Search

OBJECTIVE To assess the literature that evaluates how variations in metereddose inhaler (MDI) technique affect lung distribution for inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) formulated as MDI suspensions and solutions. DATA SOURCES PubMed (up to November 2012) and Cochrane Library (up to November 2012) were searched using the terms metered-dose inhalers, HFA 134a, Asthma/*drug therapy, and inhaled corticosteroids. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION All articles in English from the data sources that assessed MDI technique comparing total lung distribution (TLD) of MDI solutions or suspensions formulated with ICSs were included in the review. Five relevant studies were identified. DATA SYNTHESIS Five controlled studies compared how variations in MDI technique affect TLD for ICS MDI solutions with suspensions. MDI solutions resulted in greater TLD compared with larger particle MDI suspensions. Delayed or early inspiration upon device actuation of MDI solutions resulted in less TLD than coordinated actuation, but with a 3- to 4-times greater TLD than MDI suspensions inhaled using a standard technique. A sixth study evaluated inspiratory flow rates (IFR) for small, medium, and large particles. Rapid and slow IFRs resulted in similar TLD for small particles, while far fewer particles reached the airways with medium and large particles at rapid, rather than slow, IFRs. CONCLUSIONS Based on the literature evaluated, standard MDI technique should be used for ICS suspensions. ICS MDI solutions can provide a higher average TLD than larger-particle ICS suspensions using standard technique, discoordinated inspiration and medication actuation timing, or rapid and slow IFRs. ICS MDI solutions allow for a more forgiving technique, which makes them uniquely suitable options for patients with asthma who have difficultly with MDI technique.

This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of as-required salbutamol 100μg administered from either a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI; Ventolin TM ) or from a non-CFC hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a pMDI (Ventolin TM CFC-free) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. All patients ( n = 423) continued with their standard asthma therapy, and recorded their daily use of study medication, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) and symptom scores, throughout the 4-week treatment period. Clinic lung function was measured at 2-week intervals. The median daily use of inhaled study medication remained constant at four actuations per day throughout the study in both treatment groups and statistical analysis indicated that the two formulations were equivalent. Small improvements in both treatment groups were reported in mean morning and evening PEF, clinic forced expiratory volume in 1 sec and clinic PEF and there were no significant differences between the two groups. Both formulations were well tolerated. This study indicates that as-required salbutamol 100μg administered via a HFA 134a pMDI is as effective and safe as the currently available CFC-propelled formulation.

This multi-national, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate 500 μg twice daily propelled either by the non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant, hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a, or the CFC propellants 11 and 12 used in the established pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI). The study period was 12 months and involved 412 subjects with moderate to severe asthma (HFA 134a pMDI: n = 203; CFC pMDI: n = 209). For the first 3 months, subjects kept a daily record card and attended the clinic every 4 weeks. Thereafter, they kept daily diaries for 2 weeks before each clinic assessment, which were performed at the end of 6, 9 and 12 months. Mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) increased during the first week in both treatment groups. By the end of week 12 the adjusted mean increase from baseline in morning PEF was 21 and 23 l min −1 in the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI groups, respectively, and this increase was maintained throughout the 12-month study period. Similar improvements were detected in other diary card parameters and in clinic lung function measurements. The two groups were shown to be clinically equivalent in terms of all efficacy variables and there were no differences in tolerability. There were few reports of low serum cortisol levels during the 12-month study period, and serum cortisol levels were similar at baseline and after 12 weeks and 12 months of treatment in the two groups. In conclusion, the new HFA 134a fluticasone propionate pMDI is as effective and safe as the established CFC fluticasone propionate pMDI when used at a dosage of 1 mg day −1 .

The phasing out of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) requires the development of an alternative non-ozone depleting propellant for use in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). The present study assessed the effects on tolerability and efficacy of a switch from the currently available formulation containing the CFC propellants 11 and 12 to an alternative non-CFC formulation using the propellant hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a in patients with mild to moderate asthma. After a 4-week run-in period during which patients received salbutamol 200μg four times daily from a CFC pMDI, 547 patients were randomized to 12 weeks of treatment with salbutamol 200μg four times daily administered from either an HFA 134a pMDI (Ventolin TM CFC-free; 277 patients) or CFC pMDI (Ventolin TM , 270 patients). At the end of this period, all patients then received a further 4 weeks of treatment with the same dose of salbutamol via a CFC pMDI (run-out period). On the basis that high doses of β 2 -agonists are known to increase heart rate, change in heart rate was selected as the primary outcome variable. Small increases in heart rate were observed during the treatment period and these changes were comparable in both groups; the 90% confidence interval for the treatment differences was within the predefined limits for clinical equivalence (± 10 beats min −1 ). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups and there were no reports of paradoxical bronchospasm. Furthermore, daily PEF measurements showed comparability in terms of lung function. Symptom scores and use of additional bronchodilator were also similar in both groups. These results demonstrate that salbutamol (800μg day −1 ), formulated with HFA 134a is equivalent to the current CFC formulation in terms of tolerability and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Secondary to phasing out chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), the fluticasone propionate (FP) pressurized metered-dose inhaler has been formulated in a nonozone-depleting propellant, hydrofluoralkane (HFA) 134a.OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety of FP 200 µg daily propelled by HFA 134a to FP 200 µg daily propelled by CFCs 11 and 12 over a four-week treatment period in pediatric asthmatic patients.METHODS: The study was multinational, randomized, double blind and of parallel group design. Eligible patients aged 16 years and younger were steroid naive or receiving 500 µg/day or less of beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide or flunisolide, or 250 µg/day or less of inhaled FP. The primary efficacy variable was mean morning peak expiratory flow with equivalence determined if the 90% CIs for the treatment differences between groups were within ±15 L/min.RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen patients (mean age 9.3±2.8 years) were randomly assigned; 158 patients received FP HFA 134a and 157 patients received FP CFC. Over the four-week treatment period, mean morning peak expiratory flow increased from baseline in both groups (14 L/min and 17 L/min, respectively), with a mean treatment difference of -2 L/min. Equivalence was demonstrated between the groups (90% CI -6 to +3 L/min; P=0.589). Both formulations were well tolerated with no serious drug-related events.CCONCLUSIONS: FP propelled by HFA 134a has equivalent efficacy and comparable safety to FP propelled by CFC propellants at a microgram equivalent dose in pediatric asthmatic patients.

Five commercially available spacers were investigated to determine their influence on the percentage of drug retained in the spacer device, percentage fine particle fraction (FPF), percentage deposited in the induction port, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), and geometric standard deviation (GSD). Betamethasone valerate (BMV) and triamcinolone acetonide (TAA) were used as model drugs in the pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) formulations containing the propellant HFA 134a. The BMV was dissolved in an ethanol/HFA 134a system, and the TAA was suspended in HFA 134a using ethanol as a dispersing agent. The metering chamber volume of the valve was either 50 microl or 150 microl. The spacer devices investigated included the ACE, Aerochamber, Azmacort, Easivent, and Ellipse spacers. Each spacer device was attached to an Andersen Cascade Impactor powered by a vacuum pump. Cascade impaction data were used to derive the percentage drug deposited in the induction port, MMAD, GSD, and FPF. The BMV particles emitted from the spacers were finer than the TAA particles because the dissolved drug precipitated as the cosolvent evaporated. The TAA particles had significantly larger MMADs because many undissolved drug particles were contained within each droplet following actuation. After evaporation of the liquid continuous phase, the suspended drug aggregated to form larger agglomerates than those particles precipitated from the BMV pMDI solution droplets. The addition of a spacer device lowered the MMAD to less than 4.7 microm for particles from both the BMV pMDI solution and the TAA pMDI suspension. The addition of a spacer device also lowered the percentage drug deposited in the induction port. The FPF was significantly increased when a spacer device was used. The MMAD significantly decreased when a spacer device was added for the two model drugs when using the 150-microl metering valves, but the difference was not statistically significant when the 50-microl valves were used (P < .05). The GSD was not influenced by the use of a spacer device. The use of a spacer device will enhance pMDI therapy by reducing the amount of drug deposited in the oropharyngeal region, which will lead to fewer instances of local and systemic side effects. In addition, the spacer devices investigated will allow a higher dose of drug to reach the deep lung, which may permit the use of lower dosage regimens with increased therapeutic efficacy.

This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was designed to investigate the hypothesis of equivalent efficacy and comparable safety of two inhaled presentations of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination product (SALM/FP) 50/100 microg administered twice daily to patients with mild-to-moderate asthma for 12 weeks. The delivery systems were a 25/50 microg strength hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) and a Diskus inhaler (50/100 microg strength). A third group received FP 100 microg twice daily via a chlorofluorocarbon MDI (50 microg strength). A total of 497 patients aged 11-79 years with reversible airways obstruction who were symptomatic on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy and had room for improvement in lung function were randomized to treatment in a double-blind, parallel-group design (SALM/FP MDI: n=165; SALM/FP Diskus: n=167; FP MDI: n=165) for 12 weeks. A total of 383 patients completed the study according to the protocol. According to the primary efficacy variable, increase in mean morning PEF over weeks 1-12, the two inhaled presentations of SALM/FP were clinically equivalent (adjusted mean increases 43 and 46 l min(-1); treatment difference 3 l min(-1); 95% confidence interval: -6 to 11 l min(-1)). Equivalence was also demonstrated by all secondary efficacy measures. The SALM/FP MDI was significantly superior to the FP MDI for increase in mean morning PEF (treatment difference 19 l min(-1); P

Rationale Airway mucosal vasculature participates in absorption of inhaled drugs and inflammatory processes. We tested two soluble gases, HFA 134a and acetylene to determine non-invasively airway mucosal vascularity as a marker of airway inflammation. Methods Six steroid naive asthmatics and six healthy subjects were tested. Deadspace volume was assessed using Fowler's method. Subjects inhaled to TLC one soluble gas mixture containing 0.3% acetylene and another containing HFA 134a which were exhaled into a spirometer through a critical flow orifice to standardize flow. Instantaneous concentrations of these gases in the anatomical dead-space fraction were measured at the airway opening using a mass spectrometer. Time dependent uptake was assessed by increasing breathold times between 2.5 and 20 secs. Results Mean percentage uptake of acetylene and HFA 134a was for asthmatic subjects, median 25.1% (15.76%-31.79%) and 3.87% (2.0%7.48%) compared to normal subjects, median 14.4% (6.10%-20.83%) ( p p Conclusions Lack of time dependent uptake of HFA 134a renders it unsuitable to determine airway mucosal blood flow (AMBF). Our results demonstrated acetylene is the better gas to determine AMBF as a marker of airway inflammation. It has the potential to evaluate new and existing treatments with utility across the range of asthma severity and other inflammatory airway diseases.

A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 1 mg twice daily administered via a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) containing the new non-chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant (HFA 134a), or the established CFC propellants 11 and 12 in patients with severe asthma. The study comprised a 2-week run-in period followed by two 6-week treatment periods, with no washout period in between. One hundred and nineteen symptomatic adult patients with severe asthma, who were receiving inhaled beclomethasone 2–4 mg day −1 or equivalent, were randomized to treatment. Patients were randomized to one of two sequence groups (sequence 1: HFA 134a pMDI then CFC pMDI or sequence 2: CFC pMDI then HFA 134a pMDI). The sequence groups differed with respect to mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) at baseline; however, the magnitude of the increase in PEF from baseline during treatment was similar in the two sequence groups. Mean PEF at baseline was 334 l min −1 in sequence group 1 (HFA 134a→CFC pMDI) and this increased to 357 l min −1 and 366 l min −1 during treatment with the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI, respectively. In sequence group 2 (CFC→HFA 134a pMDI) mean PEF at baseline was 297 l min −1 and this increased to 336 l min −1 and 328 l min −1 during treatment with the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI, respectively. Based on an overall analysis of the two treatment groups at week 6, equivalence was demonstrated; the mean treatment difference (HFA 134a-CFC pMDI) in morning PEF was 0 l min −1 (90% confidence interval (CI), for difference between groups: −7, 6 l min −1 ). There was a comparable improvement in secondary efficacy variables, including clinic lung function measurements, in the two treatment groups. The incidence and type of most adverse events were similar in the two treatment groups. There was no difference in the adjusted geometric mean morning serum cortisol levels after treatment with the HFA 134a and CFC pMDI. Therefore, the fluticasone propionate HFA 134a pMDI constitutes a suitable replacement for the established CFC pMDI at a microgram equivalent dose.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of the fluticasone propionate 125 μg pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) propelled by either hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants, in adult patients with asthma. HFA 134a is a non-ozone depleting propellant used as a replacement for the CFC propellants 11 and 12 which are being phased out in accordance with the Montreal Protocol. Three hundred and eighty patients with mild to moderate asthma and ‘room for improvement' in their treatment were randomized to receive fluticasone propionate 250 μg twice daily via pMDIs propelled by either CFC propellants 11 and 12 ( n = 195) or HFA 134a ( n = 185). Fluticasone propionate significantly improved lung function over the 4-week treatment period in both treatment groups. The improvement in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) after 7 days of treatment was approximately 12 l min −1 in both groups, rising to approximately 22 l min −1 at the end of the 4-week treatment period. The adjusted mean difference between the two formulations over weeks 1–4 was −1 l min −1 (90% confidence interval: −7, 5 l min −1 ), confirming their equivalence. Clinical comparability was also demonstrated with respect to secondary efficacy variables, including daily symptom scores, evening PEF and clinic visit expiratory measurements. There were no clinically relevant differences in adverse events or serum cortisol levels between the two groups. The fluticasone propionate 125 μg HFA 134a pMDI is an effective and well tolerated product and is a suitable replacement for the fluticasone propionate 125 μg CFC pMDI at a microgram equivalent dose.

Beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) extrafine is a hydrofluoroalkane-based, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-free inhalation aerosol. This study was conducted to determine whether BDP extrafine and CFC-fluticasone proprionate (FP) aerosols were equivalent in terms of efficacy and tolerability in children with symptomatic mild-to-moderate asthma. Male and female patients (aged 5-12 yr) with an asthma diagnosis for > or =3 months, peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =60% of predicted normal and suboptimal asthma control were randomised to double-blind treatment with BDP extrafine 200 microg day(-1) (n=139) or CFC-FP 200 microg day(-1) (n=141) for up to 18 weeks. After 6 and 12 weeks, study medication was 'stepped down' to 100 and 50 microg day(-1), respectively, if patients had achieved good asthma control. Patients with poor asthma control discontinued from the study and those with intermediate control continued in the study but did not undergo a dose reduction. The estimated treatment difference in morning PEF% predicted at 6 weeks was -1.9% (90% CI -4.9, 1.0). There was a trend towards a greater increase in forced vital capacity (% predicted) in the BDP extrafine group (5.3 versus 0.4%; p=0.084). A 'step-down' in therapy to 100 microg day(-1) was possible in 36% and 42% of patients in the BDP extrafine and CFC-FP groups, respectively, at 6 weeks. Both drugs were well tolerated. BDP extrafine and CFC-FP aerosols were equally effective at improving asthma control in children with mild-to-moderate asthma at the same daily dose.