1. Evaluation of Three Commercial and Two Non-Commercial Immunoassays for the Detection of Prior Infection to SARS-CoV-2
- Author
-
Galit Alter, Maia Norman, Nicole V. Tolan, Tal Gilboa, Christopher L. Bennett, Karina Oganezova, Ann E. Woolley, Peter H. Schur, Daimon P. Simmons, Petr Jarolim, Caroline Atyeo, Elizabeth W. Karlson, Stephanie Fischinger, Guohai Zhou, Eric J. Nilles, Lindsey R. Baden, and David R. Walt
- Subjects
Non commercial ,biology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) ,General Medicine ,Roche Diagnostics ,Virology ,Epitope ,Serology ,Immunoassay ,biology.protein ,Medicine ,Symptom onset ,Antibody ,business - Abstract
Background Serological testing provides a record of prior infection with SARS-CoV-2, but assay performance requires independent assessment. Methods We evaluated 3 commercial (Roche Diagnostics pan-IG, and Epitope Diagnostics IgM and IgG) and 2 non-commercial (Simoa and Ragon/MGH IgG) immunoassays against 1083 unique samples that included 251 PCR-positive and 832 prepandemic samples. Results The Roche assay registered the highest specificity 99.6% (3/832 false positives), the Ragon/MGH assay 99.5% (4/832), the primary Simoa assay model 99.0% (8/832), and the Epitope IgG and IgM 99.0% (8/830) and 99.5% (4/830), respectively. Overall sensitivities for the Simoa, Roche pan-IG, Epitope IgG, Ragon/MGH IgG, and Epitope IgM were 92.0%, 82.9%, 82.5%, 64.5% and 47.0%, respectively. The Simoa immunoassay demonstrated the highest sensitivity among samples stratified by days postsymptom onset (PSO), 21 days PSO (95.18%). Conclusions All assays demonstrated high to very high specificities while sensitivities were variable across assays.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF