Search

Background: With few data regarding treatment and outcome of patients with AIH outside of large centres we present such a study of patients with AIH in 28 UK hospitals of varying size and facilities. Methods: Patients with AIH were identified in 14 University and 14 District General hospitals; incident cases during 2007–2015 and prevalent cases, presenting 2000–2015. Treatment and outcomes were analysed. Results: In 1267 patients with AIH, followed up for 3.8 (0–15) years, 5‐ and 10‐year death/transplant rates were 7.1 ± 0.8% and 10.1 ± 1.3% (all‐cause) and 4.0 ± 0.6% and 5.9 ± 1% (liver related) respectively. Baseline parameters independently associated with death/transplantation for all causes were: older age, vascular/respiratory co‐morbidity, cirrhosis, decompensation, platelet count, attending transplant centre and for liver related: the last four of these and peak bilirubin. All‐cause and liver‐related death/transplantation was independently associated with: non‐treatment with corticosteroids, non‐treatment with a steroid‐sparing agent (SSA), non‐treatment of asymptomatic or non‐cirrhotic patients and initial dose of Prednisolone >35 mg/0.5 mg/kg/day (all‐cause only), but not with type of steroid (Prednisolone vs. Budesonide) or steroid duration beyond 12 months. Subsequent all‐cause and liver‐death/transplant rates showed independent associations with smaller percentage fall in serum ALT after 1 and 3 months, but not with failure to normalise levels over 12 months. Conclusions: We observed higher death/transplant rates in patients with AIH who were untreated with steroids (including asymptomatic or non‐cirrhotic subgroups), those receiving higher Prednisolone doses and those who did not receive an SSA. Similar death/transplant rates were seen in those receiving Prednisolone or Budesonide, those continuing steroids after 12 months and patients attaining normal ALT within 12 months versus not. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is common in females of childbearing age. Although some studies have provided information about the outcomes of pregnancy, there remains uncertainty regarding conclusions. Aim: To comprehensively explore the interactions between pregnancy and AIH. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Science Citation Index Expanded were searched to collect available studies in relation to pregnancy in AIH patients (from inception to 28 August 2021). Pooled data were calculated using a random effects model with standardised mean difference (SMD), or risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Twelve studies were considered eligible for meta‐analysis. Data from 26 case reports/series were extracted for systematic review. AST level in AIH patients was significantly lower during pregnancy (SMD = −0.41, 95% CI = [−0.70, −0.12]; SMD = −1.60, 95% CI = [−2.76, −0.44]) and loss of biochemical remission occurred more frequently in post‐partum (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = [0.19, 0.52]). Patients with portal hypertension or without established remission before conception presented as high‐risk subgroups and the incidence of pre‐term delivery was higher in these groups compared to other AIH patients (RR = 9, 95% CI = [1.22, 51.1]; RR = 0.05, 95% CI = [0.004, 0.38]). In population‐based comparison, pre‐term birth (RR = 2.45, 95% CI = [1.66, 3.62]) also occurred more often in AIH patients compared with the general population. Conclusions: Successful pregnancy is a reasonable expectation in AIH. However, hepatic biochemistry should be monitored closely in both the puerperium and the post‐partum period. Though some patients may present higher risk, with carefully selected therapeutic manipulation and multi‐disciplinary care, the majority of mothers and infants should achieve uneventful outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

LINKED CONTENT: This article is linked to Nayagam et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16708 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16751 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In common with several other autoimmune diseases, there is a marked female preponderance in both autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). Whether this is due to gender differences relating specifically to the liver or more generally to the female constitution is unknown. The clinical expression of these disorders provides few clues to explain their predilection for females. Sexual dimorphism in the metabolic functions of the liver is well recognised, and several studies have suggested that donor-recipient gender matching/mismatching has a major impact on the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) but, overall, the available evidence does not support the concept that the female liver is inherently more susceptible to immune mediated damage. Since the majority of patients present peri-menopausally and endocrinopathy is frequently associated with these conditions, it seems more likely that hormonal factors may be involved. Review of the available information about hormonal effects on the immune system and how they might impact on what is known about the pathogenetic mechanisms, and interact with genetic factors, in the two conditions unfortunately provides no definitive explanation for the predilection of these disorders for females. However, this is clearly a potentially fruitful area for further research. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: To report baseline features and long-term medical/social outcomes of juvenile autoimmune liver disease, including autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis (ASC), managed in a single tertiary center.Study Design: Retrospective study of children diagnosed in 2000-2004 with AIH/ASC followed up to date. Patients with abnormal cholangiogram were classified as ASC. Presentation and outcome features were compared.Results: Eighty-three children were included (42 female, median age 12.1 years [8.5-14.1 years], AIH = 54, ASC = 29). Most (65%) had antinuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle autoantibodies; 6% presented with acute liver failure; 29% had histologic evidence of cirrhosis. The 1999 and simplified International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group criteria failed to diagnose up to 26% of patients with AIH and 48% with ASC, and the proposed the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition criteria were accurate. Response to treatment was excellent with 95% achieving normal transaminase levels. During follow-up, 31% had at least 1 relapse episode; 3 patients with AIH developed cholangiopathy and 5 patients with ASC developed progressive bile duct injury. At last follow-up (median of 14.5 years, 10.4-16.8), 99% were alive, 11 underwent transplantation and 1 is listed for transplant. Five-, 10-, and 15-year transplant-free survival rates were 95%, 88%, and 83%; patients with ASC and those relapsing being more likely to require transplant. Social outcome was excellent with 93% in employment/education.Conclusions: Seamless management of juvenile autoimmune liver disease leads to excellent clinical and social outcomes. Despite good response to immunosuppressive treatment, patients with ASC have a worse prognosis than those with AIH. Diagnostic models developed for adults are unsatisfactory to correctly diagnose juvenile autoimmune liver disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Autoimmune hepatitis is a corticosteroid-responsive liver disease arising consequent to immunogenetic and environmental risk factors. The clinical course reflects relapsing and remitting, hepatocyte targeted immunologic damage, which is countered by reparative responses to cell injury. Appropriate and timely immunosuppressive therapy drives the disease into remission, albeit with inevitable side effects. Many challenges faced in the clinic reflect practice that must capture a heterogeneous disease presentation, course, and treatment response, as well as treatment tolerability. In this Grand Round we appraise the evidence supporting current treatment approaches, address the impact of autoimmune liver disease 'crossover or overlap' presentations, explore important clinical correlates to immune-serological classifiers, and discuss the factors influencing choice of alternative therapy in difficult-to-treat situations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) has been well characterised and codified through the development of diagnostic criteria. These criteria have been adapted and simplified and are widely used in clinical practice. However, there is a need to update and precisely define the criteria for both treatment response and treatment. A systematic review was performed and a modified Delphi consensus process was used to identify and redefine the response criteria in autoimmune hepatitis. The consensus process initiated by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group proposes that the term 'complete biochemical response' defined as 'normalization of serum transaminases and IgG below the upper limit of normal' be adopted to include a time point at 6 months after initiation of treatment. An insufficient response by 6 months was a failure to meet the above definition. Non-response was defined as '<50% decrease of serum transaminases within 4 weeks after initiation of treatment'. Remission is defined as liver histology with a Hepatitis Activity Index <4/18. Intolerance to treatment was agreed to stand for 'any adverse event possibly related to treatment leading to potential drug discontinuation'. These definitions provide a simple and reproducible framework to define treatment response and non-response, irrespective of the therapeutic intervention. A consensus on endpoints is urgently required to set a global standard for the reporting of study results and to enable inter-study comparisons. Future prospective database studies are needed to validate these endpoints. Consensus among international experts on response criteria and endpoints in autoimmune hepatitis is lacking. A consensus on endpoints is urgently required to set a global standard for the reporting of study results and to enable the comparison of results between clinical trials. Therefore, the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) herein presents a statement on 5 agreed response criteria and endpoints: complete biochemical response, insufficient response, non-response, remission, and intolerance to treatment, which can be used to guide future reporting. [Display omitted] • Consensus among experts on response criteria in autoimmune hepatitis is lacking. • A consensus on endpoints is required to set a standard for reporting study results. • Herein, the IAIHG presents a statement on 5 agreed response criteria and endpoints. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) usually receive maintenance therapy with thiopurines, such as azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine. Genetic polymorphisms in AZA metabolism can lead to variations in thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) and 6-methylmercaptopurine, both of which can cause adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In inflammatory bowel disease, a therapeutic TGN range (225–450 pmol/8x108 erythrocytes) has been identified to optimise effectiveness. We evaluated the benefits of a personalised medicine approach to thiopurine dosing, in comparison to standard weight-based dosing. A retrospective matched cohort study of 214 patients with AIH who were seen at King's College between 1999-2019 was performed. Metabolite levels were measured in 109 patients. The control group included 105 patients on weight-based thiopurine dosing with no metabolite monitoring. Biochemical response (BR) occurred more frequently at 6-month follow-up in patients with metabolite monitoring compared to those on a weight-based regimen (77% vs. 60%, p = 0.008). This remained true with data analysis based on clinicians who measure metabolites and those who do not (BR at 6 months: 84% vs. 64%, p = 0.016). Patients with BR had TGN levels within the therapeutic range of 225–450 pmol/8x108 erythrocytes significantly more often than those who failed to achieve or lost BR (40% vs. 13%, p < 0.0001). Moreover, TGN levels within the pre-defined therapeutic range predicted more stable disease within 6 months of testing compared to levels outside the range (p < 0.0001). A high proportion of patients with sub-therapeutic TGN levels (75–225 pmol/8x108 erythrocytes) remained in BR (75% vs. 81%, p = 0.589) with fewer ADRs (44% vs. 86%, p = 0.0002) when compared to patients with therapeutic TGN levels. A strategy of personalised medicine using metabolite levels can optimise treatment regimens in AIH, resulting in fewer ADRs whilst maintaining BR. This study looked to see if measuring the breakdown products of a medication used in autoimmune hepatitis increases the chances of gaining good control of the disease, when compared to a group of patients who were on a dose of this medication based on their weight. A group of 214 patients with autoimmune hepatitis were split into 2 groups: roughly half had their medication dose adjusted according to measurements of breakdown products in the blood, whilst the other half received their weight-based dose as normal. The results confirmed that using a personalised approach and checking drug breakdown products resulted in fewer side effects and potentially improved control of disease. [Display omitted] • Patients with autoimmune hepatitis are typically on thiopurine maintenance therapy. • Measuring thiopurine metabolites can improve rates of biochemical response (BR). • 75% of patients with TGN levels lower than the range established for inflammatory bowel disease can maintain BR with fewer side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims No standardised definition exists for acute, severe AIH (AS-AIH). However, rapid identification of AS-AIH and early corticosteroid therapy may prevent the need for liver transplantation (LT). We set out to determine the clinical outcomes of patients with AS-AIH presenting to our institution with particular focus on the role of corticosteroids. Methods Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collated database identified patients presenting with AS-AIH from 1999 to 2009. We defined AS-AIH as an acute presentation with an INR of ⩾1.5 at any time without histological evidence of cirrhosis. Results 32 patients were identified with AS-AIH. Among the 32 AS-AIH patients 23 were treated with corticosteroids of whom 10 (48%) required LT, whilst all 9 untreated patients required LT ( p = 0.01). Untreated patients demonstrated higher MELD scores at presentation (34 vs. 28 p = 0.01) and a non-significant decrease in episodes of sepsis but no difference in sepsis or mortality was observed between untreated or treated patients (11% vs. 26% p = 0.6 and 22% vs. 17% p = 0.99 respectively). Among treated patients, no difference in MELD scores was observed between responders or failures. Despite 59% undergoing LT, six deaths (19%) occurred. Conclusion In a well characterised cohort of patients with AS-AIH, almost 60% required LT and 20% died. There was no difference in prognostic scores between steroid responders and failures and steroid exposure did not appear to jeopardise survival. Patients with AS-AIH should be considered for a trial of corticosteroids expediently whilst a thorough search for sepsis and assessment for LT should occur if clinical deterioration or encephalopathy develops. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]