Search

This study aims at segregating the neural substrate for the 3D-form and 3D-motion attributes in structure-from-motion perception, and at disentangling the stimulus-driven and endogenous-attention-driven processing of these attributes. Attention and stimulus were manipulated independently: participants had to detect the transitions of one attribute--form, 3D motion or colour--while the visual stimulus underwent successive transitions of all attributes. We compared the BOLD activity related to form and 3D motion in three conditions: stimulus-driven processing (unattended transitions), endogenous attentional selection (task) or both stimulus-driven processing and attentional selection (attended transitions). In all conditions, the form versus 3D-motion contrasts revealed a clear dorsal/ventral segregation. However, while the form-related activity is consistent with previously described shape-selective areas, the activity related to 3D motion does not encompass the usual "visual motion" areas, but rather corresponds to a high-level motion system, including IPL and STS areas. Second, we found a dissociation between the neural processing of unattended attributes and that involved in endogenous attentional selection. Areas selective for 3D-motion and form showed either increased activity at transitions of these respective attributes or decreased activity when subjects' attention was directed to a competing attribute. We propose that both facilitatory and suppressive mechanisms of attribute selection are involved depending on the conditions driving this selection. Therefore, attentional selection is not limited to an increased activity in areas processing stimulus properties, and may unveil different functional localization from stimulus modulation.

Brain imaging studies on duration perception usually report the activation of a network that includes the frontal and mesiofrontal cortex (supplementary motor area, SMA), parietal cortex, and subcortical areas (basal ganglia, thalamus, and cerebellum). To address the question of the specific involvement of these structures in temporal processing, we contrasted two visual discrimination tasks in which the relevant stimulus dimension was either its intensity or its duration. Eleven adults had to indicate (by pressing one of two keys) whether they thought the duration or the intensity of a light (LED) was equal to (right hand) or different from (left hand) that of a previously presented standard. In a control task, subjects had to press one of the two keys at random. A similar broad network was observed in both the duration-minus-control and intensity-minus-control comparisons. The intensity-minus-duration comparison pointed out activation in areas known to participate in cognitive operations on visual stimuli: right occipital gyrus, fusiform gyri, hippocampus, precuneus, and intraparietal sulcus. In contrast, the duration-minus-intensity comparison indicated activation of a complex network that included the basal ganglia, SMA, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and temporal cortex. These structures form several subnetworks, each possibly in charge of specific time-coding operations in humans. The SMA and basal ganglia may be implicated in the time-keeping mechanism, and the frontal-parietal areas may be involved in the attentional and mnemonic operations required for encoding and retrieving duration information.

In human vision, two features of the same object can be identified concurrently without loss of accuracy. Performance declines, however, when the features belong to different objects in opposite visual fields. We hypothesized that different positron emission tomography activation patterns would reflect these behavioral results. We first delineated an attention network for single discriminations in left or right visual field and then compared this with the activation pattern when subjects divided attention over two features of a single object or over two objects in opposite hemifields. When subjects attended to a single feature, parietal, premotor, and anterior cingulate cortex were activated. These effects were strongest in the right hemisphere and were, remarkably, unaffected by the direction of attention. In contrast, direction of attention affected occipital and frontal activity: right occipital and left lateral frontal activity were higher with attention to the left, whereas right lateral frontal activity was higher with attention to the right. When subjects identified two features of the same object, parietal, premotor, and anterior cingulate activity was enhanced further, predominantly this time in the left hemisphere. Again, there was no direction sensitivity. Direction-sensitive activation of lateral frontal cortex also was increased. Finally, when subjects divided their attention over opposite hemifields, activity in the direction-sensitive occipital and frontal regions fell to a level midway between those seen during exclusively leftward or rightward attention. Thus, the behavioral efficiency with which we attend to multiple features of a single peripheral object is paralleled by enhanced activity in structures generally active during peripheral selective attention as well as in structures that depend on the specific direction of attention, most notably lateral frontal cortex. In addition, in the direction-sensitive regions, dividing attention over hemifields causes a compromise pattern between the extreme levels obtained during unilateral attention.

Parametric study designs can reveal information about the relationship between a study parameter (e.g., word presentation rate) and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in functional imaging. The brain's responses in relation to study parameters might be nonlinear, therefore the (linear) correlation coefficient as often used in the analysis of parametric studies might not be a proper characterization. We present a noninteractive method, which fits nonlinear functions of stimulus or task parameters to rCBF responses, using second-order polynomial expansions. This technique is implemented in the context of the general linear model and statistical parametric mapping. We also consider the usefulness of statistical inferences, based on F fields, about similarities and differences of these nonlinear responses in different groups. This approach is illustrated with a 12-run H215O PET activation study using an auditory paradigm of increasing word presentation rates. A patient who had recovered from severe aphasia and a normal control were studied. We demonstrate the ability of this new technique to identify brain regions where rCBF is closely related to increasing word presentation rate in both subjects without constraining the nature of this relationship and where these nonlinear responses differ.

PET activation studies are performed widely to study human brain function. The question of reproducibility, reliability, and comparability of the results of such experiments has never been addressed on a large scale. Recently, 12 European PET centers performed the same cognitive activation experiment in a European Union funded concerted action. The experiment involved a standardized and validated cross-lingual experimental and control task involving verbal fluency. Each center contributed at least 6 subjects. In total there were 77 subjects and 247 scans in each of the two conditions, giving 494 scans in total. We have analyzed each center's dataset and pooled datasets using statistical parametric mapping. We present results that address the consistency of these analyses, discuss the factors that influence their sensitivity, and comment on a number of related methodological issues. We used a MANOVA to test for center, condition, and centre by condition effects and found a strong condition and center effect and weaker interactions. The main effect determining reproducibility was the overall sensitivity of the experiment, to which the scanner and number of scans contribute in a major way, with a marked advantage for 3D scanners and a large field of view. An important conclusion is that data from different centers can be pooled to improve the reliability of results, which is of particular importance for studies in patients with rare conditions.