Search

Background and Aims: The potential benefit of the centralization of Bariatric surgery (BS) remains debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact on 90-day mortality of an innovative organization aiming at centralizing the care of severe postoperative complications of BS., Study Design: The centralization of care for postoperative complication after BS was implemented by French Authorities in 2013 in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais Region, France. This unique formalized network (OSEAN), coordinated by 1 tertiary referral center, enrolled all regional institutions performing bariatric surgery. Data were extracted from the medico-administrative database providing information on all patients undergoing BS between 2009 and 2016 in OSEAN (n = 22,928) and in Rest of France (n = 288,942). The primary outcome was the evolution of 90-day mortality before and after the implementation of this policy. Rest of France was used as a control group to adjust the results to improvement with time of BS outcomes., Results: The numbers of primary procedure and reoperations increased similarly before and after 2013 within OSEAN and in Rest of France. The 90-day mortality rate became significantly lower within OSEAN than in the rest of France after 2013 (0.03% vs 0.08%, P < 0.01). This difference was confirmed in multivariate analysis after adjustment to the procedure specific mortality (P < 0.04). The reduction of 90-day mortality was most visible for sleeve gastrectomy., Conclusion: The implementation of centralized care for early postoperative complications after BS in OSEAN was associated with reduced 90-day mortality. Our results indicate that this reduction was not due to a lower incidence of complications but to the improvement of their management.

Objective: The aim of the study was to explore the impact of the absence of band fixation on the reoperation rate and to identify other risk factors for longterm complications. Background: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding has been demonstrated to permit important weight loss and comorbidity improvement, but some bands will have to be removed mainly for failure or in case of planned 2- step surgery. Then, the absence of a gastro-gastric suture (GGS) would allow easier band removal. There are insufficient data to conclude that GGS should be abandoned, as the associated risk of band slippage has not been prospectively assessed. Methods: The ANOSEAN study was a randomized controlled single-blind trial (CPP 2009-A00346-51). Primary outcome was reintervention rate for band removal or repositioning at 3 years. It included 706 patients in 17 bariatric centers. Patients in group 1 received a gastric band with GGS. Inclusion criteria were adapted from National Institutes of Health recommendations. Surgical technique was standardized among all surgeons. Results: At 3 years, the reintervention rate for band retrieval or repositioning was significantly higher in the absence of band fixation (19.4% vs11.3%; P = 0.013), partly because of the slippage rate (10.3% vs 3.6%; P = 0.005). Body mass index <40 kg/m² at baseline was also an independent risk factor of slippage (odds ratio 2.769, 95% confidence interval 1.373, 5.581). Conclusions: GGS prevents band slippage and lower reintervention rate at 3 years. Fixation could be discussed for patients with high BMI who are scheduled to undergo 2-step surgery, but it needs to be specifically assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]