Search

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has become the cornerstone treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). While in cryoablation cell damage is caused by thermal effects, lately, pulsed field ablation (PFA) has been established as a novel non-thermal tissue-specific ablation modality for PVI. However, data comparing outcomes of patients undergoing either PFA or cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for primary PVI are sparse., Methods: Consecutive patients with AF undergoing PVI by either CBA or PFA were included in the analysis. The primary outcome was the time to AF/AT recurrence. For secondary outcomes, clinical and periprocedural parameters were compared., Results: In total, outcomes of 141 AF patients treated by PFA (94 patients) or CBA (47 patients) were compared. After 365 days, 70% of patients in the PFA group and 61% of patients in the CBA group were free from AF/AT (HR 1.35, 95% CI 0.60-3.00; p = 0.470). No deaths occurred. While symptoms alleviated in both groups, only after PFA, we observed significant improvement of left atrial volume index (PFA group baseline: 40 [31;62] ml/m 2 , PFA group follow-up: 35 [29;49] ml/m 2 ; p = 0.015), NT-pro BNP levels (PFA group baseline: 1106 ± 2479 pg/ml, PFA group follow-up: 1033 ± 1742 pg/ml; p = 0.048), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (PFA group baseline: 55 [48;60] %, PFA group follow-up: 58 [54;63] %; p = 0.006). PVI by PFA was the only independent predictor of LVEF improvement., Conclusion: In our study, we show that CBA and PFA for PVI are of similar efficacy when it comes to AF recurrence. However, our findings suggest that PFA rather than CBA might induce left atrial reverse remodeling thereby contributing to left ventricular systolic function., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), for which pre-clinical and early-stage clinical data are suggestive of some degree of preferentiality to myocardial tissue ablation without damage to adjacent structures. Here in the MANIFEST-17K study we assessed the safety of PFA by studying the post-approval use of this treatment modality. Of the 116 centers performing post-approval PFA with a pentaspline catheter, data were received from 106 centers (91.4% participation) regarding 17,642 patients undergoing PFA (mean age 64, 34.7% female, 57.8% paroxysmal AF and 35.2% persistent AF). No esophageal complications, pulmonary vein stenosis or persistent phrenic palsy was reported (transient palsy was reported in 0.06% of patients; 11 of 17,642). Major complications, reported for ~1% of patients (173 of 17,642), were pericardial tamponade (0.36%; 63 of 17,642) and vascular events (0.30%; 53 of 17,642). Stroke was rare (0.12%; 22 of 17,642) and death was even rarer (0.03%; 5 of 17,642). Unexpected complications of PFA were coronary arterial spasm in 0.14% of patients (25 of 17,642) and hemolysis-related acute renal failure necessitating hemodialysis in 0.03% of patients (5 of 17,642). Taken together, these data indicate that PFA demonstrates a favorable safety profile by avoiding much of the collateral damage seen with conventional thermal ablation. PFA has the potential to be transformative for the management of patients with AF., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Although atrial inflammation has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF), the identification of atrial inflammation remains challenging. We aimed to establish a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) protocol with 18 Fluor-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) for the detection of atrial hypermetabolism as surrogate for inflammation in AF., Methods: We included n = 75 AF and n = 75 non-AF patients undergoing three common PET/CT protocols (n = 25 per group) optimized for the detection of (a) inflammation and (b) malignancy in predefined fasting protocols, and (c) cardiac viability allowing for maximized glucose uptake. 18 F-FDG-uptake was analyzed in predefined loci., Results: Differences of visual atrial uptake in AF vs non-AF patients were observed in fasting (inflammation [13/25 vs 0/25] and malignancy [10/25 vs 0/25]) protocols while viability protocols showed non-specific uptake in both the groups. In the inflammation protocol, AF patients showed higher uptake in the right atrium [(SUVmax: 2.5 ± .7 vs 2.0 ± .7, P = .01), atrial appendage (SUVmax: 2.4 ± .7 vs 2.0 ± .6, P = .03), and epicardial adipose tissue (SUVmax: 1.4 ± .5 vs 1.1 ± .4, P = .04)]. Malignancy and viability protocols failed to differentiate between AF and non-AF., Conclusion: Glucose uptake suppression protocols appear suitable in detecting differential atrial 18 F-FDG uptake between AF and non-AF patients. Imaging-based assessment of inflammation might help to stratify AF patients offering individualized therapeutic approaches., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)