Search

Objective: High power short duration (HPSD) ablation strategy is proposed to be more effective than low power long duration (LPLD) for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Although small trials abound, data from a large cohort are lacking. This meta-analysis compares all the existing studies comparing these two approaches to evaluate perceived advantages of one over the other. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identified studies comparing HPSD to LPLD ablation. All the analyses used the random-effects model. Results: Ablation settings varied widely across 20 studies comprising 2,136 patients who underwent HPSD and 1,753 patients who underwent LPLD. The pooled incidence of atrial arrhythmia recurrence after HPSD ablation was 20% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.16–0.25; I2=88%]. Atrial arrhythmia recurrences were significantly less frequent with HPSD ablation (incidence risk ratio=0.66; 95% CI: 0.49–0.88; I2=72%; p=0.004). Procedural, fluoroscopy, and ablation times were significantly shorter with HPSD ablation. First-pass pulmonary vein isolations (PVIs) were significantly more [odds ratio (OR)=2.94; 95% CI: 1.50–5.77; I2=89%; p=0.002), and acute pulmonary vein reconnections (PVRs) were significantly lesser (OR=0.41; 95% CI: 0.28–0.62; I2=62%; p<0.001) in the HPSD group. Although radiofrequency energy was significantly higher, esophageal thermal injuries (ETI) were lower with HPSD ablation. Acute complications, including steam-pops, were rare and statistically similar in both the groups. Conclusion: HPSD ablation enables faster first-pass PVI with fewer PVRs, similar ETI rates, rare collateral damage, and lower recurrence of atrial arrhythmia in the long term than LPLD. Randomized controlled studies with a larger cohort are indicated both to confirm the benefit of HPSD ablation and standardize the ablation protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Diffuse transmural fibrosis and scarring limited to the area without atrial dilation or significant structural heart or other systemic disease has not been reported. We present three cases of a syndrome characterized by refractory organized atrial arrhythmias, diffuse atrial scarring with electrical silence, and mechanical paralysis in the absence of atrial dilation or any systemic or neurodegenerative disorders. Methods: Patients referred for electrophysiology study of atrial arrhythmias were included. Electroanatomic mapping with the Carto system (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) and magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI) with scar sequencing were performed. Results: There was no family or personal history of cardiac, muscular, or developmental diseases. All patients had organized atrial arrhythmias. Echocardiograms showed atrial standstill with normal atrial and ventricular dimensions. No other structural abnormalities were noted. Carto mapping revealed severe biatrial diffuse scarring. The left atrial (LA) was less affected than the right atrial (RA). MRI findings confirmed biatrial scarring. During tachycardia, islands of dissociated electrical activity could be seen in the right atria. Entrainment mapping was not performed in the atria as high-output pacing could not capture the atria. Coronary sinus entrainment demonstrated the coronary sinus (CS) not to be critical to the tachycardia. Ablation was targeted toward channels of low voltage but was not successful in any cases. All required atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation with pacing. Conclusion: An association between biatrial cardiomyopathy and scarring with normal atrial dimensions has been described. Since severe scarring has not been reported with organized arrhythmias this may represent a new syndrome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Knowledge of the global atrial activation pattern is critical to ablation of an atrial arrhythmia. We hypothesized that the variability in post-pacing intervals (PPIs) with pacing at different cycle lengths (CLs) from the same pacing site, regardless of distance to the circuit, can be used to identify atrial activation patterns during tachycardia. Methods and Results: Consecutive patients referred for ablation of organized atrial arrhythmias were included (n = 28, 31 total tachycardias). The variability in PPIs (PPIV) was calculated by comparing the difference in PPIs after overdrive pacing with 5-second trains 10, 20, and 30 ms shorter than the tachycardia cycle length (TCL). The global activation pattern was defined as circuitous (macroreentrant atrial circuit) or centrifugal (focal origin with centrifugal radiation) by electroanatomic mapping. Except for one case, all pacing was performed from the proximal coronary sinus bipole. Circuitous tachycardias (n = 17, all macro-reentrant) exhibited minimal variability with pacing at 10 ms and 30 ms shorter than TCL (6.0 ± 2.5 ms), whereas centrifugal tachycardias (n = 14, 8 microreentrant) displayed a high degree of variability (56.5 ± 20.6 ms). Rank sum analysis of PPIV suggests that the two groups are indeed distinct (P < 0.001). Using PPIV cutoffs of ≤10 ms and ≥30 ms, circuitous and centrifugal activation patterns could be distinguished with a high degree of sensitivity (94% circuitous, 92.8% centrifugal) and 100% specificity. Conclusions: Our data support the use of PPIV to rapidly and accurately predict the global activation pattern during atrial arrhythmia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]