Search

Background and Aims: The diagnosis and stratification of gastric atrophy (GA) predict patients' gastric cancer progression risk and determine endoscopy surveillance interval. We aimed to construct an artificial intelligence (AI) system for GA endoscopic identification and risk stratification based on the Kimura-Takemoto classification., Methods: We constructed the system using two trained models and verified its performance. First, we retrospectively collected 869 images and 119 videos to compare its performance with that of endoscopists in identifying GA. Then, we included original image cases of 102 patients to validate the system for stratifying GA and comparing it with endoscopists with different experiences., Results: The sensitivity of model 1 was higher than that of endoscopists (92.72% vs. 76.85 %) at image level and also higher than that of experts (94.87% vs. 85.90 %) at video level. The system outperformed experts in stratifying GA (overall accuracy: 81.37 %, 73.04 %, p = 0.045). The accuracy of this system in classifying non-GA, mild GA, moderate GA, and severe GA was 80.00 %, 77.42 %, 83.33 %, and 85.71 %, comparable to that of experts and better than that of seniors and novices., Conclusions: We established an expert-level system for GA endoscopic identification and risk stratification. It has great potential for endoscopic assessment and surveillance determinations., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled “An artificial intelligence system for chronic atrophic gastritis diagnosis and risk stratification under white light endoscopy”. The coauthors of the manuscript are: Xiao Tao, Yijie Zhu, Zehua Dong, Li Huang, Renduo Shang, Hongliu Du, Junxiao Wang, Xiaoquan Zeng, Wen Wang, Jiamin Wang, Yanxia Li, Yunchao Deng, Lianlian Wu and Honggang Yu., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) performed variously among test sets with different diversity due to sample selection bias, which can be stumbling block for AI applications. We previously tested AI named ENDOANGEL, diagnosing early gastric cancer (EGC) on single-center videos in man-machine competition. We aimed to re-test ENDOANGEL on multi-center videos to explore challenges applying AI in multiple centers, then upgrade ENDOANGEL and explore solutions to the challenge., Methods: ENDOANGEL was re-tested on multi-center videos retrospectively collected from 12 institutions and compared with performance in previously reported single-center videos. We then upgraded ENDOANGEL to ENDOANGEL-2022 with more training samples and novel algorithms and conducted competition between ENDOANGEL-2022 and endoscopists. ENDOANGEL-2022 was then tested on single-center videos and compared with performance in multi-center videos; the two AI systems were also compared with each other and endoscopists., Results: Forty-six EGCs and 54 non-cancers were included in multi-center video cohort. On diagnosing EGCs, compared with single-center videos, ENDOANGEL showed stable sensitivity (97.83% vs. 100.00%) while sharply decreased specificity (61.11% vs. 82.54%); ENDOANGEL-2022 showed similar tendency while achieving significantly higher specificity (79.63%, p < 0.01) making fewer mistakes on typical lesions than ENDOANGEL. On detecting gastric neoplasms, both AI showed stable sensitivity while sharply decreased specificity. Nevertheless, both AI outperformed endoscopists in the two competitions., Conclusions: Great increase of false positives is a prominent challenge for applying EGC diagnostic AI in multiple centers due to high heterogeneity of negative cases. Optimizing AI by adding samples and using novel algorithms is promising to overcome this challenge., (© 2023. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

Background and Aims: EGD is essential for GI disorders, and reports are pivotal to facilitating postprocedure diagnosis and treatment. Manual report generation lacks sufficient quality and is labor intensive. We reported and validated an artificial intelligence-based endoscopy automatic reporting system (AI-EARS)., Methods: The AI-EARS was designed for automatic report generation, including real-time image capturing, diagnosis, and textual description. It was developed using multicenter datasets from 8 hospitals in China, including 252,111 images for training, 62,706 images, and 950 videos for testing. Twelve endoscopists and 44 endoscopy procedures were consecutively enrolled to evaluate the effect of the AI-EARS in a multireader, multicase, crossover study. The precision and completeness of the reports were compared between endoscopists using the AI-EARS and conventional reporting systems., Results: In video validation, the AI-EARS achieved completeness of 98.59% and 99.69% for esophageal and gastric abnormality records, respectively, accuracies of 87.99% and 88.85% for esophageal and gastric lesion location records, and 73.14% and 85.24% for diagnosis. Compared with the conventional reporting systems, the AI-EARS achieved greater completeness (79.03% vs 51.86%, P < .001) and accuracy (64.47% vs 42.81%, P < .001) of the textual description and completeness of the photo-documents of landmarks (92.23% vs 73.69%, P < .001). The mean reporting time for an individual lesion was significantly reduced (80.13 ± 16.12 seconds vs 46.47 ± 11.68 seconds, P < .001) after the AI-EARS assistance., Conclusions: The AI-EARS showed its efficacy in improving the accuracy and completeness of EGD reports. It might facilitate the generation of complete endoscopy reports and postendoscopy patient management. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05479253.)., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

White light endoscopy is the most pivotal tool for detecting early gastric neoplasms. Previous artificial intelligence (AI) systems were primarily unexplainable, affecting their clinical credibility and acceptability. We aimed to develop an explainable AI named ENDOANGEL-ED (explainable diagnosis) to solve this problem. A total of 4482 images and 296 videos with focal lesions from 3279 patients from eight hospitals were used for training, validating, and testing ENDOANGEL-ED. A traditional sole deep learning (DL) model was trained using the same dataset. The performance of ENDOANGEL-ED and sole DL was evaluated on six levels: internal and external images, internal and external videos, consecutive videos, and man–machine comparison with 77 endoscopists in videos. Furthermore, a multi-reader, multi-case study was conducted to evaluate the ENDOANGEL-ED's effectiveness. A scale was used to compare the overall acceptance of endoscopists to traditional and explainable AI systems. The ENDOANGEL-ED showed high performance in the image and video tests. In man–machine comparison, the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-ED was significantly higher than that of all endoscopists in internal (81.10% vs. 70.61%, p < 0.001) and external videos (88.24% vs. 78.49%, p < 0.001). With ENDOANGEL-ED's assistance, the accuracy of endoscopists significantly improved (70.61% vs. 79.63%, p < 0.001). Compared with the traditional AI, the explainable AI increased the endoscopists' trust and acceptance (4.42 vs. 3.74, p < 0.001; 4.52 vs. 4.00, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we developed a real-time explainable AI that showed high performance, higher clinical credibility, and acceptance than traditional DL models and greatly improved the diagnostic ability of endoscopists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]