Search

The impact of infectious diseases (ID) specialist consultation in the management of many types of bacterial infections has been fully demonstrated but not for bone and joint infections (BJIs). Nineteen ID Italian centres collected of data from June 2009 to May 2012. Italian guidelines (2009) were used to determine the appropriateness of the diagnostic and therapeutic process of BJIs before and after consulting an ID specialist. Data on 311 patients were collected: 111 cases of prosthetic joint infection, 99 osteomyelitis, 64 spondylodiscitis and 37 fixation device infection. A significant increase of microbiological investigations, imaging techniques and blood inflammation markers were noted after consulting the ID specialist. Moreover, inappropriateness of treatment duration, dosage, and number of administrations significantly decreased after consultation. Infectious disease specialist intervention in the management of BJIs significantly increases the appropriateness both in performing instrumental and laboratory analysis, but especially in determining the correct therapy.

All infected diabetic foot wounds require antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment is influenced by the patient's features as the vascular status, the leukocyte function and the kidney activity. The initial antibiotic regimen is usually chosen empirically and it can be modified on the basis of the microbiological information obtained subsequently. The initial empiric therapy should be based, on one hand, on the grade of infected lesion and, secondly, on the epidemiological data. Almost all of the mild/moderate infected wounds can be treated with antibiotics with a spectrum of activity limited to Gram-positive cocci. Treatment with oral antibiotics is sufficient in most cases in patients with mild/moderate infections. With severe infections is more appropriate to use a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. Furthermore it is safer to start a parenteral therapy, possibly modifying it into an oral administration if the patient has stabilized. The most frequently pathogen observed in diabetic foot infections is Staphylococcus aureus. It is important to understand whether there are elements that may lead to the suspicion of MRSA infection in order to establish an appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

The diagnosis of wound infection is based on clinical signs and local and/or systemic inflammation. Therefore, the examination has a major role in the diagnosis of infected lesions of the foot. Once the clinical diagnosis of infection is made, the next step is to determine the etiology with the aim to undertake a rational and appropriate treatment. The most reliable method for assessing microbiological etiology is the specimen of material from infected lesion to perform a bacterioscopic examination and culture. The microorganisms involved in the etiology of diabetic foot depends on the type of injury and on specific patient features (antibiotic therapy, previous hospitalization). The most frequently detected pathogen is Staphylococcus aureus. Mild infections are mostly caused by Gram positive cocci, with a prevalence of S. aureus. Moderate infections are mostly supported by pyogenic Gram positive cocci, but also Gram-negative bacteria can be involved. In severe infections the etiology is polymicrobial. As regards the involvement of fungi in diabetic foot infections data are few and mostly conflicting.

Bacterial infections are the most frequent cause of hospitalization in elderly patients. In the early eighties, the advantages of Outpatient parenteral Antibiotic therapy (OPAT) were identified in the United States, and suitable therapeutic programs were established. In order to understand the different ways of managing OPAT, a National OPAT Registry was set up in 2003 in Italy. This study analyzes data concerning bacterial infections in 176 elderly patients including demographics, therapeutic management, clinical response, and side-effects. Bone and joint infections (48.9%) and skin and soft tissue infections (27.8%) were the most common infections treated with OPAT. Teicoplanin (28.9%) and ceftriaxone (22.1%) were the top two antibiotics chosen. OPAT was mainly performed at a hospital infusion center (52.8%). The clinical success rate was high and side-effects were low (12.6% of cases). Management of bacterial infections in the elderly with an outpatient program is effective and safe.

Aims: To conduct a multicentre observational study to describe management of foot infections in diabetes in the out-patient setting in Italy., Patients and Methods: Ten centres equally distributed nationwide were asked to collect, by means of a spreadsheet (Access/Excel Microsoft program), data concerning 30 consecutive diabetic patients with foot infections deemed suitable for antibiotic treatment in the out-patient setting. Centres with > or = 5 years' experience of out-patient management were selected. Data from 271 consecutive patients treated as out-patients were collected and analysed by the central coordinator. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical software package., Results: Lesions were mainly located at the toes and midfoot (33.6 and 30.2%, respectively); 63 (23.2%) patients had multiple ulcers. Seventy (25.8%) patients also had concomitant osteomyelitis. Three hundred and four pathogens, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobes and anaerobes, were isolated in 219/271 patients (80.8%) by culturing debrided tissue (71.2%) or purulent material (28.8%). Infections were polymicrobial in 33.8% of patients. The most common pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (27.3%) and Pseudomonas spp. (20.4%); enterobacteriaceae, enterococci, streptococci and anaerobes accounted for 11.5, 7.6, 6.9 and 1.9%, respectively. Antibiotics were frequently administered by parenteral route and frequently in combination. Piperacillin/tazobactam was the parenteral antibiotic most frequently utilized (21.1%). Cure/improvement was observed in 93.4% of patients., Conclusions: Foot ulcers in diabetes are common and serious; the aetiology is often polymicrobial, often including S. aureus and Pseudomonas spp. Treatment in the out-patient setting is safe and effective, and penicillins together with beta-lactamase inhibitors and fluoroquinolones are the most frequent choice.

Long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) comprise a heterogeneous group of institutions that provide a wide variety of services to diverse groups of patients, most of whom are elderly. Infections are common in LTCFs and these are complicated by antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. The residents in LTCFs have a high frequency of colonization with antimicrobial-resistant organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, penicillin-resistant pneumococci, extended spectrum P-lactamase-producing gram-negative organisms, and fluoroquinolone-resistant gram-negative organisms. Although several control programs have been published, up to now there still is a long way to go in this area of health care. This review will briefly touch upon the clinical relevance of antimicrobial resistance in LTCFs.

Defining the severity of an infection can play a central role for a correct therapeutic choice, avoiding inadequate antimicrobial treatments. Severe bacterial infections are, in fact, characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates so that the appropriateness of therapy can have a profound clinical impact. Indeed, initial inappropriate empirical therapies, and the further need to modify them, substantially increase the mortality risk. Several strategies have been suggested to improve the clinical outcome of patients affected by severe bacterial infections, such as the use of guidelines, use of antibiotics in combination, de-escalation therapy, cycling therapy and the use of infectious disease specialist consultation. A closer collaboration between the medical staff in the wards and infectious disease specialists can possibly bridge the gap between different strategies and individual needs of the patient, thereby improving the decision-making process.

Ascertainment of SBIs plays a central role in their management, which can affect the prognosis, hopefully avoiding an inappropriate antibacterial therapy concerning choice, dosing, timing, duration and route of administration of antibiotics. Different aspects of SBI management were evaluated by interviewing doctors practising in ICU, Surgery and Haematology wards. In the period 16 June - 7 July 2003, 150 doctors, equally distributed by specialty and geographical location, experienced in the management of antibiotic therapy, were interviewed in order to acquire the following information: criteria adopted to define SBIs, presumed incidence, most frequent diagnosis, initial approach to antibiotic therapy (empirical or not, route of administration, mono- or combination therapy), ID consultation request. In most cases generic and empirical criteria are used to define SBI, generally associated to the presence of co-morbidities, the highest rates being reported in ICUs (35.1%) and Haematology (34.7%) wards. Pneumonia is the top reported SBI in all the wards, followed by sepsis in ICUs and Haematology, and by intrabdominal infections in Surgery. Antibiotic therapy is often empirical (~90%), often performed i.v. with antibiotics given in combination. Following treatment failure, which occurs on average in 35.5% of cases, ID consultation and microbiological investigation are required. ID consultation is required in 20.2%, 26.1% and 28.1% of cases by haematologists, surgeons and ICU specialists, respectively. SBIs frequently occur in all the wards where the interviews were conducted. Their management is generally empirical and either ID consultation or microbiological investigation is infrequently required especially as an initial approach. The use of appropriate guidelines and ID consultation, as proven in many controlled studies, could be efficacious in reducing the incidence of inappropriate therapies and increasing favourable outcome rates.

Bacterial infections are the major cause of illness and death in the intensive care unit (ICU). In general, each unit is in itself a high risk environment for infections, simultaneously containing many diverse factors that favor the spread of clinically evident and generally serious infections: the constant presence of serious concomitant diseases, the frequent use of invasive diagnostic methods and procedures, the elevated selective pressure caused by multiple and prolonged antibiotic treatment on endogenous and environmental microbial flora. Notwithstanding the fact that the bacterial epidemiology of the ICU varies slightly in different countries and in different ICUs, in the last 15 years a general and progressive increase in the etiology of Gram-positive aerobic bacteria has been observed. Currently, Staphylococcus aureus is the etiologic agent most frequently responsible for infections in the ICU; S. aureus + coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS) + Enterococcus are responsible for more than 60% of infections. More recent data confirm that next to modifications in bacterial etiology in the ICU, the most alarming phenomenon is the methicillin-resistance of S. aureus (MRSA). The high percentage of multi-resistance compels us to reconsider therapy relative to the choice of antibiotics to use and, in particular, raises the question of possibly selecting the class of glycopeptides, alone or in combination, as the choice of treatment every time that an infection is caused by a Gram-positive microorganism. The use of glycopeptides, as with all antibiotics, must be evaluated in a suitable manner with the objective of limiting the selective pressure on resistant bacterial flora caused by their use. It is widely understood that inappropriate use of antibiotics, such as selecting an antibacterial agent with an inadequate spectrum that is thus ineffective, determines an increase in the mortality rate compared to using an agent with an appropriate spectrum of activity.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of post-surgical infections and to assess the way of managing antibiotic surgical prophylaxis. The survey was carried out by means of a questionnaire in order to obtain diverse information such as demographics, length of pre- and post-operative hospitalization, type of surgery, intervention duration, possible antibiotic prophylaxis and onset of post-surgical infections also monitored by post-discharge ambulatory controls. Four General Surgery and five Obstetrics and Gynaecology Departments in Campania (southern Italy) participated in the study, which was carried out in the period December 2001-January 2002. Overall, 410 questionnaires were collected referring to as many patients; antibiotic prophylaxis was performed in 385 (93.9%) patients. Antibiotic prophylaxis was generally managed not according to the general principles suggested by the international guidelines either for timing or for its duration or for the route of administration. Substantial differences were also noted in patient selection and antibiotic choice. Surgical site infections were recorded in 0.6% of patients undergoing clean surgery, in 5.3% of patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgery and in 3.2% of those undergoing contaminated surgery. Distant infections occurred in 1.8% and 6.5% in clean-contaminated and contaminated surgery, respectively. The results of the present study suggest the need of a continuous and accurate monitoring of post-surgical infections and the need to adopt appropriate guidelines to improve the management of surgical prophylaxis.

Treatment of diabetic foot infections (DFIs) represents an important challenge for surgeons, especially in light of the poor results achieved by traditional therapeutic approaches. In this study, the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of TZP for treatment of DFIs in 38 outpatients was evaluated. All patients (median age 63 yrs) were affected by DFIs to different degrees of severity according to Wagner's classification: degree 0, 7 pts; degree 1, 17 pts; degree 2, 10 pts; degree 3, 4 pts. Degree 0-1 infections underwent a 10-18 day course with TZP given i.m. (2.25 g bid); degree 2-3 infections were initially treated with TZP i.v. (4.5 g bid or tid). Some patients began treatment in hospital and after early discharge continued parenteral therapy at home; others were treated exclusively at home. Some pts, after a 5-7-day course of i.v. therapy switched to i.m. route. The average duration of antibiotic therapy was 28 days. At the end of treatment with TZP, some patients underwent a new treatment with oral coamoxi-clav for 10-15 days. A bacteriological examination was done for all patients: ulcus (degree 1) and deep tissue (degree 2-3) swabs at the first surgical toilette. Clinical controls, medications, surgical toilettes and microbiological cultures were performed according to the degree of severity, extension of the lesion and response to treatment. All cultures were positive for polymicrobial infections (Staphylococcus spp, Enterococcus spp, Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas spp). In 30/38 pts (79%) a complete resolution was observed; in 4 pts (10%) an improvement. DFIs require long term parenteral treatment, with wide spectrum antibiotics including Gram +, Gram - and anaerobes. OPAT represents a valid alternative to hospitalisation when the general conditions of the patient are stable, the infection is not too severe and complications are not present. TZP proved to be a good choice for treatment of diabetic foot infections that, due to its high safety, can be successfully utilized also in OPAT programmes