1. De-biasing microbiome sequencing data: bacterial morphology-based correction of extraction bias and correlates of chimera formation.
- Author
-
Rauer L, De Tomassi A, Müller CL, Hülpüsch C, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Reiger M, and Neumann AU
- Subjects
- Humans, Skin microbiology, Bias, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing methods, Microbiota genetics, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S genetics, Bacteria classification, Bacteria genetics, Bacteria isolation & purification, DNA, Bacterial genetics, Sequence Analysis, DNA methods
- Abstract
Introduction: Microbiome amplicon sequencing data are distorted by multiple protocol-dependent biases from bacterial DNA extraction, contamination, sequence errors, and chimeras, hindering clinical microbiome applications. In particular, extraction bias is a major confounder in sequencing-based microbiome analyses, with no correction method available to date. Here, we suggest using mock community controls to computationally correct extraction bias based on bacterial morphological properties., Methods: We compared dilution series of 3 cell mock communities with an even or staggered composition. DNA of these mock, and additional skin microbiome samples, was extracted with 8 different extraction protocols (2 buffers, 2 extraction kits, 2 lysis conditions). Extracted DNA was sequenced (V1-V3 16S rRNA gene) together with corresponding DNA mocks., Results: Microbiome composition was significantly different between extraction kits and lysis conditions, but not between buffers. Independent of the extraction protocol, chimera formation increased with higher input cell numbers. Contaminants originated mostly from buffers, and considerable cross-contamination was observed in low-input samples. Comparing the microbiome composition of the cell mocks to corresponding DNA mocks revealed taxon-specific protocol-dependent extraction bias. Strikingly, this extraction bias per species was predictable by bacterial cell morphology. Morphology-based computational correction of extraction bias significantly improved resulting microbial compositions when applied to different mock samples, even with different taxa. Equivalent correction of the skin samples showed a substantial impact on microbiome compositions., Conclusions: Our results indicate that higher DNA density increases chimera formation during PCR amplification. Furthermore, we show that computational correction of extraction bias based on bacterial cell morphology would be feasible using appropriate positive controls, thus constituting an important step toward overcoming protocol biases in microbiome analysis. Video Abstract., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval consent to participate: The collection of skin microbiome samples for methodological work was approved within the frame of the ProRaD study by the ethics committee of the Technical University of Munich (112/16S). Study subjects provided written informed consent for participation. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2025. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF