Search

Troglophilus neglectus (Krauss, 1879) From the CR, it was first reported as T. cavicola (Holu��a et al. 1999) on the basis of misidentification, and it has been considered to be introduced (Koč��rek et al. 1999). In Moravia, it has been found only in several caves in the environs of Hlubočky (Holu��a et al. 1999). In Bohemia, it inhabits caves, cellars, bunkers, etc. in the area of Česk�� ��v��carsko NP (Chl��dek et al. 2000). It is wingless, and only parthenogenetic females are known from the CR (Ko����rek et al. 2005). Cave-crickets of the genus Troglophilus are distributed mostly in karst areas of South Europe. T. neglectus is a European species reported from Germany, southern Austria, northern Italy, from the countries of former Yugoslavia (described from Istria), and from Greece (Karaman et al. 2011)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 444, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Pholidoptera aptera (Fabricius, 1793) Material examined. Bohemia bor., Jetřichovice, 25.- 26.viii. 2009, J. Holu��a observ.; Bohemia centr., T��řovicehrad T��řov castle, 20.vii. 2005, 3M, J. Holu��a leg., det. et coll.; Bohemia occ., Korunn�� Kyselka, 5644, 2.viii. 2006, 2 M, 1 F, P. Marhoul leg., det. et coll.; Moravia mer., Vranov nad Dyj��, B��č�� hora hill, 23.vii. 2006, 1F, J. Holu��a et P. Koč��rek, leg., det. et coll. This species is known from several isolated areas in Bohemia (Mařan 1953; as noted earlier in this report), where it was described as the separate subspecies Ph. aptera bohemica. The status of this subspecies is uncertain as well as the classification of individuals from south-Moravian localities. Its occurrence there has not been confirmed recently in previously recorded localities; these include Mohelno (Chl��dek 1976) and the Jihlava River valley (Dob����k 1948). The only recently confirmed locality in Moravia is Podyj�� NP (Vranov nad Dyj��)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 443, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Leptophyes boscii Fieber, 1853 Material examined. Bohemia mer., Česk�� Krumlov, 3.viii. 2008, 1 M, 2 F, 15.viii. 2008, 1 M, 1 F, 10.viii. 2010, 1 M, 2 F; P. Marhoul leg., det. et coll.; 29.ix. 2012, 1 M, J. Holu��a leg., det. et coll.; Klenov��, 15.viii. 2009, 2 M, P. Marhoul leg., det. et coll. Species with relatively small area of distribution; it occurs from central Europe to northern Italy and the western parts of the Balkan Peninsula (Koč��rek et al. 2005). In the CR, it has been previously found only in the surroundings of Česk�� Krumlov (Čejchan 1955). In neighbouring countries, it has been reported from Slovakia (I���Klub Slovensk��ch Orthopterol��gov 2006-2012), but the occurrence there must be confirmed, and from Austria, where it occurs continuously from Vienna southwards (Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 440, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Tetrix bolivari Saulcy, 1901 Material examined. Moravia mer., Novosedly, clay-pit, 17.iv. 2011, 2 M, 2 F, R. Vlk leg., det. et coll., 8.v. 2011, 3M, 2 F, J. Holu��a leg., det. et coll.; Host��radice, quarry, 24.viii. 2011, 1 M, R. Vlk leg., det. et coll., Rouchovany, 19.vii. 2012, 5M, 5 F, J. Holu��a leg., det. et coll. T. bolivari is a rare species in the CR and has been considered to be missing for a certain period (Ko�rek et al. 1999). It is distributed only at several localities in southern Moravia. All known localities are within the territory of the Pannonian geographical subprovince, on the border of this subprovince (Ko�rek et al. 2011), or beyond the border in the lowlands of rivers flowing to Pannonia., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Onconotus laxmanni (Pallas, 1771) Material examined. Moravia mer., Kom��rov, ix. 1922, 1 F, F. Chl��dek det. et coll., R.Vlk revid. This species has been described as a new species for the CR based on a single specimen found at a locality of Kom��rov in 1922 (Chl��dek 2006). This non-flying species of east-Palearctic bush-cricket has its closest occurrence areas in the eastern Ukraine (Heller et al. 1998); therefore an occurrence in the CR, even a historical occurrence, is extremely unlikely., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 450, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Pseudopodisma nagyi Galvagni & Fontana, 1996 P. nagyi is a recently described species (Galvagni & Fontana 1996) but its status may be problematic (Nagy et al. 2010). It has a Carpathian distribution. It is known only from northern Hungary (Nagy et al. 2010), Slovakia (Galvagni & Fontana 1996), and the CR, but it reaches its western-most limit in the White Carpathians (Galvagni & Fontana 1996). To date, it has been found here only in the Machová NR near Javorník and the Čertoryje NNR near Knĕždub, although the Bílé Karpaty Mts. have been studied very extensively (Görtler 1944; Chládek 2002 b; Holuša et al. 2012).

Platycleis veyseli Kocak, 1984 Material examined. Moravia mer., Velk�� B��lovice, ��zk�� ��lehle, 1 M, 2 F, 26.ix. 2011, J. Holu��a leg., det et coll. P. veyseli occurs in southeastern Europe, southern Russia, northeastern Turkey, northern Iran, Transcaucasia, and Turkestan (Ciplak et al. 2002). The northwestern edge of its range is in the Pannonian part of eastern Austria and the CR (Franz 1961; Kaltenbach 1970; Holu��a & Chl��dek 1998). P. veyseli has not been found beyond the borders of Pannonia in the CR (Holu��a 2003; Holu��a et al. 2008), in Slovakia (Holu��a & Chl��dek 1998; Kri��t��n et al. 2004), or even in Austria (Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009). In the CR, P. veyseli has been found at only four localities (Holu��a et al. 2012 b). It seems to have disappeared from two localities in the 1960 s. The research suggests that P. veyseli in the CR is on the brink of extinction because of extreme fragmentation of suitable habitats and degradation of optimal habitats (Holu��a et al. 2012 b)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 443, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Celes variabilis (Pallas, 1771) This species has been demonstrably found at only two localities in the CR (G��rtler 1946; Chl��dek 1988). Individuals were last observed in the 1960 s. No population is known from these localities, and the species must be considered regionally extinct (Holu��a 2012). C. variabilis occurs on steppes, sands, and similar areas (Ko�rek et al. 2005). The area of such sandy and shallow-soil grasslands is very limited and isolated in the territory of the CR (Chytr�� et al. 2010; AOPK 2011). The closest known area of C. variabilis occurrence is in Austria (Berg & Bieringer 1998), ca. 130 km distant., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Barbitistes serricauda (Fabricius, 1798) Material examined. Moravia mer., NP Podyj�����Lipinsk�� louka, 8.v. 2009, 1 nymph M, 1 nymph F, reared, P. Marhoul leg., det. et coll., 27.vi. 2011, 1 nymph M, 1 nymph F, reared, R. Vlk leg., det. et coll. Area of distribution is situated inside a belt extending from Belgium and eastern France through central Europe to the north of the Balkan Peninsula and Ukraina (Koč��rek et al. 2005). In neighboring countries, it occurs in Germany (Ingrisch & K��hler 1998), Austria (Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009), and western Slovakia (I���Klub Slovensk��ch Orthopterol��gov 2006-2012). Therefore, the occurrence in Bohemia is possible, especially given the occurrence in Germany near the Czech border (DGFO 2012); it is mentioned by Haury & Nickerl (1905) but without specific information concerning locality. Other findings are not dependable (Obenberger 1926; Chl��dek 1979). It is reliably documented only from southern Moravia (Chl��dek 1979; Holu��a 2003; as noted earlier in this report). Isophya pienensis Ma ř an, 1954 Material examined. Moravia mer., Sob����ice, 1998, 1 M, 1 F, F. Chl��dek leg. et det., R. Vlk coll. It was described relatively recently from the Pieniny Mts. in Slovakia (Mařan 1954). In the CR, it was found for the first time in 2004 at several localities in the Moravskoslezsk�� Beskydy Mts. (Koč��rek & Holu��a 2006). Other findings were published from southern Moravia (Sob����ice, Braitava) (Chl��dek 2010 a, 2011) and the White Carpathians [= B��l�� Karpaty Mts.] (Holu��a et al. 2012 a), from the Rychlebsk�� hory Mts. (Petř��kov), and also from the Orlick�� hory Mts. in Bohemia (De��tn��) (Chl��dek 2010 a, 2011). The identification is difficult; the species is distinguished by its characteristic stridulation and by the structure of the stridulatory apparatus (Koč��rek et al. 2005)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 441, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Isophya costata Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 The species was included in the first complete checklist of Czech species (both Czech and Slovak species), compiled by Mařan & Čejchan (1977), on the basis of data taken from the works of Ginter (1924, 1925, 1928). Ginter (1924, 1925) wrote that the species was abundant on tall grasses and bushes from early of June until July. The species is only mentioned again by Ginter (1928). Chl��dek (1988) was able to study (make a revision of) two males and one female from Pouzdřany that had been identified by Ginter as I. costata; Chl��dek realized that all three individuals were misidentified and that they belong to I. pyrenea (a group of species, of which probably only I. kraussii is present in the CR). In neighboring eastern Austria (Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009), this species lives in habitats that differ with respect to soil humidity, from periodically damp meadows to semiarid grasslands. However, it avoids both consistently dry and wet habitats. All I. costata habitats may be characterized by a certain freshness of the vegetation and a high proportion of herbaceous plants. However, repeated recent surveys at localities where I. costata could be occurring in the CR, including surveys using a bat detector, have failed to detect any specimens., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 450, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Polysarcus denticauda (Charpentier, 1825) Material examined. Bohemia or., Lib��ň, 15.vi. 2012, common, P. Marhoul observ. European montane species distributed in the Pyrenees, the Alps, the Carpathians, and the southern Balkan mountains (Koč��rek et al. 2005). In the CR, it has been considered to be rare because records exist from only three isolated areas. The most abundant occurrences are known from several localities in the White Carpathians Landscape protected area, connected with a continuous distributional range in the Carpathians. In addition, it has been also known from two isolated relict localities outside the main area of its distribution: in Bohemia near Jič��n and in Moravia near Olomouc. However, at the last mentioned locality, it has not been confirmed during the last 60 years, and the population has been extinct for a long time (Holu��a et al. 2007 c; as noted earlier in this report). During 2008, another isolated locality was detected in the foothills northeast of the Jesen��ky Mts. near Zlat�� Hory (Koč��rek et al. 2009)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 441, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Gampsocleis glabra (Herbst, 1786) From the area of the CR, three localities have been published (Seidl 1836; Ginter 1951; Hyke�� 1925), but the only reliably documented locality is V��trn��ky (Ginter 1951; Holu��a 2012). Unfortunately, the wetland area at V��trn��ky has been overgrown with bushes and there are no regularly mown sedge meadows, like those that were available in the past. This is certainly the reason for regional extinction of the species (Holu��a 2012)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 442, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Stenobothrus rubicundulus Kruseman & Jeekel, 1967 This species has been demonstrably known from only two localities on the southern edge of the Moravian Karst (Czižek 1917; Chl��dek 1977; Holu��a 2012). The species was not recently detected on the southern slopes of H��dy near Brno or at Adamov (Chl��dek 1977; Holu��a 2012). The species is extinct in the CR (Holu��a 2012)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 449, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Modicogryllus frontalis (Fieber, 1844) Material examined. Moravia mer., Modřice, clay-pit, 13.vi. 1992, 2 M, 2 F, Vlk leg., det. et coll.; Hodon��n���P��nov, clay-pit, 12.vi. 2008, 1 M, 1 F, Vlk leg., det. et coll.; Hevl��n, clay-pit, 2.viii. 2008, 19.viii. 2009, 11.ix. 2009, 12.viii. 2011; Mikulov���Mu��lov, sand-pit, 6.vi. 2009, 20.viii. 2009; Novosedly, clay-pit, 11.ix. 2009, all R. Vlk observ. M. frontalis is distributed from France through southern Europe and the southern part of Central Europe to western Asia. In southeastern Europe, it occurs in Bosnia and Serbia (Koč��rek et al. 2005). It has been known in southern Moravia since the beginning of 20 th century: Pis��rky, Černovice (Czižek 1905), H��dy (Czižek 1915), Pavlovsk�� vrchy, Lednice, Čejč (Dob����k 1948), Pouzdřansk�� step (Čejchan 1959). It is currently detected in many localities in Moravia (as noted earlier in this report). From Bohemia, it has been known for a long time from the Česk�� středohoř�� hills, the environs of Prague, Karl��tejn (Fieber 1853), and Lib��ice (Krejč�� 1896). However Haury & Nickerl (1905) did not mention this species, and Obenberger (1926) only repeated data from Fieber (1853) and Krejč�� (1896). In the 1980 s, many new localities were reported (Čejchan 1981) (Nov�� Huť u Nižboru, Radot��n, Podhoř��, Z��vist u Zbraslavi, Kralupy nad Vltavou, Terez��n), and the occurrence in the Česk�� středohoř�� hills was confirmed (Mil��, Lovo��). However, we have no reports about the species from Bohemia since those times. Its occurrence was obviously polydisjuntive, and the species inhabited extremely warm slopes. Honců (1993) did not find it on Lovo�� and Mil�� hills. Since 1990 s, it has been unsuccesfully searched for at previously known localities. For those reasons, it is evaluated as missing in Bohemia., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on pages 444-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Meconema meridionale A. Costa 1860 Material examined. Bohemia centr., Praha-Suchdol, 28.x. 2012, 1 F, I. Kř��žov�� leg., J. Holu��a det. et coll. M. meridionale occurred until 1900 or even the 1950 s only in Italy and some neighboring countries. During the 1960 s, M. meridionale began to expand northwards from its original area of distribution and gradually occupied the northern Alps, southern Germany, and northern France. During the 1990 s, it reached central Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Hungary, and in 2001 it was found in Great Britain. An isolated population was also found along the northeast coast of the Black Sea in Bulgaria in 2002. During the last 5 years, it occupied northern Germany (Vlk et al. 2012). In the CR, M. meridionale was observed for the first time in a camping site in Prague in September 2008. One year later, it was caught in a camping site at Slapy, about 35 km (SSE) from the first locality. Both of these first records of M. meridionale in the CR were merely incidental (Balv��n et al. 2010). The records of M. meridionale in the CR come mostly from urban environments or they are connected with the car traffic and clearly support the idea of its passive dispersal by cars, especially by caravans and trucks (Chl��dek 2009; Vlk et al. 2012). However, it has been found recently also in a sparse deciduous forest, which represents the habitat type preferred in the original area of distribution, i.e., in southern Europe. The current known distribution is concentrated in lower altitudes in Central Bohemia, especially in Prague, and in Southern Moravia, especially in Brno, and also southwards along the main road to Mikulov (Vlk et al. 2012)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 442, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Aiolopus thalassinus (Fabricius, 1781) Material examined. Moravia mer., Lanžhot, 3.ix. 2007, 1M; Sedlec, Slanisko u Nesytu NNR, 8.viii. 2008, 2M, 2 F; Velk�� B��lovice, 6.ix. 2011, 1M, 2 F, all P. Koč��rek leg., det. et coll. This species was reported from Bohemia by Krejč�� (1896) and Haury & Nickerl (1905) but without any specific information concerning locality. Given that its distribution in central Europe does not extend beyond the Pannonian district (Kri��t��n et al. 2007 a, b), an occurrence in Bohemia seems unlikely, although it is a very efficient flier (Kri��t��n et al. 2007 a, b). It is a rare species in the CR, demonstrably documented only from southern Moravia, where isolated populations have inhabited salt marshes (Werner 1923; Dob����k 1948; Chl��dek 1995). At the present time, only one reproducing population of this species is known from the Slanisko u Nesytu NNR. The presence of A. thalassinus at that locality could not be confirmed during the period of 1990-2005. We expect that this population originated by migration of individuals from Austria. Migratory individuals are sometimes found even in habitats unsuitable for reproduction (Holu��a 1996, 2003; as noted earlier in this report). A. thalassinus occurs in all neighbouring countries, but in all cases it is considered a locally occurring, rare species (I���Klub Slovensk��ch Orthopterol��gov 2006-2012; Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009; DGFO 2012; Liana 2000)., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on page 447, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524

Holuša, Jaroslav, Kočárek, Petr, Vlk, Robert, Marhoul, Pavel (2013): Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic. Zootaxa 3616 (5): 437-460, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2

Acrida ungarica (Herbst, 1786) Material examined. Moravia mer., Bzenec, Vojensk�� cviči��t�� Bzenec NM, 22.viii. 2010, 4 M, 1 F, 7 nymphs, R. Vlk observ.; 8.ix. 2012, 7M, J. Holu��a, P. Koč��rek observ. There are only two references to the occurrence of Acrida ungarica in the area of the CR, and these concern only two specimens (Makowsky 1875; Mařan 1952). Both specimens were considered by Mařan (1952) to be imported (introduced). The specimens do not exist in any collection. Details concerning the localities were not provided, and so the areas could not be re-examined. The first reference to the occurrence of Acrida ungarica in the area of the CR was in 1875 (Makowsky 1875). The extensive sandy areas in southern Moravia were already forested at the time, and only small-scale localities remained there (Holu��a 2012). This species has clearly not occurred in the CR after this time. It was not detected in the past and during recent surveys of the sandy areas of Bzenec and Hodon��n environs (Ginter in litt.; Koč��rek et al. 1999; Holu��a & Koč��rek 2005; Koč��rek et al. 2005). A. ungarica occurs in the Palearctic and the Afrotropic regions (Koč��rek et al. 2005). In Slovakia, this species reached (Mařan 1952) and still reaches the northern limit of its distributional range (Kri��t��n et al. 2004). In Central Europe, its regular occurrence is now known only in southern Hungary (R��cz 1986; Nagy 1991, 1996; Nagy & Szovenyi 2001), where it is evaluated as frequent, because it was recorded on 16.9 % of investigated fields (R��cz 1998). It is more abundant in Romania than in other parts of Central Europe because it inhabits eco-regions in addition to mountains there (Iorgu et al. 2008). This species is distinctively psammophilous on the edge of its distributional range; it prefers habitats with herbal vegetation both on sand dunes and terrain depressions (Kri��t��n et al. 2004). Such habitats are limited to small areas and are isolated in the CR (Chytr�� et al. 2010, AOPK 2011). Recent occurrences near the CR are known at 14 localities in southern Slovakia and one locality in southeastern Slovakia (Kri��t��n pers. comm., Kri��t��n et al. 2004). In Austria, reproducing populations have been observed near the eastern bank of the Neusiedler See Lake (Kaltenbach 1970; Bieringer & Rotter 2001) but the most recent reliable record from Austria is from Illmitz in the late 1960 s (Berg & Zuna-Kratky 1997; Berg et al. 2005; Zuna-Kratky et al. 2009; Zuna-Kratky pers. comm.). Recently, as well as historically, the species has not been found in the Z��horie region in southwestern Slovakia (Gavlas 2002; Kri��t��n pers. comm.). Because recent Slovak localities situated south of Nov�� Z��mky (Kri��t��n et al. 2004) are about 130 km distant from suitable sandy habitats on the Czech side of the border, natural colonisation of the CR from the Slovak localities is unlikely. Perhaps, in 2008 or before, however, at least one female of A. ungarica was intentionally introduced (by an unknown person) into a locality with suitable habitat in southeastern Moravia. Subsequently, small populations of dozen of individuals were found at the same locality near Bzenec in 2010 and 2012. The occurrence is not considered in the Checklist because a genetic analysis (two fragments of COI) confirmed that the grasshoppers originated from southern Europe (unpublished) and belonged to the meridional subspecies A. ungarica mediterranea Dirsh, 1949. The population seems to be fixed at the site without evidence of spread. The site is situated in a relatively small, deforested, sandy, desert-like area (it was formerly a military training ground) isolated in a dense pine woods (as noted earlier in this report). It is very probable that no population of this species has occurred in the area of the CR for at least the last 135 years because thermophilic habitats in southern Moravia have been studied intensively during the entire 20 th century (e.g., Rozko��n�� & Vaňhara 1995, 1996 a, 1996 b, 1998, 1999; La��t��vka 1994). Species Occurrence in the Czech Republic ENSIFERA TETTTIGONIIDAE PHANEROPTERINAE Phaneroptera falcata (Poda, 1761) B, M Phaneroptera nana Fieber, 1853 B, M * Leptophyes albovittata (Kollar, 1833) B, M Leptophyes boscii Fieber, 1853 B * Leptophyes punctatissima (Bosc, 1792) B, M * Barbitistes constrictus Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 B, M Barbitistes serricauda (Fabricius, 1798) 'B, M* Isophya kraussi Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1878 B, M Isophya pienensis Mařan, 1954 B, M * Poecilimon intermedius (Fieber, 1853) M* Polysarcus denticauda (Charpentier, 1825) B, M* MECONEMATINAE Meconema thalassinum (De Geer, 1773) B, M Meconema meridionale A. Costa 1860 B, M* CONOCEPHALINAE Conocephalus fuscus (Fabricius, 1793) B, M syn. Conocephalus discolor Thunberg, 1815 Conocephalus dorsalis ( Latreille, 1804) B, M ...... continued on the next page Species Occurrence in the Czech Republic Ruspolia nitidula (Scopoli, 1786) M* syn. Homorocoryphus nitidulus (Scopoli, 1786) TETTIGONIINAE Tettigonia cantans (F��ssli, 1775) B, M Tettigonia caudata (Charpentier, 1842) B, M Tettigonia viridissima Linnaeus, 1758 B, M Decticus verrucivorus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Gampsocleis glabra (Herbst, 1786) ���M * Platycleis albopunctata (Goeze, 1778) B, M Platycleis montana (Kollar, 1833) M * Platycleis veyseli Kocak, 1984 M* syn. Platycleis vittata (Charpentier, 1825) Metrioptera bicolor (Philippi, 1830) B, M Metrioptera brachyptera (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Metrioptera roeselii (Hagenbach, 1822) B, M Pholidoptera aptera (Fabricius, 1793) B, M * Pholidoptera fallax (Fischer, 1853) 'M * Pholidoptera griseoaptera (De Geer, 1773) B, M SAGINAE Saga pedo (Pallas, 1771) M BRADYPORINAE Ephippiger ephippiger (Serville, 1831) M RHAPHIDOPHORIDAE AEMODOGRYLLINAE Diestrammena asynamora (Adelung, 1902) s. B, M syn. Tachycines asynamorus Adelung, 1902 TROGLOPHILINAE Troglophilus neglectus (Krauss, 1879) B, M * GRYLLOTALPIDAE Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M MYRMECOPHILIDAE Myrmecophilus acervorum (Panzer, 1799) B, M GRYLLIDAE NEMOBIINAE Nemobius sylvestris (Bosc, 1792) B, M Pteronemobius heydenii (Fischer, 1853) M * GRYLLINAE Gryllus campestris Linnaeus, 1758 B, M Acheta domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758) s. B, M Eumodicogryllus bordigalensis (Latreille, 1804) M * syn. Tartarogryllus burdigalensis (Latreille, 1804) Modicogryllus frontalis (Fieber, 1844) 'B, M * ...... continued on the next page Species Occurrence in the Czech Republic OECANTHINAE Oecanthus pellucens (Scopoli, 1763) B, M CAELIFERA TRIDACTYLIDAE TRIDACTYLINAE Xya pfaendleri (Harz, 1970) 'M * syn. Tridactylus pfaendleri Harz, 1970 Xya variegata Latreille, 1809 M syn. Tridactylus variegatus (Latreille, 1809) TETRIGIDAE Tetrix bipunctata (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M syn. Tetrix kraussi Saulcy, 1888 Tetrix bolivari Saulcy, 1901 M* Tetrix ceperoi (Bolivar, 1887) 'B, M * Tetrix subulata (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Tetrix tenuicornis Sahlberg, 1893 B, M syn. Tetrix nutans Hagenbach, 1822 Tetrix tuerki (Krauss, 1876) 'B, M * Tetrix undulata (Sowerby, 1806) B, M syn. Tetrix vittata Zetterstedt, 1821 ACRIDIDAE CALLIPTAMINAE Calliptamus italicus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M MELANOPLINAE Podisma pedestris (Linnaeus, 1758) 'M * Pseudopodisma nagyi Galvagni & Fontana, 1996 M * syn. Pseudopodisma fieberi Scudder, 1897 Miramella alpina (Kollar, 1833) B, M OEDIPODINAE Psophus stridulus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Locusta migratoria Linnaeus, 1758 ���B, ���M * Oedaleus decorus (Germar, 1826) ���M * Celes variabilis (Pallas, 1771) ���M * Oedipoda caerulescens (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Oedipoda germanica (Latreille, 1804) B Sphingonotus caerulans (Linnaeus, 1767) B, M Aiolopus thalassinus (Fabricius, 1781)?B, M * ACRIDINAE Mecostethus parapleurus (Hagenbach, 1822)?B, M * syn. Parapleurus alliaceus Germar, 1825 Stethophyma grossum (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M syn. Mecostethus grossus (Linnaeus, 1785) ...... continued on the next page Species Occurrence in the Czech Republic GOMPHOCERINAE Acryptera fusca (Pallas, 1773) ���M * Acryptera microptera (Fischer de Waldheim, 1833) ���M * Chrysochraon dispar (Germar, 1834) B, M Euthystira brachyptera (Ocskay, 1826) B, M syn. Chrysochraon brachypterus (Ocskay, 1826) Dociostaurus brevicollis (Eversmann, 1848) M * Omocestus haemorrhoidalis (Charpentier, 1825) B, M Omocestus petraeus (Brisout de Barneville, 1856) M * Omocestus rufipes (Zetterstedt, 1821) 'B, M * syn. Omocestus ventralis Zetterstedt, 1821 Omocestus viridulus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Stenobothrus crassipes (Charpentier, 1825) B, M Stenobothrus eurasius Mařan, 1958 B * Stenobothrus lineatus (Panzer, 1796) B, M Stenobothrus nigromaculatus (Herrich-Sch��ffer, 1840) B, M Stenobothrus rubicundulus Kruseman & Jeekel, 1967 ���M * syn. Stenobothrus rubicundus Germar, 1817 Stenobothrus stigmaticus (Rambur, 1838) B, M Gomphocerippus rufus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M syn. Gomphocerus rufus (Linnaeus, 1758) Myrmeleotettix maculatus (Thunberg, 1815) B, M Chorthippus apricarius (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Chorthippus biguttulus (Linnaeus, 1758) B, M Chorthippus brunneus (Thunberg, 1815) B, M Chorthippus mollis (Charpentier, 1825) B, M Chorthippus pullus (Phillipi, 1830) B, M Chorthippus vagans (Eversmann, 1848) B, M Chorthippus albomarginatus (De Geer, 1773) B, M Chorthippus dichrous (Eversmann, 1859) 'M* Chorthippus dorsatus (Zetterstedt, 1821) B, M Chorthippus montanus (Charpentier, 1825) B, M Chorthippus parallelus (Zetterstedt, 1821) B, M syn. Chorthippus longicornis Lattreille, 1804 Euchorthippus declivus (Brisout de Barneville, 1849) M Euchorthippus pulvinatus (Fischer de Waldheim, 1846) B, M Abbreviations: B���Bohemia; M���Moravia, including historical Silesia (Kment 2009); syn.���synonym, invalid name; ������regionally extinct species; '���regionally missing species;?���regionally unclear species; intr.���introduced (imported) species; s.���synanthropic species (Koč��rek 2006); *���the species is discussed in the Comments section., Published as part of Holu��a, Jaroslav, Ko����rek, Petr, Vlk, Robert & Marhoul, Pavel, 2013, Annotated checklist of the grasshoppers and crickets (Orthoptera) of the Czech Republic, pp. 437-460 in Zootaxa 3616 (5) on pages 450-454, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.5.2, http://zenodo.org/record/222524