Search

Introduction: Female hormones and obesity have an impact on women with asthma. We aimed to describe how these components affect asthma inflammatory processes. Methods: Sex hormones [FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), estrone (E1), testosterone and Δ4 androstenedione (A4)] and serum IL1β, IL13, IL17a, IL-5, IL6, TNF-a were measured from 11 to18 pre- and postmenopausal women with asthma. Results: Premenopausal normal weight women revealed higher levels of IL5 and IL17a than obese women on both days of the menstrual cycle (IL5: D1: 6.4 vs 1.4 pg/ml, p =.036 and D14: 3 vs 1.4 pg/ml, p =.045 and IL17a: D1: 13.7 pg/ml vs 10.6 pg/ml and D14: 12.4 pg/ml vs 10.6 pg/ml, p =.009, respectively). In premenopausal women on D1, Δ4 Androstenedione was positively correlated with IL1β (p =.016, r = 0.733), whereas on D14, Estradiol with IL1β (p =.009, r = −.768) and TNF-a with Testosterone (p =.004, r = −0.816), and Δ4 Androstenedione (p =.002, r = −0.841) negatively. In postmenopausal women, TNF-a was negatively associated with FSH (p =.004, r = −0.638), but positively with Testosterone (p =.025, r = 0.526) and IL10 also positively with Estradiol (p =.007, r = 0.610). Conclusion: Obesity shows a protective role in asthma through the suppression of IL5 and IL17. Estrogens seem to inhibit Th1 and Th2 inflammation, while androgens have a dual role with negative and positive correlations with neutrophilic biomarkers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objective: Sensitization to specific IgE Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins (SEs) is associated with an increased risk for severe asthma development. Limited data exist regarding the association of seropositivity for specific IgE SEs and the different aspects of severe asthma. We aimed to determine whether the presence of SEs is associated with asthma-related parameters such as inflammatory cells in the airways, features of airway remodeling, and other variables relating to asthma assessment and severity. Methods: Fifty patients with severe asthma were recruited in the study. Demographics, comorbidities, asthma duration, and asthma medication were recorded by treating physicians. Specific IgE SE measurement, lung function, atopic status, asthma control test (ACT), sputum induction, bronchoscopy with BAL, and indices of airway remodeling were also assessed. Results: Twelve patients were positive to enterotoxin sensitization. Patients seropositive to specific IgE SEs significantly differed in regard to FEV1% pred and FEV1/FVC ratio compared to seronegative ones. Analyzing the inflammatory variables obtained from induced sputum, BAL, and endobronchial biopsies, the only significant difference was that of smooth muscle area (SMA), which was greater in specific IgE SE seropositive patients. The multivariate linear regression analysis showed two significant associations of specific IgE SE seropositivity. We found a negative with FEV1% pred with beta standardized coefficient 95%CI −0.054 (−0.083, −0.031), p < 0.001, and a positive with SMA with beta standardized coefficient 95%CI 0.054 (0.081, 0.037), p < 0.001. Conclusions: Seropositivity to specific IgE SEs in severe asthma is associated with more severe airflow limitation, obstruction, and upregulation in SMA, indicating a possible role in the remodeling process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article presents a post hoc analysis of the RELight study, which investigated the clinical benefit of switching from omalizumab to mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma. The study found that patients who switched to mepolizumab experienced a reduction in asthma exacerbations, improved asthma control, and a decrease in oral corticosteroid intake. These improvements were observed regardless of whether the patients had previously received omalizumab treatment. The findings suggest that switching therapies may be beneficial for patients with severe asthma who do not achieve optimal disease control. [Extracted from the article]

Background and objectives: Administration of inhaled medication for asthma and COPD is often difficult and incorrect device use is associated with unfavorable outcomes. We aimed to evaluate device use errors in asthma and COPD patients and to associate incorrect use with the patient's characteristics and medical history.Methods: Demographics and medical history were recorded. The use of each prescribed device was evaluated according to predefined steps.Results: 607 patients (49.9% male, median age (IQR) 63 (51, 70) years performed 663 demonstrations (56 patients were using 2 different types of devices). 51.4% were treated for asthma and 48.6% for COPD. 79.6% of demonstrations were performed using DPIs. Errors were documented on 41.2% of demonstrations and were associated with the type of device, p < 0.001. Elderly patients were less frequently using their devices correctly compared to younger patients, 50.8% vs 62.2%, respectively, p = 0.007. Correct demonstrations were more among asthmatics compared to COPD patients 63.1% vs 54.5%, p = 0.024. Incorrect use was associated with more acute exacerbations in the preceding year [median(IQR), 1(0, 2) vs 1(0, 1)], for incorrect and correct use, respectively, p < 0.001. Upon demonstration, 15.5% of patients have never been trained (i.e., undergone actual demonstrations and observation while using their device) by anyone. Errors occurred more frequently among patients who reported not to be trained compared to those who were trained, 67.0% vs 14.6%, respectively, p < 0.001. The commonest error was associated with the inspiration maneuver and accounted for the 48.3% of errors in the DPIs and 53.0% of errors in the MDIs.Conclusion: Device use errors are common and associated with unfavorable outcomes. Trained patients were more likely to use the device correctly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]