Search

Colorectal cancer (CRC), as a fatal cancer, is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Although the standard treatment for colorectal cancer is well researched and established, long-term patient survival remains poor, and mortality remains high. Therefore, more and more effective treatment options are needed. To evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab, the histone demethylase inhibitor IOX1, or their combination for the treatment of colorectal cancer, we examined the effects of IOX1, bevacizumab, and IOX1 combined with bevacizumab on cell activity, proliferation, and migration of colorectal cancer cell lines HCT116, RKO, and CT26 by CCK8, colony formation assay, wound healing assay, and transwell assay. The effects of the drugs alone as well as in combination on apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines were examined by flow cytometry and further validated by Western blotting for apoptosis-related proteins. The antitumor effects of treatment alone or in combination on colorectal cancer cells were examined in animal models. Mice were injected subcutaneously with CT26 cells and the growth and immune infiltration in tumor tissues were detected by IHC after drug treatment. We found that IOX1 could effectively inhibit the activity of CRC cells and had a significant inhibitory effect on the proliferation and migration of CRC cells. The apoptosis rate increased in a dose-dependent manner after IOX1 treatment on colorectal cancer cells, and the expression of apoptosis-related proteins changed accordingly. Further combination with bevacizumab revealed that the combination had a more significant effect on the proliferation, migration, and apoptosis of CRC cells than either IOX1 or bevacizumab alone. In vivo experiments have found that both alone and combination drugs can inhibit the growth of mouse tumors, but the effect of combination inhibition is the most obvious. Combination therapy significantly inhibited the expression of proliferative marker (Ki67) in tumor xenograft models, and increased content of antigen-specific CD4 + , CD8 + T cell growth, and granzymeB (GZMB), which is associated with T cell cytotoxicity, was detected in combination therapy. Immunoassays suppressed the expression of relevant PD-1 and decreased. The anticancer drug bevacizumab and the histone demethylase inhibitor IOX1 may inhibit colon cancer cell growth by regulating apoptosis. The inhibitory effect of combination therapy on tumor growth may be achieved, in part, through upregulation of infiltration-mediated tumor immunity by T lymphocytes. The combination of IOX1 and bevacizumab produced significant synergistic effects. This study aims to provide a new direction for CRC combination therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is the standard of care for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the first-line setting, although was only evaluated in patients with Child-Pugh (CP) A liver function in the IMbrave150 trial. We sought to determine the outcomes of these patients based on CP score and ALBI grade in the US population., Methods: This multicenter cohort study included patients with HCC who received atezolizumab with bevacizumab as first-line systemic therapy between March 2018 and November 2023. Overall survival (OS) was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazard regression method., Results: Among 322 patients, 226, 86, and 10 patients had CP-A, CP-B, and CP-C liver function, respectively. Median age was 66.5 years, 78.6% were male, and 82.6% were White. Median OS (mOS) was 21.6 months for those with CP-A, 9.1 months for those with CP-B7, and 4.7 months for those with CP-B8-C12 (P < .0001). Among patients with CP-A, those with ALBI grade 1 had an mOS of 34.9 months versus 14.2 months in those with grade 2. In multivariate analyses, CP score, ALBI grade, hepatitis B, performance status, and macrovascular invasion were significantly associated with survival., Conclusions: CP score is an important prognostic tool for patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and this regimen remains a viable option for patients with CP-B7 with no additional safety concern, although the benefit is significantly less than those with CP-A. ALBI score has independent predictive value in patients with CP-A liver function., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

In this study, we focused on calcification and diffusion restriction, which sometimes appear around the resection cavity or periventricular white matter in patients with high-grade glioma (HGG) treated with bevacizumab (BVZ), as candidate imaging biomarkers for BVZ treatment efficacy. We investigated the timing of the appearance of diffusion restriction and calcification using magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in 35 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent HGG treated with BVZ. In 17 (48.6%) patients, calcification was identified around the resection cavity or periventricular white matter at a median of 12 months after the initiation of BVZ treatment. Patients with calcification had significantly longer progression-free survival (16 vs. 7 months; p = 0.0023) and overall survival (36 vs. 12 months; p = 0.0006) than those without calcification. Histopathological examination revealed the presence of scattered microcalcifications within areas of necrosis, which suggested dystrophic calcification induced by BVZ. Diffusion-restricted lesions that appeared in patients with calcification had significantly lower apparent diffusion coefficients than those in patients without calcifications, indicating the presence of treatment-related necrosis but not hypercellularity. In conclusion, the radiological finding of diffusion restriction followed by calcification could be a potential imaging biomarker for favorable clinical course in patients with HGG treated with BVZ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background/aim: We hypothesized that adding bevacizumab to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy - whose efficacy for patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer has already been proven - could optimize the therapy regimen, leading to improved response rates and survival outcomes., Patients and Methods: Forty patients with histologically confirmed cervical cancer with FIGO stage IB3-IVA who received platinum-based neoadjuvant treatment between March 2008 and January 2019 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of University Hospital Cologne were analyzed. Twenty patients were treated with additional bevacizumab. The comparative cohort consisted of 18 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The response rates and clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival and overall survival, were evaluated., Results: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab significantly improved the response rate (p=0.046). The survival analysis showed that patients treated without bevacizumab had better progression-free survival up to FIGO stage IVA than patients treated with bevacizumab. However, overall survival was similar for both cohorts. For patients with advanced tumor stage, including FIGO IVB, progression-free survival and overall survival improved with the addition of bevacizumab. Pathological complete remission was a statistically significant prognostic factor for progression-free survival (p=0.039) but did not significantly affect overall survival (p=0.098)., Conclusion: While bevacizumab did not demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival rates, it was associated with a notable reduction in tumor size and showed a trend towards improved clinical response rates. These findings suggest that bevacizumab may have potential in optimizing the neoadjuvant treatment approach., (Copyright © 2024, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Due to the lack of a definitive effective treatment method that provides a complete cure and increases survival rates in uveal melanoma, the search for alternative treatments at the molecular level continues. In this context, we aimed to comparatively analyze the therapeutic effects of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (D2), 1a, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (D3), bevacizumab and radiotherapy (RT) in a uveal melanoma cell line (MP41). Cytotoxicity was evaluated using XTT cell proliferation kit and Xcelligence cell analyzer system. RT dose was determined after a clonogenic assay. Annexin V/PI staining and Western blot analyses for caspase-3, -8, and -9 were performed to analyze apoptosis. Additionally, cell cycle analyses were also conducted. As a result, we found that D2 and D3 did not show cytotoxic effects, while bevacizumab and RT showed time and dose-dependent cytotoxicity. IC 50 concentration of bevacizumab was 6.945 mg/mL. Radiotherapy and bevacizumab significantly reduced cell survival and induced apoptosis when administered both as monotherapy and in combination. A significant increase in caspase proteins was detected at high bevacizumab concentrations. However, the combination of bevacizumab and radiotherapy caused a substantial decrease in caspase-3, -8 and -9 expressions. No significant difference in cell cycle distribution was detected in any treatment. Our results showed that bevacizumab inhibited MP41 cell proliferation and had an additive effect when administered with RT. In conclusion, our study offers a different perspective on the treatment of uveal melanoma, and these results, when supported by animal experiments and clinical studies in the future, might be a new step in the treatment of this challenging ocular tumor., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study compared the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (ddTC+Bev) with ddTC for advanced ovarian cancer., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 134 patients who received ddTC+Bev or ddTC as first-line chemotherapy for stage III-IV ovarian cancer. Progression-free survival as primary endpoint of this study was compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to analyze prognostic factors, and the frequency of adverse events was examined using the χ² test., Results: We categorized 134 patients in the ddTC+Bev (n=57) and ddTC (n=77) groups who started treatment at four related institutions from November 2013 to December 2017. No patients used poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as the first line maintenance therapy. The progression-free survival (PFS) of the ddTC+Bev group had a significantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (hazard ratio [HR]=0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.32-0.79; p<0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that ddTC+Bev regimen was a prognostic factor. However, intergroup comparison using PSM revealed that the PFS of the ddTC+Bev group had a nonsignificantly better prognosis than that of the ddTC group (HR=0.70; 95% CI=0.41-1.20; p=0.189). Few adverse events above G3 were noted for ddTC+Bev, which were sufficiently tolerable., Conclusion: This study could not demonstrate that adding Bev to ddTC improves prognosis. Further studies with more cases are warranted., Competing Interests: Aikou Okamoto has honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., MSD K.K., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Bayer Holding Ltd., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd., Zeria Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Eisai Co., Ltd., and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. Also, Dr. Okamoto was supported by research funding from Meiji Holdings Co., Ltd., Fuji Pharma Co., Ltd., Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd., ASKA Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Eisai Co., Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Mochida Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Linical Co., Ltd., Pfizer Japan Inc., Gyne Mom Co.Ltd, Terumo Corporation, Kissei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., AstraZeneca K.K., Tsumura & Co., and Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Objectives: The BETAcc clinical trial demonstrated that chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab plus atezolizumab (CBA) significantly prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer. However, to the best of our knowledge, the economic value of using this new therapy for this indication is currently unknown. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CBA for the first-line treatment of metastatic, persistent, or recurrent cervical cancer from the United States healthcare payers perspective., Methods: A state-transition Markov model over a 10-year lifetime horizon was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of CBA with that of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (CB). The primary outcomes of our study included costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the results., Results: CBA was associated with an additional 0.58 QALY at an extra cost of $172 495.90 compared with CB. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $295 972.43/QALY, significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold value of $150 000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses revealed that results were most sensitive to the progression-free disease utility, the unit cost of atezolizumab, and progressed disease utility. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that CBA achieved a 4.3% probability of cost-effectiveness at a $150 000/QALY threshold. To achieve cost-effectiveness, the unit price of atezolizumab must be reduced by approximately 56.6%., Conclusions: CBA treatment is unlikely to be a cost-effective option compared with CB for patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer in the United States., Competing Interests: Author Disclosures Author disclosure forms can be accessed below in the Supplemental Material section., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: We aimed to revalidate the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system as a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer patients with breast cancer gene ( BRCA ) mutations or those receiving frontline poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors or bevacizumab as maintenance therapy., Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records of patients with high-grade serous carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery between January 2007 and December 2021 at 5 tertiary medical institutions in South Korea. At each hospital, pathologists independently assessed each slide of omental tissues obtained from surgery using the CRS system. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were obtained using Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate the effect of BRCA mutation, maintenance therapy, and CRS on survival time., Results: Of 466 patients, BRCA mutations were detected in 156 (33.5%) and 131 (28.1%) were treated with maintenance therapy; 98 (21.0%) and 42 (9.0%) were treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab, respectively. Patients with CRS3 had significantly longer PFS than those with CRS1 or 2 (24.7 vs. 16.8 months, p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in PFS improvement between CRS3 patients and those with CRS1 or 2 with BRCA mutation (22.0 vs. 19.3 months, p=0.193). Moreover, no significant PFS prolongation was observed in CRS3 patients compared to CRS1 or 2 patients treated with PARP inhibitors or bevacizumab (24.3 vs. 22.4 months, p=0.851; 27.5 vs. 15.7 months, p=0.347, respectively)., Conclusion: CRS may not be a prognostic factor in patients with BRCA mutations and those receiving frontline maintenance therapy., Competing Interests: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: The safety and efficacy of combination of gefitinib with chemotherapy and bevacizumab in treatment patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are currently unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of a combination therapy consisting of gefitinib, bevacizumab, pemetrexed, and carboplatin in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations., Methods: Eligible patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC were recruited and received gefitinib combination with bevacizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin treatment. The primary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS)., Results: From June 2019 to June 2021, 20 patients were enrolled in this study. The median follow-up was 33.8 months (95% CI, 31.0-36.6). Grade ≥ 3 adverse events was 65%, including neutropenia (30%), thrombocytopenia (20%), nausea (20%), skin rash (20%), bleeding (10%), and increased ALT (10%). There was no death related to toxicity occurred. The median PFS was 28 months (95% CI, 20.4-35.6). the ORR was 95% (95% CI, 75.1-99.9%), the DCR was 100% (95% CI, 83.2-100%), and the median DOR was 26.4 months (95% CI, 18.9-33.9). The median OS has not been reached., Conclusion: The results of this study demonstrate that the four-drug combination regimen, led by gefitinib, is manageable and tolerated and effective for patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous NSCLC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

In later-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there may be large differences in treatment efficacy depending on cancer cachexia. Recently, the cachexia index (CXI), which was calculated from the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI), serum albumin concentration, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, was developed to evaluate cancer cachexia. We retrospectively examined the CXI of 80 patients who were treated with trifluridine/thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor (FTD/TPI) + bevacizumab (Bmab) therapy as a later-line treatment for mCRC, and assessed the impact of cancer cachexia on chemotherapeutic efficacy using CXI. Progression-free and overall survival rates were significantly worse in the low CXI group than in the high CXI group, although there were no marked differences in tumor factors, such as the number of metastatic organs or gene mutations, between the two groups. As the cross-sectional area of the iliopsoas muscle was significantly associated with that of the skeletal muscle, the accuracy of the CXI based on the psoas mass index (P-CXI), which is easier to calculate than the SMI, in predicting treatment outcomes was equivalent to that of the CXI based on the SMI (S-CXI). Cancer cachexia is an important factor related to treatment efficacy in later-line treatments, such as FTD/TPI + Bmab therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Aim: To investigate the characteristics and prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) who achieved a complete response (CR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)., Methods: A total of 120 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0 or 1 and Child-Pugh A at the start of Atz/Bev treatment were included. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was recorded in 59 patients., Results: The CR rate with Atz/Bev alone was 15.0%. The median time to CR was 3.4 months, and the median duration of CR was 15.6 months. A significant factor associated with achieving CR with Atz/Bev alone was an AFP ratio of 0.34 or less at 3 weeks. Adding transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the six patients who achieved a partial response increased the overall CR rate to 20%. Among the 24 patients who achieved CR, the median progression-free survival was 19.3 months, the median overall survival was not reached, and 14 patients (58.3%) were able to discontinue Atz/Bev and achieve a drug-free status. Twelve of these patients developed progressive disease (PD), but eleven successfully received post-PD treatments and responded well., Conclusions: Achieving CR by mRECIST using Atz/Bev alone or with additional TACE can be expected to offer an extremely favorable prognosis.

Atezolizumab and bevacizumab show promise for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but identifying responsive patients remains challenging, due to tumor heterogeneity. This study explores immune dynamics following this combination therapy. Between 2020 and 2023, 29 patients with advanced HCC who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at Severance Hospital, Seoul, were enrolled in this study. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were analyzed using flow cytometry and statistical methods to assess immune alterations and identify biomarkers. Baseline characteristics showed a diverse HCC cohort with a mean age of 64 years and 82.8% male predominance. Absence of extrahepatic metastasis was associated with better overall survival. Immune responses revealed distinct CD4 + T-cell phenotypes between the 'partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD)' and 'progressive disease (PD)' groups, with an overall increase in CD8 + T-cell phenotypes. Patients with higher frequencies of CD8 + PD-1 + Ki-67 + T cells experienced significantly improved overall survival, while those with lower frequencies of CD4 + Foxp3 + PD-1 + LAG3 + T cells also had notable survival benefits. These findings enhance the overall understanding of immune responses to this combination therapy, facilitating improved patient stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches for HCC.

Background: The third-line treatment for refractory colorectal cancer (CRC) has limited efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SHR-8068 (an anti-CTLA-4 antibody), combined with adebrelimab (an anti-PD-L1 antibody), and bevacizumab in refractory non-microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) CRC., Method: This study is a prospective, open-label, single-center phase Ib/II clinical trial. Patients with pathologically confirmed pMMR/non-MSI-H metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma who have failed ≥2 lines prior standard systemic treatments will be enrolled (n=36). The Ib phase will evaluate two dosing regimens of SHR-8068 in combination therapy (n=9 each dosage): SHR-8068 (1 mg per kilogram, every six weeks, intravenously) or SHR-8068 (4 mg per kilogram, every twelve weeks, intravenously) combined with adebrelimab (1200 mg, every three weeks, intravenously) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg per kilogram, every three weeks, intravenously). The efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these regimens will be assessed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of SHR-8068. Those of RP2D group from the phase Ib will be included in the phase II. The study will go to include 18 additional patients according to the one-sample log-rank test design in the phase II. The primary endpoint of the Ib phase is safety, with secondary endpoints including the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and quality of life (QOL). The primary endpoint for phase II was PFS, with secondary endpoints including ORR, OS, DCR, safety, and QOL. Identifying biomarkers to predict the efficacy of this regimen is the exploratory study endpoint., Discussion: This proof-of-concept study would provide safety and efficacy signals of this novel combination treatment for the MSS CRCs in the late-line setting. And it may offer new insights on the clinical application of dual immunotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy in the MSS CRC., Competing Interests: Author JW was employed by Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. JW has no role in the study design and interpretation of results. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Li, Wang, Yang, Wang and Cao.)

Introduction: Anaplastic meningiomas, categorized as WHO grade 3 tumors, are rare and highly aggressive, accounting for 1-2% of all meningioma cases. Despite aggressive treatment, including surgery and Radiation, they exhibit a high recurrence rate and poor survival outcomes. The aggressive histopathological features emphasize the urgent need for effective management strategies., Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional analysis was conducted on patients with recurrent anaplastic meningioma who underwent re-irradiation between 2017 and 2023. Clinical, dosimetric, and outcome data were collected and analyzed, focusing on local control, progression free survival and treatment-related adverse events., Results: Thirty-four cases were analyzed, with a median follow-up 11 months after re-irradiation. Progression-free survival at 12 months was 61.9%, with higher doses correlating with better outcomes. Concomitant Bevacizumab improves progression-free survival and reduces the risk of radiation necrosis. CDKN2A homozygote deletion correlated with a higher risk of local failure. Symptomatic radiation necrosis occurred in 20.5% of cases, but its incidence was lower with concomitant Bevacizumab treatment., Conclusion: Re-irradiation presents a viable option for recurrent anaplastic meningioma despite the associated risk of radiation necrosis. Higher doses with concomitant Bevacizumab improve clinical outcomes and reduce toxicity. Individualized treatment approaches are necessary, emphasizing the importance of further research to refine management strategies for this challenging disease., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Opinion Statement: Recommended first and second line treatments for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based therapy, and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapies. In third line, the SUNLIGHT trial showed that trifluridine/tipiracil + bevacizumab (FTD/TPI + BEV) provided significant survival benefits and as such is now a recommended third line regimen in patients with refractory mCRC, irrespective of RAS mutational status and previous anti-VEGF treatment. Some patients are not candidates for intensive combination chemotherapy as first-line therapy due to age, low tumor burden, performance status and/or comorbidities. Capecitabine (CAP) + BEV is recommended in these patients. In the SOLSTICE trial, FTD/TPI + BEV as a first line regimen in patients not eligible for intensive therapy was not superior to CAP + BEV in terms of progression-free survival (PFS). However, in SOLSTICE, FTD/TPI + BEV resulted in similar PFS, overall survival, and maintenance of quality of life as CAP + BEV, with a different safety profile. FTD/TPI + BEV offers a possible first line alternative in patients for whom CAP + BEV is an unsuitable treatment. This narrative review explores and summarizes the clinical trial data on FTD/TPI + BEV., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: In the era of immunotherapy, bevacizumab seems to be losing its place in NSCLC treatment algorithms. The aim of this work is to try to define the advantages and disadvantages of NSCLC treatment with bevacizumab in combination regimens., Areas Covered: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar to review the most important topics regarding bevacizumab treatment in NSCLC, with or without driver mutations, including trials with checkpoint inhibitors. Special emphasis was placed on the analysis of data on the treatment of patients with CNS metastases., Expert Opinion: Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic compound whose addition to chemotherapy made the first major breakthrough in the treatment of NSCLC. However, for the last 10 years or so, the use of combination immunotherapy regimens has suppressed the use and acquisition of new knowledge about bevacizumab. Newer data are primarily related to the treatment of EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with bevacizumab, with only a few larger studies investigating the use of a combination of bevacizumab and checkpoint inhibitors. The basic task remains to define the place of bevacizumab in treatment algorithms.

Background: This meta-analysis was dedicated to evaluating the effectiveness and safety of Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) and Lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line systematic therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC)., Methods: The prospective protocol for this study was registered with the PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022356874). Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE database Cochrane Library, and Web Science to determine all clinical controlled studies that reported Atez/Bev and LEN for treating u-HCC. We. evaluated as primary end-point overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), as well as other outcomes such as tumor response and adverse events (AEs).Quality assessment and data extraction of studies were conducted independently by three reviewers. Mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using a fixed-effects or random-effects model. The meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software., Results: 12 retrospective cohort studies (RCSs) involving a total of 4948 patients were finally included. The results showed that compared with LEN, Atez/Bev can improve the patient's PFS (HR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72 ~ 0.88; p < 0.0001) and reduce the rate of overall AEs (OR = 0.46 95% CI: 0.38 ~ 0.55, p < 0.00001) and grade ≥ 3 AEs (OR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.36 ~ 0.51, p < 0.00001), while there is no difference between OS and treatment responses rate (objective response rate, disease control rate, complete response, partial response, progressive disease, and stable disease) between two groups. In addition, the subgroup analysis shows that Atez/Bev can promote the OS of patients with viral hepatitis. (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.67 ~ 0.95; p = 0.01), while LEN has an advantage in improving OS in patients with Child-Pugh grade B liver function (HR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.50 ~ 2.63; p < 0.00001)., Conclusion: Current evidence shows that compared with LEN, Atez/Bev has more advantages in PFS and safety in treating u-HCC and can improve the OS of patients with viral. LEN has advantages in improving the OS of patients with grade B liver function. However, more multicenter randomized controlled experiments are needed in the future to verify our results., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is a rare disease of the airway for which there is no known cure. Treatment involves the surgical removal or destruction of these lesions. There has been a long-standing debate over the effectiveness of the adjuvant intralesional injection of the immune modifying agent bevacizumab. This study is a systematic review investigating the effect of adjuvant intralesional bevacizumab on patients with laryngeal papillomatosis. The main objective was to assess functional outcomes and efficacy., Data Sources: Pubmed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science., Review Methods: Search words were "intralesional bevacizumab" AND "recurrent respiratory papillomatosis." Sources were systematically identified using inclusion and exclusion criteria (ie, study publication must post-date 2000, must be peer-reviewed, investigate patients with RRP, apply bevacizumab intralesionally, not systemically). Findings were then collected and analyzed., Results: Ten studies were included for analysis. The majority of these studies found an increase in the surgical interval, voice outcomes, and a decrease in tumor burden in most patients. No studies reported side effects or lasting complications related to the bevacizumab injection., Conclusion: This systematic review provides further evidence for the safety of intralesional bevacizumab injections and their likely positive effect on disease control. Future research would benefit from the implementation of standardized documentation of RRP outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background and Aim: Serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) before the administration of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez + Bev) is a prognostic biomarker in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with Atez + Bev. We previously revealed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and serum chemokine levels during treatment with Atez + Bev were more useful as prognostic biomarkers. Therefore, we examined the predictive ability of serum IL-6 for the efficacy of Atez + Bev in patients with HCC., Methods: We enrolled 94 patients with HCC who received treatment with Atez + Bev. Initial responses were assessed through dynamic computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The levels of IL-6 in serum were measured before and at the initiation of the second course of Atez + Bev. Subsequently, the relationship of IL-6 levels with treatment efficacy was evaluated., Results: IL-6 levels at the initiation of the second course tended to be higher in patients with progressive disease versus those with non-progressive disease in the initial evaluation (P = 0.054). Moreover, the cutoff value (7.4 pg/mL) was useful in stratifying patients by overall survival (i.e. low vs high: not reached vs 21.4 months, respectively, P = 0.001) and progression-free survival (low vs high: 11.9 vs 5.2 months, respectively, P = 0.004). This result was reproduced in patients with HCC who received Atez + Bev as first-line therapy. In the multivariate analyses, IL-6 levels at the initiation of the second course were independent predictive factors for progression-free and overall survival., Conclusions: Serum levels of IL-6 at the initiation of the second course of treatment may predict Atez + Bev efficacy and prognosis in HCC., (© 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Purpose: Proteinuria can cause interindividual variability in the pharmacokinetics of therapeutic antibodies and may affect therapeutic efficacy. Here, we measured the serum and urinary concentrations of bevacizumab (BV) and nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with proteinuria and reported a case series of these patients., Methods: Thirty-two cancer patients who received BV every 3 weeks or NIVO every 2 weeks between November 2020 and September 2021 at Kyoto University Hospital were enrolled in this study. The serum and urinary concentrations of BV and NIVO were measured using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry., Results: We divided the BV-treated patients and the NIVO-treated patients into two groups based on the urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR): UPCR 1 g/g or higher (BV, n = 9; NIVO, n = 3) and UPCR less than 1 g/g (BV, n = 14; NIVO, n = 6). Serum concentrations of the therapeutic antibodies adjusted by their doses were significantly lower in both BV- and NIVO-treated patients with UPCR 1 g/g or higher compared to those with less than 1 g/g. In patients with UPCR 1 g/g or higher, urinary concentrations of the therapeutic antibodies adjusted by their serum concentrations and urinary creatinine concentrations tended to increase., Conclusion: This case-series study suggests a possibility of reduction in serum concentrations of BV and NIVO in patients with proteinuria by urinary excretion of these drugs., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Bevacizumab serves as an effective treatment in cervical cancer patients with metastatic, recurrent, or advanced disease. However, gastrointestinal (GI)/genitourinary (GU) toxicities have been observed after bevacizumab treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) is the mainstay of treatment of cervical cancer., Objectives: To investigate the risk of GI/GU toxicities with bevacizumab plus RT compared with RT alone in cervical cancer patients., Search Strategy: In this meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 25, 2022., Selection Criteria: Cohort studies evaluating the association between bevacizumab and GI/GU fistula or perforation in irradiated metastatic, recurrent, or advanced cervical cancer patients., Data Collection and Analysis: Results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The inconsistency test (I 2 ) was used to assess heterogeneity. Egger's regression test with a two-tailed P value was used to evaluate publication bias., Main Results: Four cohort studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 597 women included. There was a significant association between GI fistula/perforation and GU fistula/perforation in irradiated cervical cancer patients receiving bevacizumab (OR 4.03 [95% CI: 1.76-9.20] and OR 4.71 [95% CI: 1.51-14.70], respectively)., Conclusions: The bevacizumab-containing regimen was associated with an increased risk of GI or GU toxicities in cervical cancer individuals undergoing pelvic RT. These results suggest the bevacizumab-associated benefits and risk should be better weighted to reach an optimal treatment strategy. Further investigation on optimal dosage and timing of bevacizumab and RT is vital to minimize the adverse events and maximize the benefits., (© 2024 The Author(s). International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.)

Purpose: To characterize trends in use of and expenditure for the intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab among the population enrolled in Original Medicare from 2014 to 2019., Methods: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File was used to extract Medicare Part B fee-for-service outpatient injection claims data submitted by ophthalmologists. Multivariable linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between reimbursement, ophthalmologist availability, and agent administration rate., Results: Between 2014 and 2019, 17,588,995 intravitreal injection claims were filed by 4218 US ophthalmologists. Medicare costs for anti-VEGF injections increased from 2.51 B USD in 2014 to 4.02 B USD in 2019. Increased state-level ophthalmologist availability and incremental increases in average reimbursement amounts were found to be significantly associated with a 6.8-fold variation in 2019 overall anti-VEGF injection rates across states., Conclusions: Medicare injection rates and costs for anti-VEGF injections have both increased between 2014 and 2019, largely driven by increased aflibercept use. There is a significant association between ophthalmologist availability and anti-VEGF injection rate on the state level, suggesting access to care may contribute to the observed state-level disparities in intravitreal injection rates. Further characterization of factors contributing to the state-level variation in injection rates of individual anti-VEGF agents may help inform interventions promoting equitable access to and use of these drugs.

Background/aims: Combination immunotherapy, exemplified by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, has become the standard of care for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the lack of predictive biomarkers and limited understanding of response mechanisms remain a challenge., Methods: Using data from the IMbrave150plus cohort, we applied an immune signature score (ISS) predictor to stratify HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or with sorafenib alone into potential high and low response groups. By applying multiple statistical approaches including a Bayesian covariate prediction algorithm, we refined the signature to 10 key genes (ISS10) for clinical use while maintaining similar predictive power to the full model. We further validated ISS10 in an independent HCC cohort treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab., Results: The study identified a significant association between the ISS and treatment response. Among patients classified as high responders, those treated with the atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination exhibited improved overall and progression-free survival as well as better objective response rate compared to those treated with sorafenib. We also observed a significant correlation between ISS10 and response to nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment. Analysis of immune cell subpopulations revealed distinct characteristics associated with ISS subtypes. In particular, the ISS10 high subtype displayed a more favorable immune environment with higher proportions of antitumor macrophages and activated T-cells, potentially explaining its better response., Conclusion: Our study suggests that ISS and ISS10 are promising predictive biomarkers for enhanced therapeutic outcomes in HCC patients undergoing combination immunotherapy. These markers are crucial for refining patient stratification and personalized treatment approaches to advance the effectiveness of standard-of-care regimens.

Purpose: Since 2020, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) has been the standard first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but long-term treatment studies are limited. This study evaluated the clinical characteristics and effects of Ate/Bev for over 1 year., Materials and Methods: This study included patients with unresectable HCC treated with first-line Ate/Bev between May 2020 and April 2022. Those receiving Ate/Bev for 1 year or more were classified as the long-term treatment group., Results: Of 246 patients, 69 (28.0%) were in the long-term treatment group, which comprised more proportions of intrahepatic tumor burden < 25%, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0, and a lower proportion of portal vein tumor thrombosis than the short-term treatment group. The long-term treatment group had a higher incidence of atezolizumab-related thyroid dysfunction (31.9% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001; median time to onset [mTTO], 2.8 months), dermatologic toxicity (29.0% vs. 14.7%, p=0.017; mTTO, 3.3 months), bevacizumab-related hypertension (44.9% vs. 22.0%, p=0.001; mTTO, 4.2 months), and proteinuria (69.6% vs. 38.4%, p < 0.001; mTTO, 6.8 months), compared to the short-term treatment group. Regarding liver function in the long-term treatment group, patients initially classified as Child-Pugh class A decreased from 87.0% to 75.4%, and albumin-bilirubin grade 1 decreased from 68.1% to 50.7% after 1 year of treatment., Conclusion: The Ate/Bev long-term treatment group had a lower intrahepatic tumor burden, less portal vein tumor thrombosis, and better performance status and liver function at baseline. Atezolizumab-related immunological adverse events emerged relatively early in treatment compared to the bevacizumab-related. Additionally, some patients demonstrated liver function deterioration during long-term Ate/Bev treatment.

Background: Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC)., Methods: This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS)., Results: Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded., Conclusions: The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapies have significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although more than 70% of patients still do not respond to this first-line treatment. Many new combination strategies are currently being explored, which drastically increases the need for preclinical models that would allow large-scale testing of new immunotherapies and their combinations. We developed several in ovo (in the egg) human liver cancer models, based on human tumor xenografts of different liver cancer cell lines on the chicken embryo's chorioallantoic membrane. We characterized the angiogenesis, as well as the collagen accumulation and tumor immune microenvironment, and tested atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) plus bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) treatment. Our results show the involvement of chicken immune cells in tumor growth, reproducing a classical non-inflamed "cold" as well as inflamed "hot" tumor status, depending on the in ovo liver cancer model. The treatment by atezolizumab and bevacizumab was highly efficient in the "hot" tumor model PLC/PRF/5 in ovo with the reduction of tumor size by 76% (p ≤ .0001) compared with the control, whereas the efficacy was limited in the "cold" Hep3B in ovo tumor. The contribution of the anti-PD-L1 blockade to the anti-tumoral effect in the PLC/PRF/5 in ovo model was demonstrated by the efficacy of atezolizumab monotherapy (p = .0080, compared with the control). To conclude, our study provides a detailed characterization and rational arguments that could help to partially replace conventional laboratory animals with a more ethical model, suited to the current needs of preclinical research of new immunotherapies for liver cancer., (© 2024 The Author(s). The FASEB Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.)

Background: The QUATTRO-II trial examined the efficacy and safety of capecitabine+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (CAPOXIRI)+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. 5-fluorouracil+folinic acid+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)+BEV in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04097444; jRCTs041190072), patients were randomized (1:1) to FOLFOXIRI+BEV or CAPOXIRI+BEV. The induction treatment in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV/CAPOXIRI+BEV arms was continued for 8/6 cycles (maximum 12/8 cycles if feasible), and the maintenance treatment was 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin+BEV or capecitabine+BEV at the investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with the two arms deemed equivalent if the hazard ratio (HR) of the point estimate was 0.80 < HR < 1.25. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes., Findings: Overall, 51 and 52 patients were randomized to FOLFOXIRI+BEV and CAPOXIRI+BEV, respectively. The study met its primary endpoint; PFS at median follow-up of 23.7 months was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-13.3) in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV arm vs. 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.3) in the CAPOXIRI+BEV arm (HR 1.114 [0.80 < HR < 1.25], p = 0.654). In the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms, the 2-year OS rate (95% CI) was 65.5% (49.5%-77.6%) vs. 74.3% (59.8%-84.2%), and the ORR (95% CI) was 76.5% (62.5%-87.2%) vs. 84.6% (71.9%-93.1%). Major (grade ≥3) AEs in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms were neutropenia (68.6% vs. 40.4%), febrile neutropenia (9.8% vs. 11.5%), diarrhea (7.8% vs. 17.3%), and appetite loss (7.8% vs. 17.3%)., Conclusion: CAPOXIRI+BEV was well tolerated with reduced hematological toxicity and efficacy comparable to those of FOLFOXIRI+BEV, providing a potentially convenient first-line treatment alternative to FOLFOXIRI+BEV in patients with mCRC., Funding: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests H.B. received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical. H.B. also reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. D.K. reports honoraria from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Seagen, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eisai, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Pfizer, Merck Biopharma, and Sysmex and research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical, MSD, Novartis, Servier, Janssen, IQVIA, Syneoshealth, CIMIC, and Cimic Shift Zero. H.S. received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Sanofi and reports honoraria from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Bio Pharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha. T.H. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical. M.S. is on the speakers’ bureau at Johnson & Johnson, Kaken Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha. M.K. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Yakult Honsha, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. T. Masuishi reports honoraria from Bayer Yakuhin, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Ono Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Yakult Honsha and reports research funding from Amgen (Inst), Boehringer Ingelheim (Inst), CMIC (Inst), Daiichi Sankyo (Inst), Eli Lilly Japan (Inst), MSD (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), and Syneos Health (Inst). H.Y. reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Yakult Honsha. Y. Kagawa reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical and Yakult Honsha. Y. Komatsu received grants from Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Shionogi, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Nippon Kayaku, Daichi Sankyo, IQVIA Services Japan, MSD, Astellas Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Eisai, National Cancer Center Japan, Syneos Health Clinical, Shift Zero, PARAXEL International, Japan Clinical Cancer Research Organization, EPS Holdings, SYSMEX Corporation, Public Health Research Foundation, Aichi Cancer Center, and the Kyushu Study group of Clinical Cancer and reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Alfresa Pharma Corporation, Astellas Pharma, EA Pharma, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Nippon Zoki Pharmaceutical, Sanofi, NIPRO, MOROO, Boehringer lngelheim, Hakodate National Hospital, Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, MSD, Zeria Pharmaceutical, Bayer Yakuhin, Yakult Honsha, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Incyte Corporation, Merck Biopharma, The Japanese Gastroenterological Association, Sapporo Minami Tokushukai Hospital, and Pancan Japan. E.O. is on the speakers’ bureau at Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and received research funding from Guardant Health. Y.Y. reports honoraria for lectures from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, Yakult, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lily, Bayer, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Servier, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Teijin, and Insight. H.K. received grants or contracts from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Eisai and received consulting fees from BMS, Eli Lilly Japan, Ono Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and has received honoraria from BMS, Bayer Yakuhin, Eli Lilly Japan, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. T. Misumi reports honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, and Miyarisan. H.T. received lecture fees from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly, Merck Biopharma, and Chugai Pharmaceutical and received research funds from Takeda Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, and Ono Pharmaceutical. K.Y. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Yakult, Daiichi Sankyo, Merk Serono, Sanofi, MSD, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bayer, Eli Lily, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Bristol-Myers Squibb. K.M. reports honoraria from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD, Eli Lilly, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical; reports a consulting or advisory role at Amgen, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and received research funding from Amgen (Inst), Astellas Pharma (Inst), Chugai Pharmaceutical (Inst), Eisai (Inst), MSD (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), and Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst). T.Y. received consulting fees Sumitomo Corporation; received grants from Amgen, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, FALCO biosystems, Genomedia, Molecular Health GmbH, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pfizer Japan, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, Sysmex, and Taiho Pharmaceutical; and reports honoraria for presentations from Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Merck Biopharma, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical. T.K. reports honoraria for lectures from Chugai Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Eli Lilly and Company. A.T. is on the speakers' bureau at Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eli Lilly Japan, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Takeda Pharmaceutical and reports research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), and Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: FOLFIRI is a standard regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We hypothesized that a pharmacogenomic-directed strategy where more efficient irinotecan metabolizers (UGT1A1 *1/*1 homozygotes and *1/*28 heterozygotes) receive higher-than-standard irinotecan doses would improve progression-free survival (PFS) compared to non-genotype selected historical controls with acceptable toxicity., Methods: In this phase II multicenter study irinotecan dosing in first-line FOLFIRI and bevacizumab for mCRC was based on UGT1A1 genotype with *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28 patients receiving 310 mg/m2, 260 mg/m2, and 180 mg/m2, respectively. Primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were investigator and patient-reported adverse events, and estimation of overall survival (OS)., Results: One-hundred patients were enrolled with 91 evaluable for PFS and 83 evaluable for best response. Median PFS was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 15.4), shorter than the anticipated alternative hypothesis of 14 months. PFS by genotype was 12.5 months (90% CI 10.9, 17.4) for *1/*1, 14.6 months (90% CI 11.8, 17.5) for *1/*28, and 6 months (90% CI 2.3, 7.7) for *28/28, respectively. OS was 24.5 months (90% CI 19.1, 30.7) and by genotype was 26.5 (90% CI 19.1, 32.9), 25.9 (90% CI 17.6, 37.7), and 13.4 (90% CI 2.3, 20.5) months for *1/*1, *1/*28, and *28/*28, respectively. G3/4 toxicity was similar between all subgroups, including diarrhea and neutropenia., Conclusions: A pharmacogenomic-directed irinotecan strategy improved PFS in the *1/*1 and *1/*28 genotypes with higher rates of neutropenia and similar rates of diarrhea compared to expected with standard FOLFIRI dosing. However, improvements in response rate and PFS were modest. This strategy should not change standard practice for mCRC patients in the first-line setting., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press.)

Background: For treating recurrent glioblastoma, for which there is no established treatment, the antiangiogenic antibody, bevacizumab, is used alone or with irinotecan. This study was aimed at comparing the survival of patients with recurrent glioblastoma receiving bevacizumab monotherapy and those receiving bevacizumab plus irinotecan combination therapy (B+I) by using a nationwide population-based dataset., Methods: Patients matching the International Classification of Diseases code C71.x were screened from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. From January 2008 to November 2021, patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and subsequent standard concurrent chemoradiation with temozolomide were included. Among them, those who received bevacizumab monotherapy or B+I were selected. Demographic characteristics, inpatient stay, prescription frequency, survival outcomes, and steroid prescription duration were compared between these two groups., Results: Eight hundred and forty-six patients who underwent surgery or biopsy and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide were included. Of these, 450 and 396 received bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I, respectively. The corresponding median overall survival from the initial surgery was 22.60 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 20.50-24.21) and 20.44 months (95% CI, 18.55-22.60; P = 0.508, log-rank test). The B+I group had significantly more bevacizumab prescriptions (median 5 times; BEV group: median 3 times). Cox analysis, based on the postsurgery period, revealed that male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; P = 0.002), older age (HR, 1.01; P = 0.042), and undergoing biopsy instead of surgery (HR, 1.79; P < 0.0001) were significantly associated with decreased survival. Fewer radiotherapy cycles correlated with improved survival outcomes (HR, 0.63; P = 0.001). Cox analysis, conducted from the start of chemotherapy including bevacizumab, showed that male sex was the only variable significantly associated with decreased survival (HR, 1.18; P = 0.044)., Conclusion: We found no significant difference in overall survival between the bevacizumab monotherapy and B+I groups. Considering the additional potential toxicity associated with irinotecan, bevacizumab monotherapy could be a suitable treatment option for treating recurrent glioblastoma., Competing Interests: The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (© 2024 The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences.)

Background: This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of the combination of raltitrexed, S-1 (RS), and fruquintinib with the combination of RS and bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)., Methods: This retrospective cohort included mCRC patients who received the RS plus fruquintinib or regorafenib as the third-line therapy from May 2019 to April 2023. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to balance the baseline characteristics of all patients. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, and safety of the two regimens were evaluated., Results: Of the 153 patients enrolled, 123 patients received the RS plus bevacizumab and 30 patients received the RS plus fruquintinib. After PSM, 30 pairs were analyzed. Patients treated with RS plus fruquintinib had a longer PFS than those treated with RS plus bevacizumab before PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.008) and after PSM (5.0 months vs. 4.4 months, p = 0.012). A longer OS was also observed in RS plus fruquintinib group before PSM and after PSM, but there was no statistic difference between two groups after PSM. Both objective response rate and disease control rate were higher in the RS plus fruquintinib cohort than those in the RS plus bevacizumab cohort before PSM, and the difference in values between the two groups reduced after PSM. The adverse effects (AEs) of both groups were well tolerated., Conclusion: In patients with refractory mCRC, RS plus fruquintinib demonstrated a superior OS, PFS than RS plus bevacizumab and had manageable AEs., (© 2024 Chinese Cochrane Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) compared to lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line systemic therapy for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exceeding the up-to-seven criteria threshold, who are typically unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)., Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 49 consecutive patients with HCC treated at Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital between May 2018 and October 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: the Atez/Bev group (21 patients) and the LEN group (28 patients). Eligibility criteria included Child-Pugh A classification, no prior systemic therapy, and ineligibility for resection, ablation, or transplantation. Treatment outcomes were assessed through periodic imaging and laboratory tests, evaluating OS, PFS, ORR, and disease control rate (DCR)., Results: Both groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics, with a median follow-up of 15.4 months. No significant difference was observed in OS between the Atez/Bev and LEN groups (median OS: 19.80 vs. 22.20 months, p = 0.763). The median PFS was 10.23 months for Atez/Bev and 7.20 months for LEN (p = 0.343). There were no statistically significant differences in ORR or DCR between the two groups. Common adverse events included elevated AST and ALT levels, with no significant difference in the overall rate of adverse events between the groups., Conclusions: Atez/Bev and LEN demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety as first-line systemic treatments for patients with BCLC stage B HCC exceeding the up-to-seven criteria. Both therapeutic options are viable for this population, though further large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm these findings., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aim: Atezolizumab plus beva-cizumab (AteBev) are an integral part of first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), whereas no second-line regimen has been developed for these patients. This study evaluated the efficacy of second-line therapy for uHCC following AteBev treatment., Patients and Methods: Sixty uHCC patients who were administered AteBev therapy were included in the study. Dynamic computed tomography was conducted after 6, 9, and 12 weeks, and blood tests were performed at baseline and after three weeks., Results: After six weeks of AteBev therapy, 19 patients experienced partial response (PR), 12 had stable disease (SD), and 29 exhibited progressive disease (PD), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 31.7%. Of the 21 patients treated with lenvatinib as second-line treatment, one dropped out, nine experienced a compete response (CR) or PR, and 11 had SD or PD, resulting in an ORR of 45.0%. Serum levels of fibroblast growth factors (FGF)-19 increased substantially following lenvatinib therapy in the CR+PR group, although the levels decreased significantly in the SD+PD group. Soluble FGF-R4 levels did not differ significantly between the CR+PR group and the SD+PD group when assessed before and after lenvatinib treatment., Conclusion: Lenvatinib is useful as second-line treatment after Ate/Bev for uHCC patients who do not response to Ate/Bev treatment. Changes in serum FGF-19 levels after three weeks of AteBev therapy may serve as a biomarker for selecting lenvatinib as second-line therapy., (Copyright © 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.)

Objective: Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is associated with chemoresistance. Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of targeted therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and bevacizumab, and the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS)., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed genomic features and treatment outcomes of 172 OCCC patients treated at our institution from January 2000 to May 2022. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed where sufficient archival tissue was available., Results: 64.0% of patients were diagnosed at an early stage, and 36.0% at an advanced stage. Patients with advanced/relapsed OCCC who received platinum-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab followed by maintenance bevacizumab had a median first-line progression-free survival (PFS) of 12.2 months, compared with 9.3 months for chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio=0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.33, 1.45). In 27 patients who received an ICI, the overall response rate was 18.5% and median duration of response was 7.4 months (95% CI=6.5, 8.3). In 17 carefully selected patients with fewer than 3 sites of relapse, median PFS was 35 months (95% CI=0, 73.5) and median overall survival was 96.8 months (95% CI=44.6, 149.0) after SCS. NGS on 58 tumors revealed common mutations in ARID1A (48.3%), PIK3CA (46.6%), and KRAS (20.7%). Pathogenic alterations in PIK3CA , FGFR2 , and NBN were associated with worse survival outcomes. Median tumor mutational burden was 3.78 (range, 0-16). All 26 patients with available loss of heterozygosity (LOH) scores had LOH <16%., Conclusion: Our study demonstrates encouraging outcomes with bevacizumab and ICI, and SCS in select relapsed OCCC patients. Prospective trials are warranted., Competing Interests: Natalie YL Ngoi reports honorarium and travel from AstraZeneca, and honorarium from Pfizer and Merck., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

In retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) type I, the use of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB), which is an inhibitor of endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has become popular despite not being a therapy approved by regulatory agencies. However, IVB has shown positive effects in halting disease progression at lower costs compared to other anti-VEGF therapies (ranibizumab or aflibercept). In this report, we present the experience during the treatment with IVB of 102 Colombian children with ROP type I, with a success rate of 98% (100). Complications occurred in 3.9% (4). Finally, we conclude that a single dose of IVB is an effective therapy for the management of ROP type I, with a lower risk of complications and retreatment., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Oftalmología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Angiogenesis is critical for tumor growth and metastasis. Bevacizumab is an antiangiogenic drug used to treat various adult and childhood solid tumors. Its potential efficacy in Wilms tumor (WT) with poor prognosis is not established., Areas Covered: The response to bevacizumab-containing regimens in relapsed or refractory WT was reviewed in available literature. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Eight papers were identified, published between 2007 and 2020, including six treatment regimens, predominantly vincristine, irinotecan, and bevacizumab (VIB) ± temozolomide (VITB). Among 16 evaluable patients, there were two complete responses, seven partial responses, five patients achieved stable disease (SD), and two patients had progressive disease. Objective responses (OR) were observed in 56% of all cases. OR or SD was observed in 89% (8/9) patients who received VIB/VITB. Bevacizumab was generally well tolerated. Related toxicities included hypertension, proteinuria, and delayed wound healing., Expert Opinion: This review suggests potential effectiveness and good tolerability of bevacizumab in the setting of relapsed/refractory WT when used in combination with other drugs. Such combination therapies may serve as a bridging treatment option to other interventions and more personalized treatment options in the future; however, focused trials are needed to obtain additional evidence.

Objective: First-line bevacizumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) is approved for stage III/IV ovarian cancer treatment following initial surgical resection, based on global phase III GOG-0218 and ICON7 trials. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab + CP as first-line ovarian cancer therapy in Chinese patients., Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III/IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer post-primary surgery were randomized 1:1 to receive 6 cycles of CP with bevacizumab/placebo, followed by bevacizumab/placebo maintenance until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Stratification factors were FIGO stage and debulking status (stage III optimally debulked vs stage III suboptimally debulked vs stage IV) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1 or 2)., Results: Of randomized patients, 51 received bevacizumab + CP and 49 received placebo + CP. Median PFS was 22.6 months with bevacizumab + CP (95% confidence interval [CI]=18.6, not estimable) and 12.3 months (95% CI=9.5, 15.0) with placebo + CP (stratified hazard ratio=0.30; 95% CI=0.17, 0.53). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 46 of 49 (94%) patients receiving bevacizumab + CP, and 34 of 50 (68%) receiving placebo + CP., Conclusion: Bevacizumab + CP showed clinically meaningful improvement in PFS vs placebo + CP, consistent with GOG-0218 results. Safety data were aligned with the known bevacizumab safety profile. These results support first-line bevacizumab + CP therapy in Chinese patients with ovarian cancer., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03635489., Competing Interests: W.X., L.J., A.R., Y.R., Z.Y., Z.H., H.A., W.L., Z.J., L.Z., D.W., Z.J., L.G., C.G., C.Y., and X.F. received institute research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. N.S., W.H., and L.D. are employees of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. N.S. and W.H. own shares in F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., (© 2024. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.)

Background: Prior trials validated triplet chemotherapy (Tri-CT) with bevacizumab as first line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but real-world data are scarce and practices remain heterogeneous., Aims: To evaluate Tri-CT +/- bevacizumab efficacy and safety, and to identify factors influencing treatment decisions., Methods: The COLOTRIP retrospective study enrolled mCRC patients treated from 2014 to 2019 in 14 French centers., Results: Of 299 patients (81% PS 0-1, 58% RAS-mutated and 19% BRAF-mutated), 51% received Tri-CT and 49% Tri-CT + bevacizumab. Metastatic disease was classified as resectable (6.5%), potentially resectable (40%), and unresectable (54%). Bevacizumab use was associated with primary tumor location, mutational status and number of metastases. Median overall survival was 33.5 months in the Tri-CT group and 23.9 months in the Tri-CT + bevacizumab group, with median progression-free survival being 14.5 and 11.4 months. After adjusting for initial characteristics, no difference in survival was noted. Around 30% of patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events., Conclusions: This study highlights several factors influencing Tri-CT use +/- bevacizumab decision and confirms the real-world good oncological outcomes and tolerability of these regimens in mCRC patients. Our results suggest that Tri-CT alone may by an appropriate option for specific subgroups of patients., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Dr Philonenko has received honoraria as a speaker or in an advisory role for Servier, and travel grants from Mundi Farma and Pierre Fabre. Dr Artru has received honoraria in an advisory role for Roche, Merck-Serono, Amgen, and travel grants from Roche and Merck-Serono. Pr Lecomte has received personnel fees from Amgen, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Ipsen, Bayer, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Pierre Fabre and Servier. Pr Taieb has received honoraria as a speaker or in an advisory role from Astellas, Roche, Merck Serono, Amgen, Servier, Pierre Fabre, BMS, Astra Zeneca, Novartis, Takeda and MSD. Dr Coutzac has received honoraria as a speaker or in an advisory role from Amgen, Servier, Merck Serono, Bristol-Myers Squib, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Astra Zeneca, and Daiichi Sankyo. All other authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the anatomical and functional results of the "3+PRN" protocol in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME), determine the predictive factors for good final visual acuity, and compare it to other protocols., Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional study of patients with DME, which we dubbed HTSM. All patients were treated with three monthly initial intravitreal injections (IVT) of 1.25mg bevacizumab and followed according to the pro re nata (PRN) protocol for a period of 3years. The protocol was based on a monthly monitoring schedule for the first 3months, then increasingly spaced out over time. "On-demand" treatment was indicated with resumption of bevacizumab IVT in the event of worsening of DME., Results: A total of 52 patients were included. The mean age was 65years. Type 2 was the most frequently observed type of diabetes. The mean duration of the PRN protocol was 6months, and the mean number of injections was 6. The mean visual acuity (VA), initially 1/10, improved to 3/10 by the conclusion of the 3+PRN protocol, with an improvement of more than 5 letters in 77.6% of cases. The mean initial central macular thickness (CMT) was 451.5μm. The final mean EMC decreased to 298.5μm, which corresponds to a reduction of 153μm compared to the initial value. The mean subfoveal choroidal thickness, initially 304.2μm, decreased to a mean of 284.5μm at completion. Comparative analysis of the results before and after the PRN protocol confirmed the existence of a statistically significant correlation between VA and CMT (P<0.05). No correlation was observed between age and visual acuity or between initial and final VA. The analysis of the various tomographic parameters and VA revealed a significantly better visual improvement in the group in whom the external limiting membrane (MLE) and ellipsoid zone (ZE) were intact (P=0.04), as well as in the group in whom serous retinal detachment (SRD) was absent (P<0.001). Posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) was the most frequently observed vitreomacular anomaly. The final VA was similar in the groups with and without PVD (P=0.04)., Conclusion: The 3+PRN protocol is effective both functionally and tomographically in the treatment of DME. Various tomographic parameters might influence therapeutic efficacy. However, further in-depth studies are needed to better investigate these parameters., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: Proteinuria is a well-known toxicity of bevacizumab which can lead to kidney injury or nephrotic syndrome. There is little guidance on the frequency of monitoring and management of those that experience bevacizumab-induced proteinuria. Previous literature has suggested routine monitoring with every dose has limited clinical significance. Currently, there is no standardization of proteinuria monitoring at OhioHealth., Methods: This retrospective descriptive study included 100 adult patients who received at least 3 doses of a bevacizumab product for a malignant condition at any OhioHealth facility from April 15, 2022 to October 15, 2022. The primary outcome was to describe the average number of proteinuria tests ordered over the course of therapy., Results: Of the 100 patients evaluated, 91 received proteinuria monitoring during treatment with bevacizumab. The overall average number of tests completed per patient per month based on treatment period of bevacizumab was 1.51. Twenty-two of 91 patients (24%) developed grade 2+ proteinuria. Average time to first grade 2+ proteinuria event was 5.7 months. A history of baseline renal dysfunction or chronic kidney disease was the only predefined factor found to be significantly associated with developing grade 2+ proteinuria. The most common treatment modification following a grade 2+ proteinuria result was a delay in therapy., Conclusion: Proteinuria monitoring may not be necessary for short definitive courses of bevacizumab and closer monitoring should be considered in patients with baseline renal dysfunction or CKD. Future direction includes evaluating the cost of varying proteinuria tests and developing a recommendation for OhioHealth to standardize testing., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the pre-clinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC., Findings: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43-1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61-1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab., Conclusions: In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time., Clinical Trial Information: NCT00520975., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Evidence regarding chemosensitivity to different therapeutic regimens in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) remains limited. This study aimed to investigate EOC implementation in daily clinical practice and reveal favorable regimens for EOC among Japanese patients., Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients newly diagnosed with EOC from 2012 to 2021 at our affiliated institutions. We evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of conventional paclitaxel plus carboplatin (TC) vs. dose-dense TC (ddTC) according to the eligibility of GOG262 and JGOG3016 and those with bevacizumab (BEV) vs. without BEV based on GOG218. Further, we evaluated OS and PFS of ddTC and ddTC + BEV to TC + BEV among patients with stage III/IV., Results: The ddTC group (n = 402) demonstrated longer PFS and OS than the TC group (n = 165) (adjusted hazard ratios [aHRs] [95% confidential intervals (CIs)]: 0.69 [0.55-0.88] and 0.67 [0.50-0.90], respectively). The group with BEV (n = 158) demonstrated a longer PFS than those without BEV (n = 296) (0.74 [0.57-0.95]), but not for OS (0.84 [0.60-1.17]). The ddTC and ddTC + BEV groups (n = 259 and 117) demonstrated no statistically significant differences in PFS and OS than the TC + BEV group (n = 75) (1.09 [0.79-1.50] and 0.74 [0.52-1.08] for PFS and 0.89 [0.59-1.34] and 0.73 [0.50-1.05] for OS, respectively)., Conclusion: Our study may indicate ddTC, BEV, and their combination regimen as the promising first-line chemotherapy option among Japanese patients with advanced EOC., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.)

Bevacizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 antibody of VEGF, and inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Ferroptosis, a new form of regulated cell death function independently of the apoptotic machinery, has been accepted as an attractive target for pharmacological intervention; the ferroptosis pathway can enhance cell immune activity of anti-PD1 immunotherapy in HCC. In this study we investigated whether and how bevacizumab regulated ferroptosis and immune activity in liver cancer. Firstly, we performed RNA-sequencing in bevacizumab-treated human liver cancer cell line HepG2 cells, and found that bevacizumab significantly altered the expression of a number of genes including VEGF, PI3K, HAT1, SLC7A11 and IL-9 in liver cancer, bevacizumab upregulated 37 ferroptosis-related drivers, and downregulated 17 ferroptosis-related suppressors in particular. We demonstrated that bevacizumab triggered ferroptosis in liver cancer cells by driving VEGF/PI3K/HAT1/SLC7A11 axis. Clinical data confirmed that the expression levels of VEGF were positively associated with those of PI3K, HAT1 and SLC7A11 in HCC tissues. Meanwhile, we found that bevacizumab enhanced immune cell activity in tumor immune-microenvironment. We identified that HAT1 up-regulated miR-143 targeting IL-9 mRNA 3'UTR in liver cancer cells; bevacizumab treatment resulted in the increase of IL-9 levels and its secretion via VEGF/PI3K/HAT1/miR-143/IL-9 axis, which led to the inhibition of tumor growth in vivo through increasing the release of IL-2 and Granzyme B from activated CD8 + T cells. We conclude that in addition to inhibiting angiogenesis, bevacizumab induces ferroptosis and enhances CD8 + T cell immune activity in liver cancer. This study provides new insight into the mechanisms by which bevacizumab synergistically modulates ferroptosis and CD8 + T cell immune activity in liver cancer., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Chinese Pharmacological Society.)

Introduction: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH), a condition that develops over time, is characterized by inflammation, angiogenesis, and membrane development. As the population's average age increases, the incidence of cSDH is expected to grow. While surgery is the primary treatment technique, medicinal therapy options are being explored for high-risk patients. Currently, the most effective therapy combination is dexamethasone (Dex) and atorvastatin (Ato); however, it is associated with an increased risk of mortality. This study explored the effects of bevacizumab (Bev), a vascular endothelial growth factor antagonist, on cSDH., Materials and Methods: Ninety-five rats were divided into four groups (n = 18): sham, control hematoma, Dex-Ato, and Bev. Two separate autologous blood injections into the subdural space were used as the model. Weight was monitored for all rats to assess changes in their overall health. The control group was given i.p. saline, the Dex-Ato treatment was given by gavage, and the Bev treatment was given i.p. On seventh, 14th and 21st days six rats from each group were sacrificed and analyzed, while 23 rats were excluded from the experiment., Results: The maximum immunological response to cSDH was observed on day 14. Hematoma volume decreased over time in all groups. Dex-Ato and Bev were both found effective, while Dex-Ato caused weight loss., Conclusion: Bev had similar effects to the Dex-Ato group and was well tolerated by rats. Given that cSDH is a disease of the elderly and vulnerable populations, Bev may be a viable alternative that can shed light on the disease's etiology for future research., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are among the most common malignancies in various age ranges. Low-grade glioma (LGG) can account for nearly 30% of pediatric CNS malignancies. Progression or recurrence after the first-line treatments is common among these patients. Therefore, more treatments are required. Bevacizumab as an anti-VEGF antibody has come into the spotlight recently and is especially used in relapse or recurrence settings. This review aims to study the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab for patients with recurrent LGG., Methods: This study was conducted according to The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were comprehensively searched using the relevant key terms until 24th August 2023 to retrieve the studies that investigated clinical outcomes of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent LGG. All statistical analysis was performed by STATA v.17., Results: A total of 1306 papers were gathered, out of which 13 were incorporated in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence rate of treatment according to the RANO scale was 70% (95% CI = 43-98%) for objective response rate, 26% (95% CI = 58-96%) for partial response, 21% (95% CI = 15-28%) for minor response, 14% (95% CI = 3-24%) for complete response, 48% (95% CI = 37-59%) for stable disease, and 8% (95% CI = 4-11%) for progressive disease. Furthermore, according to progressive survival after treatment, it was 4% (95% CI = -1 to 9%) for 6-month PFS, 41% (95% CI = 32-50%) for 2-year PFS, and 29% (95% CI = 22-35%) for 3-year PFS., Conclusion: According to the RANO scale and PFS, clinicians should be aware that Bevacizumab could be a favorable alternative therapy for recurrent LGG. Furthermore, bevacizumab exhibits minimal toxicity and high tolerability in recurrent LGG., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Cynomolgus monkeys and human FcRn transgenic mice are generally used for pharmacokinetic predictions of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). In the present study, the application of the common marmoset, a small nonhuman primate, as a potential animal model for prediction was evaluated for the first time.Canakinumab, adalimumab, and bevacizumab, which exhibited linear pharmacokinetics in humans, were selected as the model compounds. Marmoset pharmacokinetic data were reportedly available only for canakinumab, and those for adalimumab and bevacizumab were acquired in-house.Four pharmacokinetic parameters for a two-compartment model (i.e. clearance and volume of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments) in marmosets were extrapolated to the values in humans with allometric scaling using the average exponents of the three mAbs. As a result, the observed human serum concentration-time curves of the three mAbs following intravenous administration and those of canakinumab and adalimumab following subcutaneous injections (with an assumed absorption rate constant and bioavailability) were reasonably predicted.Although further prediction studies using a sufficient number of other mAbs are necessary to evaluate the versatility of this model, the findings indicate that marmosets can be an alternative to preceding animals for human pharmacokinetic predictions of therapeutic mAbs.

Bleeding-related adverse events may occur due to anti-vascular endothelial growth factors. Here, we report two cases of variceal rupture during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BV) treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC).Case 1 involved a man in his 60 s with alcoholic liver cirrhosis (LC) and u-HCC. Seventy-four days after ATZ/BV administration, the patient was admitted for hematemesis. Upper esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed worsening of the esophageal varices (EVs) to F2 grade with active bleeding. Endoscopic variceal ligation successfully achieved hemostasis.Case 2 involved a man in his 70 s with alcoholic LC and u-HCC. The patient was admitted with hematemesis 114 days after ATZ/BV administration. During EGD, the EVs deteriorated to F3 grade, although hemostasis had already been achieved. The evaluation was discontinued during the observation stage because of the worsening hepatic reserve.Neither patient had EVs warranting prophylactic treatment before ATZ/BV administration, showed a partial tumor response, or had portal vein tumor thrombus. Both patients demonstrated increased total diameters of the collateral veins and splenic volume compared to those before treatment. These findings suggest that ATZ/BV treatment may increase portal pressure. In conclusion, the administration of ATZ/BV to patients with LC and u-HCC necessitates careful management of EVs aggravation and rupture., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

A woman in her early 80 s was followed up in our hospital for chronic hepatitis C after viral eradication. We detected rapid-growing lymph node metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and/or radiofrequency ablation. We found that the metastasis was operable, but the size and location of the metastasis obliged the patient to receive pancreatoduodenectomy, which was too invasive. Then we initiated systemic chemotherapy to perform radical minimally invasive surgery. We treated the patient with 3 weekly cycles of atezolizumab 1200 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg. The patient tolerated the treatment well, and treatment-emergent adverse events included deterioration of hypertension and increased uric protein. After a total of 4 cycles of therapy, abdominal computed tomography findings showed that the metastasis evidently decreased, and a complete response was achieved based on the Revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines (version 1.1). Seventeen days later, the metastasis was dissected. Subsequently, we confirmed that there was no pathological metastatic lesion in the resected lymph node. Our case is the first report of successful application of the radical therapy to lymph node metastasis of HCC via combination therapy with atezolizumab/bevacizumab., (© 2024. Japanese Society of Gastroenterology.)

Recently, in Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting, the use of metformin has been associated to a trend toward worse response rate, overall survival and progression free survival in patients who received immunotherapy. The study population included individuals from both Eastern and Western regions with a confirmed diagnosis of HCC and receiving first line treatment with Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab or Lenvatinib. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by Cox proportional. For the analysis, patients were stratified based on their use of concomitant medication or not. At the time of database lock, 319 deaths were observed: 209 in the Lenvatinib cohort, 110 in the Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab cohort. In the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab arm, 50 (16.5%) patients were on chronic metformin use. At the univariate analysis for OS, patients who used metformin showed significantly shorter OS compared to patients who did not use metformin (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.2). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter OS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1-3.1). At the univariate analysis for PFS, patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.6). Multivariate analysis confirmed that patients in metformin group had significantly shorter PFS compared to patients in no-metformin group (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.1-2.7; p = 0.0147). No differences were reported in terms of ORR and DCR between patients in metformin group and those in no-metformin group. In the Lenvatinib cohort, 65 (15%) patients were recorded to chronically use metformin. No statistically significant differences in terms of both OS and PFS were found between patients in metformin group and patients in no-metformin group. This analysis unveils a negative prognostic role associated with metformin use specifically within the Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab group., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Cerebral radiation necrosis (RN), a severe complication of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), has been shown to significantly decrease patient survival time and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether bevacizumab can prevent or reduce the occurrence of SRT-induced cerebral RN in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of NSCLC patients with brain metastases from March 2013 to June 2023 who were treated with SRT. Patients were divided into two groups: those in the bevacizumab group received SRT with four cycles of bevacizumab, and patients in the control group received SRT only. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed based on a multinomial propensity score model to balance the baseline characteristics. The chi-square test was used. A Cox model was used to evaluate overall survival (OS)., Results: A total of 80 patients were enrolled, namely, 28 patients in the bevacizumab group and 52 patients in the control group. The possibility of developing cerebral RN and/or symptomatic edema (RN/SE) was significantly decreased in patients treated with bevacizumab compared to those who did not receive bevacizumab before IPTW (p=0.036) and after IPTW (p=0.015) according to chi-square analysis. The IPTW-adjusted median OS was 47.7 months (95% CI 27.4-80.8) for patients in the bevacizumab group and 44.1 months (95% CI 36.7-68.0) (p=0.364) for patients in the control group., Conclusion: The application of bevacizumab concurrent with SRT may prevent or reduce the occurrence of cerebral RN in NSCLC patients with brain metastases., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer XL declared a shared parent affiliation with the author JZ to the handling editor at the time of the review., (Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Yu, Yang, Jiang, Dong, Liu, Yu, Yu and Shi.)

Treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab is the first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are novel and effective treatments, they can induce immune-related adverse events. However, neurological immune-related adverse events have rarely been reported. We report the case of a man in his 40s with hepatocellular carcinoma who developed life-threatening encephalitis after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was administered. The patient presented with fever, headache, altered mentality, and general epileptic seizures, ten days after administration. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed elevated white blood cells and elevated protein levels, but revealed no infection or malignancy. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed diffuse leptomeningeal enhancement in both the cerebrum and cerebellum. As immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced encephalitis was strongly suspected, steroid pulse therapy was initiated and neurological symptoms quickly improved. The patient was discharged after 66 days of hospitalization, and administration of sorafenib and radiotherapy was started for the hepatocellular carcinoma on an outpatient basis. This case demonstrates the importance of recognizing neurological immune-related adverse events following atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment for early intervention. We discuss this case in comparison to available literature and previous two cases of Atezolizumab- and bevacizumab- induced encephalitis in hepatocellular carcinoma., (© 2024. The Author(s).)