Search

Many years of research have demonstrated that instead of the total concentration of metals in soil, bioavailability is the key to understand the environmental risk derived by metals, since adverse effects are related only to the biologically available forms of these elements. The knowledge of bioavailability can decrease the uncertainties in evaluating exposure in human and ecological risk assessment. At the same time, the efficiency of remediation treatments could be greatly influenced by availability of the contaminants. Consideration of the bioavailability processes at contaminated sites could be useful in site-specific risk assessment: the fraction of mobile metals, instead of total content should be provided as estimates of metal exposure. Moreover, knowledge of the chemical forms of heavy metals in soils is a critical component in the evaluation of applicability of different remediation technologies such as phytoremdiation or soil washing.

Phytoextraction may be applied at field scale when the removal of bioavailable metals is the specific target of the technology. Residual metals in soil can be considered substantially inert or to be evaluated by site specific risk analysis.

In microcosm experiments, the use of inorganic and organic amendments has been studied as potential agents to reduce heavy metal bioavailability in an acidic soil highly contaminated by Cu, Zn and Ni, that has to be remediated by phytoremediation. The concentrations of heavy metals in the original soil (O-Soil) produced phytotoxic effects with a strong reduction in biomass yield that hinder the utilization of this technology. To overcome phytotoxicity the use of three immobilizing agents was evaluated. The results obtained showed that all the strategies decreased the mobile fractions of heavy metals in soil and increased the metal removal efficiency. In the case of Brassica juncea the best results for Zn and Ni were obtained after zeolites addition (Z-Soil) with an increase of about 6 times with respect to the value found in the O-Soil. In the case of Cu, the more efficient treatment was Ca(OH)2 addition (Ca-Soil). The B. juncea plants accumulated Cu amounts 8 times greater than in the O-Soil. For this metal, relevant results were obtained also with compost, that increased the amount of Cu in the plants of 7 times with respect to the O-Soil. Similar results were obtained with Helianthus annuus the highest Zn and Ni accumulation was detected in the Z-Soil and compost-treated soils (C-Soil), with an increase of nearly 11 times with respect to the accumulation in the O-Soil. In the case of Cu the highest increase of total uptake was found in the C-Soil: 28 times higher than in the O-Soil. Total accumulation in Poa annua plants showed the highest removal efficiency in the Z-Soil for all metals. The values obtained increased of 4, 11 and 12 times for Cu, Zn and Ni, respectively. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]