Search

Psychosocial stress can cause mental conditions such as depression in humans. To develop drug therapies for the treatment of depression, it is necessary to use animal models of depression to screen drug candidates that exhibit anti-depressive effects. Unfortunately, the present methods of drug screening for antidepressants, the forced-swim test and tail-suspension test, are limiting factors in drug discovery because they are not based on the constructive validity of objective phenotypes in depression. Previously, we discovered that the onset of nest building is severely delayed in mice exposed to subchronic mild social defeat stress (sCSDS). Therefore, a novel paradigm combining acute social defeat stress (ASDS) and the nest-building test (SNB) were established for the efficient screening of drugs for depressive-like symptoms. Since ASDS severely delayed the nest-building process as shown in chronically social defeated mice, we sought to rescue the delayed nest-building behavior in ASDS mice. Injecting a specific serotonin 2a receptor antagonist (SR-46349B), the nest-building deficit exhibited by ASDS mice was partially rescued. On the other hand, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (fluoxetine) did not rescue the nest-building deficit in ASDS mice. Therefore, we conclude that the SNB paradigm is an another potential behavioral method for screening drugs for depressive-like symptoms including attention deficit, anxiety, low locomotion, and decreased motivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nest building is one of the innate behaviors that are widely observed throughout the animal kingdom. Previous studies have reported specific brain regions and genetic loci associated with nest building in mice. These studies mainly evaluated the nest structure, without observing the nesting process. In this study, we evaluated the effects of strain and learning on the nesting process of mice using a 3D depth camera. To determine the quality of the nest structure, a conventional scoring method, Deacon scores 1–5, was applied to the recorded depth images. The final score of the nest, latency to start nesting behavior, and latencies to reach Deacon scores 3–5, were determined using three genetically different mouse strains—C57BL/6NCrl (B6), DBA/2NCrlCrlj (DBA), and B6D2F1/Crl (B6D2F1). The final score of the DBA nest was significantly lower than that of the B6D2F1 nest, and DBA mice showed significantly longer latency to start nest building than the other two strains in the first trial. By observing the time course of nest building, we confirmed that DBA mice took significantly longer to build their nests than B6 and B6D2F1 mice. Although we did not find any significant differences between DBA and B6 mice in the final assessment of the nest based on the Deacon method, overnight monitoring of the nesting behavior using a 3D depth camera could elucidate the clear differences in the amount of time spent nesting between DBA and B6 mice. In addition, the learning effect was more evident in DBA mice than it was in B6 in terms of latencies to reach Deacon score 3–5 in five repeated trials. DBA mice showed a gradual decrease in latency to build, whereas nesting behaviors of B6 mice were relatively consistent throughout the five trials. Therefore, our 3D depth image method gives higher resolution and structural information regarding the nesting process in mice. Future genetic analyses using the 3D assessment system will provide novel insights into the complex genetic basis for nesting and other behaviors in animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We developed a novel method to evaluate the nest-building behavior of mice using an inexpensive depth camera. The depth camera clearly captured nest-building behavior. Using three-dimensional information from the depth camera, we obtained objective features for assessing nest-building behavior, including “volume,” “radius,” and “mean height”. The “volume” represents the change in volume of the nesting material, a pressed cotton square that a mouse shreds and untangles in order to build its nest. During the nest-building process, the total volume of cotton fragments is increased. The “radius” refers to the radius of the circle enclosing the fragments of cotton. It describes the extent of nesting material dispersion. The “radius” averaged approximately 60 mm when a nest was built. The “mean height” represents the change in the mean height of objects. If the nest walls were high, the “mean height” was also high. These features provided us with useful information for assessment of nest-building behavior, similar to conventional methods for the assessment of nest building. However, using the novel method, we found that JF1 mice built nests with higher walls than B6 mice, and B6 mice built nests faster than JF1 mice. Thus, our novel method can evaluate the differences in nest-building behavior that cannot be detected or quantified by conventional methods. In future studies, we will evaluate nest-building behaviors of genetically modified, as well as several inbred, strains of mice, with several nesting materials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tameness is a major element of animal domestication and involves two components: motivation to approach humans (active tameness) and reluctance to avoid humans (passive tameness). To understand the behavioral and genetic mechanisms of active tameness in mice, we had previously conducted selective breeding for long durations of contact and heading toward human hands in an active tameness test using a wild‐derived heterogeneous stock. Although the study showed a significant increase in contacting and heading with the 12th generation of breeding, the effect on other behavioral indices related to tameness and change of gene expression levels underlying selective breeding was unclear. Here, we analyzed nine tameness‐related traits at a later stage of selective breeding and analyzed how gene expression levels were changed by the selective breeding. We found that five traits, including contacting and heading, showed behavioral change in the selective groups comparing to the control through the generations. Furthermore, we conducted cluster analyses to evaluate the relationships among the nine traits and found that contacting and heading combined in an independent cluster in the selected groups, but not in the control groups. RNA‐Seq of hippocampal tissue revealed differential expression of 136 genes between the selection and control groups, while the pathway analysis identified the networks associated with these genes. These results suggest that active tameness was hidden in the control groups but became apparent in the selected populations by selective breeding, potentially driven by changes in gene expression networks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Japanese indigenous chicken breeds are often used to improve meat quality rather than broilers in the Jidori industry. There are sometimes severe crowding accidents caused by many birds frightened by environmental stimuli. To prevent the economic loss, the chickens need to be more gentle, tame, and imperturbable. Methods: In this study, a new handling test for tameness in adult chickens in individual cages was performed with 100 birds from each sex of Shamo, Rhode Island Red, Nagoya, Australorp, and Ukokkei, as well as 10 hens of F1 hybrid between Shamo and Rhode Island Red, to measure both active and passive tameness. We counted the number heading toward human hands (heading) and retreating in other directions (avoiding) in both active and passive tameness phases, as well as the number of steps taken (step) during the handling test. Results: Male chickens exhibited higher avoidance behavior than females. Nagoya females displayed the lowest level of avoidance behavior, which implies passive tameness. In terms of active tameness, a variety of phenotypes can be obtained in different combinations of breed and sex. These results suggested the handling test will be good method for rapid screening of individual differences in tameness. In addition, there were heterosis effects on avoidance and locomotive behaviors. Since F1 is often used in the Jidori industry, the breeders should be tested not only for meat production but also for tameness. Conclusions: In the future, combining both the behavioral screening and the population genomics will establish typical evidence about mechanisms of tameness and domestication in animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]