Search

In the face of the hard-line approach to asylum-seekers currently being taken by both the major political parties in Australia, alienated cosmopolitans have been increasingly inclined to disidentify with the Australian nation and declare 'not in my name'. Although sympathetic both to the cosmopolitan position and to these acts of principled dissent, I express reservations about such an approach on the grounds that it distances the cosmopolitan elite from the democratic mass and inclines towards irresponsibility. Drawing on Socrates as an exemplar, I investigate how citizens with cosmopolitan sensibilities might resist injustice on universal moral grounds without being either condemned by or exiled from their local political community. Ultimately, I argue in favour of an embedded cosmopolitanism that engages critically with the political ethos and calls on citizens to take responsibility for protecting the state in its ideal image. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article examines developments in Australian politics and governance between January and June, 2011. The author notes that partisan politics dominated political discourse in Australia during this period, although a slate of natural disasters and subsequent rescue efforts interrupted political bickering. Controversial policies concerning mining taxes, off-shore processing of asylum seekers, and carbon taxes are then assessed. Budget concerns are addressed, as is criticism of the ruling Labor Party and Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard. The article then discusses political developments in specific Australian states.