Search

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation, ablation decreases left atrial (LA) compliance, which may lead to left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction. We aimed to examine serial changes in LV diastolic function after 2 ablation procedures and their related factors in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF)., Hypothesis: LV diastolic function is different after 2 ablation procedures., Methods: We enrolled 132 patients with PAF (76 males, mean age 67 years; cryoballoon [CB] ablation/radiofrequency [RF] ablation 60/72) who underwent a single ablation procedure. The transthoracic echocardiographic parameters were obtained before, 3 days after, and 6 months after ablation., Results: The afterload-related index of LV diastolic function, Ed/Ea = E/e' / (0.9 × systolic blood pressure), increased significantly at 3 days after ablation, especially after CB ablation (P <0.05), although no differences were observed in age, sex, LA size, LV size, and E/e' before ablation between CB ablation and RF ablation. Creatine kinase release after ablation was significantly higher in CB ablation than in RF ablation (P <0.001). The increment of Ed/Ea after CB ablation was positively correlated with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) before ablation (r =0.416; P <0.05). The elderly (age ≥ 75 years), females, and patients with hypertension were more likely to show impaired LV diastolic function transiently after 3 days of ablation, but the diastolic index was restored to baseline level after 6 months., Conclusions: The increased Ed/Ea after CB ablation represented transient manifestation of underlying LV diastolic dysfunction in PAF patients with preserved LVEF with older age, female sex, and a history of hypertension., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

The presence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in the left atrium has been reported to be an independent predictor of thromboembolic risk in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Dabigatran was associated with lower rates of stroke and systemic embolism as compared with warfarin when administered at a higher dose. Between July 2011 and October 2015, nonvalvular AF patients treated with warfarin or dabigatran who had transesophageal echocardiography prior to ablation therapy for AF were enrolled. The intensity of SEC was classified into four grades, from 0 to 3. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to analyze factors associated with SEC. Sixty-five patients were on dabigatran and 65 were on warfarin, with the prothrombin time in therapeutic range. There were no significant differences in the age, CHADS2 score, left atrial dimension, and left atrial appendage flow between the two groups. However, there were more grade 2 or higher patients with left atrial SEC in the warfarin group (n = 20) than in the dabigatran group (n = 2) (p < 0.001). When multivariate regression analysis was performed, grade 2 or higher left atrial SEC was independently associated with no dabigatran usage in addition to high brain natriuretic peptide level and high incidence of diabetes mellitus or persistent AF. Thus, dabigatran exhibited low intensity of left atrial SEC in nonvalvular AF patients as compared with warfarin.

Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and a large left atrium are at a high risk for thromboembolisms. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have mainly been used for the prevention of cardiac embolisms caused by AF. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is performed in order to exclude any left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi. We herein report two cases of persistent AF, both of which were treated with rivaroxaban for more than two years. Since TEE identified mobile LAA thrombi with this treatment, we switched from rivaroxaban to the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. Dabigatran resolved the LAA thrombi that had been refractory to rivaroxaban.