Search

Abstract: Though electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) requires a close cooperation between anesthesiology and psychiatry, literature lacks of approaches that consider both disciplines in parallel. Special problems might be posed by patients with complicated features or ECT-indications other than treatment-refractory depression (TRD). Considering these patients there is a particular paucity of data, especially regarding anesthesiological aspects. Therefore, we sought (1) to discuss special issues of the peri-interventional management of non-TRD-cases from a combined psychiatric–anesthesiological point of view and (2) to assess the efficacy of ECT in the classical indication of TRD as compared to cases undergoing ECT for other indications or under difficult conditions (non-TRD) by means of Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale scores. A retrospective chart analysis of patients treated with ECT between the years 2009 and 2011 at the University of Ulm, Department of Psychiatry, was conducted. Special anesthesiological efforts were necessary in cohort non-TRD. There was no difference in the clinical outcome between cohort non-TRD (n=7) and TRD (n=22) with a median CGI-I score of 2 (“much improved”) in both groups. Close cooperation between psychiatry and anesthesiology is indispensable in non-TRD patients. Our results provide preliminary evidence that ECT is equally effective in the standard indication of TRD compared to other indications. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]