Search

Differential diagnosis between avascular necrosis (AVN) and transient osteoporosis of the hip (TOH) can be complicated even for experienced MSK radiologists. Our study attempted to use MR images in order to develop a deep learning methodology with the use of transfer learning and a convolutional neural network (CNN) ensemble, for the accurate differentiation between the two diseases. An augmented dataset of 210 hips with TOH and 210 hips with AVN was used to finetune three ImageNet-trained CNNs (VGG-16, InceptionResNetV2, and InceptionV3). An ensemble decision was reached in a hard-voting manner by selecting the outcome voted by at least two of the CNNs. Inception-ResNet-V2 achieved the highest AUC (97.62%) similar to the model ensemble, followed by InceptionV3 (AUC of 96.82%) and VGG-16 (AUC 96.03%). Precision for the diagnosis of AVN and recall for the detection of TOH were higher in the model ensemble compared to Inception-ResNet-V2. Ensemble performance was significantly higher than that of an MSK radiologist and a fellow (P < 0.001). Deep learning was highly successful in distinguishing TOH from AVN, with a potential to aid treatment decisions and lead to the avoidance of unnecessary surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Differentiation between transient osteoporosis (TOH) and avascular necrosis (AVN) of the hip is a longstanding challenge in musculoskeletal radiology. The purpose of this study was to utilize MRI-based radiomics and machine learning (ML) for accurate differentiation between the two entities. A total of 109 hips with TOH and 104 hips with AVN were retrospectively included. Femoral heads and necks with segmented radiomics features were extracted. Three ML classifiers (XGboost, CatBoost and SVM) using 38 relevant radiomics features were trained on 70% and validated on 30% of the dataset. ML performance was compared to two musculoskeletal radiologists, a general radiologist and two radiology residents. XGboost achieved the best performance with an area under the curve (AUC) of 93.7% (95% CI from 87.7 to 99.8%) among ML models. MSK radiologists achieved an AUC of 90.6% (95% CI from 86.7% to 94.5%) and 88.3% (95% CI from 84% to 92.7%), respectively, similar to residents. The general radiologist achieved an AUC of 84.5% (95% CI from 80% to 89%), significantly lower than of XGboost (p = 0.017). In conclusion, radiomics-based ML achieved a performance similar to MSK radiologists and significantly higher compared to general radiologists in differentiating between TOH and AVN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]