Search

Accurate assessment of adverse health effects attributable to ingestion of inorganic arsenic (As) present in contaminated soils requires determination of the internal dose of metal provided by ingested soil. This calculation requires estimation of the oral bioavailability of soil-borne (As). Animal models to assess the bioavailability of soil (As) are frequently used as surrogates for determination of this variable in humans. A mouse assay has been widely applied to estimate the bioavailability of As in soils at sites impacted by mining, smelting, and pesticides. In the mouse assay, the relative bioavailability (RBA) of soil (As) is determined as the ratio of the fraction of the ingested arsenic dose excreted in urine after consumption of diets containing a test soil or the soluble reference compound, sodium arsenate. The aim of the current study was to compare (As) bioavailability measured in the mouse assay with reported estimates in humans. Here, a pharmacokinetic model based on excretion of arsenic in urine and feces was used to estimate the absolute bioavailability (ABA) of As in mice that received an oral dose of sodium arsenate. Based upon this analysis, in mice that consumed diet amended with sodium arsenate, the ABA was 85%. This estimate of arsenic ABA for the mouse is comparable to estimates in humans who consumed (As) in drinking water and diet, and to estimates of ABA in monkeys and swine exposed to sodium arsenate. The concordance of estimates for ABA in mice and humans provides further support for use of the mouse model in human health risk assessment. Sodium arsenate ABA also provides a basis for estimating soil arsenic ABA from RBA estimates obtained in the mouse model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Extensive research has examined arsenic (As) bioavailability in contaminated soils and is routinely assessed using in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) assays. Analysis of differences in bioaccessibility measurements across IVBA assays and phases is expected to provide valuable insights into geochemical mechanisms controlling soil As bioaccessibility and bioavailability. Soil iron (Fe) content and As speciation are expected to significantly influence IVBA gastric and intestinal phases due to fluctuations in precipitation-dissolution chemistry and sorption reactivity as pH and assay chemical complexity changes. The aim of this review was to examine these relationships by 1) conducting a meta-analysis (n = 47 soils) determining the influence of total Fe on As bioaccessibility measurements and 5 IVBA assays and 2) investigating the effect of As speciation on gastric/intestinal phase IVBA and in vitro-in vivo correlations. Our findings indicate that soil Fe content and As speciation heterogeneity are important in elucidating variability of bioaccessibility measurements across IVBA assays and gastrointestinal phases. Greater focus on coupled As speciation and Fe precipitation chemistry may (1) improve our understanding of soil geochemical factors and assay constituents that influence As in vitro-in vivo correlations and (2) resolve variability in the precision of oral relative bioavailability (RBA) estimated using IVBA assays for soils possessing heterogenous As speciation and Fe composition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arsenic (As) is the most frequently occurring contaminant on the priority list of hazardous substances, which lists substances of greatest public health concern to people living at or near U.S. National Priorities List site. Accurate assessment of human health risks from exposure to As-contaminated soils depends on estimating its bioavailability, defined as the fraction of ingested As absorbed across the gastrointestinal barrier and available for systemic distribution and metabolism. Arsenic bioavailability varies among soils and is influenced by site-specific soil physical and chemical characteristics and internal biological factors. This review describes the state-of-the science that supports our understanding of oral bioavailability of soil As, the methods that are currently being explored for estimating soil As relative bioavailability (RBA), and future research areas that could improve our prediction of the oral RBA of soil As in humans. The following topics are addressed: (1) As soil geochemistry; (2) As toxicology; (3) in vivo models for estimating As RBA; (4) in vitro bioaccessibility methods; and (5) conclusions and research needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effect of dietary lead on the intestinal microbiome has not been fully elucidated. To determine if there was an association between microflora modulation, predicted functional genes, and Pb exposure, mice were provided diets amended with increasing concentrations of a single lead compound, lead acetate, or a well characterized complex reference soil containing lead, i.e. 6.25–25 mg/kg Pb acetate (PbOAc) or 7.5–30 mg/kg Pb in reference soil SRM 2710a having 0.552 % Pb among other heavy metals such as Cd. Feces and ceca were collected following 9 days of treatment and the microbiome analyzed by 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Treatment effects on the microbiome were observed in both feces and ceca of mice. Changes in the cecal microbiomes of mice fed Pb as Pb acetate or as a constituent in SRM 2710a were statistically different except for a few exceptions regardless of dietary source. This was accompanied by increased average abundance of functional genes associated with metal resistance, including those related to siderophore synthesis and arsenic and/or mercury detoxification. Akkermansia , a common gut bacterium, was the highest ranked species in control microbiomes whereas Lactobacillus ranked highest in treated mice. Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratios in the ceca of SRM 2710a treated mice increased more than with PbOAc, suggestive of changes in gut microbiome metabolism that promotes obesity. Predicted functional gene average abundance related to carbohydrate, lipid, and/or fatty acid biosynthesis and degradation were greater in the cecal microbiome of SRM 2710a treated mice. Bacilli/Clostridia increased in the ceca of PbOAc treated mice and may be indicative of increased risk of host sepsis. Family Deferribacteraceae also was modulated by PbOAc or SRM 2710a possibly impacting inflammatory response. Understanding the relationship between microbiome composition, predicted functional genes, and Pb concentration, especially in soil, may provide new insights into the utility of various remediation methodologies that minimize dysbiosis and modulate health effects, thus assisting in the selection of an optimal treatment for contaminated sites. • Ingesting lead acetate or mining soil altered murine fecal and cecal microbiome differently. • Differences in cecal microflora were observed at different taxon levels. • Cecal Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio was greater with exposure to soil than lead acetate. • Predicted cecal microbiome metabolism and detoxification genes were elevated. • Microbiome impacts in soil treated mice did not directly correlate with lead acetate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lead (Pb) in soil is an important exposure source for children. Thus, determining bioavailability of Pb in soil is critical in evaluating risk and selecting appropriate strategies to minimize exposure. A mouse model was developed to estimate relative bioavailability of Pb in NIST SRM 2710a (Montana 1 Soil). Based on Pb levels in tissues, the mean relative bioavailability of this metal in this soil was 0.5. Estimates of relative bioavailabilities derived from mouse compared favorably with those obtained in juvenile swine. The mouse model is thus an efficient and inexpensive method to obtain estimates of relative bioavailability of soil Pb. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several investigations have been conducted to develop in vitro bioaccessibility (IVBA) assays that reliably predict in vivo oral relative bioavailability (RBA) of arsenic (As). This study describes a meta-regression model relating soil As RBA and IVBA that is based upon data combined from previous investigations that examined the relationship between As IVBA and RBA when IVBA was determined using an extraction of soil in 0.4Mglycine at pH 1.5. Data used to develop the model included paired IVBA and RBA estimates for 83 soils from various types of sites such as mining, smelting, and pesticide or herbicide application. The following linear regression model accounted for 87% of the observed variance in RBA (R2= .87): RBA(%) = 0.79 × IVBA(%) + 3. This regression model is more robust than previously reported models because it includes a larger number of soil samples, and also accounts for variability in RBA and IVBA measurements made on samples collected from sites contaminated with different As sources and conducted in different labs that have utilized different experimental models for estimating RBA. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Ingested soil and surface dust may be important contributors to elevated blood lead (Pb) levels in children exposed to Pb contaminated environments. Mitigation strategies have typically focused on excavation and removal of the contaminated soil. However, this is not always feasible for addressing widely disseminated contamination in populated areas often encountered in urban environments. The rationale for amending soils with phosphate is that phosphate will promote formation of highly insoluble Pb species (e.g., pyromorphite minerals) in soil, which will remain insoluble after ingestion and, therefore, inaccessible to absorption mechanisms in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT). Amending soil with phosphate might potentially be used in combination with other methods that reduce contact with or migration of contaminated soils, such as covering the soil with a green cap such as sod, clean soil with mulch, raised garden beds, or gravel. These remediation strategies may be less expensive and far less disruptive than excavation and removal of soil. This review evaluates evidence for efficacy of phosphate amendments for decreasing soil Pb bioavailability. Evidence is reviewed for (1) physical and chemical interactions of Pb and phosphate that would be expected to influence bioavailability, (2) effects of phosphate amendments on soil Pb bioaccessibility (i.e., predicted solubility of Pb in the GIT), and (3) results of bioavailability bioassays of amended soils conducted in humans and animal models. Practical implementation issues, such as criteria and methods for evaluating efficacy, and potential effects of phosphate on mobility and bioavailability of co-contaminants in soil are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A mouse assay for measuring the relative bioavailability (RBA) of arsenic (As) in soil was developed. In this study, results are presented of RBA assays of 16 soils, including multiple assays of the same soils, which provide a quantitative assessment of reproducibility of mouse assay results, as well as a comparison of results from the mouse assay with results from a swine and monkey assay applied to the same test soils. The mouse assay is highly reproducible; three repeated assays on the same soils yielded RBA estimates that ranged from 1 to 3% of the group mean. The mouse, monkey, and swine models yielded similar results for some, but not all, test materials. RBA estimates for identical soils (nine test soils and three standard reference materials [SRM]) assayed in mice and swine were significantly correlated (r = 0.70). Swine RBA estimates for 6 of the 12 test materials were higher than those from the mouse assay. RBA estimates for three standard reference materials (SRM) were not statistically different (mouse/swine ratio ranged from 0.86–1). When four test soils from the same orchard were assessed in the mouse, monkey, and swine assays, the mean soil As RBA were not statistically different. Mouse and swine models predicted similar steady state urinary excretion fractions (UEF) for As of 62 and 74%, respectively, during repeated ingestion doses of sodium arsenate, the water-soluble As form used as the reference in the calculation of RBA. In the mouse assay, the UEF for water soluble AsV(sodium arsenate) and AsIII(sodium [meta] arsenite) were 62% and 66%, respectively, suggesting similar absolute bioavailabilities for the two As species. The mouse assay can serve as a highly cost-effective alternative or supplement to monkey and swine assays for improving As risk assessments by providing site-specific assessments of RBA of As in soils. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]