Search

Allowed stimulating means of recovery are considered substances and physiological processes that act through the increase in performance athletes and to more efficient recovery and improvement of sports results, which are very difficult to achieve the usual training methods of training, and it can be considered useful until used as a supplement to training. If the rational use, it significantly increases the resistance of the organism in Training athletes and competition loads and favorably affect the elimination of general and local fatigue. The aim of the research consists of testing and analyzing the attitudes of different sports experience on the allowed means of stimulating recovery. The sample of examinees consists of 120 footballers of different sports experience (I group (62) – 4-8 years of sports experience, II group (58) – 9-14 years of sports experience). The sample of variables consists of the system of 10 attitudes (claims), and each attitude (claim) consists of 5 verbal categories (marked from -2 to +2). To determine multivariate and univariate significance of differences between footballers of different competition ranks multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) have been applied. Generally it can be concluded that players with less experience attach less importance to some of the allowed recovery stimulus, and that the level of information increases with sports experience.

Training exercises of recovery of sportsmen include both exercises implying higher level of training and exercises of optimal recovery of sportsmen. In order to use training exercises of recovery best way it is necessary to know how they react to the body of a sportsman concerning their character and length. It is also necessary to take into consideration the fact that human body adapts equally both to burden and adequate recovery exercises. To increase the efficiency of training exercises of recovery it is inevitable to use different exercises and methods changing their use, that is, they should be applied in a complex way considering their change depending on sport activities and structure of training process. The aim of the study is to check and analyse attitudes of football players of different age on training exercises of recovery. The sample of examinees consists of 120 players from nine different clubs from the area-level competition of the Football Association of Vojvodina (Serbian Super League = 43, first division = 40 Serbian and Serbian league = 37), which were divided into two groups according to age (group I (65 ) - 18-25 years age group II (55) - over 25 years of age). The sample of variables consists of the system of 10 attitudes (claims), and each attitude (claim) consists of 5 verbal categories (marked from -2 to +2). To determine the significance of differences between players of different ages multivariate analysis of variance were used (MANOVA), univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA), discriminative analysis and Roy’s test. All sample of examinees is unique in a larger number attitudes towards the training exercises of recovery, determined statistical differences can be attributed to a better understanding of the recovery process by a group of older players.

Illegal stimulant use is considered a recovery or giving athletes a substance that artificially affects the improvement of physical and psychological condition of athletes and thus increase their success in sport. Consumption of materials that a healthy body can synthesize as hormones (testosterone, cortisone, growth hormone, etc.) falls under 164 CRNOGORSKA SPORTSKA AKADEMIJA, „Sport Mont“ časopis br. 31,32,33. the concept of doping. Doping substances by their chemical composition and effect on the body of an athlete are different. The study aims to examine the attitudes of players of different ages on illegal stimulants of recovery. The sample comprised 120 players from nine different clubs from the area-level competition of the Football Association of Vojvodina (Serbian Super League = 43, first division = 40 Serbian and Serbian league = 37), which were divided into two groups according to age (group I (65 ) - 18-25 years age group II (55) - over 25 years of age). The sample of variables constitutes a system of 10 items (statements), and each paragraph (the claim) has five verbal categories. To determine the significance of differences between players of different ages multivariate analysis of variance were used (MANOVA), univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA), discriminative analysis, Roy’s test, Pearson's coefficient of contingency (χ) and coefficient of multiple correlation (R). In general terms it can be concluded that the players of different ages do not differ and are unique to the approval of the proposed positions.

Usage of unallowed stimulative drugs for recovery implies consuming or giving to others substances which artificially improve physical and psychical condition of an athlete and thus improve his/her success in sport. The goal of the study is to examine attitudes of football players of various length of sports experience, towards unallowed stimulative substances for recovery. The sample of examinees consists of 120 football players divided into two groups, on basis of the sports experience length (first group: 4-8 years of sport experience, second group: 9-14 years). The sample of variables consists of a system of 10 items (claims) assessed on a 5-grade scale. The importance of the differences between the groups was determined by a multivariate and univariate analysis of variance, discriminative analysis, Royís test, Pearson's coefficient of contingency and the coefficient of multiple correlation. It is evident that football players of different length of sport experience differ among themselves in their attitudes towards unallowed drugs for recovery, however, those differences are not big.