Search

Iron acquisition is an essential aspect of cell physiology for most bacteria. Although much is known about how bacteria initially recognize the various iron sources they can encounter, whether siderophore, heme, host iron/heme binding proteins, much less is known about how the iron containing compounds (Fe 2+ , Fe 3+ , Fe 3+ -siderophore complex or heme) are transported across the cytoplasmic membrane. This last transport step is powered by specific ABC (ATP-Binding-Cassette) transporters, made up of a substrate binding protein (SBP) that delivers its cargo to the TMD (TransMembrane Domain) of the ABC transporter triggering the entry of the substrate inside the cytoplasm upon catalytic activity of the ABC module. This review focuses on structural aspects of the functioning of such ABC transporters with the most part devoted to the substrate binding proteins., (Copyright © 2019 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Haem is the major iron source for bacteria that develop in higher organisms. In these hosts, bacteria have to cope with nutritional immunity imposed by the host, since haem and iron are tightly bound to carrier and storage proteins. Siderophores were the first recognized fighters in the battle for iron between bacteria and host. They are non-proteinaceus organic molecules having an extremely high affinity for Fe(3+) and able to extract it from host proteins. Haemophores, that display functional analogy with siderophores, were more recently discovered. They are a class of secreted proteins with a high affinity for haem; they are able to extract haem from host haemoproteins and deliver it to specific receptors that internalize haem. In the past few years, a wealth of data has accumulated on haem acquisition systems that are dependent on surface exposed/secreted bacterial proteins. They promote haem transfer from its initial source (in most cases, a eukaryotic haem binding protein) to the transporter that carries out the membrane crossing step. Here we review recent discoveries in this field, with particular emphasis on similar and dissimilar mechanisms in haemophores and siderophores, from the initial host source to the binding protein/receptor at the cell surface., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Bacteria use diverse signaling pathways to control gene expression in response to external stimuli. In Gram-negative bacteria, the binding of a nutrient is sensed by an outer membrane transporter. This signal is then transmitted to an antisigma factor and subsequently to the cytoplasm where an ECF sigma factor induces expression of genes related to the acquisition of this nutrient. The molecular interactions involved in this transmembrane signaling are poorly understood and structural data on this family of antisigma factor are rare. Here, we present the first structural study of the periplasmic domain of an antisigma factor and its interaction with the transporter. The study concerns the signaling in the heme acquisition system (Has) of Serratia marcescens. Our data support unprecedented partially disordered periplasmic domain of an anti-sigma factor HasS in contact with a membrane-mimicking environment. We solved the 3D structure of the signaling domain of HasR transporter and identified the residues at the HasS−HasR interface. Their conservation in several bacteria suggests wider significance of the proposed model for the understanding of bacterial transmembrane signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because heme is a major iron-containing molecule in vertebrates. the ability to use heme-bound iron is a determining factor in successful infection by bacterial pathogens. Until today, all known enzymes performing iron extraction from heme did so through the rupture of the tetrapyrrol skeleton. Here, we identified 2 Escherichia coli paralogs, YfeX and EfeB, without any previously known physiological functions. YfeX and EfeB promote iron extraction from heme preserving the tetrapyrrol ring intact. This novel enzymatic reaction corresponds to the deferrochelation of the heme. YfeX and EfeB are the sole proteins able to provide iron from exogenous heme sources to E. coli. YfeX is located in the cytoplasm. EfeB is periplasmic and enables iron extraction from heme in the periplasm and iron uptake in the absence of any heme permease. YfeX and EfeB are widespread and highly conserved in bacteria. We propose that their physiological function is to retrieve iron from heme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Iron is an essential element for most organisms, including bacteria. The oxidized form is insoluble, and the reduced form is highly toxic for most macro-molecules and, in biological systems, is generally sequestrated by iron- and heme-carrier proteins. Thus, despite its abundance on earth, there is practically no free iron available for bacteria whatever biotope they colonize. To fulfill their iron needs, bacteria have multiple iron acquisition systems, reflecting the diversity of their potential biotopes. The iron/heme acquisition systems in bacteria have one of two general mechanisms. The first involves direct contact between the bacterium and the exogenous iron/heme sources. The second mechanism relies on molecules (siderophores and hemophores) synthesized and released by bacteria into the extracellular medium; these molecules scavenge iron or heme from various sources. Recent genetic, biochemical, and crystallographic studies have allowed substantial progress in describing molecular mechanisms of siderophore and hemophore interactions with the outer membrane receptors, transport through the inner membrane, iron storage, and regulation of genes encoding biosynthesis and uptake proteins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many gram-negative bacteria have specific outer membrane receptors for free heme, hemoproteins, and hemophores. Heme is a major iron source and is taken up intact, whereas hemoproteins and hemophores are not transported: the iron-containing molecule has to be stripped off at the cell surface, with only the heme moiety being taken up. The Serratia marcescens hemophore-specific outer membrane receptor HasR can transport either heme itself or heme bound to the hemophore HasA. This second mechanism is much more efficient and requires a higher TonB-ExbB-ExbD (TonB complex) concentration than does free or hemoglobinbound heme uptake. This requirement for more of the TonB complex is associated with a higher energy requirement. Indeed, the sensitivity of heme-hemophore uptake to the protonophore carbonyl cyanide mchlorophenyl hydrazone is higher than that of heme uptake from hemoglobin. We show that a higher TonB complex concentration is required for hemophore dissociation from the receptor. This dissociation is concomitant with heme uptake. We propose that increasing the TonB complex concentration drives more energy to the outer membrane receptor and speeds up the release of empty hemophores, which, if they remained on receptors, would inhibit heine transport. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]