Search

The recently proposed artificial cooperative search (ACS) algorithm is a population-based iterative evolutionary algorithm (EA) for solving real-valued numerical optimization problems. It uses a rotation-invariant line recombination-based mutation strategy and rule-based crossover operator. However, it performs poorly for problems that include closely-related variables because, in these cases, generating uncorrelated feasible trial solution vectors using stochastic crossover methods is extremely difficult, and its mutation and crossover operators are also less effective. This paper adds a new QR-decomposition-based rotation-invariant search strategy to the ACS algorithm to improve its ability to solve such problems. This new, advanced ACS algorithm, called A+, has only one control parameter, α , and experimental results have shown that its performance does not strongly depend on the initial value of α . This paper also examines A+’s performance for noisy point cloud filtering, which is a complex real-world problem. The results of numerical experiments demonstrate that A+’s performance when solving numerical and real-world problems with closely-related variables is better than those of the comparison algorithms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper introduces a comparison of training algorithms of radial basis function (RBF) neural networks for classification purposes. RBF networks provide effective solutions in many science and engineering fields. They are especially popular in the pattern classification and signal processing areas. Several algorithms have been proposed for training RBF networks. The Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm is a new, very simple and robust population based optimization algorithm that is inspired by the intelligent behavior of honey bee swarms. The training performance of the ABC algorithm is compared with the Genetic algorithm, Kalman filtering algorithm and gradient descent algorithm. In the experiments, not only well known classification problems from the UCI repository such as the Iris, Wine and Glass datasets have been used, but also an experimental setup is designed and inertial sensor based terrain classification for autonomous ground vehicles was also achieved. Experimental results show that the use of the ABC algorithm results in better learning than those of others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Bernstein polynomials based parameter-free crossover. • A new universal/parameter-free Differential Evolution. • Real-valued numerical function optimization. • Evolutionary Image Vectorization. • Evolutionary Digital Terrain Model Simplification. The standard Differential Evolution Algorithm (sDE) is a stochactic search method commonly used in evolutionary computing. The problem solving success of sDE is highly sensitive to the genetic operators used and the initial values of the parameters of these operators. Since a universal Differential Evolution Algorithm (uDE) is not sensitive to the structure and parameter values of the genetic operators used, it is parameter-free in practice and easier to control than sDE. uDE does not need a trial-and-error process when selecting the genetic operators and initial values of intrinsic parameter of related genetic operators to solve the problem, unlike the sDE. Therefore, the use and adaptation of a uDE to solve different types of numerical engineering problems is easy and time-consuming compared to sDE. In this paper, a new uDE, Bernstain-Search Differential Evolution Algorithm (BSD), is introduced. BSD is new and easily controllable, simple structured, non-recursive, highly efficient, fast and practically parameter-free uDE. BSD have a too feasible random crossover and mutation process and does not have a control-parameter setting process, contrary to sDE and its improved variants. In this paper, 30 benchmark problems of CEC'2014, 60 classic benchmark problems, image evolution problems for 12 test images and one Triangulated Irregular Network (TIN) refinement problem were used in the experiments performed to investigate the problem solving success of BSD, statistically. Four tested methods (i.e. , ABC, JADE, CUCKOO, WDE) were used in the conducted experiments. Problem solving successes of BSD and tested methods were statistically compared by using Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test piecewisely. Results obtained from the performed tests showed that in general, problem solving success of BSD is statistically better than the tested methods that have been used in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]