Search

Transcriptional activation of the prolactin and growth hormone genes, occurring in a cell-specific fashion, requires short-range synergistic interactions between the pituitary-specific POU domain factor Pit-1 and other transcription factors, particularly nuclear receptors. Unexpectedly, we find that these events involve the gene-specific use of alternative Pit-1 synergy domains. Synergistic activation of the prolactin gene by Pit-1 and the estrogen receptor requires a Pit-1 amino-terminal 25-amino-acid domain that is not required for analogous synergistic activation of the growth hormone promoter. The action of this Pit-1 synergy domain is dependent on the presence of two of three tyrosine residues spaced by 6 amino acids and can be replaced by a comparable tyrosine-dependent trans-activation domain of an unrelated transcription factor (hLEF). The gene-specific utilization of this tyrosine-dependent synergy domain is conferred by specific Pit-1 DNA-binding sites that determine whether Pit-1 binds as a monomer or a dimer. Thus, the critical DNA site in the prolactin enhancer, where this domain is required, binds Pit-1 as a monomer, whereas the Pit-1 sites in the growth hormone gene, which do not utilize this synergy domain, bind Pit-1 as a dimer. The finding that the sequence of specific DNA sites dictates alternative Pit-1 synergy domain utilization based on monomeric or dimeric binding suggests an additional regulatory strategy for differential target gene activation in distinct cell types.

A pituitary LIM homeodomain factor, P-Lim, is expressed as Rathke's pouch forms and as specific pituitary cell phenotypes are established, suggesting functional roles throughout pituitary development. While selectively expressed in both anterior and intermediate pituitary in mature mice, P-Lim is also transiently expressed in the developing ventral neural cord and brainstem. P-Lim binds to and activates the promoter of the alpha-glycoprotein subunit gene, a marker of early pituitary development, and synergizes with Pit-1 in transcriptional activation of genes encoding terminal differentiation markers. The LIM domain of P-Lim specifically interacts with the Pit-1 POU domain and is required for synergistic interactions with Pit-1, but not for basal transcriptional activation events.

We have identified and characterized a new member of the leucine zipper (bZIP) gene family of transcription factors, thyrotroph embryonic factor (TEF). Analysis of the ontogeny of TEF gene expression reveals the presence of TEF transcripts, beginning on embryonic day 14, only in the region of the rat anterior pituitary gland in which thyrotrophs arise. This pattern of gene expression corresponds temporally and spatially to the onset of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH beta) gene expression, which defines the thyrotroph phenotype. Coupled with this observation, we find that TEF can bind to and trans-activate the TSH beta promoter. In contrast to this restricted pattern of expression during embryogenesis, TEF transcripts appear in several tissues in the mature organism. We propose that TEF belongs to a new class of bZIP proteins on the basis of the unique homology between TEF and another member of the bZIP gene family, the albumin D box-binding protein (DBP). TEF and DBP transcripts are coexpressed in a pituitary cell line, and these two proteins can readily form heterodimers. The DNA-binding and dimerization domains of TEF correspond to those found in other bZIP proteins. We have however, identified a cluster of basic amino acids, found only in TEF and DBP, that is necessary for the proper DNA-binding site specificity of TEF. A major trans-activation domain of TEF resides outside the region of homology to other bZIP proteins. These data are consistent with a role for a member of a new class of bZIP transcription factors in activating gene expression in the developing thyrotroph.

Reciprocal gene activation and restriction during cell type differentiation from a common lineage is a hallmark of mammalian organogenesis. A key question, then, is whether a critical transcriptional activator of cell type–specific gene targets can also restrict expression of the same genes in other cell types. Here, we show that whereas the pituitary-specific POU domain factor Pit-1 activates growth hormone gene expression in one cell type, the somatotrope, it restricts its expression from a second cell type, the lactotrope. This distinction depends on a two–base pair spacing in accommodation of the bipartite POU domains on a conserved growth hormone promoter site. The allosteric effect on Pit-1, in combination with other DNA binding factors, results in the recruitment of a corepressor complex, including nuclear receptor corepressor N-CoR, which, unexpectedly, is required for active long-term repression of the growth hormone gene in lactotropes.

Pit-1 is a tissue-specific POU domain factor obligatory for the appearance of three cell phenotypes in the anterior pituitary gland. Expression of the pit-1 gene requires the actions of a cell-specific 390-bp enhancer, located 10 kb 5' of the pit-1 transcription initiation site, within sequence that proves essential for effective pituitary targeting of transgene expression during murine development. The enhancer requires the concerted actions of a cell-specific cis-active element, Pit-1 autoregulatory sites, and atypical morphogen response elements. Pituitary ontogeny in the Pit-1-defective Snell dwarf mouse reveals that pit-1 autoregulation is not required for initial activation or continued expression during critical phases of Pit-1 target gene activation but, subsequently, is necessary for maintenance of pit-1 gene expression following birth. A potent 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-responsive enhancer element defines a physiological site in which a single nucleotide alteration in the sequence of core binding motifs modulates the spacing rules for nuclear receptor response elements. Unexpectedly, the major retinoic acid response element is absolutely dependent on Pit-1 for retinoic acid receptor function. On this DNA element, Pit-1 appears to function as a coregulator of the retinoic acid receptor, suggesting an intriguing linkage between a cell-specific transcription factor and the actions of morphogen receptors that is likely to be prototypic of mechanisms by which other cell-specific transcription factors might confer morphogen receptor responsivity during mammalian organogenesis.