Koichi Tokuda, Shiro Endo, Hitoshi Goto, Yoshiaki Gu, Risako Kakuta, Hisakazu Yano, Yukio Katori, Shinya Inomata, Takuya Shimizu, Daiki Ozawa, Mitsuo Kaku, Chihiro Oe, Hajime Kanamori, Tetsuji Aoyagi, and Masumitsu Hatta
To the Editor: Infected abdominal aortic aneurysm (IAAA) is uncommon, but life-threatening; the mortality rate ranges from 25% to30% (1,2). Identification of the pathogen is essential for diagnosis and treatment. Previous studies have shown that species of the genera Salmonella, Staphylococcus, and Streptococcus are the most common pathogens associated with IAAA, but a causative organism is not identified in 14%–40% of patients (1,2). Helicobacter cinaedi has mainly been isolated from immunocompromised patients with bacteremia, cellulitis, and septic arthritis (3,4). Here, we report 3 cases of IAAA caused by H. cinaedi detected by 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene analysis. The 3 patients (case-patients 1–3) were referred to Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan, for surgical treatment of IAAA in 2013. None had a history of disease known to cause immunodeficiency. Because their abdominal aneurysms enlarged rapidly, all 3 patients underwent resection of the aneurysm and extensive local debridement and irrigation. Histopathologic examination of the surgical specimens revealed severe atherosclerosis and inflammation, consistent with a diagnosis of IAAA. For each case-patient, blood culture (BacT/ALERT; bioMerieux Industry, Tokyo, Japan) was negative, as was culture of surgically removed tissue on HK semisolid agar (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) at 35°C under aerobic conditions for 7 days for enrichment of microorganisms, and on chocolate agar at 35°C under 5% CO2 for 48 h. We then used 16S rRNA gene analysis to identify a pathogen. We extracted DNA from resected tissues using a QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN K.K., Tokyo, Japan), amplified it using PCR, and sequenced it using universal primers for 16S rRNA (5). We used the EzTaxon-e Database for sequence analysis (http://eztaxon-e.ezbiocloud.net/), which revealed that the 16S rRNA gene sequence of bacteria in the aneurysmal tissues was identical to that of H. cinaedi. For case-patient 3, we cultured microaerophilic tissue at 35°C using Trypticase Soy Agar II with 5% sheep blood (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial Co.) and an Anaero Pouch-MicroAero (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical Co., Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to detect H. cinaedi. We observed bacterial colonies, after Gram staining, which showed gram-negative spiral rods. By 16S rRNA gene analysis, we confirmed that the isolate was H. cinaedi. For each of the 3 case-patients, species identification was further confirmed by sequence analysis of 23S ribosomal RNA (23S rRNA) (DNA Data Bank of Japan: http://blast.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/blastn?lang = ja) and amplification of the gyrB gene region that is specific to H. cinaedi (6,7). In samples from the 3 patients, there were mutations of the 23S rRNA gene and amino acid substitutions in GyrA related to macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance, respectively (6,8). After identifying the pathogen, we selected antimicrobial agents based on the reported drug susceptibility profile of H. cinaedi (6,8). The patients survived and are being followed up as outpatients. Clinical and molecular characteristics of the 3 cases of IAAA with H. cinaedi infection are shown in the Table. Table Clinical characteristics of 3 patients with Helicobacter cinaedi–infected abdominal aortic aneurysms and molecular characteristics of isolates, Japan * Although the high negative culture rate for pathogens causing IAAA had been explained by prolonged preoperative antimicrobial drug therapy (2), another possibility is that H. cinaedi may be a causative organism. Earlier research has suggested that H. cinaedi infections can remain undiagnosed or be incorrectly diagnosed because of difficulty in isolating this microorganism (9). H. cinaedi grows slowly under microaerophilic conditions, but no current standard laboratory methods result in a diagnosis of this pathogen (6,7,9). We isolated H. cinaedi from surgically removed tissue from case-patient 3 by microaerophilic culture after taking this pathogen into consideration. For diagnosis of H. cinaedi infections, methods leading to accurate identification by clinical microbiological laboratories are needed. Currently, H. cinaedi is identified by molecular analysis of the 16S rRNA gene (6,7,10). In addition, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) (10), may become a useful tool for this purpose. Standard breakpoints of antimicrobial drugs for H. cinaedi have not been defined, but all isolates in this study had mutations that indicated resistance to macrolides and fluoroquinolones. For adequate treatment for H. cinaedi infections, guidelines for selection of antimicrobial drugs and surveillance of its antimicrobial susceptibility profile are required. During November 2012–November 2013, 8 patients underwent their first operation for IAAA at the university hospital. We used 16S rRNA gene analysis of surgical tissues and culture of blood and tissue specimens to detect pathogens (data not shown). Identification of H. cinaedi in 3 of 8 patients suggests that it could be a prevalent pathogen related to IAAA. Taking such information into consideration could affect the prognosis of many patients. Accordingly, tissue should be cultured while considering H. cinaedi infection in patients with IAAA. H. cinaedi colonizes the gastrointestinal tract, and bacterial translocation may lead to bacteremia associated with mucosal damage (4). However, the route of transmission and reason most H. cinaedi infections have been reported in Japan are unclear. To clarify the relationship between H. cinaedi and IAAA, further clinical and epidemiologic studies are needed. Meanwhile, we recommend clinical consideration of H. cinaedi infection, use of appropriate laboratory procedures to identify cases, and development of treatment guidelines.