Search

Background: Adequate anticoagulation represents a major problem for left ventricle assist device (LVAD) utilization in patients awaiting heart transplantation as well as for regeneration of the native heart. The proper management of hemostatic abnormalities during LVAD support may improve survival by reducing the incidence of hemorrhagic and/or thromboembolic complications., Case Report: A 40-year-old man with implanted pulsatile LVAD due to dilated cardiomyopathy received aspirin and warfarin. The patient underwent serial weekly monitoring of hemostatic biomarkers including international normalization ratio, prothrombin time, prothrombin activity, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, D-dimer, platelet aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate and arachidonic acid, platelet count, and mean platelet volume. The external pump was exchanged three times - twice because of a clot formation in the blood chamber of the pump, and once according to the standard protocol., Results: LVAD use was consistently associated with enhanced adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation independent from the timing of clot formation or external pump exchange. Among coagulation indices, increased D-dimer holds predictive value for clot formation. The fibrinogen level peaked before the first pump exchange and was twice as high than the average values. Gradual improvement in exercise capacity was observed 2 years after implantation, after which the patient underwent a controlled stress test in the stop mode of the LVAD and the device was successfully explanted., Conclusions: Serial assessment of hemostatic biomarkers may benefit and triage LVAD patients. Consistent platelet activation during long-term LVAD may justify the addition of clopidogrel, while high D-dimer and/or elevated fibrinogen may indicate adding heparin to the conventional antithrombotic regimen. Randomized evidence is needed to test such a hypothesis., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The no-reflow (NR) phenomenon exists despite percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and is especially prevalent in diabetics. The causes(s) of NR are not fully elucidated, but may be associated with impaired residual platelet and inflammatory reactivity during dual-antiplatelet therapy. Objective: To assess the relationship between dual-antiplatelet therapy, NR and conventional biomarkers suggestive of platelet and inflammatory response in diabetics following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with PCI. Methods: Sixty diabetics with (n = 27) and without NR (n = 33) were prospectively enrolled. All patients were treated with clopidogrel and aspirin. Platelet and inflammatory biomarkers were assessed serially in the peripheral blood and right atrium before and after PCI and then at 24 h, 7 days and 30 days. Results: Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation and the serum thromboxane B2 level before and after PCI (in the peripheral and right atrium blood) were significantly higher in the NR patients than in those with no NR. AA-induced aggregation >100 (AUC*min) before PCI predicted NR in diabetic patients with 96.2% sensitivity and 38.5% specificity (AUC 0.66; 95% CI 0.52-0.71; p = 0.029). There were no other correlations between NR and platelet reactivity (collagen, adenosine diphosphate, thrombin receptor agonist peptide-induced aggregation, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein platelet reactivity index, soluble P-selectin, soluble CD40 ligand, platelet-derived growth factor AB and the level of platelet-monocyte aggregates) or between NR and inflammatory indices (i.e. high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, interleukin 6 and interleukin 10). Conclusion: An inadequate response to aspirin, but not to clopidogrel, may be associated with the occurrence of the NR phenomenon in diabetics with STEMI who have been treated with primary PCI. © 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]