Search

Background and Aims: Accurate bowel preparation assessment is essential for determining colonoscopy screening intervals. Patients with suboptimal bowel preparation are at a high risk of missing >5 mm adenomas and should undergo an early repeat colonoscopy. In this study, we used artificial intelligence (AI) to evaluate bowel preparation and validated the ability of the system to accurately identify patients who are at high risk of having >5 mm adenomas missed due to inadequate bowel preparation., Methods: This prospective, single-center, observational study was conducted at the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from October 8, 2021, to November 9, 2022. Eligible patients who underwent screening colonoscopy were consecutively enrolled. The AI assessed bowel preparation using the e-Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (e-BBPS) while endoscopists made evaluations using BBPS. If both BBPS and e-BBPS deemed preparation adequate, the patient immediately underwent a second colonoscopy; otherwise, the patient underwent bowel re-cleansing before the second colonoscopy., Results: Among the 393 patients, 72 adenomas >5 mm in size were detected; 27 adenomas >5 mm in size were missed. In unqualified-AI patients, the >5 mm adenoma miss rate (AMR) was significantly higher than in qualified-AI patients (35.71% vs 13.19% [P = .0056]; odds ratio [OR], .2734 [95% CI, .1139-.6565]), as were the AMR (50.89% vs 20.79% [P < .001]; OR, .2532 [95% CI, .1583-.4052]) and >5 mm polyp miss rate (35.82% vs 19.48% [P = .0152]; OR, .4335 [95% CI, .2288-.8213])., Conclusions: This study confirmed that patients classified as inadequate by AI exhibited an unacceptable >5 mm AMR, providing key evidence for implementing AI in guiding bowel re-cleansing and potentially standardizing future colonoscopy screening. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05145712.)., Competing Interests: Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships. This study was funded by the Science and Technology Achievement Transformation Platform Construction Project of Ministry of Education (to H.Y.) and the Public Health Research Project of Futian District, Shenzhen (nos. FTWS2021056, FTWS2023001, FTWS2023028; and Sun Yat-sen Eighth Affiliated Hospital Clinical Research Program, grant no. 202301, to H.C). The funder had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report., (Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: EGD is essential for GI disorders, and reports are pivotal to facilitating postprocedure diagnosis and treatment. Manual report generation lacks sufficient quality and is labor intensive. We reported and validated an artificial intelligence-based endoscopy automatic reporting system (AI-EARS)., Methods: The AI-EARS was designed for automatic report generation, including real-time image capturing, diagnosis, and textual description. It was developed using multicenter datasets from 8 hospitals in China, including 252,111 images for training, 62,706 images, and 950 videos for testing. Twelve endoscopists and 44 endoscopy procedures were consecutively enrolled to evaluate the effect of the AI-EARS in a multireader, multicase, crossover study. The precision and completeness of the reports were compared between endoscopists using the AI-EARS and conventional reporting systems., Results: In video validation, the AI-EARS achieved completeness of 98.59% and 99.69% for esophageal and gastric abnormality records, respectively, accuracies of 87.99% and 88.85% for esophageal and gastric lesion location records, and 73.14% and 85.24% for diagnosis. Compared with the conventional reporting systems, the AI-EARS achieved greater completeness (79.03% vs 51.86%, P < .001) and accuracy (64.47% vs 42.81%, P < .001) of the textual description and completeness of the photo-documents of landmarks (92.23% vs 73.69%, P < .001). The mean reporting time for an individual lesion was significantly reduced (80.13 ± 16.12 seconds vs 46.47 ± 11.68 seconds, P < .001) after the AI-EARS assistance., Conclusions: The AI-EARS showed its efficacy in improving the accuracy and completeness of EGD reports. It might facilitate the generation of complete endoscopy reports and postendoscopy patient management. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT05479253.)., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To develop a machine learning-based prediction model using clinical data from the first 24 h of ICU admission to enable rapid screening and early intervention for sepsis patients. Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic medical records of sepsis patients using machine learning methods. We evaluated model performance in predicting sepsis outcomes within the first 24 h of ICU admission across US and Chinese healthcare settings. Results: From 31 clinical features, machine learning models demonstrated significantly better predictive performance than traditional approaches for sepsis outcomes. While linear regression achieved low test scores (0.25), machine learning methods reached scores of 0.78 and AUCs above 0.8 in testing. Importantly, these models maintained robust performance (scores 0.63–0.77) in external validation. Conclusions: The application of machine learning-based prediction models for sepsis could significantly improve patient outcomes through early detection and timely intervention in the critical first 24 h of ICU admission, supporting clinical decision-making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening is being implemented in countries with a high incidence of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer. High‐quality EGD screening ensures the yield of early diagnosis and prevents suffering from advanced UGI cancer and minimal operational‐related discomfort. However, performance varied dramatically among endoscopists, and quality control for EGD screening remains suboptimal. Guidelines have recommended potential measures for endoscopy quality improvement and research has been conducted for evidence. Moreover, artificial intelligence offers a promising solution for computer‐aided diagnosis and quality control during EGD examinations. In this review, we summarized the key points for quality assurance in EGD screening based on current guidelines and evidence. We also outline the latest evidence, limitations, and future prospects of the emerging role of artificial intelligence in EGD quality control, aiming to provide a foundation for improving the quality of EGD screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The histopathologic diagnosis of colorectal sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and hyperplastic polyps (HPs) is of low consistency among pathologists. This study aimed to develop and validate a deep learning (DL)–based logical anthropomorphic pathology diagnostic system (LA-SSLD) for the differential diagnosis of colorectal SSL and HP. Methods The diagnosis framework of the LA-SSLD system was constructed according to the current guidelines and consisted of 4 DL models. Deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) 1 was the mucosal layer segmentation model, DCNN 2 was the muscularis mucosa segmentation model, DCNN 3 was the glandular lumen segmentation model, and DCNN 4 was the glandular lumen classification (aberrant or regular) model. A total of 175 HP and 127 SSL sections were collected from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University during November 2016 to November 2022. The performance of the LA-SSLD system was compared to 11 pathologists with different qualifications through the human-machine contest. Results The Dice scores of DCNNs 1, 2, and 3 were 93.66%, 58.38%, and 74.04%, respectively. The accuracy of DCNN 4 was 92.72%. In the human-machine contest, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the LA-SSLD system were 85.71%, 86.36%, and 85.00%, respectively. In comparison with experts (pathologist D: accuracy 83.33%, sensitivity 90.91%, specificity 75.00%; pathologist E: accuracy 85.71%, sensitivity 90.91%, specificity 80.00%), LA-SSLD achieved expert-level accuracy and outperformed all the senior and junior pathologists. Conclusions This study proposed a logical anthropomorphic diagnostic system for the differential diagnosis of colorectal SSL and HP. The diagnostic performance of the system is comparable to that of experts and has the potential to become a powerful diagnostic tool for SSL in the future. It is worth mentioning that a logical anthropomorphic system can achieve expert-level accuracy with fewer samples, providing potential ideas for the development of other artificial intelligence models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Accurate endoscopic optical prediction of the depth of cancer invasion is critical for guiding an optimal treatment approach of large sessile colorectal polyps but was hindered by insufficient endoscopists expertise and inter‐observer variability. We aimed to construct a clinically applicable artificial intelligence (AI) system for the identification of presence of cancer invasion in large sessile colorectal polyps. Methods: A deep learning‐based colorectal cancer invasion calculation (CCIC) system was constructed. Multi‐modal data including clinical information, white light (WL) and image‐enhanced endoscopy (IEE) were included for training. The system was trained using 339 lesions and tested on 198 lesions across three hospitals. Man–machine contest, reader study and video validation were further conducted to evaluate the performance of CCIC. Results: The overall accuracy of CCIC system using image and video validation was 90.4% and 89.7%, respectively. In comparison with 14 endoscopists, the accuracy of CCIC was comparable with expert endoscopists but superior to all the participating senior and junior endoscopists in both image and video validation set. With CCIC augmentation, the average accuracy of junior endoscopists improved significantly from 75.4% to 85.3% (P = 0.002). Conclusions: This deep learning‐based CCIC system may play an important role in predicting the depth of cancer invasion in colorectal polyps, thus determining treatment strategies for these large sessile colorectal polyps. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

White light endoscopy is the most pivotal tool for detecting early gastric neoplasms. Previous artificial intelligence (AI) systems were primarily unexplainable, affecting their clinical credibility and acceptability. We aimed to develop an explainable AI named ENDOANGEL-ED (explainable diagnosis) to solve this problem. A total of 4482 images and 296 videos with focal lesions from 3279 patients from eight hospitals were used for training, validating, and testing ENDOANGEL-ED. A traditional sole deep learning (DL) model was trained using the same dataset. The performance of ENDOANGEL-ED and sole DL was evaluated on six levels: internal and external images, internal and external videos, consecutive videos, and man–machine comparison with 77 endoscopists in videos. Furthermore, a multi-reader, multi-case study was conducted to evaluate the ENDOANGEL-ED's effectiveness. A scale was used to compare the overall acceptance of endoscopists to traditional and explainable AI systems. The ENDOANGEL-ED showed high performance in the image and video tests. In man–machine comparison, the accuracy of ENDOANGEL-ED was significantly higher than that of all endoscopists in internal (81.10% vs. 70.61%, p < 0.001) and external videos (88.24% vs. 78.49%, p < 0.001). With ENDOANGEL-ED's assistance, the accuracy of endoscopists significantly improved (70.61% vs. 79.63%, p < 0.001). Compared with the traditional AI, the explainable AI increased the endoscopists' trust and acceptance (4.42 vs. 3.74, p < 0.001; 4.52 vs. 4.00, p < 0.001). In conclusion, we developed a real-time explainable AI that showed high performance, higher clinical credibility, and acceptance than traditional DL models and greatly improved the diagnostic ability of endoscopists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Changes in gastric mucosa caused by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection affect the observation of early gastric cancer under endoscopy. Although previous researches reported that computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have great potential in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection, their explainability remains a challenge. Objective: We aim to develop an explainable artificial intelligence system for diagnosing H. pylori infection (EADHI) and giving diagnostic basis under endoscopy. Design: A case–control study. Methods: We retrospectively obtained 47,239 images from 1826 patients between 1 June 2020 and 31 July 2021 at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University for the development of EADHI. EADHI was developed based on feature extraction combining ResNet-50 and long short-term memory networks. Nine endoscopic features were used for H. pylori infection. EADHI's performance was evaluated and compared to that of endoscopists. An external test was conducted in Wenzhou Central Hospital to evaluate its robustness. A gradient-boosting decision tree model was used to examine the contributions of different mucosal features for diagnosing H. pylori infection. Results: The system extracted mucosal features for diagnosing H. pylori infection with an overall accuracy of 78.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 76.2–80.3]. The accuracy of EADHI for diagnosing H. pylori infection (91.1%, 95% CI: 85.7–94.6) was significantly higher than that of endoscopists (by 15.5%, 95% CI: 9.7–21.3) in internal test. And it showed a good accuracy of 91.9% (95% CI: 85.6–95.7) in external test. Mucosal edema was the most important diagnostic feature for H. pylori positive, while regular arrangement of collecting venules was the most important H. pylori negative feature. Conclusion: The EADHI discerns H. pylori gastritis with high accuracy and good explainability, which may improve the trust and acceptability of endoscopists on CADs. Plain language summary: An explainable AI system for Helicobacter pylori with good diagnostic performance Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the main risk factor for gastric cancer (GC), and changes in gastric mucosa caused by H. pylori infection affect the observation of early GC under endoscopy. Therefore, it is necessary to identify H. pylori infection under endoscopy. Although previous research showed that computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems have great potential in H. pylori infection diagnosis, their generalization and explainability are still a challenge. Herein, we constructed an explainable artificial intelligence system for diagnosing H. pylori infection (EADHI) using images by case. In this study, we integrated ResNet-50 and long short-term memory (LSTM) networks into the system. Among them, ResNet50 is used for feature extraction, LSTM is used to classify H. pylori infection status based on these features. Furthermore, we added the information of mucosal features in each case when training the system so that EADHI could identify and output which mucosal features are contained in a case. In our study, EADHI achieved good diagnostic performance with an accuracy of 91.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 85.7–94.6], which was significantly higher than that of endoscopists (by 15.5%, 95% CI: 9.7–21.3%) in internal test. In addition, it showed a good diagnostic accuracy of 91.9% (95% CI: 85.6–95.7) in external tests. The EADHI discerns H. pylori gastritis with high accuracy and good explainability, which may improve the trust and acceptability of endoscopists on CADs. However, we only used data from a single center to develop EADHI, and it was not effective in identifying past H. pylori infection. Future, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical applicability of CADs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Tandem colonoscopy studies have found that about one in five adenomas are missed at colonoscopy. It remains debatable whether the combination of a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) system with a computer-aided quality improvement (CAQ) system for real-time monitoring of withdrawal speed results in additional benefits in adenoma detection or if the synergetic effect may be harmed due to excessive visual burden resulting from information overload. This study aimed to evaluate the interaction effect on improving the adenoma detection rate (ADR).Methods: This single-center, randomized, four-group, parallel, controlled study was performed at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. Between 1 July and 15 October 2020, 1076 patients were randomly allocated into four treatment groups: control 271, CADe 268, CAQ 269, and CADe plus CAQ (COMBO) 268. The primary outcome was ADR.Results: The ADR in the control, CADe, CAQ, and COMBO groups was 14.76 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 10.54 to 18.98), 21.27 % (95 %CI 16.37 to 26.17), 24.54 % (95 %CI 19.39 to 29.68), and 30.60 % (95 %CI 25.08 to 36.11), respectively. The ADR was higher in the COMBO group compared with the CADe group (21.27 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.024, odds ratio [OR] 1.284, 95 %CI 1.033 to 1.596) but not compared with the CAQ group (24.54 % vs. 30.6 %, P = 0.213, OR 1.309, 95 %CI 0.857 to 2.000, respectively).Conclusions: CAQ significantly improved the efficacy of CADe in a four-group, parallel, controlled study. No significant difference in the ADR or polyp detection rate was found between CAQ and COMBO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Prediction of intramucosal gastric cancer (GC) is a big challenge. It is not clear whether artificial intelligence could assist endoscopists in the diagnosis. Methods: A deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) model was developed via retrospectively collected 3407 endoscopic images from 666 gastric cancer patients from two Endoscopy Centers (training dataset). The DCNN model's performance was tested with 228 images from 62 independent patients (testing dataset). The endoscopists evaluated the image and video testing dataset with or without the DCNN model's assistance, respectively. Endoscopists' diagnostic performance was compared with or without the DCNN model's assistance and investigated the effects of assistance using correlations and linear regression analyses. Results: The DCNN model discriminated intramucosal GC from advanced GC with an AUC of 0.942 (95% CI, 0.915–0.970), a sensitivity of 90.5% (95% CI, 84.1%–95.4%), and a specificity of 85.3% (95% CI, 77.1%–90.9%) in the testing dataset. The diagnostic performance of novice endoscopists was comparable to those of expert endoscopists with the DCNN model's assistance (accuracy: 84.6% vs. 85.5%, sensitivity: 85.7% vs. 87.4%, specificity: 83.3% vs. 83.0%). The mean pairwise kappa value of endoscopists was increased significantly with the DCNN model's assistance (0.430–0.629 vs. 0.660–0.861). The diagnostic duration reduced considerably with the assistance of the DCNN model from 4.35s to 3.01s. The correlation between the perseverance of effort and diagnostic accuracy of endoscopists was diminished using the DCNN model (r: 0.470 vs. 0.076). Conclusions: An AI-assisted system was established and found useful for novice endoscopists to achieve comparable diagnostic performance with experts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]