Search

Background: There is little knowledge about how oral and respiratory health is interrelated even though the mucosa of the oral cavity and airways constitutes a continuum and the exposures to these are partly similar. Aims: To investigate whether gum bleeding is related to asthma, respiratory symptoms and self-reported COPD. Methods: A postal questionnaire including questions about respiratory and oral health was sent to general population samples in seven Northern European centres. In 13,409 responders, gum bleeding when brushing teeth was reported always/often by 4% and sometimes by 20%. Logistic regressions accounted for age, smoking, educational level, centre and gender. Effects of BMI, cardio-metabolic diseases, early life factors, gastro-oesophageal reflux, dental hygiene, nasal congestion, and asthma medication were addressed. Results: Gum bleeding always/often was significantly associated with ≥3 asthma symptoms (OR 2.58, 95% CI 2.10–3.18), asthma (1.62 [1.23–2.14]) and self-reported COPD (2.02 [1.28–3.18]). There was a dose-response relationship between respiratory outcomes and gum bleeding frequency (≥3 symptoms: gum bleeding sometimes 1.42 [1.25–1.60], often/always 2.58 [2.10–3.18]), and there was no heterogeneity between centres (pheterogeneity = 0.49). None of the investigated risk factors explained the associations. The observed associations were significantly stronger among current smokers (pinteraction = 0.004). Conclusions: A consistent link between gum bleeding and obstructive airways disease was observed, not explained by common risk factors or metabolic factors. We speculate that oral pathogens might have unfavourable impact on the airways, and that the direct continuity of the mucosa of the oral cavity and the airways reflects a pathway that might provide novel opportunities for interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A Phase IV, 4-week, open, randomized multicenter parallel group trial compared correct use and acceptability of Diskus®, Turbuhaler®, and Easyhaler® powder inhalers among 326 inhaler naive asthmatics/symptomatics. The subjects were asked to read the instruction leaflet before taking one dose at the first visit. The correct use was evaluated when the subject took the dose. After that, the subjects were instructed in correct use. The use of the devices was also videotaped at every visit, and independent referees judged correct use. Acceptability was evaluated by a questionnaire. At the first visit, the proportions of subjects who used the devices correctly were as follows: Easyhaler, 45%; Diskus, 43%; and Turbuhaler, 51%. The corresponding figures at the last visit were 84%, 89%, and 81%. The differences at any visit were not statistically significant. Acceptability was greater for Easyhaler and Diskus for three of eight items throughout the study, all pertaining to receiving the powder from the device and control of the inhalation of the powder. Patient education in the use of devices is important, because only half of the subjects used the devices correctly, and still after 4 weeks 10-20% could not use the devices satisfactorily, regardless of which device. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]