (odds ratio 1.21 [95% confidence interval 1.04-1.41], P = 0.015. Combining our results with those of all other studies in a large trans-ethnic meta-analysis revealed an association of the BANK1 rs3733197 G allele and RA (1.11 [1.02-1.21], P = 0.012)., Conclusion: This study confirms BANK1 as an RA susceptibility gene and for the first time provides evidence for epistasis between BANK1 and BLK in RA. Our results illustrate the concept of pleiotropic epistatic interaction, suggesting that BANK1 and BLK might play a role in RA pathogenesis.

Objective: Because available biomarkers (rheumatoid factors [RF], anti-cyclic citrullinated autoantibodies [anti-CCP2], erythrocyte sedimentation rate at 1st hour [ESR]/C-reactive peptide [CRP] and bone erosions) are insufficient to predict rheumatoid arthritis (RA) structural damage, to determine whether synovium expression of greater or equal to 1 markers could constitute new prognostic factor(s)., Method: The study was conducted on 18 prospectively enrolled disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD)- and glucocorticoid-naïve, VErA cohort patients with very-early arthritis (median duration: 4months). Recorded at baseline were: clinical and biological (serum ESR, CRP, RF-isotypes, anti-CCP2, osteoprotegerin, receptor activator of nuclear κB-ligand [RANK-L] and cartilage oligomeric matrix protein [COMP] levels) data; synovium expression (HLA-DR, CD163, CD3, CD20, VEGF, osteoprotegerin, RANK-L, Bcl2 and global inflammation index) for a metacarpophalangeal joint-synovium biopsy. Baseline and 3-year hand-and-foot X-rays were graded with the van der Heijde-modified-Sharp score; the judgment criterion was its progression during follow-up. Pearson's product moment correlation statistics were used to test for association between paired samples., Results: A baseline, a significant relationship was found between erosive damage and markers of B-cell activation, notably the synovium CD20 expression (r=0.68; P=0.0001). Quantified by the modified-Sharp erosion score variation, the 3-year structural damage progression was significantly correlated with: serum levels of RF-IgG (r=0.75; P=0.0003), -IgM (r=0.69; P=0.001), anti-CCP2 (r=0.53; P=0.02) and RANK-L (r=0.61; P=0.007); synovium CD20 expression (r=0.70; P=0.001)., Conclusion: This analysis of the prognostic value of a large panel of synovium markers in a limited sample of prospectively followed, well-documented patients suggested that both synovial CD20 and serum RANK-L levels might be new predictors of structural damage progression in very-early RA., (Copyright © 2011 Société française de rhumatologie. Published by Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved.)

A better definition of goals of therapy has deeply changed the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. The main goal is the early control of joint inflammation reaching, if possible, remission in early arthritis and, in later cases, low disease activity. To target such a low activity, a tight control with therapeutic adjustment is necessary. The other goals derive from the control of inflammatory activity: reduction of progression and, if possible, stop of structural damage tightly linked to inflammation; control of functional consequences related mainly to the addition of inflammatory component and structural damage; control of cardio-vascular risk factors responsible of 30-50% of deaths and finally protection of bone.

Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic inflammatory disorder that principally attacks synovial joints. However, accelerated atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are major clinical consequences of endothelial dysfunction in RA patients. Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) is the major mediator of inflammation in RA, related to vascular injury by targeting VE-cadherin, an endothelium-specific adhesion molecule of vital importance for endothelium integrity and angiogenesis. We undertook this study to examine the mechanisms regulating VE-cadherin processing by TNFα and their occurrence in RA., Methods: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells were used in primary culture and treated with recombinant TNFα to study VE-cadherin cleavage. Cell lysates and conditioned media were analyzed by Western blotting for VE-cadherin cytoplasmic domain and extracellular domain (VE-90) generation, respectively. VE-90 was analyzed at baseline and at the 1-year followup in sera from 63 RA patients (from the Very Early Rheumatoid Arthritis cohort) with disease duration of <6 months., Results: TNFα induced a time-dependent shedding of VE-90 in cell media. This effect was prevented by tyrosine kinase inhibitors (genistein and PP2) or by knocking down Src kinase. In contrast, tyrosine phosphatase blockade enhanced VE-cadherin cleavage, confirming the requirement of tyrosine phosphorylation processes. In addition, using the matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activator APMA and the MMP inhibitor GM6001, we demonstrated that MMPs are involved in TNFα-induced VE-cadherin cleavage. Of major importance, VE-90 was detected in sera from the 63 RA patients and was positively correlated with the Disease Activity Score at baseline and after 1-year followup., Conclusion: These findings provide the first evidence of VE-cadherin proteolysis upon TNFα stimulation and suggest potential clinical relevance of soluble VE-cadherin in management of RA., (Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To analyse the therapeutic effects of etanercept (ETA) or adalimumab (ADA) on the numbers and phenotypes of CD4+CD25hi Tregs in RA patients., Methods: RA patients received ADA (n = 28) or ETA (n = 20) and stable-dose MTX or LEF. Therapeutic responses were assessed with the 28-joint DAS (DAS-28) criteria after 12 weeks of treatment. Treg numbers and phenotypes, determined by flow cytometry using different gating strategies, were compared between responders and non-responders before and after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment., Results: The percentages of good, moderate and non-responders among patients given ADA or ETA, respectively, were 46.5, 35.7 and 17.8% or 30, 20 and 50%, with respective mean (s.d.) pre-treatment CD4+CD25hi Treg percentages of 5.5 (0.04)% or 4.95 (0.02)%. Overall, for patients with active RA given ADA or ETA, neither TNF-α-blocking agent had an effect on Tregs percentage and absolute number. Moreover, CD4+CD25hi Treg counts remained unaffected in RA responders to ADA or ETA, compared with RA non-responders. Furthermore, the CD4+CD25hiCD45RA+, CD4+CD25hiCD45RO+ and CD4+CD25hiCD62L+ cell populations were unchanged by TNF-α-blocking agents., Conclusion: Neither ADA nor ETA modified the percentages or absolute numbers of circulating CD4+CD25hi Tregs and their phenotypes after being administered for 6 and 12 weeks to RA patients., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00234234.

Objectives: To test the performances of combining anti-CCP second generation (CCP2) with ACR 1987 classification criteria and to diagnose early RA in a community-based very early arthritis (VErA) patient cohort., Methods: The VErA cohort comprised 310 patients (median age 52 years; 68.1% women; median symptom duration 4.2 months; glucocorticoid- and DMARD naïve) conservatively treated during the first 2 years. At 6 years of follow-up, a three-expert committee classified the patients into three groups: RA, other classified arthritis (OCA) or unclassified arthritis (UA). We calculated the performances of the different sets, including anti-CCP2 positivity, while retaining or deleting RF and rheumatoid nodule components with ACR 1987 criteria for early RA diagnosis. Models were subjected to receiver operating characteristics curve and logistic regression analyses to try to identify relevant sets able to classify very early RA., Results: At 6 years, 149 patients were diagnosed as RA and 119 as non-RA (95 OCA and 24 UA). The original ACR 1987 criteria had 77.9% sensitivity and 64.7% specificity for the RA diagnosis at 6 years. The modified set excluding rheumatoid nodules, including anti-CCP2 positivity and retaining RF performed significantly better than ACR 1987 criteria, with 79.9% sensitivity and 64.7% specificity and with a larger area under the curve. However, in the zone of interest, i.e., ≥4/7 criteria, the curves for these sets were superimposed., Conclusions: Adding anti-CCP2 positivity and deleting rheumatoid nodules failed to improve the performances of ACR 1987 classification criteria for the diagnosis of early RA.

Objectives: To develop and/or update fact sheets about TNFα antagonists treatments, in order to assist physicians in the management of patients with inflammatory joint disease., Methods: 1. selection by a committee of rheumatology experts of the main topics of interest for which fact sheets were desirable; 2. identification and review of publications relevant to each topic; 3. development and/or update of fact sheets based on three levels of evidence: evidence-based medicine, official recommendations, and expert opinion. The experts were rheumatologists and invited specialists in other fields, and they had extensive experience with the management of chronic inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid. They were members of the CRI (Club Rhumatismes et Inflammation), a section of the Société Francaise de Rhumatologie. Each fact sheet was revised by several experts and the overall process was coordinated by three experts., Results: Several topics of major interest were selected: contraindications of TNFα antagonists treatments, the management of adverse effects and concomitant diseases that may develop during these therapies, and the management of everyday situations such as pregnancy, surgery, and immunizations. After a review of the literature and discussions among experts, a consensus was developed about the content of the fact sheets presented here. These fact sheets focus on several points: 1. in RA and SpA, initiation and monitoring of TNFα antagonists treatments, management of patients with specific past histories, and specific clinical situations such as pregnancy; 2. diseases other than RA, such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis; 3. models of letters for informing the rheumatologist and general practitioner; 4. and patient information., Conclusion: These TNFα antagonists treatments fact sheets built on evidence-based medicine and expert opinion will serve as a practical tool for assisting physicians who manage patients on these therapies. They will be available continuously at www.cri-net.com and updated at appropriate intervals., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)