Search

Summary Polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is an ancient exoribonuclease conserved in the course of evolution and is found in species as diverse as bacteria and humans. Paradoxically, Escherichia coli PNPase can act not only as an RNA degrading enzyme but also by an unknown mechanism as a chaperone for small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs), with pleiotropic consequences for gene regulation. We present structures of the ternary assembly formed by PNPase, the RNA chaperone Hfq, and sRNA and show that this complex boosts sRNA stability in vitro. Comparison of structures for PNPase in RNA carrier and degradation modes reveals how the RNA is rerouted away from the active site through interactions with Hfq and the KH and S1 domains. Together, these data explain how PNPase is repurposed to protect sRNAs from cellular ribonucleases such as RNase E and could aid RNA presentation to facilitate regulatory actions on target genes., Graphical abstract, Highlights • Cryo-EM structures of PNPase in complex with the RNA chaperone Hfq and regulatory RNA • Structural insights into regulatory RNA recognition by Hfq and PNPase • Model for stabilization of regulatory RNAs and facilitation of their functions, The conserved exoribonuclease PNPase contributes to RNA turnover in many organisms, but in bacteria the enzyme can be re-programmed by the RNA chaperone Hfq and regulatory RNA to switch from degradative to chaperoning roles in RNA-mediated gene regulation. Dendooven et al. provide structural insight into the basis for this functional switch and details of the recognition of complex regulatory RNAs by Hfq and PNPase.

Cell growth and division are coordinated, ensuring homeostasis under any given growth condition, with division occurring as cell mass doubles. The signals and controlling circuit(s) between growth and division are not well understood; however, it is known inEscherichia colithat the essential GTPase Era, which is growth rate regulated, coordinates the two functions and may be a checkpoint regulator of both. We have isolated a mutant of Era that separates its effect on growth and division. When overproduced, the mutant protein Era647 is dominant to wild-type Era and blocks division, causing cells to filament. Multicopy suppressors that prevent the filamentation phenotype of Era647 either increase the expression of FtsZ or decrease the expression of the Era647 protein. Excess Era647 induces complete delocalization of Z rings, providing an explanation for why Era647 induces filamentation, but this effect is probably not due to direct interaction between Era647 and FtsZ. The hypermorphicftsZ* allele at the native locus can suppress the effects of Era647 overproduction, indicating that extra FtsZ is not required for the suppression, but another hypermorphic allele that accelerates cell division through periplasmic signaling,ftsL*, cannot. Together, these results suggest that Era647 blocks cell division by destabilizing the Z ring.IMPORTANCEAll cells need to coordinate their growth and division, and small GTPases that are conserved throughout life play a key role in this regulation. One of these, Era, provides an essential function in the assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit inEscherichia coli, but its role in regulatingE. colicell division is much less well understood. Here, we characterize a novel dominant negative mutant of Era (Era647) that uncouples these two activities when overproduced; it inhibits cell division by disrupting assembly of the Z ring, without significantly affecting ribosome production. The unique properties of this mutant should help to elucidate how Era regulates cell division and coordinates this process with ribosome biogenesis.

Small regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) are an important class of bacterial post-transcriptional regulators that control numerous physiological processes, including stress responses. In Gram-negative bacteria including Escherichia coli, the RNA chaperone Hfq binds many sRNAs and facilitates pairing to target transcripts, resulting in changes in mRNA transcription, translation, or stability. Here, we report that poly(A) polymerase (PAP I), which promotes RNA degradation by exoribonucleases through the addition of poly(A) tails, has a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression by Hfq-dependent sRNAs. Specifically, we show that deletion of pcnB, encoding PAP I, paradoxically resulted in an increased turnover of certain Hfq-dependent sRNAs, including RyhB. RyhB instability in the pcnB deletion strain was suppressed by mutations in hfq or ryhB that disrupt pairing of RyhB with target RNAs, by mutations in the 3′ external transcribed spacer of the glyW-cysT-leuZ transcript (3′ETSLeuZ) involved in pairing with RyhB, or an internal deletion in rne, which encodes the endoribonuclease RNase E. Finally, the reduced stability of RyhB in the pcnB deletion strain resulted in impaired regulation of some of its target mRNAs, specifically sodB and sdhCDAB. Altogether our data support a model where PAP I plays a critical role in ensuring the efficient decay of the 3′ETSLeuZ. In the absence of PAP I, the 3′ETSLeuZ transcripts accumulate, bind Hfq, and pair with RyhB, resulting in its depletion via RNase E-mediated decay. This ultimately leads to a defect in RyhB function in a PAP I deficient strain.

Gene regulation by base pairing between small noncoding RNAs (sRNAs) and their mRNA targets is an important mechanism that allows bacteria to maintain homeostasis and respond to dynamic environments. In Gram-negative bacteria, sRNA pairing and regulation are mediated by several RNA-binding proteins, including the sRNA chaperone Hfq and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). PNPase and its homolog RNase PH together represent the two 3′ to 5′ phosphorolytic exoribonucleases found in Escherichia coli ; however, the role of RNase PH in sRNA regulation has not yet been explored and reported. Here, we have examined in detail how PNPase and RNase PH interact to support sRNA stability, activity, and base pairing in exponential and stationary growth conditions. Our results indicate that these proteins facilitate the stability and regulatory function of the sRNAs RyhB, CyaR, and MicA during exponential growth. PNPase further appears to contribute to pairing between RyhB and its mRNA targets. During stationary growth, each sRNA responded differently to the absence or presence of PNPase and RNase PH. Finally, our results suggest that PNPase and RNase PH stabilize only Hfq-bound sRNAs. Taken together, these results confirm and extend previous findings that PNPase participates in sRNA regulation and reveal that RNase PH serves a similar, albeit more limited, role as well. These proteins may, therefore, act to protect sRNAs from spurious degradation while also facilitating regulatory pairing with their targets. IMPORTANCE In many bacteria, Hfq-dependent base-pairing sRNAs facilitate rapid changes in gene expression that are critical for maintaining homeostasis and responding to stress and environmental changes. While a role for Hfq in this process was identified more than 2 decades ago, the identity and function of the other proteins required for Hfq-dependent regulation by sRNAs have not been resolved. Here, we demonstrate that PNPase and RNase PH, the two phosphorolytic RNases in E. coli , stabilize sRNAs against premature degradation and, in the case of PNPase, also accelerate regulation by sRNA-mRNA pairings for certain sRNAs. These findings are the first to demonstrate that RNase PH influences and supports sRNA regulation and suggest shared and distinct roles for these phosphorolytic RNases in this process.

Almost 60 years ago, Severo Ochoa was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the enzymatic synthesis of RNA by polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase). Although this discovery provided an important tool for deciphering the genetic code, subsequent work revealed that the predominant function of PNPase in bacteria and eukaryotes is catalyzing the reverse reaction, i.e., the release of ribonucleotides from RNA. PNPase has a crucial role in RNA metabolism in bacteria and eukaryotes mainly through its roles in processing and degrading RNAs, but additional functions in RNA metabolism have recently been reported for this enzyme. Here, we discuss these established and noncanonical functions for PNPase and the possibility that the major impact of PNPase on cell physiology is through its unorthodox roles., Author summary Widely distributed among bacteria and eukaryotes, including humans, polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) is a critical enzyme in RNA metabolism that functions in most organisms as a 3ʹ to 5ʹ exoribonuclease. In bacteria, inactivation of the gene encoding PNPase results in a wide range of consequences, including impaired growth, diminished stress responses, and loss of virulence. In mammals, PNPase has an essential role in mitochondrial function. Mutations in the gene encoding the human PNPase (hPNPase) that reduce its activity can lead to hereditary hearing loss, encephalomyopathy, severe axonal neuropathy, delayed myelination, and Leigh syndrome. In this review, we highlight both the canonical and unorthodox activities that have been reported for PNPase. Specifically, we examine its role in bacterial mRNA and rRNA decay, RNA processing, and small regulatory RNA (sRNA) degradation and stabilization. Furthermore, we explore the recently reported findings on the function of hPNPase in mitochondrial RNA import and degradation and cytoplasmic mRNA and noncoding RNA decay. Despite being discovered more than six decades ago, we are still only beginning to grasp the breadth of mechanisms by which the enzymatic activities of PNPase contribute to cellular and organismal physiology.

Polar growth represents a surprising departure from the canonical dispersed cell growth model. However, we know relatively little of the underlying mechanisms governing polar growth or the requisite suite of factors that direct polar growth. Underscoring how classic doctrine can be turned on its head, the peptidoglycan layer of polar-growing bacteria features unusual crosslinks and in some species the quintessential cell division proteins FtsA and FtsZ are recruited to the growing poles. Remarkably, numerous medically important pathogens utilize polar growth, accentuating the need for intensive research in this area. Here we review models of polar growth in bacteria based on recent research in the Actinomycetales and Rhizobiales, with emphasis on Mycobacterium and Agrobacterium species.

Growth and cell division in rod-shaped bacteria have been primarily studied in species that grow predominantly by peptidoglycan (PG) synthesis along the length of the cell. Rhizobiales species, however, predominantly grow by PG synthesis at a single pole. Here we characterize the dynamic localization of several Agrobacterium tumefaciens components during the cell cycle. First, the lipophilic dye FM 4-64 predominantly stains the outer membranes of old poles versus growing poles. In cells about to divide, however, both poles are equally labeled with FM 4-64, but the constriction site is not. Second, the cell-division protein FtsA alternates from unipolar foci in the shortest cells to unipolar and midcell localization in cells of intermediate length, to strictly midcell localization in the longest cells undergoing septation. Third, the cell division protein FtsZ localizes in a cell-cycle pattern similar to, but more complex than, FtsA. Finally, because PG synthesis is spatially and temporally regulated during the cell cycle, we treated cells with sublethal concentrations of carbenicillin (Cb) to assess the role of penicillin-binding proteins in growth and cell division. Cb-treated cells formed midcell circumferential bulges, suggesting that interrupted PG synthesis destabilizes the septum. Midcell bulges contained bands or foci of FtsA-GFP and FtsZ-GFP and no FM 4-64 label, as in untreated cells. There were no abnormal morphologies at the growth poles in Cb-treated cells, suggesting unipolar growth uses Cb-insensitive PG synthesis enzymes.

The synthesis of peptidoglycan (PG) in bacteria is a crucial process controlling cell shape and vitality. In contrast to bacteria such as Escherichia coli that grow by dispersed lateral insertion of PG, little is known of the processes that direct polar PG synthesis in other bacteria such as the Rhizobiales. To better understand polar growth in the Rhizobiales Agrobacterium tumefaciens, we first surveyed its genome to identify homologs of (~70) well-known PG synthesis components. Since most of the canonical cell elongation components are absent from A. tumefaciens, we made fluorescent protein fusions to other putative PG synthesis components to assay their subcellular localization patterns. The cell division scaffolds FtsZ and FtsA, PBP1a, and a Rhizobiales- and Rhodobacterales-specific l,d-transpeptidase (LDT) all associate with the elongating cell pole. All four proteins also localize to the septum during cell division. Examination of the dimensions of growing cells revealed that new cell compartments gradually increase in width as they grow in length. This increase in cell width is coincident with an expanded region of LDT-mediated PG synthesis activity, as measured directly through incorporation of exogenous d-amino acids. Thus, unipolar growth in the Rhizobiales is surprisingly dynamic and represents a significant departure from the canonical growth mechanism of E. coli and other well-studied bacilli., IMPORTANCE Many rod-shaped bacteria, including pathogens such as Brucella and Mycobacterium, grow by adding new material to their cell poles, and yet the proteins and mechanisms contributing to this process are not yet well defined. The polarly growing plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens was used as a model bacterium to explore these polar growth mechanisms. The results obtained indicate that polar growth in this organism is facilitated by repurposed cell division components and an otherwise obscure class of alternative peptidoglycan transpeptidases (l,d-transpeptidases). This growth results in dynamically changing cell widths as the poles expand to maturity and contrasts with the tightly regulated cell widths characteristic of canonical rod-shaped growth. Furthermore, the abundance and/or activity of l,d-transpeptidases appears to associate with polar growth strategies, suggesting that these enzymes may serve as attractive targets for specifically inhibiting growth of Rhizobiales, Actinomycetales, and other polarly growing bacterial pathogens.

Serine protease autotransporters of the family Enterobacteriaceae (SPATE) comprise a family of virulence proteins secreted by enteric Gram-negative bacteria via the autotransporter secretion pathway. A SPATE polypeptide contains a C-terminal translocator domain that inserts into the bacterial outer membrane as a β-barrel structure and mediates secretion of the passenger domain to the extracellular environment. In the present study, we examined the role of conserved residues located in the SPATE β-barrel-forming region in passenger domain secretion. Thirty-nine fully conserved residues in Tsh were mutated by single-residue substitution, and defects in their secretion phenotypes were assessed by cell fractionation and immunochemistry. A total of 22 single mutants exhibited abnormal phenotypes in different cellular compartments. Most mutants affecting secretion are charged residues with side chains pointing into the β-barrel interior. Seven mutants showed notable abnormalities in processing (constructs with the E1231A, E1249A, and R1374A mutations) and β-barrel assembly or insertion into the outer membrane (constructs with the G1158Y, F1360A, Y1375A, and F1377A mutations). The phenotypes of the β-barrel assembly/insertion mutants and the presence of a processed Tsh passenger domain in the periplasm support the possibility that the translocator domain must undergo extensive folding prior to insertion into the outer membrane. Results from double-mutation experiments further demonstrate that F1360 and F1377 affect β-barrel insertion/assembly at different times. In light of these new data, a more refined model for the mechanism of SPATE secretion is presented.