Search

Conclusion: Patients with sudden deafness who had abnormal ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP)/cervical VEMP (cVEMP) responses but retained caloric function may subsequently develop secondary hydrops with a mean interval of 8 years. Objective: This study applied the inner ear test battery in patients who had sudden deafness previously to elucidate how secondary endolymphatic hydrops occurs years after sudden deafness. Methods: Twenty patients who had experienced recent vertiginous attacks several years after sudden deafness (group A) and 20 patients without rotational vertiginous episode for at least 5 years following sudden deafness (group B) were enrolled. All patients underwent an inner ear test battery comprising audiometry, caloric test, and oVEMP and cVEMP tests. Results: The mean interval from initial sudden deafness to vertiginous attack in group A was 8 years, with a mean hearing level of 66 ± 20 dB, which did not significantly differ from 61 ± 20 dB in group B. For the vestibular test results, the percentages of abnormal cVEMP, oVEMP, and caloric tests in group A were 65%, 70%, and 25%, respectively. Compared to the respective 70%, 60%, and 75% abnormalities in group B, only the caloric test differed significantly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of recording vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) using simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulation (B-VEMP), and compare it with that using monaural acoustic stimulation (M-VEMP). Seven healthy volunteers were evoked by initial B-VEMP test and subsequent M-VEMP test, whereas vice versa in another 7 volunteers. All 14 subjects demonstrated both B-VEMPs and M-VEMPs, without significant difference in the latencies of p13 and n23. When using interaural amplitude difference (IAD) ratio for interpreting amplitude, B-VEMPs did not differ significantly from that of M-VEMPs. Hence, B-VEMPs can produce information equivalent to M-VEMPs in terms of response rate, latencies, and IAD ratio in healthy subjects. Likewise, similar results were also shown in the patients with unilateral Meniere’s disease. In conclusion, B-VEMPs provide neither different information nor less variability, as compared with M-VEMPs. In addition, B-VEMPs can offer information on unilateral inner ear (saccular) pathology similar to that by M-VEMPs. Furthermore, recording from binaural stimulation can be used as a possibly more convenient mode compared with two monaural recordings, especially when testing young or old or disabled patients, since a continuous muscular effort is required during recording. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]