1. Diagnostic yield of simultaneous dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance perfusion measurements and [ 18 F]FET PET in patients with suspected recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma.
- Author
-
Henriksen OM, Hansen AE, Muhic A, Marner L, Madsen K, Møller S, Hasselbalch B, Lundemann MJ, Scheie D, Skjøth-Rasmussen J, Poulsen HS, Larsen VA, Larsson HBW, and Law I
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Positron-Emission Tomography methods, Tyrosine metabolism, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Perfusion, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Glioblastoma diagnostic imaging, Brain Neoplasms pathology, Astrocytoma diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Purpose: Both amino acid positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) blood volume (BV) measurements are used in suspected recurrent high-grade gliomas. We compared the separate and combined diagnostic yield of simultaneously acquired dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion MRI and O-(2-[
18 F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18 F]FET) PET in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma following standard therapy., Methods: A total of 76 lesions in 60 hybrid [18 F]FET PET/MRI scans with DCE MRI from patients with suspected recurrence of anaplastic astrocytoma and glioblastoma were included retrospectively. BV was measured from DCE MRI employing a 2-compartment exchange model (2CXM). Diagnostic performances of maximal tumour-to-background [18 F]FET uptake (TBRmax ), maximal BV (BVmax ) and normalised BVmax (nBVmax ) were determined by ROC analysis using 6-month histopathological (n = 28) or clinical/radiographical follow-up (n = 48) as reference. Sensitivity and specificity at optimal cut-offs were determined separately for enhancing and non-enhancing lesions., Results: In progressive lesions, all BV and [18 F]FET metrics were higher than in non-progressive lesions. ROC analyses showed higher overall ROC AUCs for TBRmax than both BVmax and nBVmax in both lesion-wise (all lesions, p = 0.04) and in patient-wise analysis (p < 0.01). Combining TBRmax with BV metrics did not increase ROC AUC. Lesion-wise positive fraction/sensitivity/specificity at optimal cut-offs were 55%/91%/84% for TBRmax , 45%/77%/84% for BVmax and 59%/84%/72% for nBVmax . Combining TBRmax and best-performing BV cut-offs yielded lesion-wise sensitivity/specificity of 75/97%. The fraction of progressive lesions was 11% in concordant negative lesions, 33% in lesions only BV positive, 64% in lesions only [18 F]FET positive and 97% in concordant positive lesions., Conclusion: The overall diagnostic accuracy of DCE BV imaging is good, but lower than that of [18 F]FET PET. Adding DCE BV imaging did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of [18 F]FET PET, but may improve specificity and allow better lesion-wise risk stratification than [18 F]FET PET alone., (© 2022. The Author(s).)- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF