Search

Introduction: Ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy in patients with alopecia areata (AA) in the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807). However, hair loss presentation may vary based on location (e.g., scalp, eyebrow/eyelash, body). Here, we sought to identify distinct hair loss profiles at baseline and evaluate whether they affected the efficacy of ritlecitinib. Methods: Patients with AA aged ≥ 12 years with ≥ 50% scalp hair loss were randomized to daily ritlecitinib 10 mg (assessed for dose ranging only), 30 or 50 mg (± 4-week, 200-mg loading dose), or placebo for 24 weeks. Latent class analysis (LCA) identified hair loss profiles based on four baseline measurements: clinician-reported extent of scalp (Severity of Alopecia Tool score), eyebrow hair loss, eyelash hair loss, and patient-reported body hair loss. Logistic regression evaluated ritlecitinib (50 and 30 mg) efficacy vs placebo using Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) and Patient Satisfaction with Hair Growth (P-Sat; amount, quality, and overall satisfaction) responses at Week 24, adjusting for key covariates, including latent class membership. Results: LCA identified five latent classes: (1) primarily non–alopecia totalis (AT; complete loss of scalp hair); (2) non-AT with moderate non-scalp involvement; (3) extensive scalp, eyebrow, and eyelash involvement; (4) AT with moderate non-scalp involvement; and (5) primarily alopecia universalis (complete scalp, face, and body hair loss). Adjusting for latent class membership, patients receiving ritlecitinib 30 or 50 mg were significantly more likely to achieve PGI-C response (30 mg: odds ratio, 8.62 [95% confidence interval, 4.42–18.08]; 50 mg: 12.29 [6.29–25.85]) and P-Sat quality of hair regrowth (30 mg: 6.71 [3.53–13.51]; 50 mg: 8.17 [4.30–16.46]) vs placebo at Week 24. Results were similar for P-Sat overall satisfaction and amount of hair regrowth. Conclusion: Distinct and clinically relevant hair loss profiles were identified in ALLEGRO-2b/3 participants. Ritlecitinib was efficacious compared with placebo, independent of hair loss profile at baseline. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03732807. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction/Background The oral JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor ritlecitinib demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients aged ≥12 years with alopecia areata (AA) with ≥50% hair loss in the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 study. ALLEGRO-LT is an ongoing phase 3 open-label study investigating the long-term safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib in patients aged ≥12 years with AA with ≥25% hair loss. Objectives This post hoc analysis of ALLEGRO-LT evaluated the efficacy of ritlecitinib through Month 15 in patients with AA by the extent of scalp hair loss at baseline. Methods The open-label, multicenter, long-term ALLEGRO-LT study (NCT04006457) enrolled patients into two arms: (1) roll-over patients who had received study intervention in either the ALLEGRO phase 2a study (NCT02974868) or phase 2b/3 study (NCT03732807), and (2) de novo patients who were aged ≥12 years with AA with ≥25% scalp hair loss at baseline and had not participated in either study. This post hoc analysis only included patients in the de novo cohort. All patients received an initial 4-week loading dose of ritlecitinib 200 mg once-daily (QD) followed by ritlecitinib 50 mg QD. Outcomes included median Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score over time and the proportions of patients with SALT score ≤20 (≤20% scalp hair loss) and ≤10 at Month 15. Patients were stratified by extent of scalp hair loss at baseline (measured by SALT score) as follows: 25 to <50, 50 to <75, 75 to <90, 90 to <95, and 95 to 100. Analyses were based on observed data. Results 1052 patients were enrolled in ALLEGRO-LT, of whom 447 patients received ritlecitinib in the de novo arm. Of the 447 de novo patients, 26.6% (n=119), 16.8% (n=75), 9.2% (n=41), 2.9% (n=13), and 44.5% (n=199) had baseline SALT scores 25 to <50, 50 to <75, 75 to <90, 90 to <95, and 95 to 100, respectively. Patients with baseline SALT score ≥95 generally had longer mean duration of AA episode (3.47 years) and disease duration (10.86 years) than patients with SALT score <50 at baseline (2.53 and 8.79 years, respectively). A greater proportion of patients with baseline SALT score <50 had active shedding at baseline (49.6%) vs patients with baseline SALT score ≥95 (11.6%). Across all groups, median SALT scores improved (decreased) from baseline through Month 15. At Month 15, median SALT scores were 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, 2.4, and 30.9 for the 25 to <50, 50 to <75, 75 to <90, 90 to <95, and 95 to 100 groups, respectively. At Month 15, 93.0% (93/100), 87.7% (57/65), 88.2% (30/34), 83.3% (10/12), and 43.9% (68/155) of patients, respectively, achieved SALT scores ≤20, and 81.0% (81/100), 76.9% (50/65), 73.5% (25/34), 75.0% (9/12), and 33.5% (52/155) of patients, respectively, achieved SALT score ≤10. Conclusions After 15 months of ritlecitinib treatment, patients with less than 95% hair loss at baseline reached median SALT scores of <2.4, reflecting almost complete scalp hair regrowth. More refractory disease was seen in the subset of patients with extensive (≥95%) hair loss at baseline; however, over one third of these patients achieved clinically meaningful SALT response (SALT ≤20 and SALT ≤10) at Month 15. Overall, ritlecitinib was efficacious in patients with AA with ≥25% hair loss including those with extensive hair loss at baseline. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since first described by Kossard in 1994, frontal fibrosing alopecia ( FFA) has been something of an enigma. The clinical heterogeneity of FFA, its apparent rarity and investigators' suboptimal access to phenotypically consistent patient cohorts may all have had a negative impact on delineating disease pathogenesis. Moreover, there is a relative paucity of epidemiological, interventional and basic research studies, and there have been no advances in translational therapeutics, unlike for other inflammatory dermatoses, such as alopecia areata ( AA). Dermatologists anecdotally describe an increasing incidence in FFA over the last decade, which has led to the notion that the disorder may be induced by unknown environmental triggers. On the other hand, segregation of FFA in some families lends support to an unexplored genetic element implicated in disease pathogenesis. We herein review what is known about the pathobiology of FFA and formulate working hypotheses to advance insight into this intriguing hair disorder. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Keywords: benzyl salicylate; contact allergy; frontal fibrosing alopecia; patch test EN benzyl salicylate contact allergy frontal fibrosing alopecia patch test 483 484 2 09/21/21 20211001 NES 211001 Pastor-Nieto et al1 report a case series of 36 patients with frontal fibrosing alopecia (FFA) who have undergone patch testing. Subsequently, Pastor-Nieto et al1 propose several hypotheses to account for their observed association between benzyl salicylate sensitivity and FFA, notably suggesting that benzyl salicylate could be a sole or significant factor in FFA pathogenesis. [Extracted from the article]