Search

Background: Healthcare workers are usually the first responders during outbreaks and are instrumental in educating the populace about the prevention of different diseases and illnesses. The aim of this study was to assess the association between healthcare workers' characteristics and knowledge, attitudes and practices toward Zika virus.Methods: This was a cross-sectional study that collected data from healthcare workers at 3 medical facilities using a validated self-administered questionnaire between July 2017 - September 2017. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between sociodemographic and knowledge, attitudes, and practices.Results: A total of 190 healthcare workers were analyzed. Of these, 60, 72.6 and 64.7% had good knowledge, positive attitudes, and good practices toward Zika virus, respectively. Healthcare workers without a formal degree were less likely to have good knowledge of Zika virus (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0:49; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.24-0.99) compared to those with a formal degree. Reduced odds for positive attitude towards Zika virus were observed in healthcare workers with low income as compared to those with high income (AOR = 0.31; 95% CI =0.13-0.75). Being younger than 40 years old was associated with poor Zika virus practices (AOR = 0:34; 95% CI = 0.15-0.79).Conclusions: Significant association between healthcare workers' sociodemographic characteristics and Zika virus knowledge, attitudes and practices were observed. Public health interventions that seek to increase Zika virus awareness should aim to train healthcare workers who are younger, without formal degree and those earning low income. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery in pediatrics is still uncommon and few studies assessed in clinical practice advantages and disadvantages. Applicability and effectiveness of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic procedures in congenital and acquired conditions in children are still unknown. We assessed applicability and effectiveness of 3D compared with 2D laparoscopic procedures in a pediatric setting. Methods: Two groups of patients who underwent 3D or 2D laparoscopic surgical procedures between May 2016 and April 2018 were compared. Each 3D/2D laparoscopic procedure was assessed with a surgeon/assistant questionnaire. Results: The 3D group included 30 patients and the 2D group 32 patients. The analysis of the 3D/2D questionnaire showed statistically significant superiority of 3D technical aspects (P = .0000), allowing a better spatial orientation and depth perception, reducing manipulation and trauma to tissues. Moreover, no difference was reported in physical complaints (P = .7084), but decreased visual fatigue was highlighted by surgeon (P = .000). Conclusions: In pediatric patients, 3D laparoscopic procedures prove to be more effective facilitating the surgeon's performance, while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]