Search

Summary: Background: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK 2 inhibitor, was shown to improve the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) in patients with moderate‐to‐severe AD and inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to ciclosporin A (CA). Methods: In this double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase III study, patients were randomized 1: 1: 2: 1 to placebo (N = 93), baricitinib 1 mg (N = 93), 2 mg (N = 185) or 4 mg (N = 92) with background TCS. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients receiving baricitinib 4 mg or 2 mg (+ TCS) vs. placebo + TCS who achieved ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) at week 16. Results: Baricitinib 4 mg + TCS was superior to placebo + TCS for EASI 75 (4 mg: 32%, placebo: 17%, P = 0·031) at week 16 and for improvements in itch, skin pain and number of night‐time awakenings owing to itch. Improvements were maintained through 52 weeks of treatment. Treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were more common with baricitinib than placebo (+ TCS); most were mild or moderate. The most frequent TEAEs with baricitinib 4 mg + TCS were nasopharyngitis, herpes simplex, influenza and headache. No deaths or deep vein thromboses were reported. Conclusions: Baricitinib 4 mg + TCS improved the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe AD through 52 weeks of treatment in patients with inadequate response, intolerance or contraindication to CA. The safety profile was consistent with previous studies of baricitinib in moderate‐to‐severe AD. What is already known about this topic?Ciclosporin A is indicated for the treatment of atopic dermatitis that is refractory to topical therapies. However, its use is limited by safety concerns and it may not provide adequate response for some patients.Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and JAK2 inhibitor, has been shown to improve the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis as a monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids. What does this study add?Baricitinib combined with background low‐ or moderate‐potency topical corticosteroids provided improvements in the signs and symptoms of moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis through 1 year of treatment in patients with a contraindication, intolerance or failure to respond to ciclosporin A.The most common treatment‐emergent adverse events with baricitinib 4 mg were nasopharyngitis, herpes simplex, influenza and headache.The safety profile was consistent with previous studies in patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic dermatitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Skin pain (discomfort/soreness) is a common symptom associated with atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To evaluate rapid changes in skin pain severity with baricitinib, and its impact on patient quality of life (QoL) in adults with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to topical therapy. Methods: Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who were inadequate responders to topical therapies (N = 440, BREEZE-AD5 [NCT03435081]) were randomized to once-daily placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, or baricitinib 2 mg for 16 weeks. Change in Skin Pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were assessed for the randomized population. Skin Pain NRS and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores were assessed for Skin Pain Response groups and patients with Body Surface Area (BSA) 10% to 50%. Results: Skin Pain NRS improvement was significant versus placebo by day 1 baricitinib 2 mg (least squares mean [LSM] difference −4.4%, P =.048) and by day 2 for baricitinib 1 mg (−6.7%, P =.011). As measured weekly, improvement was significant starting at Week 1 and remained significant through Week 16 for both doses. At Week 16, 70.9% of Skin Pain NRS responders vs 10.4% of nonresponders had a clinically meaningful improvement in DLQI (P <.0001). At week 16, LSM DLQI change from baseline was −11.1 for all Skin Pain NRS responders versus −3.5 for nonresponders (P <.0001). Patients with BSA 10% to 50% showed similar trends. Conclusions: Patients with moderate-to-severe AD, treated with baricitinib, reported rapid improvements in skin pain severity by day 1 for baricitinib 2 mg and day 2 for baricitinib 1 mg and remained effective through 16 weeks of treatment, which positively impacted patient QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Baricitinib previously demonstrated improvements in itch and sleep disturbance versus placebo in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Examine if itch and sleep improvements are associated with better quality of life (QoL) and productivity in patients with AD. Data were drawn from BREEZE-AD5 (NCT03435081). Itch and sleep improvement at Week 16 were defined using ≥4-point improvements in the Itch Numeric Rating Scale and ≥1.5 decreases in the number of nighttime awakenings since baseline, respectively. Patients with and without improvements were compared on Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-AD scores. Changes from baseline were analyzed using ANCOVA with last observation carried forward. Proportions were analyzed using logistic regression with non-responder imputation. Greater proportions of patients with versus without itch improvement indicated no impact of AD on QoL (37.7 vs. 1.8%). Patients with itch improvement had greater decreases in work time impaired (−29.3 vs. −5.6%). More patients with versus without sleep improvement reported no effect of AD on QoL (25.5 vs. 1.1%); patients with better sleep experienced larger reductions in work time spent impaired (−33.3 vs. −6.1%). Patients with AD who experienced itch and sleep improvement had significantly better QoL and productivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase 1/Janus kinase 2 inhibitor, is being studied for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in adults.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib monotherapy in a North American phase 3 trial (BREEZE-AD5/NCT03435081) of adults with moderate-to-severe AD who responded inadequately or were intolerant to topical therapy.Methods: Patients (N = 440) were randomized 1:1:1 to once-daily placebo or baricitinib (1 mg or 2 mg). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving ≥75% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 16. A key secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0 (clear)/1(almost clear) with ≥2-point improvement.Results: At week 16, the proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index was 8%, 13%, and 30% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) and those with a validated Investigator Global Assessment for AD score of 0/1 were 5%, 13%, and 24% (P < .001, 2 mg vs placebo) for placebo, baricitinib 1 mg, and baricitinib 2 mg, respectively. Safety findings were similar to those of other baricitinib AD studies.Limitations: Short-term clinical trial results may not be generalizable to real-world settings.Conclusion: Baricitinib was efficacious for patients with moderate-to-severe AD with no new safety findings over 16 weeks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT‐F) is validated for measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, 10 of 13 FACIT‐F items are identified as relevant to patients with RA. The Patient‐Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) uses an item response theory–calibrated T score metric. The PROMIS Fatigue item bank includes the FACIT‐F items, enabling score conversion. The performance of converted PROMIS Fatigue scores has not been evaluated in RA populations or clinical trials. Our objective was to assess the performance of converted PROMIS Fatigue scores in 2 RA clinical trials of baricitinib. Methods: Crosswalk tables and pattern‐scoring methods converted FACIT‐F scores to PROMIS Fatigue for both the 13‐item FACIT‐F and the 10‐item RA‐optimized FACIT‐F instrument, in 2 RA clinical trials evaluating baricitinib, RA‐BEAM, and RA‐BEACON. RA‐BEAM patients had an inadequate response to methotrexate. RA‐BEACON patients had an inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 tumor necrosis factor inhibitor. Baricitinib was compared to all treatment arms via analysis of covariance on PROMIS Fatigue score conversions. Results: Baseline FACIT‐F–derived PROMIS Fatigue scores reflected severe fatigue across treatment groups and were similar using different scoring methods. At week 24 in both studies, baricitinib was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in PROMIS Fatigue scores. PROMIS Fatigue scores were consistent for conversion methods and for the 13‐item or 10‐item FACIT‐F. Conclusion: All 4 conversion methods showed differentiation of active treatment compared with placebo from week 12, supporting the use of the PROMIS Fatigue and converting the 10‐item FACIT‐F to assess fatigue and demonstrate treatment benefit in RA clinical trials on a standardized metric. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Baricitinib, an oral selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and Janus kinase 2, modulates proinflammatory cytokine signaling. Objectives The efficacy and safety of baricitinib were evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 124 patients with moderate-to-severe AD applied topical corticosteroids (TCSs) for 4 weeks before randomization to once-daily placebo, 2 mg of baricitinib, or 4 mg of baricitinib for 16 weeks. Use of TCSs was permitted during the study. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-50) compared with placebo. Results Significantly more patients who received baricitinib, 4 mg, achieved EASI-50 than did patients receiving placebo (61% vs 37% [ P =.027]) at 16 weeks. The difference between the proportion of patients receiving baricitinib, 2 or 4 mg, who achieved EASI-50 and the proportion of patients receiving placebo and achieving EASI-50 was significant as early as week 4. Baricitinib also improved pruritus and sleep loss. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24 of the patients receiving placebo (49%), 17 of those receiving 2 mg of baricitinib (46%), and 27 of those receiving 4 mg of baricitinib (71%). Limitations A TCS standardization period before randomization reduced disease severity, limiting the ability to compare results with those of baricitinib monotherapy. Longer studies are required to confirm baricitinib's efficacy and safety in patients with AD. Conclusions Baricitinib used with TCSs reduced inflammation and pruritus in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]