Search

To explore the interactions among column processes in the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM), the single‐column version of CAM (SCAM) is integrated for 1000 days in radiative‐convective equilibrium (RCE) with tropical values of boundary conditions, spanning a parameter or configuration space of model physics versions (v5 vs. v6), vertical resolution (standard and 60 levels), sea surface temperature (SST), and some interpretation‐driven experiments. The simulated time‐mean climate is reasonable, near observations and RCE of a cyclic cloud‐resolving model. Updraft detrainment in the deep convection scheme produces distinctive grid‐scale structures in humidity and cloud, which also interact with radiative transfer processes. These grid artifacts average out in multi‐column RCE results reported elsewhere, illustrating the nuts‐and‐bolts interpretability that SCAM adds to the hierarchy of model configurations. Multi‐day oscillations of precipitation arise from descent of warm convection‐capping layers starting near the tropopause, eventually reset by a burst of convective deepening. Experiments reveal how these oscillations depend critically on an internal parameter that controls the number of neutral buoyancy levels allowed for determining cloud top and computing dilute convective available potential energy in the deep convection scheme, and merely modified a little by disabling cloud‐base radiation (heating of cloud base). This strong dependence of transient behavior in 1D on this parameter will be tested in the second part of this work, in which SCAM is coupled to a parameterized dynamics of two‐dimensional, linearized gravity wave, and in the 3D simulations in future study. Plain Language Summary: Atmospheric climate models are so complicated, with so many interacting processes, that their behaviors are hard to interpret and thus flaws are hard to fix. This study tries to address that difficulty by isolating the algorithms representing vertical physical processes within an air column (turbulence, clouds, and radiation), without allowing any wind to move and smear the features caused by those interacting processes. Two versions of a popular open‐source community model are compared in this one‐dimensional single‐column framework, along with modified versions. Results suggest some ways that the model can be understood and perhaps improved, but those hypotheses need to be tested in more complicated versions of the model, accounting for winds and a spherical planet and eventually all the other complications of Earth. Key Points: Radiative‐convective equilibrium occurs in the Single Column Atmospheric ModelThe simulated climate states feature grid artifacts of humidity and cloud that are contributed from deep convective updraft detrainmentMulti‐day oscillations occur spontaneously, and are modulated by number of neutral buoyancy levels allowed for determining final cloud top [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Characteristics of, and fundamental differences between, the radiative‐convective equilibrium (RCE) climate states following the Radiative‐Convective Equilibrium Model Intercomparison Project (RCEMIP) protocols in the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 (CAM5) and version 6 (CAM6) are presented. This paper explores the characteristics of clouds, moisture, precipitation and circulation in the RCE state, as well as the tropical response to surface warming, in CAM5 and CAM6 with different parameterizations. Overall, CAM5 simulates higher precipitation rates that result in larger global average precipitation, despite lower outgoing longwave radiation compared to CAM6. Differences in the structure of clouds, particularly the amount and vertical location of cloud liquid, exist between the CAM versions and can, in part, be related to distinct representations of shallow convection and boundary layer processes. Both CAM5 and CAM6 simulate similar peaks in cloud fraction, relative humidity, and cloud ice, linked to the usage of a similar deep convection parameterization. These anvil clouds rise and decrease in extent in response to surface warming. More generally, extreme precipitation, aggregation of convection, and climate sensitivity increase with warming in both CAM5 and CAM6. This analysis provides a benchmark for future studies that explore clouds, convection, and climate in CAM with the RCEMIP protocols now available in the Community Earth System Model. These results are discussed within the context of realistic climate simulations using CAM5 and CAM6, highlighting the usefulness of a hierarchical modeling approach to understanding model and parameterization sensitivities to inform model development efforts. Plain Language Summary: Clouds, circulations and rainfall in the tropics play an important role in Earth's climate. However, global climate models differ in their representation of these features, contributing to uncertainty in future climate projections. One useful tool to better understand model differences and inform efforts to improve models is to analyze idealized configurations. We explore two different numerical representations of an idealized atmosphere relevant to tropical regions to determine the impact on the characteristics of clouds, rainfall and circulations as well as the tropical atmospheric response to warming. We show that our idealized models mirror differences in the low‐cloud structure in the deep tropics of more realistic models. This work also finds similarities between the two numerical representations, such as a decrease in the spatial extent of high altitude clouds with warming. As the surface is warmed, both versions also show increases in the clustering of clouds, the likelihood of extreme precipitation rates, and an estimate of how much warming would occur in response to a doubling of carbon dioxide. Key Points: A new radiative‐convective equilibrium (RCE) configuration is added to the official release of Community Earth System Model (CESM) to facilitate the use of Radiative‐Convective Equilibrium Model Intercomparison Project (RCEMIP) in the CESM hierarchyThe Community Atmosphere Model version 5 and Community Atmosphere Model version 6 (CAM6) RCEMIP climate states and variation across SST experiments are documented in the context of the CESM hierarchyDiffering parameterizations lead to a reduction of low‐level clouds in CAM6, consistent with differences in more realistic simulations [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]