Search

Dicer is a multidomain ribonuclease that processes double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) to 21 nt small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) during RNA interference, and excises microRNAs from precursor hairpins. Dicer contains two domains related to the bacterial dsRNA-specific endonuclease, RNase III, which is known to function as a homodimer. Based on an X-ray structure of the Aquifex aeolicus RNase III, models of the enzyme interaction with dsRNA, and its cleavage at two composite catalytic centers, have been proposed. We have generated mutations in human Dicer and Escherichia coli RNase III residues implicated in the catalysis, and studied their effect on RNA processing. Our results indicate that both enzymes have only one processing center, containing two RNA cleavage sites and generating products with 2 nt 3′ overhangs. Based on these and other data, we propose that Dicer functions through intramolecular dimerization of its two RNase III domains, assisted by the flanking RNA binding domains, PAZ and dsRBD.

Dicer is a multi-domain RNase III-related endonuclease responsible for processing double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) during a process of RNA interference (RNAi). It also catalyses excision of the regulatory microRNAs from their precursors. In this work, we describe the purification and properties of a recombinant human Dicer. The protein cleaves dsRNAs into approximately 22 nucleotide siRNAs. Accumulation of processing intermediates of discrete sizes, and experiments performed with substrates containing modified ends, indicate that Dicer preferentially cleaves dsRNAs at their termini. Binding of the enzyme to the substrate can be uncoupled from the cleavage step by omitting Mg(2+) or performing the reaction at 4 degrees C. Activity of the recombinant Dicer, and of the endogenous protein present in mammalian cell extracts, is stimulated by limited proteolysis, and the proteolysed enzyme becomes active at 4 degrees C. Cleavage of dsRNA by purifed Dicer and the endogenous enzyme is ATP independent. Additional experiments suggest that if ATP participates in the Dicer reaction in mammalian cells, it might be involved in product release needed for the multiple turnover of the enzyme.

The antisense RNA, CopA, regulates the replication frequency of plasmid R1 through inhibition of RepA translation by rapid and specific binding to its target RNA (CopT). The stable CopA–CopT complex is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side alignment of two long intramolecular helices. The significance of this structure for binding in vitro and control in vivo was tested by mutations in both CopA and CopT. High rates of stable complex formation in vitro and efficient inhibition in vivo required initial loop–loop complexes to be rapidly converted to extended interactions. These interactions involve asymmetric helix progression and melting of the upper stems of both RNAs to promote the formation of two intermolecular helices. Data presented here delineate the boundaries of these helices and emphasize the need for unimpeded helix propagation. This process is directional, i.e. one of the two intermolecular helices (B) must form first to allow formation of the other (B′). A binding pathway, characterized by a hierarchy of intermediates leading to an irreversible and inhibitory RNA–RNA complex, is proposed.

RNAIII, a 514-nt RNA molecule, regulates the expression of many Staphylococcus aureus genes encoding exoproteins and cell-wall-associated proteins. We have studied the structure of RNAIII in solution, using a combination of chem- ical and enzymatic probes. A model of the secondary structure was derived from experimental data with the help of computer simulation of RNA folding. The model contains 14 hairpin structures connected by unpaired nucleotides. The data also point to three helices formed by distant nucleotides that close off structural domains. This model was generally compatible with the results of in vivo probing experiments with dimethylsulfate in late exponential-phase cultures. Toe-printing experiments revealed that the ribosome binding site of hld, which is encoded by RNAIII, was accessible to the Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunit, suggesting that the in vitro structure represented a trans- latable form of RNAIII. We also found that, within the 39 end of RNAIII, the conserved hairpin 13 and the terminator form an intrinsic structural domain that exerts specific regulatory activity on protein A gene expression.

The antisense RNA CopA binds to the leader region of the repA mRNA (target: CopT). Previous studies on CopA-CopT pairing in vitro showed that the dominant product of antisense RNA-mRNA binding is not a full RNA duplex. We have studied here the structure of CopA-CopT complex, combining chemical and enzymatic probing and computer graphic modeling. CopI, a truncated derivative of CopA unable to bind CopT stably, was also analyzed. We show here that after initial loop-loop interaction (kissing), helix propagation resulted in an extended kissing complex that involves the formation of two intermolecular helices. By introducing mutations (base-pair inversions) into the upper stem regions of CopA and CopT, the boundaries of the two newly formed intermolecular helices were delimited. The resulting extended kissing complex represents a new type of four-way junction structure that adopts an asymmetrical X-shaped conformation formed by two helical domains, each one generated by coaxial stacking of two helices. This structure motif induces a side-by-side alignment of two long intramolecular helices that, in turn, facilitates the formation of an additional intermolecular helix that greatly stabilizes the inhibitory CopA-CopT RNA complex. This stabilizer helix cannot form in CopI-CopT complexes due to absence of the sequences involved. The functional significance of the three-dimensional models of the extended kissing complex (CopI-CopT) and the stable complex (CopA-CopT) are discussed.

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA–CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop–loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop–loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop–loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.

In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. In plasmid R1, we have recently shown that the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by the formation of two intermolecular helices, resulting in a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. Based on lead-induced cleavage and ribonuclease (RNase) V(1) probing combined with molecular modeling, a strikingly similar topology is supported for the complex formed between the antisense RNA (Inc) and mRNA (RepZ) of plasmid Col1b-P9. In particular, the position of the four-way junction and the location of divalent ion-binding site(s) indicate that the structural features of these two complexes are essentially the same in spite of sequence differences. Comparisons of several target and antisense RNAs in other plasmids further indicate that similar binding pathways are used to form the inhibitory antisense-target RNA complexes. Thus, in all these systems, the structural features of both antisense and target RNAs determine the topologically possible and kinetically favored pathway that is essential for efficient in vivo control.