1. Comparison of Digene Hybrid Capture 2 and Conventional Culture for Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Cervical Specimens
- Author
-
Kim Smith, Attila T. Lorincz, Ling H. Darwin, Thomas C. Quinn, Carole D. Long, Patrick M. Arthur, Allison Cullen, Jennifer L. Girdner, and Edward W. Hook
- Subjects
Microbiology (medical) ,Sexually transmitted disease ,education.field_of_study ,biology ,Population ,Gonorrhea ,Cervicitis ,medicine.disease_cause ,medicine.disease ,biology.organism_classification ,Virology ,McNemar's test ,medicine ,Neisseria gonorrhoeae ,Chlamydiaceae ,Chlamydia trachomatis ,education - Abstract
Digene's Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) CT/GC, CT-ID, and GC-ID DNA tests were evaluated by comparison to traditional culture methods for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in 669 cervical specimens from high-risk female populations attending two sexually transmitted disease clinics. For detection of either or both infections, the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm had 93.8% sensitivity and 95.9% specificity compared to those of culture. After resolution of discrepant results by direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) staining or PCR assay, the relative sensitivity and specificity of the HC2 CT/GC test algorithm increased to 94.8 and 99.8%, while the values for culture were 83.6% (McNemar's P value, 0.0062) and 100%, respectively. For detection of the individual pathogens, the relative sensitivities for the HC2 CT-ID and GC-ID tests were 97.2 and 92.2% and the specificities were greater than 99% compared to culture adjucated by DFA staining and PCR. Test performance varied at the two clinics: the HC2 CT/GC algorithm, CT-ID, and GC-ID tests had significantly higher sensitivities (McNemar's P value
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF